Recent well liked threads
Fox dropped an Exclusive:
“The Obama administration "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise”
I know we are all saying “duh”.
But there are details we didn’t get before.
Such as, this is the first time, that I know of, the Trump admin has used the word “treason”
“The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government," Gabbard told Fox News Digital”
The article lays out a sequence of events that is important.
12/7/2016 Clapper said "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome."
And Fox lays the coup for MSM consumers.
12/8/2016 the presidential daily brief for Obama which was prepared by DHS, with reporting from the CIA, DIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, State Department and open sources, for Obama stated:
1. "We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure,"
2. "Russian Government-affiliated actors most likely compromised an Illinois voter registration database and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states."
3. "Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes,"
4. DNI assessed that any Russian activities "probably were intended to cause psychological effects, such as undermining the credibility of the election process and candidates." & cyber criminals "tried to steal data and to interrupt election processes by targeting election infrastructure, but these actions did not achieve a notable disruptive effect."
But!
The FBI had prepared a draft “dissent” & DNI said hold up - do not publish the brief, scheduled for the 9th, until the FBI shares their “concerns”
Question - when was the draft prepared? Has the meta data been reviewed? Was this a post planted paper trail?
12/9/2016 big situation room meeting with top officials in the National Security Council, Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among others.
Question: I want to know who “the others” are. Was Spaulding there?
Meeting notes say they “agreed to recommend sanctioning of certain members of the Russian military intelligence and foreign intelligence chains of command responsible for cyber operations as a response to cyber activity that attempted to influence or interfere with U.S. elections. if such activity meets the requirements"
Then, Clapper’s assistance emails all the IC leaders & told them to create a new ICA "per the president’s request," that detailed the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” & tells them “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS,"
Then, Obama officials "leaked false statements to media outlets" claiming that "Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election."
The 1/6/17 the ICA was released that totally contradicted their previous assessment& was meant to deceive America:
They “suppressed intelligence from before and after the election showing Russia lacked intent and capability to hack the 2016 election."
1 of
“The Obama administration "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise”
I know we are all saying “duh”.
But there are details we didn’t get before.
Such as, this is the first time, that I know of, the Trump admin has used the word “treason”
“The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government," Gabbard told Fox News Digital”
The article lays out a sequence of events that is important.
12/7/2016 Clapper said "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome."
And Fox lays the coup for MSM consumers.
12/8/2016 the presidential daily brief for Obama which was prepared by DHS, with reporting from the CIA, DIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, State Department and open sources, for Obama stated:
1. "We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure,"
2. "Russian Government-affiliated actors most likely compromised an Illinois voter registration database and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states."
3. "Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes,"
4. DNI assessed that any Russian activities "probably were intended to cause psychological effects, such as undermining the credibility of the election process and candidates." & cyber criminals "tried to steal data and to interrupt election processes by targeting election infrastructure, but these actions did not achieve a notable disruptive effect."
But!
The FBI had prepared a draft “dissent” & DNI said hold up - do not publish the brief, scheduled for the 9th, until the FBI shares their “concerns”
Question - when was the draft prepared? Has the meta data been reviewed? Was this a post planted paper trail?
12/9/2016 big situation room meeting with top officials in the National Security Council, Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among others.
Question: I want to know who “the others” are. Was Spaulding there?
Meeting notes say they “agreed to recommend sanctioning of certain members of the Russian military intelligence and foreign intelligence chains of command responsible for cyber operations as a response to cyber activity that attempted to influence or interfere with U.S. elections. if such activity meets the requirements"
Then, Clapper’s assistance emails all the IC leaders & told them to create a new ICA "per the president’s request," that detailed the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” & tells them “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS,"
Then, Obama officials "leaked false statements to media outlets" claiming that "Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election."
The 1/6/17 the ICA was released that totally contradicted their previous assessment& was meant to deceive America:
They “suppressed intelligence from before and after the election showing Russia lacked intent and capability to hack the 2016 election."
1 of
Let’s go back to Spaulding’s Stanford speech on 3/23/2018. This speech is her undoing & adds some understanding to the recent disclosures.
The Freudian slip I’ve mentioned a dozen times in x posts & in the report- She stated she starting on 1/20/2016 looking at “adversary threats to fundamental Democratic institutions writ large”
“and now doing a deep dive on adversary threats to public confidence in the American judicial system”
“First thing I did was reach out to the courts…”
“We are educating judges, court personnel, educating the media, educating the press, educating congress, educating the bar, the lawyers about the nature of the threat that we face...”
This is after Obama, Brennan & Comey got @PatrickByrne to shmooze @Maria_Butina in 2015, preparing for the Russia scandal to land on a Republican- Trump just happened to be the lucky one.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
And got Byrne to bribe Hillary in Thanksgiving 2015.
Spaulding says she then starts looking into threats to fundemental democratic institutions in her Freudian slip. 🤔
Then by 2/2016 Byrne’s handlers tell him to forget it all. Hillary will be the next President.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
From there, of course, we know the rest:
Spring 2016 Spaulding see registrations being hacked.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
6/2016 through 12/2016 Steele Dossier is “written”
August, September, October 2016 Spaulding & crew finally tell counties their registrations are being hacked & convince them to sign on for cyber help by CISA.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
10/2016 Carter Page FISA issued to spy on Trump
Election happens
The Rig from Venezuela /Serbia is stopped & screwed up Obama/Brennan/Comey plan - per @PatrickByrne
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
This evidence is yet to be seen. But Hillary wasn’t mad for nothing. They all knew. That’s what makes the 1/2017 assessment so egregious.
12/8/2016 Operation RussiaHoax goes into warp speed.
1/6/2017 Manipulated ICA report is released.
1/6/2017 Jeh Johnson unilaterally declare elections critical infrastructure
1/7/2017 Jeh Johnson blames Russia for database registration hack. Which they found SQL code left behind. Important fact.
And 1/10/2017 Steele Dossier “leaked”
Obama meets with SJ Terp & Media to start information control. There is no reason to believe Spaulding has not gotten the same messaging/orders considering her extensive involvement.
Add in the SolarWinds hack & you have one heck of a planned operation that covered everything.
It’s Evil Genius.
2 of 5
The Freudian slip I’ve mentioned a dozen times in x posts & in the report- She stated she starting on 1/20/2016 looking at “adversary threats to fundamental Democratic institutions writ large”
“and now doing a deep dive on adversary threats to public confidence in the American judicial system”
“First thing I did was reach out to the courts…”
“We are educating judges, court personnel, educating the media, educating the press, educating congress, educating the bar, the lawyers about the nature of the threat that we face...”
This is after Obama, Brennan & Comey got @PatrickByrne to shmooze @Maria_Butina in 2015, preparing for the Russia scandal to land on a Republican- Trump just happened to be the lucky one.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
And got Byrne to bribe Hillary in Thanksgiving 2015.
Spaulding says she then starts looking into threats to fundemental democratic institutions in her Freudian slip. 🤔
Then by 2/2016 Byrne’s handlers tell him to forget it all. Hillary will be the next President.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
From there, of course, we know the rest:
Spring 2016 Spaulding see registrations being hacked.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
6/2016 through 12/2016 Steele Dossier is “written”
August, September, October 2016 Spaulding & crew finally tell counties their registrations are being hacked & convince them to sign on for cyber help by CISA.
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
10/2016 Carter Page FISA issued to spy on Trump
Election happens
The Rig from Venezuela /Serbia is stopped & screwed up Obama/Brennan/Comey plan - per @PatrickByrne
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
This evidence is yet to be seen. But Hillary wasn’t mad for nothing. They all knew. That’s what makes the 1/2017 assessment so egregious.
12/8/2016 Operation RussiaHoax goes into warp speed.
1/6/2017 Manipulated ICA report is released.
1/6/2017 Jeh Johnson unilaterally declare elections critical infrastructure
1/7/2017 Jeh Johnson blames Russia for database registration hack. Which they found SQL code left behind. Important fact.
And 1/10/2017 Steele Dossier “leaked”
Obama meets with SJ Terp & Media to start information control. There is no reason to believe Spaulding has not gotten the same messaging/orders considering her extensive involvement.
Add in the SolarWinds hack & you have one heck of a planned operation that covered everything.
It’s Evil Genius.
2 of 5
In addition to knowing the election rig was stopped, they knew the IRA had no impact on 2016 & Butina had no influence, but they took action against innocent people to further their agenda.
Spaulding brought up the IRA in her speech & the conviction of this group.
“Facebook testimony in front of the Hill, particularly in their answers to the questions for the record, 126 million people saw three posts that were from 470 Russian accounts and pages that are affiliated with the Russian internet research agency, which of course is what was Mueller's indictment laid bare.”
I found a study by Gareth Porter @GarethPorte, an AMERICAN award winning investigative journalist specializing in US national security issues. He stated it as overstated the impact this group had. See the shared post below on this post 👇🏻
The speech really is an outline of the entire operation - explaining registration databases are vulnerable, Judiciary leaks are a real concern, give them technology & tools to combat disinfo & influence judges.
Did she drop a hint that judges could be blackmailed with hacking their computer & finding porn or embarrassing personal emails? Listen to the clip.
Between 2017 & 2019 hacks into the judiciary increased 200%
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
Is she that clandestine? Or perhaps it was part of the whole operation.
3 of 5
Spaulding brought up the IRA in her speech & the conviction of this group.
“Facebook testimony in front of the Hill, particularly in their answers to the questions for the record, 126 million people saw three posts that were from 470 Russian accounts and pages that are affiliated with the Russian internet research agency, which of course is what was Mueller's indictment laid bare.”
I found a study by Gareth Porter @GarethPorte, an AMERICAN award winning investigative journalist specializing in US national security issues. He stated it as overstated the impact this group had. See the shared post below on this post 👇🏻
The speech really is an outline of the entire operation - explaining registration databases are vulnerable, Judiciary leaks are a real concern, give them technology & tools to combat disinfo & influence judges.
Did she drop a hint that judges could be blackmailed with hacking their computer & finding porn or embarrassing personal emails? Listen to the clip.
Between 2017 & 2019 hacks into the judiciary increased 200%
x.com/azpinklady/sta…
Is she that clandestine? Or perhaps it was part of the whole operation.
3 of 5
$PATH UiPath Thesis
-What do they do
-Strategic Positioning
-Expanding TAM and Structural Tailwinds
-Technology Differentiation
-Adoption and Stickiness
-Partnerships
-Financial Overview
"The unknown can be scary... Create a culture around understanding and celebrating automation and its purpose, so your employees can learn to embrace it rather than fear it." Daniel Dines (CEO)
-What do they do
-Strategic Positioning
-Expanding TAM and Structural Tailwinds
-Technology Differentiation
-Adoption and Stickiness
-Partnerships
-Financial Overview
"The unknown can be scary... Create a culture around understanding and celebrating automation and its purpose, so your employees can learn to embrace it rather than fear it." Daniel Dines (CEO)
What UiPath Does (in plain terms)
UiPath is a Robotic Process Automation (RPA) platform.
Think of it as software that creates digital workers (bots) to handle repetitive tasks that humans usually do on computers....like:
Copying data from spreadsheets into systems
Filling out forms
Sending emails
Processing invoices or payroll
Managing IT tasks like user access
Instead of people clicking through screens, UiPath bots record those steps and repeat them automatically, saving time and reducing errors. This helps businesses cut costs, boost efficiency, and free employees for more strategic work
UiPath is a Robotic Process Automation (RPA) platform.
Think of it as software that creates digital workers (bots) to handle repetitive tasks that humans usually do on computers....like:
Copying data from spreadsheets into systems
Filling out forms
Sending emails
Processing invoices or payroll
Managing IT tasks like user access
Instead of people clicking through screens, UiPath bots record those steps and repeat them automatically, saving time and reducing errors. This helps businesses cut costs, boost efficiency, and free employees for more strategic work
Why AI Maestro Is Important
UiPath Maestro is the next evolution of automation. It’s not just about bots anymore, it’s about orchestrating everything together per management:
-Bots + AI agents + Humans in one seamless workflow
-Uses BPMN and DMN standards to visually model processes and decision logic
-Handles complex, long running workflows that need human input and AI decisions
-Provides real time monitoring, compliance, and analytics
In short, Maestro acts like the “brain” of enterprise automation, making sure all parts robots, AI, and people...work in harmony.
This matters because modern processes are dynamic and decision heavy, and Maestro reduces delays, improves governance, and scales automation across the business
UiPath Maestro is the next evolution of automation. It’s not just about bots anymore, it’s about orchestrating everything together per management:
-Bots + AI agents + Humans in one seamless workflow
-Uses BPMN and DMN standards to visually model processes and decision logic
-Handles complex, long running workflows that need human input and AI decisions
-Provides real time monitoring, compliance, and analytics
In short, Maestro acts like the “brain” of enterprise automation, making sure all parts robots, AI, and people...work in harmony.
This matters because modern processes are dynamic and decision heavy, and Maestro reduces delays, improves governance, and scales automation across the business
Abaixo, apenas fatos públicos. Cheguem às suas próprias conclusões.
🟦 1. Visita secreta do diretor da CIA – William Burns
📍 Julho de 2021 – Brasília
O diretor da CIA, William Burns, fez uma visita discreta ao Brasil, revelada depois pelo Estadão e confirmada por veículos internacionais. Ele se reuniu com:
•Hamilton Mourão,
•Augusto Heleno,
•Luiz Eduardo Ramos.
Segundo reportagens, Burns teria deixado um recado explícito:
O governo Bolsonaro deveria parar de questionar as urnas eletrônicas.
O fato de o diretor da CIA vir pessoalmente, algo raro e extremamente sensível, acendeu o alerta de interferência diplomática atípica.
•
🟦 2. Pressões do Pentágono sobre militares brasileiros
📍 2022 – Brasília / Washington
Reportagens da Folha, Estadão e Reuters indicam que autoridades do Departamento de Defesa dos EUA mantiveram conversas diretas com comandantes das Forças Armadas brasileiras.
O recado americano era claro:
Nenhuma contestação ao TSE deveria ser apoiada pelos militares.
Essa intervenção foi vista como uma forma de pressão preventiva em ano eleitoral.
•
🟦 3. Visita de Victoria Nuland ao Brasil
📍 Fevereiro de 2022
Victoria Nuland, subsecretária do Departamento de Estado, conhecida mundialmente por sua atuação decisiva em eleições sensíveis na Ucrânia e Geórgia, veio ao Brasil para tratar de:
•democracia,
•segurança cibernética,
•e estabilidade institucional.
Ela afirmou publicamente que os EUA iriam “monitorar de perto” a eleição brasileira.
A visita gerou forte repercussão devido ao seu histórico de influência política internacional.
•
🟦 4. Outros movimentos diplomáticos relevantes em 2022
📍 Março de 2022 — Envio de delegação de segurança cibernética dos EUA ao TSE
Foi reportado que especialistas em cibersegurança dos EUA se reuniram com:
•TSE
•Ministério da Justiça
•Ministério da Defesa
Objetivo oficial:
“trocar experiências sobre proteção de eleições e combate à desinformação.”
📍 Maio a Outubro de 2022 — Declarações de Antony Blinken e da Casa Branca
O Secretário de Estado dos EUA disse várias vezes:
“Os EUA acreditam no sistema eleitoral brasileiro e rejeitam tentativas de desacreditá-lo.”
Blinken e porta-vozes do NSC reforçaram que os EUA aceitariam o resultado anunciado pelo TSE, qualquer que fosse.
+ 👇 🧵👇
🟦 1. Visita secreta do diretor da CIA – William Burns
📍 Julho de 2021 – Brasília
O diretor da CIA, William Burns, fez uma visita discreta ao Brasil, revelada depois pelo Estadão e confirmada por veículos internacionais. Ele se reuniu com:
•Hamilton Mourão,
•Augusto Heleno,
•Luiz Eduardo Ramos.
Segundo reportagens, Burns teria deixado um recado explícito:
O governo Bolsonaro deveria parar de questionar as urnas eletrônicas.
O fato de o diretor da CIA vir pessoalmente, algo raro e extremamente sensível, acendeu o alerta de interferência diplomática atípica.
•
🟦 2. Pressões do Pentágono sobre militares brasileiros
📍 2022 – Brasília / Washington
Reportagens da Folha, Estadão e Reuters indicam que autoridades do Departamento de Defesa dos EUA mantiveram conversas diretas com comandantes das Forças Armadas brasileiras.
O recado americano era claro:
Nenhuma contestação ao TSE deveria ser apoiada pelos militares.
Essa intervenção foi vista como uma forma de pressão preventiva em ano eleitoral.
•
🟦 3. Visita de Victoria Nuland ao Brasil
📍 Fevereiro de 2022
Victoria Nuland, subsecretária do Departamento de Estado, conhecida mundialmente por sua atuação decisiva em eleições sensíveis na Ucrânia e Geórgia, veio ao Brasil para tratar de:
•democracia,
•segurança cibernética,
•e estabilidade institucional.
Ela afirmou publicamente que os EUA iriam “monitorar de perto” a eleição brasileira.
A visita gerou forte repercussão devido ao seu histórico de influência política internacional.
•
🟦 4. Outros movimentos diplomáticos relevantes em 2022
📍 Março de 2022 — Envio de delegação de segurança cibernética dos EUA ao TSE
Foi reportado que especialistas em cibersegurança dos EUA se reuniram com:
•TSE
•Ministério da Justiça
•Ministério da Defesa
Objetivo oficial:
“trocar experiências sobre proteção de eleições e combate à desinformação.”
📍 Maio a Outubro de 2022 — Declarações de Antony Blinken e da Casa Branca
O Secretário de Estado dos EUA disse várias vezes:
“Os EUA acreditam no sistema eleitoral brasileiro e rejeitam tentativas de desacreditá-lo.”
Blinken e porta-vozes do NSC reforçaram que os EUA aceitariam o resultado anunciado pelo TSE, qualquer que fosse.
+ 👇 🧵👇
🟥 5. Reunião de Bolsonaro com embaixadores (18 de julho de 2022)
Em meio às tensões, Bolsonaro convocou 40 embaixadores estrangeiros ao Palácio da Alvorada.
•citou o processo sigiloso do TSE,
•apontou fragilidades encontradas nos testes,
•questionou a atuação de ministros do Supremo.
Foi o primeiro líder brasileiro a expor vulnerabilidades técnicas para diplomatas estrangeiros.
Isso gerou:
•reação do TSE,
•ações no Ministério Público Eleitoral,
•repercussão internacional.
•
🟥 6. O processo sigiloso do TSE – citado por Bolsonaro inúmeras vezes
Durante 2021 e 2022, Bolsonaro afirmou repetidamente que havia um “processo sob sigilo” no TSE que registrava vulnerabilidades das urnas eletrônicas.
📍O número citado por Bolsonaro era:
0600371-71.2019.6.00.0000
Este processo existe e trata de:
•testes de segurança do sistema eletrônico,
•vulnerabilidades identificadas em ambiente controlado,
•relatórios técnicos sensíveis,
•correções feitas pelo TSE.
Rosa Weber confirmou:
•que vulnerabilidades foram encontradas por peritos durante os testes (TPS 2018),
•que esses achados existem oficialmente,
•que foram corrigidos antes da eleição,
•e que não havia prova de fraude.
Por conter detalhes técnicos sensíveis, o processo teve partes colocadas sob sigilo.
•
🟥 7. Declaração de Barroso pedindo apoio dos EUA
Em 13 de maio de 2025, durante um evento em Nova York, o presidente do STF, Luís Roberto Barroso, admitiu publicamente que, quando era presidente do TSE (de maio de 2020 a fevereiro de 2022), pediu apoio dos Estados Unidos em mais de uma ocasião.
Segundo o próprio Barroso:
•Ele pediu três vezes declarações oficiais do governo americano em apoio à “democracia brasileira”, uma delas diretamente ao Departamento de Estado.
•Disse que o apoio dos EUA foi “decisivo” para evitar que setores das Forças Armadas aderissem a uma tentativa de golpe.
•Explicou que fez esse apelo “porque os militares brasileiros não gostam de se indispor com os EUA, de onde recebem cursos e equipamentos”.
A fala causou tanta repercussão que a Comissão de Segurança Pública do Senado aprovou um requerimento para que Barroso seja chamado a explicar formalmente esse pedido de apoio aos EUA.
Em meio às tensões, Bolsonaro convocou 40 embaixadores estrangeiros ao Palácio da Alvorada.
•citou o processo sigiloso do TSE,
•apontou fragilidades encontradas nos testes,
•questionou a atuação de ministros do Supremo.
Foi o primeiro líder brasileiro a expor vulnerabilidades técnicas para diplomatas estrangeiros.
Isso gerou:
•reação do TSE,
•ações no Ministério Público Eleitoral,
•repercussão internacional.
•
🟥 6. O processo sigiloso do TSE – citado por Bolsonaro inúmeras vezes
Durante 2021 e 2022, Bolsonaro afirmou repetidamente que havia um “processo sob sigilo” no TSE que registrava vulnerabilidades das urnas eletrônicas.
📍O número citado por Bolsonaro era:
0600371-71.2019.6.00.0000
Este processo existe e trata de:
•testes de segurança do sistema eletrônico,
•vulnerabilidades identificadas em ambiente controlado,
•relatórios técnicos sensíveis,
•correções feitas pelo TSE.
Rosa Weber confirmou:
•que vulnerabilidades foram encontradas por peritos durante os testes (TPS 2018),
•que esses achados existem oficialmente,
•que foram corrigidos antes da eleição,
•e que não havia prova de fraude.
Por conter detalhes técnicos sensíveis, o processo teve partes colocadas sob sigilo.
•
🟥 7. Declaração de Barroso pedindo apoio dos EUA
Em 13 de maio de 2025, durante um evento em Nova York, o presidente do STF, Luís Roberto Barroso, admitiu publicamente que, quando era presidente do TSE (de maio de 2020 a fevereiro de 2022), pediu apoio dos Estados Unidos em mais de uma ocasião.
Segundo o próprio Barroso:
•Ele pediu três vezes declarações oficiais do governo americano em apoio à “democracia brasileira”, uma delas diretamente ao Departamento de Estado.
•Disse que o apoio dos EUA foi “decisivo” para evitar que setores das Forças Armadas aderissem a uma tentativa de golpe.
•Explicou que fez esse apelo “porque os militares brasileiros não gostam de se indispor com os EUA, de onde recebem cursos e equipamentos”.
A fala causou tanta repercussão que a Comissão de Segurança Pública do Senado aprovou um requerimento para que Barroso seja chamado a explicar formalmente esse pedido de apoio aos EUA.
STOP TELLING CHATGPT "FIX MY GRAMMAR AND WRITING".
Bad Prompt = Bad Result.
Use these prompts instead and see the magic:
Bad Prompt = Bad Result.
Use these prompts instead and see the magic:
1. The Professional Editor
“Act as a professional editor and rewrite the following text to correct grammar, typos, punctuation, and clarity. Keep my original meaning but improve structure and readability dramatically. Here is the text: [paste text].”
“Act as a professional editor and rewrite the following text to correct grammar, typos, punctuation, and clarity. Keep my original meaning but improve structure and readability dramatically. Here is the text: [paste text].”
2. The Grammar + Tone Perfection
“Fix all grammar, typos, and awkward phrasing in this text: [paste text]. Then rewrite it in a clean, professional tone that sounds polished, confident, and mistake-free without changing my message.”
“Fix all grammar, typos, and awkward phrasing in this text: [paste text]. Then rewrite it in a clean, professional tone that sounds polished, confident, and mistake-free without changing my message.”
"Crosetto porchetto alla griglia"
Ma adesso il nostro grande ministro della Difesa, Guido Crosetto, che per tre anni mi ha insolentito chiamandomi "cialtrone", "incapace", "incompetente", "putiniano"che cosa dice? Crosetto si nasconderà o avrà la faccia tosta di farsi vedere ⏬
Ma adesso il nostro grande ministro della Difesa, Guido Crosetto, che per tre anni mi ha insolentito chiamandomi "cialtrone", "incapace", "incompetente", "putiniano"che cosa dice? Crosetto si nasconderà o avrà la faccia tosta di farsi vedere ⏬
mentre l'Ucraina sprofonda?
Questo politico incapace di fare qualsiasi analisi sensata sulla sicurezza internazionale, che cosa farà adesso che l'Ucraina viene fatta a pezzi perché è stata massacrata dalla Russia?
Crosetto voleva impedirmi di partecipare al Giffoni Festival per⏬
Questo politico incapace di fare qualsiasi analisi sensata sulla sicurezza internazionale, che cosa farà adesso che l'Ucraina viene fatta a pezzi perché è stata massacrata dalla Russia?
Crosetto voleva impedirmi di partecipare al Giffoni Festival per⏬
spiegare agli studenti i reali rapporti di forza tra Russia e Ucraina e la strategia sbagliata della Nato. Crosetto, già proprio lui, che voleva impedirmi di parlare in pubblico perché doveva istupidire gli studenti italiani con la propaganda della Casa Bianca di Biden,che cosa⏬
Tested Claude and GPT-4 side-by-side for SEO over 90 days.
200 articles, 100 from each AI. Same topics, same prompts, same editing.
The results? Surprising and very practical for content teams.
Here’s exactly how they compared on quality, SEO, and conversions: 🧵👇
200 articles, 100 from each AI. Same topics, same prompts, same editing.
The results? Surprising and very practical for content teams.
Here’s exactly how they compared on quality, SEO, and conversions: 🧵👇
1/ Test methodology:
Fair comparison setup:
Parameters:
- Same topics (100 matched pairs)
- Same prompts (identical instructions)
- Same editing time (45 minutes per article)
- Same human editor (consistency)
- Same publication schedule
- Same promotion effort
Variables isolated: AI model only difference.
Tracking: Rankings, traffic, engagement, conversions over 90 days.
Fair comparison setup:
Parameters:
- Same topics (100 matched pairs)
- Same prompts (identical instructions)
- Same editing time (45 minutes per article)
- Same human editor (consistency)
- Same publication schedule
- Same promotion effort
Variables isolated: AI model only difference.
Tracking: Rankings, traffic, engagement, conversions over 90 days.
2/ Content quality comparison:
Initial output assessment:
Claude strengths:
- More natural tone (less formal)
- Better context retention (longer conversations)
- Cleaner structure (logical flow)
- Fewer repetitive phrases
GPT-4 strengths:
- Faster generation (2× speed)
- More confident assertions
- Better at lists and steps
- Wider knowledge base
Both required substantial editing. Raw output from either not publication-ready.
Initial output assessment:
Claude strengths:
- More natural tone (less formal)
- Better context retention (longer conversations)
- Cleaner structure (logical flow)
- Fewer repetitive phrases
GPT-4 strengths:
- Faster generation (2× speed)
- More confident assertions
- Better at lists and steps
- Wider knowledge base
Both required substantial editing. Raw output from either not publication-ready.
🧵 THREAD: What is the International Rescue Committee?
Rahmanullah Lakanwal, the accused, worked for the International Rescue Committee.
He is also being reported as working for the CIA.
Given this, is the International Rescue Committee a CIA front? I'm going to do a deep dive here.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread:
Rahmanullah Lakanwal, the accused, worked for the International Rescue Committee.
He is also being reported as working for the CIA.
Given this, is the International Rescue Committee a CIA front? I'm going to do a deep dive here.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread:
The first thing that jumps out when analyzing the IRC is its government grants. Out of its nearly 1.5 billion dollars, it has nearly a billion in grants. Their USAID grant in Afghanistan went towards "Accessible and Quality Basic Education (AQBE) Activity."
Yeah, sounds like intelligence work.
Yeah, sounds like intelligence work.
If I'm reading this right -- I am not sure I am reading this -- it seems like almost all of their government grants are from the USA. This is fairly unusual for a charity NGO of this size; often humanitarian NGOs will be co-financed by foreign governments.
you're not having sex anymore. she says she's tired, you feel rejected, she feels pressured. you both think the spark is gone and you're both wrong. here's what's actually happening in your bodies and what you can do about it
1/
1/
for the full essay: open.substack.com/pub/iterintell…
she doesn't want sex, you don't feel appreciated, and you're basically roommates who occasionally argue. you think it's her fault, she thinks it's yours, and therapists keep saying you need better communication. you've tried talking and nothing changed.
2/
2/
🔥🇺🇸 TRUMP JUST DROPPED THE BIGGEST ECONOMIC BOMB OF THE CENTURY
“The U.S. may completely eliminate income tax because tariff revenue will replace it.”
That’s a death sentence for the old system.
And the globalists heard it loud and clear.
“The U.S. may completely eliminate income tax because tariff revenue will replace it.”
That’s a death sentence for the old system.
And the globalists heard it loud and clear.
The IRS model is finished.
For 100 years, the government skimmed America’s paychecks like a cartel.
Trump’s telling you the skimming stops.
The middleman dies.
The whole parasite class loses its feeding tube.
For 100 years, the government skimmed America’s paychecks like a cartel.
Trump’s telling you the skimming stops.
The middleman dies.
The whole parasite class loses its feeding tube.
Tariffs flip the script WE tax THEM.
China? Taxed.
Mexico? Taxed.
EU? Taxed.
Anyone who wants access to the hottest economy on Earth?
Taxed.
For the first time in decades:
America collects foreigners pay.
China? Taxed.
Mexico? Taxed.
EU? Taxed.
Anyone who wants access to the hottest economy on Earth?
Taxed.
For the first time in decades:
America collects foreigners pay.
everyone tells you to spy on competitors’ ads but never shows you how.
so today, I'm gonna drop our entire competitor research process.
here’s how to reverse-engineer any brand’s google ads strategy in 10 min: 🧵
so today, I'm gonna drop our entire competitor research process.
here’s how to reverse-engineer any brand’s google ads strategy in 10 min: 🧵
A few things I’ll cover in this thread:
- Discover your REAL competitors
- Break down any brand’s strategy in under 10 minutes
- Spot gaps in the market and exploit them.
Whether you’re spending $1k/mo or $500k/mo, you’ll walk away with a big competitive edge.
Let’s dive in:
- Discover your REAL competitors
- Break down any brand’s strategy in under 10 minutes
- Spot gaps in the market and exploit them.
Whether you’re spending $1k/mo or $500k/mo, you’ll walk away with a big competitive edge.
Let’s dive in:
1. Find your real competitors.
90% of brands make decisions based on who they think their competitors are.
Not the ones that are actually stealing their most valuable traffic.
The thing is, Google literally shows who those competitors are.
90% of brands make decisions based on who they think their competitors are.
Not the ones that are actually stealing their most valuable traffic.
The thing is, Google literally shows who those competitors are.
Pentesting firms don't want you to see this.
An open-source AI agent just replicated their $50k service.
A "normal" pentest today looks like this:
- $20k-$50k per engagement
- 4-6 weeks of scoping, NDAs, kickoff calls
- A big PDF that's outdated the moment you ship a new feature
Meanwhile, AI agents are quietly starting to perform on-par with human pentester on the stuff that actually matters day-to-day:
↳ Enumerating attack surface
↳ Fuzzing endpoints
↳ Chaining simple vulns into real impact
↳ Producing PoCs and remediation steps developers can actually use
And they do it in hours instead of weeks and at a fraction of the cost.
This approach is actually implemented in Strix, a recently-trending open-source framework (14k+ stars) for AI pentesting agent.
The framework spins up a team of AI "attackers" that probe your web apps, APIs, and code.
It then returns validated findings with exploit evidence, remediation steps, and a full PDF report that looks exactly like what you'd get from a traditional firm, but without a $50k invoice and a month-long wait time.
You can see the full implementation on GitHub and try it yourself.
Just run: `strix --target https: //your-app .com` and you are good to go.
Human red teams aren't disappearing but the routine pentest (pre-launch, post-refactor, quarterly checks) is clearly shifting to AI.
Strix is one of the first tools that makes that shift feel real instead of hypothetical.
I've shared the GitHub repo in the replies.
An open-source AI agent just replicated their $50k service.
A "normal" pentest today looks like this:
- $20k-$50k per engagement
- 4-6 weeks of scoping, NDAs, kickoff calls
- A big PDF that's outdated the moment you ship a new feature
Meanwhile, AI agents are quietly starting to perform on-par with human pentester on the stuff that actually matters day-to-day:
↳ Enumerating attack surface
↳ Fuzzing endpoints
↳ Chaining simple vulns into real impact
↳ Producing PoCs and remediation steps developers can actually use
And they do it in hours instead of weeks and at a fraction of the cost.
This approach is actually implemented in Strix, a recently-trending open-source framework (14k+ stars) for AI pentesting agent.
The framework spins up a team of AI "attackers" that probe your web apps, APIs, and code.
It then returns validated findings with exploit evidence, remediation steps, and a full PDF report that looks exactly like what you'd get from a traditional firm, but without a $50k invoice and a month-long wait time.
You can see the full implementation on GitHub and try it yourself.
Just run: `strix --target https: //your-app .com` and you are good to go.
Human red teams aren't disappearing but the routine pentest (pre-launch, post-refactor, quarterly checks) is clearly shifting to AI.
Strix is one of the first tools that makes that shift feel real instead of hypothetical.
I've shared the GitHub repo in the replies.
If you found it insightful, reshare it with your network.
Find me → @_avichawla
Every day, I share tutorials and insights on DS, ML, LLMs, and RAGs.
Find me → @_avichawla
Every day, I share tutorials and insights on DS, ML, LLMs, and RAGs.
Bombshell: Reeves claims she’s lowered business rates. I call BS.
Many pubs, restaurants, and shops have realised their bills are actually going up, by a lot.
Why? Because while multipliers seem lower, an important relief was scrapped. Here's the truth… 🧵
Many pubs, restaurants, and shops have realised their bills are actually going up, by a lot.
Why? Because while multipliers seem lower, an important relief was scrapped. Here's the truth… 🧵
Conservatives introduced rates relief for retail, hospitality, worth up to £110,000.
At her first budget, Reeves cut the discount from 75% to 40%.
Now, she’s scrapped it entirely, claiming that “permanently lower” multipliers make up for it — they don’t.
At her first budget, Reeves cut the discount from 75% to 40%.
Now, she’s scrapped it entirely, claiming that “permanently lower” multipliers make up for it — they don’t.
Here lies the Government's trick.
Their chart makes it look like the multipliers, used to calculate what a business pays from its rateable value, are going down.
But this doesn’t take account of the lost 40% discount previously applied to the final bill afterward.
Their chart makes it look like the multipliers, used to calculate what a business pays from its rateable value, are going down.
But this doesn’t take account of the lost 40% discount previously applied to the final bill afterward.
1/ Hardline Russian nationalists and war supporters have reacted with hostility to the Dmitriev-Witkoff peace proposals. Igor 'Strelkov' Girkin's detailed critique is of particular interest, as it is likely representative of this powerful faction's views. ⬇️
2/ Girkin's comments provide an insight into the fine line that Putin is having to walk between reaching a settlement that he can accept and one that the hardliners will accept. Putin likely agrees with many of their objections, but knows that they are unachievable.
3/ Girkin says, in a letter from his prison, that a correspondent has sent him the leaked list of the plan's 28 points (which he says have not been published in the Russian media). He is aware that subsequent US-Ukraine talks have reduced them to 19 points, but observes sourly:
NEW: ICE’s policy of mass detaining immigrants w pending deportation proceedings has led to an avalanche of rejections in court.
More than 220 judges — including 23 Trump appointees — have called it an illegal distortion of long-settled law. politico.com/news/2025/11/2…
More than 220 judges — including 23 Trump appointees — have called it an illegal distortion of long-settled law. politico.com/news/2025/11/2…
Those judges have ruled against the administration more than 700 times since ICE implemented its draconian new policy on July 8.
Only 8 judges have side with ICE’s position. politico.com/news/2025/11/2…
Only 8 judges have side with ICE’s position. politico.com/news/2025/11/2…
The cases have surged as ICE reclassified millions who have resided in the United States for years as “arriving aliens” or “applicants for admission” — making them subject to mandatory detention typically meant for those who just crossed the border. politico.com/news/2025/11/2…
La IA sabe pensar. Sabe razonar. Sabe crear.
Pero siempre hubo un vacío imposible de llenar: el recuerdo 🧠
Puede analizar un documento entero, inventar una melodía, sostener un razonamiento complejo…
y aun así, cada vez que vuelve a hablar contigo, vuelve como si nunca te hubiera visto.
Sin ayer.
Sin antes.
Solo un presente sin raíces.
Hasta ahora.
EverMind apareció con una idea que cambia la forma en que pensamos la inteligencia:
una IA capaz de guardar una parte de lo vivido.
Una IA que ya no despierta desde cero, sino con continuidad.
Con una historia.
Así nace Memory OS, el sistema que permite a un modelo habitar el tiempo.
Pero siempre hubo un vacío imposible de llenar: el recuerdo 🧠
Puede analizar un documento entero, inventar una melodía, sostener un razonamiento complejo…
y aun así, cada vez que vuelve a hablar contigo, vuelve como si nunca te hubiera visto.
Sin ayer.
Sin antes.
Solo un presente sin raíces.
Hasta ahora.
EverMind apareció con una idea que cambia la forma en que pensamos la inteligencia:
una IA capaz de guardar una parte de lo vivido.
Una IA que ya no despierta desde cero, sino con continuidad.
Con una historia.
Así nace Memory OS, el sistema que permite a un modelo habitar el tiempo.
Cuando EverMind lanzó su primera versión, todo parecía simple: extensiones, complementos, pequeñas mejoras.
Pero detrás de esa fachada ya se estaba gestando otra cosa:
una arquitectura donde la memoria no es un accesorio, sino un espacio entero donde la IA puede crecer.
El proyecto dejó de ser un conjunto de herramientas.
Se convirtió en un sistema.
Las ideas vagas se transformaron en cimientos, y Memory OS empezó a tomar la forma de un entorno donde un recuerdo puede nacer, persistir, cambiar y regresar.
Más info: evermind.ai
Pero detrás de esa fachada ya se estaba gestando otra cosa:
una arquitectura donde la memoria no es un accesorio, sino un espacio entero donde la IA puede crecer.
El proyecto dejó de ser un conjunto de herramientas.
Se convirtió en un sistema.
Las ideas vagas se transformaron en cimientos, y Memory OS empezó a tomar la forma de un entorno donde un recuerdo puede nacer, persistir, cambiar y regresar.
Más info: evermind.ai
EverMemModel aprende cómo debe representarse un recuerdo.
EverMemOS le da un lugar donde existir, organizarse, expandirse.
EverMemBench lo somete a situaciones que revelan si ese recuerdo realmente sostiene una conversación, un vínculo, una cadena de ideas a lo largo del tiempo.
El conjunto actúa como un organismo que se construye a partir de experiencias.
Un sistema donde la memoria deja de ser un archivo y empieza a comportarse como una materia viva.
EverMemOS le da un lugar donde existir, organizarse, expandirse.
EverMemBench lo somete a situaciones que revelan si ese recuerdo realmente sostiene una conversación, un vínculo, una cadena de ideas a lo largo del tiempo.
El conjunto actúa como un organismo que se construye a partir de experiencias.
Un sistema donde la memoria deja de ser un archivo y empieza a comportarse como una materia viva.
Everyone’s talking about saunas and cold plunges.
From athletes to biohackers, it’s the hottest (and coldest) health trend right now.
But do they actually work… or is it just hype?
Here’s what the science really says: 🧵
From athletes to biohackers, it’s the hottest (and coldest) health trend right now.
But do they actually work… or is it just hype?
Here’s what the science really says: 🧵
Let’s start with the sauna.
When you expose your body to heat, you create a mild stress known as the hormetic effect.
This “good stress” forces your body to adapt, becoming stronger in the process.
Similar benefits happen with fasting, exercise, and even cold exposure.
When you expose your body to heat, you create a mild stress known as the hormetic effect.
This “good stress” forces your body to adapt, becoming stronger in the process.
Similar benefits happen with fasting, exercise, and even cold exposure.
Benefits of regular sauna use include:
• Growth hormone up by 140%
• Increased noradrenaline, dopamine & serotonin (mood + focus)
• Lower resting heart rate
• Stronger immune system
• Lower blood pressure
It even mimics the effects of moderate aerobic exercise.
• Growth hormone up by 140%
• Increased noradrenaline, dopamine & serotonin (mood + focus)
• Lower resting heart rate
• Stronger immune system
• Lower blood pressure
It even mimics the effects of moderate aerobic exercise.