Recent well liked threads
“I AM”
• Both babies were conceived by divine intervention (one by the Holy Spirit, one by the magic of the High Priestess/Goddess).
• Both babies had a human foster father who raised them but was not their biological generator (Joseph for Jesus; Seb/Geb is often the earth-father figure, though Osiris is the spiritual father).
• Both babies were of royal lineage and born to be King (King of the Jews vs. Pharaoh/King of Egypt).
• Both babies were hunted by a jealous tyrant who wanted to kill them to secure his own throne (King Herod vs. The God Set).
• Both babies had to go into hiding to survive infancy (Jesus fled to Egypt; Horus was hidden in the marshes of the Nile Delta).
• Both babies were announced by a star (The Star of Bethlehem vs. The Star Sirius/Sothis, which heralded the birth of the new year/flood).
• Both babies were visited by adoring figures bringing gifts (The Magi/Shepherds vs. The Gods and Kings depicted in "Birth Houses" bringing offerings).
• Both babies are celebrated as "The Light" arriving during the Winter Solstice to conquer the darkness.
• Both babies were destined to avenge their father's honor (Jesus glorifying the Father; Horus avenging Osiris).
• Both babies are depicted in art sitting on their mother's lap (The visual of Mary nursing Jesus is a direct artistic continuation of Isis nursing Horus).
• Both represented the "Resurrection of the Father" (Jesus is the "Resurrection and the Life" who glorifies the Father; Horus is the "Living Image" of Osiris who ensures his father’s immortality in the afterlife).
• Both had a "missing years" period (The Bible is silent on Jesus from age 12 to 30; Egyptian myth is silent on Horus’s growth from a vulnerable child in the marshes to a warrior adult).
• Both began their work at age 30 (Jesus was baptized and began his ministry at approx. 30; Horus was considered to come of age and challenge Set for the throne at 30).
• Both were "baptized" or anointed (Jesus was baptized by John in the river Jordan; Horus was ritually purified with water by Thoth before being crowned).
• Both performed miracles involving sight (Jesus healed the blind; Horus restored his own "Wadjet Eye" after it was gouged out, which became a symbol of healing and wholeness).
• Both walked on water (Jesus walked on the Sea of Galilee; Horus is depicted in texts as crossing the waters on "wings of a falcon" or trampling crocodiles underfoot to cross the Nile).
• Both fought a 40-day wilderness battle (Jesus fasted 40 days and was tempted by Satan; Horus fought a protracted battle in the desert against Set, the god of chaos/evil).
• Both were associated with the "Tree of Life" (Jesus is the vine/fruit of the tree; Horus and Osiris are often depicted rising out of a Djed pillar or Acacia tree).
• Both are the "Word" or "Command" (Jesus is the Logos or Word made flesh; Horus carried out the Hu or authoritative command of Ra).
✨ The "I Am" Connection
Perhaps the most eerie parallel is how they identified themselves.
In the Book of the Dead, Horus says:
"I am Horus in glory... I am the Lord of Light... I am the victorious one... I am the heir of endless time."
In the Gospels, Jesus says:
"I am the light of the world... I am the way, the truth, and the life... Before Abraham was, I am."
• Both babies were conceived by divine intervention (one by the Holy Spirit, one by the magic of the High Priestess/Goddess).
• Both babies had a human foster father who raised them but was not their biological generator (Joseph for Jesus; Seb/Geb is often the earth-father figure, though Osiris is the spiritual father).
• Both babies were of royal lineage and born to be King (King of the Jews vs. Pharaoh/King of Egypt).
• Both babies were hunted by a jealous tyrant who wanted to kill them to secure his own throne (King Herod vs. The God Set).
• Both babies had to go into hiding to survive infancy (Jesus fled to Egypt; Horus was hidden in the marshes of the Nile Delta).
• Both babies were announced by a star (The Star of Bethlehem vs. The Star Sirius/Sothis, which heralded the birth of the new year/flood).
• Both babies were visited by adoring figures bringing gifts (The Magi/Shepherds vs. The Gods and Kings depicted in "Birth Houses" bringing offerings).
• Both babies are celebrated as "The Light" arriving during the Winter Solstice to conquer the darkness.
• Both babies were destined to avenge their father's honor (Jesus glorifying the Father; Horus avenging Osiris).
• Both babies are depicted in art sitting on their mother's lap (The visual of Mary nursing Jesus is a direct artistic continuation of Isis nursing Horus).
• Both represented the "Resurrection of the Father" (Jesus is the "Resurrection and the Life" who glorifies the Father; Horus is the "Living Image" of Osiris who ensures his father’s immortality in the afterlife).
• Both had a "missing years" period (The Bible is silent on Jesus from age 12 to 30; Egyptian myth is silent on Horus’s growth from a vulnerable child in the marshes to a warrior adult).
• Both began their work at age 30 (Jesus was baptized and began his ministry at approx. 30; Horus was considered to come of age and challenge Set for the throne at 30).
• Both were "baptized" or anointed (Jesus was baptized by John in the river Jordan; Horus was ritually purified with water by Thoth before being crowned).
• Both performed miracles involving sight (Jesus healed the blind; Horus restored his own "Wadjet Eye" after it was gouged out, which became a symbol of healing and wholeness).
• Both walked on water (Jesus walked on the Sea of Galilee; Horus is depicted in texts as crossing the waters on "wings of a falcon" or trampling crocodiles underfoot to cross the Nile).
• Both fought a 40-day wilderness battle (Jesus fasted 40 days and was tempted by Satan; Horus fought a protracted battle in the desert against Set, the god of chaos/evil).
• Both were associated with the "Tree of Life" (Jesus is the vine/fruit of the tree; Horus and Osiris are often depicted rising out of a Djed pillar or Acacia tree).
• Both are the "Word" or "Command" (Jesus is the Logos or Word made flesh; Horus carried out the Hu or authoritative command of Ra).
✨ The "I Am" Connection
Perhaps the most eerie parallel is how they identified themselves.
In the Book of the Dead, Horus says:
"I am Horus in glory... I am the Lord of Light... I am the victorious one... I am the heir of endless time."
In the Gospels, Jesus says:
"I am the light of the world... I am the way, the truth, and the life... Before Abraham was, I am."
@jarue369
I'm 54.
I wish someone had told me this at 25.
21 sentences that'll get you ahead of 95% of people:
I wish someone had told me this at 25.
21 sentences that'll get you ahead of 95% of people:
1. You need to get comfortable with being uncomfortable. It’s proof you’re doing something big.
2. You need to find people who challenge you, not just agree with you. Iron sharpens iron.
Auf ein Wort Herr @bundeskanzler.
Es fällt mir schwer, Sie so anzusprechen, denn mein Kanzler sind Sie nicht.
Sie haben mich beschimpft, Sie ignorieren mich, Sie brechen alle Wahlversprechen und Sie sabotieren das Leben vieler Menschen.
1/3
Es fällt mir schwer, Sie so anzusprechen, denn mein Kanzler sind Sie nicht.
Sie haben mich beschimpft, Sie ignorieren mich, Sie brechen alle Wahlversprechen und Sie sabotieren das Leben vieler Menschen.
1/3
Sie haben dem Volk zu dienen, so haben Sie es versprochen.
Doch Sie dienen nur Ihren Parteifreunden, der Wirtschaft und Industrie, sowie dem Rechtsextremismus.
Sie schützen weder das Volk, noch die Demokratie.
2/3
Doch Sie dienen nur Ihren Parteifreunden, der Wirtschaft und Industrie, sowie dem Rechtsextremismus.
Sie schützen weder das Volk, noch die Demokratie.
2/3
Stattdessen schützen Sie die Straftäter in den eigenen Reihen und den zunehmenden Faschismus.
Sie sind weder christlich, noch achten Sie die Würde der Menschen.
Sie machen uns weltweit lächerlich.
Sie sind der schlechteste BK aller Zeiten.
Ich schäme mich für Sie.
3/3
Sie sind weder christlich, noch achten Sie die Würde der Menschen.
Sie machen uns weltweit lächerlich.
Sie sind der schlechteste BK aller Zeiten.
Ich schäme mich für Sie.
3/3
La industria FARMACEUTICA NO te está diciendo esto…
Pero tu NERVIO VAGO tiene la clave para BORRAR el estrés al INSTANTE.
Este nervio OCULTO:
• Calma tu sistema nervioso
• Controla tu estado de ánimo
• Reduce tu frecuencia cardíaca
Aquí hay 11 formas respaldadas por la CIENCIA para ACTIVARLO y ELIMINAR el estrés crónico RAPIDAMENTE: 🧵
Pero tu NERVIO VAGO tiene la clave para BORRAR el estrés al INSTANTE.
Este nervio OCULTO:
• Calma tu sistema nervioso
• Controla tu estado de ánimo
• Reduce tu frecuencia cardíaca
Aquí hay 11 formas respaldadas por la CIENCIA para ACTIVARLO y ELIMINAR el estrés crónico RAPIDAMENTE: 🧵
La mayoría de las personas no saben que pueden entrenar su sistema nervioso.
Pero comienza con el nervio vago 👇
Pero comienza con el nervio vago 👇
1) Exposición al agua fría
Termina tu ducha con 30 segundos de agua fría.
O sumergir tu cara en agua helada.
Esto desencadena el reflejo de inmersión, un reinicio primario que calma el sistema nervioso y reduce el cortisol en cuestión de segundos.
Es el botón de pánico de la naturaleza.
Termina tu ducha con 30 segundos de agua fría.
O sumergir tu cara en agua helada.
Esto desencadena el reflejo de inmersión, un reinicio primario que calma el sistema nervioso y reduce el cortisol en cuestión de segundos.
Es el botón de pánico de la naturaleza.
Should you build your playing style around your game model
or around your players’ qualities?
The real answer:
You need both. 🧵
or around your players’ qualities?
The real answer:
You need both. 🧵
2.
If you only follow your game model, you risk this:
→ players forced into roles they can’t execute
→ patterns that look good on paper
→ frustration when the team can’t play “your way”
A great idea with the wrong players
is still the wrong idea.
If you only follow your game model, you risk this:
→ players forced into roles they can’t execute
→ patterns that look good on paper
→ frustration when the team can’t play “your way”
A great idea with the wrong players
is still the wrong idea.
3.
But if you only follow your players’ qualities, you get this:
→ a playing style that changes every season
→ no long-term identity
→ no consistency in behaviours
→ everything depends on who you have — not how you coach
A team with no framework has no direction.
But if you only follow your players’ qualities, you get this:
→ a playing style that changes every season
→ no long-term identity
→ no consistency in behaviours
→ everything depends on who you have — not how you coach
A team with no framework has no direction.
Your subconscious has a secret name for you.
Not the name on your birth certificate. An identity label that determines every action you take, every goal you abandon, every promise you break to yourself.
I discovered mine sitting in my car after another failed streak. I wrote without thinking: "I'm the one who almost makes it."
My chest tightened. That was it. The label my brain had been running for fifteen years.
Every project that died at 80%. Every streak that ended right before the breakthrough.
My subconscious had filed it all under one program: "You almost make it. Close is safe. Finishing threatens the label."
Three labels dominate most people:
"The Cautious One" needs certainty before action. Researches endlessly. Waits for perfect timing that never comes.
"The Helper" sacrifices their goals for others. Feels guilty pursuing their dreams. Everyone's go-to person but can't finish anything for themselves.
"The One Who Waits" operates on potential, not results. Big ideas, grand visions. Just not today. Soon. When conditions align.
Your brain installed these labels to protect you. The problem? They protect you from growth, opportunity, and the life you actually want.
Here's why affirmations fail:
Your conscious mind says "I'm a finisher." Your subconscious checks the label: "But you're the one who almost makes it." The label wins. Every time.
Your brain will generate every excuse, distraction, and obstacle necessary to maintain consistency with the label. Not because you're weak. Because your subconscious treats the label as survival-level truth.
The resistance you feel isn't random. It's your subconscious defending the label like a predator defending territory.
Find your label right now:
Complete this sentence without thinking: "I'm the one who..."
Read what you wrote. Notice how your body responds.
Chest tightening?
Breathing changing?
That's your subconscious confirming you found it.
The method bypasses conscious resistance and speaks directly to the part of your brain that installed the label in the first place.
But first, you need to see the label.
Now you do.
The war for your identity starts now.
Not the name on your birth certificate. An identity label that determines every action you take, every goal you abandon, every promise you break to yourself.
I discovered mine sitting in my car after another failed streak. I wrote without thinking: "I'm the one who almost makes it."
My chest tightened. That was it. The label my brain had been running for fifteen years.
Every project that died at 80%. Every streak that ended right before the breakthrough.
My subconscious had filed it all under one program: "You almost make it. Close is safe. Finishing threatens the label."
Three labels dominate most people:
"The Cautious One" needs certainty before action. Researches endlessly. Waits for perfect timing that never comes.
"The Helper" sacrifices their goals for others. Feels guilty pursuing their dreams. Everyone's go-to person but can't finish anything for themselves.
"The One Who Waits" operates on potential, not results. Big ideas, grand visions. Just not today. Soon. When conditions align.
Your brain installed these labels to protect you. The problem? They protect you from growth, opportunity, and the life you actually want.
Here's why affirmations fail:
Your conscious mind says "I'm a finisher." Your subconscious checks the label: "But you're the one who almost makes it." The label wins. Every time.
Your brain will generate every excuse, distraction, and obstacle necessary to maintain consistency with the label. Not because you're weak. Because your subconscious treats the label as survival-level truth.
The resistance you feel isn't random. It's your subconscious defending the label like a predator defending territory.
Find your label right now:
Complete this sentence without thinking: "I'm the one who..."
Read what you wrote. Notice how your body responds.
Chest tightening?
Breathing changing?
That's your subconscious confirming you found it.
The method bypasses conscious resistance and speaks directly to the part of your brain that installed the label in the first place.
But first, you need to see the label.
Now you do.
The war for your identity starts now.
Read the full post on Substack: substack.com/home/post/p-18…
WHY EVEN JUST *OWNING* A BEIGE BRA MAKES YOU LESS ATTRACTIVE
Nobody believes beige lingerie is sexy. But, most women DO believe wearing a beige bra once in a while is harmless. In this thread I'll explain why they're wrong. The only correct number of beige bras to own is ZERO.
Nobody believes beige lingerie is sexy. But, most women DO believe wearing a beige bra once in a while is harmless. In this thread I'll explain why they're wrong. The only correct number of beige bras to own is ZERO.
Let's count the MANY reasons beige lingerie is a bad idea. And yes, if you don't want to call all women's underwear “lingerie,” this DOES apply to plainer bras and panties too. EVERYTHING.
1. Beige is a boring color.
Everybody knows this. Beige is soothing and unexciting. That's why it's used for walls! It makes rooms feel restful, but it's at the opposite pole of sexy.
Everybody knows this. Beige is soothing and unexciting. That's why it's used for walls! It makes rooms feel restful, but it's at the opposite pole of sexy.
We hope to report on an appeal for a judicial review (JR) today. Susan Evans (a former NHS psychiatric nurse and psychotherapist) and "XX" (an anonymised mother), are seeking a JR of a decision to grant a license to grant a licence to Gender Plus Healthcare Ltd
Expected start time is 10:30 in Court Room 75. The initial application for a JR was refused, the claimants are appealing that decision.
A reminder that our reporting is not a transcript; we report what we hear and can transcribe. Appeals are particularly challenging as it is largely legal argument.
🚨BREAKING - Investigativrecherche der Initiatve „Geschlecht zählt“ belegt: Die NGO-Förderung des @BMBFSFJ war unrechtmäßig🚨
Das Ministerium unter @lisapaus @GrueneBundestag förderte die NGOs
➡️Deutscher Frauenrat
➡️Bündnis Istanbul-Konvention
➡️CEDAW Allianz
im Widerspruch zu dem Verfassungsauftrag, die Gleichberechtigung von Frauen und Männern gemäß Artikel 3 Grundgesetz voranzubringen. Mit Mitteln aus Steuergeldern untergrub es die völkerrechtlich bindenden Frauenrechtskonventionen (UN-Frauenrechtskonvention CEDAW und Istanbul-Konvention) – und sogar die gesamte Gleichstellungsstrategie des Bundes.
Die Recherchen zu den Vorgängen durch Anfragen gemäß Informationsfreiheitsgesetz wurden aktiv behindert und mussten gerichtlich eingeklagt werden, obwohl das Ministerium inzwischen unter der @cducsubt @PrienKarin steht. Bis heute ist keine vollständige Transparenz zur Mittelverwendung hergestellt. Das gilt besonders auch für das
➡️Deutsche Institut für Menschenrechte
Die mit Millionen durch Steuergelder finanzierten Vereine und Verbände täuschten die Öffentlichkeit über die Inhalte der Frauenrechtskonventionen, um den transgenderideologischen Kurs der Ampelregierung zu bestärken. Dies half u.a. beim Inkrafttreten des Selbstbestimmungsgesetzes. /
Das Ministerium unter @lisapaus @GrueneBundestag förderte die NGOs
➡️Deutscher Frauenrat
➡️Bündnis Istanbul-Konvention
➡️CEDAW Allianz
im Widerspruch zu dem Verfassungsauftrag, die Gleichberechtigung von Frauen und Männern gemäß Artikel 3 Grundgesetz voranzubringen. Mit Mitteln aus Steuergeldern untergrub es die völkerrechtlich bindenden Frauenrechtskonventionen (UN-Frauenrechtskonvention CEDAW und Istanbul-Konvention) – und sogar die gesamte Gleichstellungsstrategie des Bundes.
Die Recherchen zu den Vorgängen durch Anfragen gemäß Informationsfreiheitsgesetz wurden aktiv behindert und mussten gerichtlich eingeklagt werden, obwohl das Ministerium inzwischen unter der @cducsubt @PrienKarin steht. Bis heute ist keine vollständige Transparenz zur Mittelverwendung hergestellt. Das gilt besonders auch für das
➡️Deutsche Institut für Menschenrechte
Die mit Millionen durch Steuergelder finanzierten Vereine und Verbände täuschten die Öffentlichkeit über die Inhalte der Frauenrechtskonventionen, um den transgenderideologischen Kurs der Ampelregierung zu bestärken. Dies half u.a. beim Inkrafttreten des Selbstbestimmungsgesetzes. /
Selbst die lückenhaft vorhandenen Dokumente zeigen: „Das Bundesfamilienministerium förderte die genannten NGOs für die Verfälschung der Frauenrechtskonventionen und die Verbreitung der Falschauslegungen.
Der gemeinnützige Deutsche Frauenrat e. V. erhielt als Institution wie auch als Träger des Bündnisses Istanbul-Konvention und der CEDAW-Allianz Deutschland unrechtmäßig Bundesmittel, um die Istanbul-Konvention und die UN-Frauenrechtskonvention (CEDAW) transgenderideologisch auszuhebeln.“
Der gemeinnützige Deutsche Frauenrat e. V. erhielt als Institution wie auch als Träger des Bündnisses Istanbul-Konvention und der CEDAW-Allianz Deutschland unrechtmäßig Bundesmittel, um die Istanbul-Konvention und die UN-Frauenrechtskonvention (CEDAW) transgenderideologisch auszuhebeln.“
Zugleich trug das @BMBFSFJ mit seinen Förderrichtlinien aktiv dazu bei, den Verfassungsauftrag von Grundgesetz Artikel 3 und bindende völkerrechtliche Vereinbarungen zu geschlechtsbasierten Rechten von Frauen mit geänderten Förderrichtlinien zu zersetzen.
„Das Familienministerium nutzte seine Förderrichtlinien als Fassade, um die verfassungsgemäße Gleichstellungspolitik systematisch zu zersetzen. Es förderte bereits in den Jahren 2020-2024 nicht die Gleichstellung von Frau und Mann, sondern eine Gleichberechtigung transgenderideologischer „Geschlechts-“ bzw. „Genderidentitäten“ – was bis heute manipulativ „Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter“ genannt wird.“
„Das Familienministerium nutzte seine Förderrichtlinien als Fassade, um die verfassungsgemäße Gleichstellungspolitik systematisch zu zersetzen. Es förderte bereits in den Jahren 2020-2024 nicht die Gleichstellung von Frau und Mann, sondern eine Gleichberechtigung transgenderideologischer „Geschlechts-“ bzw. „Genderidentitäten“ – was bis heute manipulativ „Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter“ genannt wird.“
Europe is working to turn its ambition into reality.
In last year, we’ve been working for a stronger, greener, and more competitive Europe. ↓
In last year, we’ve been working for a stronger, greener, and more competitive Europe. ↓
🔸Cheaper energy
🔸Less admin burdens
🔸Better investment opportunities
🔸More AI
🔸Support to boost Europe's clean tech
🔸Trade deals to provide more certainty for business and consumers
Our actions this year supported a more competitive and prosperous Europe.
🔸Less admin burdens
🔸Better investment opportunities
🔸More AI
🔸Support to boost Europe's clean tech
🔸Trade deals to provide more certainty for business and consumers
Our actions this year supported a more competitive and prosperous Europe.
At the same time:
→ We are making Europe more secure
→ We are steadfast in our solidarity with Ukraine
→ We uphold European democracy and values
→ We equip our Union with an ambitious budget, fit for the future
→ We complete our Union
→ We work for peace and prosperity
→ We are making Europe more secure
→ We are steadfast in our solidarity with Ukraine
→ We uphold European democracy and values
→ We equip our Union with an ambitious budget, fit for the future
→ We complete our Union
→ We work for peace and prosperity
ETS wykończył hutę z 220-letnią historią. Huta Królewska w Chorzowie kończy działalność. ArcelorMittal Poland ogłosił trwałe wyłączenie produkcji — instalacje zatrzymają się w grudniu. Zapraszam na nitkę🧵👇
1/7
1/7
Powód? Firma mówi o „zewnętrznych czynnikach”, które uniemożliwiły dalsze funkcjonowanie mimo inwestycji i prób ratowania zakładu.
2/7
2/7
👥270 osób ma otrzymać oferty pracy w innych oddziałach AMP. Spółka deklaruje indywidualne rozmowy i miejsca dla wszystkich chętnych.
3/7
3/7
Most people don’t know it, and others refuse to admit it, but in America, until about fifty years ago, men and women killed their partners at nearly equal rates.
That was until the mid seventies, when the rate of men being killed by their partners suddenly dropped (by around 60%), whilst women’s slowly increased, before seeing a much slower, delayed decline in the nineties.
And now, today, a large disparity has opened up, with three times more women being killed by a partner than men are.
Many researchers have attempted to explain this, with varying levels of success; but one theory presented a surprising and unpopular idea to explain this gap, that challenged our very core understanding of partner violence itself...
That was until the mid seventies, when the rate of men being killed by their partners suddenly dropped (by around 60%), whilst women’s slowly increased, before seeing a much slower, delayed decline in the nineties.
And now, today, a large disparity has opened up, with three times more women being killed by a partner than men are.
Many researchers have attempted to explain this, with varying levels of success; but one theory presented a surprising and unpopular idea to explain this gap, that challenged our very core understanding of partner violence itself...
Because –
What also happened in the mid seventies, was shelters for abused women arrived in America, at the exact same time that the intimate partner homicide rate against men suddenly plummeted.
And so the antithetical theory suggested that women’s shelters gave abused women an opportunity to flee, escaping abusive households, rather than staying within the cycle of escalating violence, where the woman might have otherwise killed her partner.
Controversial, certainly, but the data tracks...
What also happened in the mid seventies, was shelters for abused women arrived in America, at the exact same time that the intimate partner homicide rate against men suddenly plummeted.
And so the antithetical theory suggested that women’s shelters gave abused women an opportunity to flee, escaping abusive households, rather than staying within the cycle of escalating violence, where the woman might have otherwise killed her partner.
Controversial, certainly, but the data tracks...
So… did shelters for women end up actually saving men?
And more pertinent, could the complete lack of shelters for men in America be having the opposite effect, with an even larger detrimental impact on women?
What do you think?
~
Gender Differences in Patterns and Trends
in U.S. Homicide, 1976–2015 liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Bilennial Report, Refuges vawamei.org/report/biennia…
Patreon patreon.com/thetinmen
And more pertinent, could the complete lack of shelters for men in America be having the opposite effect, with an even larger detrimental impact on women?
What do you think?
~
Gender Differences in Patterns and Trends
in U.S. Homicide, 1976–2015 liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Bilennial Report, Refuges vawamei.org/report/biennia…
Patreon patreon.com/thetinmen
Lo de que las estaciones del metro de Estocolmo son preciosas es algo digno de comprobarse in situ.
Pero también esconden una historia. Una historia de amor por los servicios públicos, por las infraestructuras públicas, por la gente que las construye y por la gente que las usa cada día:
La historia empieza, como empiezan casi todas las historias buenas de ciudades nórdicas, en la roca. Ni en el hormigón ni en el hormigón revestido de hormigón —que es la tentación internacional—, sino en la roca viva, la roca madre, el granito glacial que hace de Estocolmo una ciudad con vértebras de hielo fósil.
Cuando a mediados del siglo XX decidieron construir su red de metro, optaron por la solución más directa, casi geológica: excavar, dinamitar, abrir la montaña e insertar trenes. Y en algún momento de esa operación de ingeniería a mano armada surgió una pregunta casi infantil, tan evidente y, a la vez, tan peculiar que era muy raro que alguien se la preguntase: ¿y si dejamos la roca vista?
La respuesta tiene que ver con estética, sí, pero también con política y con época. Tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial, Suecia —como buena parte del norte de Europa— estaba articulando un nuevo pacto social: bienestar público, accesibilidad, democracia cotidiana.
Uno de los engranajes de ese pacto era la convicción tranquila, pero tenaz, de que el arte no debía ser un lujo sino un derecho. Así que, si el metro iba a convertirse en el gran espacio público donde cientos de miles de personas bajarían cada día, ¿por qué no convertirlo también en un lugar donde el arte descendiese con ellas? Un soporte para democratizar la belleza, para hacer país desde el subsuelo.
Esa respuesta convirtió al metro de Estocolmo en la frase con la que lo definen: la galería de arte más larga del mundo. Algo que va más allá del eslogan turístico; es una decisión conceptual. Si vas a perforar la ciudad, abraza sus entrañas. Si vas a mover a tanta gente bajo la tierra, ofréceles algo más que azulejos blancos y tubos fluorescentes.
Haz país. Haz estética. Haz política blanda —que es la mejor política—.
Pero también esconden una historia. Una historia de amor por los servicios públicos, por las infraestructuras públicas, por la gente que las construye y por la gente que las usa cada día:
La historia empieza, como empiezan casi todas las historias buenas de ciudades nórdicas, en la roca. Ni en el hormigón ni en el hormigón revestido de hormigón —que es la tentación internacional—, sino en la roca viva, la roca madre, el granito glacial que hace de Estocolmo una ciudad con vértebras de hielo fósil.
Cuando a mediados del siglo XX decidieron construir su red de metro, optaron por la solución más directa, casi geológica: excavar, dinamitar, abrir la montaña e insertar trenes. Y en algún momento de esa operación de ingeniería a mano armada surgió una pregunta casi infantil, tan evidente y, a la vez, tan peculiar que era muy raro que alguien se la preguntase: ¿y si dejamos la roca vista?
La respuesta tiene que ver con estética, sí, pero también con política y con época. Tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial, Suecia —como buena parte del norte de Europa— estaba articulando un nuevo pacto social: bienestar público, accesibilidad, democracia cotidiana.
Uno de los engranajes de ese pacto era la convicción tranquila, pero tenaz, de que el arte no debía ser un lujo sino un derecho. Así que, si el metro iba a convertirse en el gran espacio público donde cientos de miles de personas bajarían cada día, ¿por qué no convertirlo también en un lugar donde el arte descendiese con ellas? Un soporte para democratizar la belleza, para hacer país desde el subsuelo.
Esa respuesta convirtió al metro de Estocolmo en la frase con la que lo definen: la galería de arte más larga del mundo. Algo que va más allá del eslogan turístico; es una decisión conceptual. Si vas a perforar la ciudad, abraza sus entrañas. Si vas a mover a tanta gente bajo la tierra, ofréceles algo más que azulejos blancos y tubos fluorescentes.
Haz país. Haz estética. Haz política blanda —que es la mejor política—.
La línea azul es el ejemplo más evidente. Basta bajar desde T-Centralen para entenderlo: la bóveda, pintada de azul profundo, conserva la piel rugosa de la roca. Tiene algo de caverna prehistórica, pero intervenida con brochazos gigantes. Parece la obra de un pintor expresionista que hubiera vivido aquí encerrado con un cubo de acrílico y demasiadas horas de invierno.
Además, en esa bóveda aparecen siluetas de obreros: un homenaje directo a los trabajadores que construyeron la red hace 75 años y que la mantienen cada día.
Tres cuartos de siglo de ciudad subterránea.
Además, en esa bóveda aparecen siluetas de obreros: un homenaje directo a los trabajadores que construyeron la red hace 75 años y que la mantienen cada día.
Tres cuartos de siglo de ciudad subterránea.
Sigue uno bajando por la línea y llegas a Solna Centrum, la estación más fotografiada de Suecia (y probablemente una de las más fotografiadas del mundo). Un túnel rojo, intensamente rojo, un rojo que no te abraza sino que te engulle.
Parece una bajada al infierno, sí, pero es un infierno con una intención: el mural, pintado en 1975, denuncia la deforestación sueca. El rojo del cielo frente al verde de los bosques como un aviso urgente en un país que hoy presume de sostenibilidad, pero que lleva décadas pensando en estas cosas.
Estando allí me pregunté si hoy ese mural se lee de otra manera. Si ya no habla solo de árboles sino del planeta entero.
Parece una bajada al infierno, sí, pero es un infierno con una intención: el mural, pintado en 1975, denuncia la deforestación sueca. El rojo del cielo frente al verde de los bosques como un aviso urgente en un país que hoy presume de sostenibilidad, pero que lleva décadas pensando en estas cosas.
Estando allí me pregunté si hoy ese mural se lee de otra manera. Si ya no habla solo de árboles sino del planeta entero.
‼️Man müsse das Gegenteil tun und das sogenannte Overton-Fenster verschieben.
▶️ Damit wird eine Verschiebung des Sagbaren gemeint.
‼️„Wie es Björn Höcke vor wenigen Monaten rezitiert hat, Jugend muss durch Jugend geführt werden, und dieses Prinzip muss unser Leitstern sein“,
▶️ Damit wird eine Verschiebung des Sagbaren gemeint.
‼️„Wie es Björn Höcke vor wenigen Monaten rezitiert hat, Jugend muss durch Jugend geführt werden, und dieses Prinzip muss unser Leitstern sein“,
sagte Dorow mit Blick auf Thüringens AfD-Parteichef .
„Jugend wird durch Jugend geführt“ galt als Prinzip der sogenannten Bündischen Jugend in der Weimarer Zeit und später auch der
‼️Hitlerjugend.
„Jugend wird durch Jugend geführt“ galt als Prinzip der sogenannten Bündischen Jugend in der Weimarer Zeit und später auch der
‼️Hitlerjugend.
‼️Der Baden-Württemberger Mio Trautner forderte, „dass die Abschiebungen im Land endlich starten, dass die Startbahnen in Deutschland glühen“.
vm.tiktok.com/ZNRdpkVpu/
vm.tiktok.com/ZNRdpkVpu/
@SecScottBessent 1/15 I ALWAYS know when you are LYING...it is when I see your lips start moving...tell me SCOTT, did you and Howard Luttnick, and Karoline Leavitt, and Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi, and others in Trump's Cabinet go to the same seminar Trump went to that teaches you
2/15 how to consistently LIE to the American people?? Because ALL of you LOSERS are out here LYING to us! The ONLY "golden age" is in the WH, where Donald Trump has adorned EVERYTHING with ghoulish gold trinkets, then invites the Prince of Saudi Arabia to the WH to show it off.
3/15 He is insatiable in his quest for praise, and he is surrounded by Cabinet members who act as if they can't WAIT for their turn to kiss his ass and praise him, for shit he DIDN'T do, but people like Scott Bessent is one of the WORST. One day he will have to explain to his
▶️ Herr Merz, am 13. Februar haben Sie diesen lächerlich selbstgerechten Tweet abgesetzt, in dem Sie fragten, ob
„wir die AfD wirklich immer weiter treiben wollen“.
Als hätten wir die AfD großgemacht.
Als wäre das ein Naturereignis.
Als wäre das Schicksal.
„wir die AfD wirklich immer weiter treiben wollen“.
Als hätten wir die AfD großgemacht.
Als wäre das ein Naturereignis.
Als wäre das Schicksal.
Heute, Ende des Jahres , ist klar:
Das Einzige, was die AfD die vergangenen acht Monate angetrieben hat,
▶️ waren Sie.
Nicht „wir“.
Nicht „die Gesellschaft“.
Nicht „die Medien“.
▶️ Sondern Sie und Ihre rechtsradikal anschlussfähige Politik mit ihrer Partei.
Das Einzige, was die AfD die vergangenen acht Monate angetrieben hat,
▶️ waren Sie.
Nicht „wir“.
Nicht „die Gesellschaft“.
Nicht „die Medien“.
▶️ Sondern Sie und Ihre rechtsradikal anschlussfähige Politik mit ihrer Partei.
‼️Sie haben die AfD nicht bekämpft.
‼️Sie haben sie gefüttert.
‼️Sie haben nicht gebremst.
‼️Sie haben beschleunigt.
‼️Sie haben nicht die Mitte verteidigt.
‼️Sie haben die Mitte verkauft.
‼️Sie haben sie gefüttert.
‼️Sie haben nicht gebremst.
‼️Sie haben beschleunigt.
‼️Sie haben nicht die Mitte verteidigt.
‼️Sie haben die Mitte verkauft.