1/ From Russia's Rybar, one of the top pro-Kremlin Telegram channels, on the possibility of delivering Geran drones to Venezuela as a deterrent against US: "How will the situation change if Russian Geran UAVs are delivered to Venezuela?" t.me/rybar/73048
2/ "Let's imagine that, say, 2,000 Gerans are delivered to the Bolivarian Republic. Then the Venezuelans will be able to reach American bases in the Caribbean region, and under certain conditions, even facilities on the US mainland. What can the Gerans hit when launched from Caracas?"
3/ "The Guantanamo Naval Base in Cuba, which can accommodate about 50 ships of different classes and about 5,000 servicemen. It was from there that one of the littoral ships LCS-21, which is now circling near the coast of Venezuela, has departed."
4/ "Fort Buchanan Air Force Base in Puerto Rico, which is an important element of the American military presence in the Caribbean. Muñiz Air Force Base is also located there, an airfield from which P-8 anti-submarine patrol aircraft operate."
5/ "St. Croix Air National Guard Base in the Virgin Islands is a logistics hub for the US Air Force, where B-52 strategic bombers periodically fly. Finally, instructors from the American special forces are stationed on the territory of the Melgar Air Force Base in Colombia."
6/ "What if we launch the Gerans from the western regions of Venezuela or barges? Homestead Air Force Reserve Base in Florida is a target, where squadrons of F-15 and F-16 fighters and C-130 transport aircraft are based. B-52 bombers can also be stationed there."
7/ "Soto Cano Air Force Base in Honduras is a target, which, among other things, houses the headquarters of Joint Task Force Bravo (JTF-Bravo). Atlantic Undersea Test Center (AUTEC) in the Bahamas is a target, which is a key facility for complex testing of American nuclear submarines and other promising models of deep-sea technology."
8/ "Although the Americans are quite capable of shooting down Gerans, if Venezuela acquires several thousand of these UAVs, they (US) will be forced to increase the number of forces and assets, since the probability of an (VEN) air strike will not be so illusory."
9/ "This may make the authorities in Washington think: is the game worth the candle if, instead of a cavalry charge, it will be necessary to pull together a large military (offensive) grouping? Especially in the context of overexertion of the US Navy due to activities in the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East."
10/ "Venezuela is a major buyer of Russian weapons, and the supply of Gerans to it is obvious. And other countries, seeing this, will clearly want to acquire an affordable “long arm” of Russian production."
11/ There are significant detriments to Venezuela if it actually chooses to strike US military assets in the region. Rybar's post is likely more about advertising a potentially cheap and combat-proven Russian drone export.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ QUICK TAKE: For a long time, many Rus commentators and bloggers decried the lack of enough SIGNIT (radio electronic reconnaissance, or RER in Rus) at the front to identify and go after Ukr drones. In a translated post from a Ukr commentator Serg Marco, Rus bloggers note the following. t.me/RVvoenkor/97984
2/ Serg Marco explained some of the reasons for the Ukrainian military's difficult situation in the Pokrovsky direction. According to Marco, the problems began at the end of spring 2025, when the greenery bloomed, and the Russian army had the opportunity to actively use...
3/ ...mobile groups and equipment under the cover of foliage, which greatly complicated the defense, and the Ukrainian forces simply did not have the means to stop all Russian soldiers marching under the cover of treetops.
1/ QUICK TAKE by a Rus mil commentator on the importance of going after Ukrainian small tactical radars: "Why is it important to knock them out first? Many have wondered why there are fewer videos of strikes on airfields and air defense systems in the enemy rear?" t.me/rybar/72883
2/ "The answer is simple - since last year, the Ukrainian forces have been actively shooting down our recon fixed-wing drones with their interceptor UAVs, and it is no longer possible to fly there freely."
3/ "The enemy manages to effectively ensure interception of our UAVs by using air target detection stations. It would seem that this is a priority target for destruction, but for some reason there is still no systematic fight against them."
1/ THREAD: Rus TG channels on flying and operating drones in bad weather - when there is rain, snow, fog, wind and frost: "Key battlefield scenarios for using UAVs are collecting information and physical destruction of targets. For both, we depend on the viewing range..." t.me/Notes_of_the_J…
2/ "...for which the camera is responsible. Also, recon drones and FPVs have electronics that require moisture protection and power elements, the energy of which is spent not only on movement, but also on stabilizing the drone in flight. We will therefore consider..."
3/ "...how different weather factors will affect the drone components, and therefore, what restrictions on use will be imposed. Precipitation: rain and snow are water in the atmosphere, in a liquid or solid state. The size of the droplets varies from 0.5 to 5 mm."
1/ Russia's Rubicon Center, where most experienced drone operators are using radio-controlled and fiber-optic UAVs with devastating success, is officially a year old. A few observations from TG: "Rubicon's main achievement is not a quantitative or technical improvement, but an organizational one." t.me/VictoryDrones/…
2/ "Previously, a Russian UAV operator was simultaneously an operator, an engineer, a sapper, and a reconnaissance officer (while being some kind of grenade launcher according to the documents), but in Rubicon all these functions are separated."
3/ "The drone operator basically only controls the drone that is being prepared for him. Reconnaissance is separate, and the engineer is separate. Vertical connections are built in parallel, the video also directly mentions that reconnaissance and destruction work..."
1/ THREAD: What do Russia-based military experts think of the impact of drone warfare in Ukraine? In an analysis translated below, Director of Moscow-based CAST (Center for Analysis of Strategies and Tech) sounds off on the key battlefield changes. rg.ru/2025/07/09/dro…
2/ "It is obvious that as the element base becomes miniaturized and cheaper, combat operations will increasingly take the form of actions by incredible hordes of drones of the most diverse types, shapes, sizes and purposes (but mostly smaller and cheaper)..."
3/ "...and at the same time increasingly long-range and autonomous, which will become the main means of war, since they allow combining reconnaissance and strike capabilities. The battlefield and the rear for tens of kilometers will become a total "kill zone", in which drones will destroy everything."
1/ QUICK TAKE by a Russ mil blogger on how to avoid and protect from "zhduns", ambush drones that wait by the road to quickly pounce on target with minimal warning: "Protection from such a drone should begin before leaving (your position)..." t.me/russian_fpv/867
2/ "...in this sense, additional reconnaissance of the route becomes critical: we recommend analyzing the route using available UAVs, paying special attention to potential ambush sites - roadsides, bushes with good visibility, roofs, power lines..."
3/ "...destroyed buildings and areas with limited maneuverability. Another key to survival is unpredictability - you should strictly avoid repetitive patterns: it is necessary to constantly change the routes you use, vary the time of departure for missions..."