Thread by @SimonEsler

They’re Trying to Silence You on Carney’s Child. Here’s Why. 🚨

Pundits want all discussion of Mark Carney’s kid shut down—claiming it’s “cruel” and “inappropriate.”

But this isn’t about privacy. It’s about suppressing debate on radical gender ideology in Canada.

Let’s break it down. 🧵👇

1️⃣ Carney’s child published a public essay.

If it was meant to be “off-limits,” why was it written to shape public discourse on gender identity?

Why is discussion of this policy-driven essay now “off-limits”? 🤔

If you enter the arena, your ideas are up for critique.

2️⃣ Politicians’ families aren’t off-limits—until now! 😆

🔹 Doug Ford’s daughter faced media scrutiny for her anti-vaccine stance.
🔹 Trudeau’s family was investigated in the WE Charity scandal.

Public interest in politicians’ families isn’t new—so why the sudden rules?

3️⃣ Gender policy is not “private”—it’s public.

This essay endorses:
✅ Puberty blockers
✅ Gender-affirming care
✅ Self-ID without medical gatekeeping

These are policy arguments.

We have every right to debate policies affecting Canadian children.

4️⃣ Meanwhile, the UK is backtracking on gender-affirming care

The Cass Review EXPOSED:
🚨 Puberty blockers lack solid scientific backing.
🚨 Tavistock rushed kids into medicalization.
🚨 Detransitioners were ignored & silenced.

Why is Canada doubling down while the UK reverses?

5️⃣ Sasha Carney’s essay is a chance to address this before the election

It’s not about one family—it’s about policies pushed into law without scrutiny.

🔹 Canada’s conversion therapy ban passed w zero opposition
🔹 Gender-affirming care is a Uniparty issue in Canada

6️⃣ Pundits aren’t protecting Carney’s child—they’re protecting the status quo.

The Cass Review shattered gender-affirming care.
Scandals from Tavistock, WPATH, and whistleblowers are mounting.

This is a desperate attempt to prevent scrutiny before Canada’s model collapses too.

7️⃣ This is about control.

If the debate were about truth, they’d welcome discussion.
If their position were strong, they wouldn’t need censorship.

Instead, they demand silence—because they can’t defend the reality of what’s happening.

🔥 Final Thought:

Sasha Carney’s essay isn’t just a personal story—it’s a case study in ideological subversion.

This conversation isn’t being shut down to protect a family.

It’s being shut down to protect a system that can’t survive scrutiny.

Will we let them?

🇨🇦 Canada deserves answers 🇨🇦

🔹 Why are we ignoring the Cass Review?
🔹 Why is gender medicine “off-limits” for debate?
🔹 Why was the conversion therapy law passed without opposition?

This isn’t about left vs. right—it’s about a system that must be questioned.

RT if you refuse to be silenced. 🚨 #cdnpoli #Carney #GenderDebate @BillboardChris @CandiceMalcolm

Thanks for reading. If this thread resonated with you, you need to see CUT: Daughters of the West. It’s a deep dive into the forces shaping modern womanhood—how ideology, culture, and institutions condition girls in ways we rarely question. Watch it here: simonesler.com/watchcut