Recent well liked threads
100% he'd've gotten clapped fighting in one of the bush wars for fun if he was born a quarter century earlier. LRS w/ Ranger tab means he was in military intelligence. 
The 19th special forces group is the last thing he was in (also, at best, was misleading about leaving the military in 2011).
>he felt he was not pulling his weight
>Got out for college, got bored, went to re-enlist
>got bored
>Got out for college, got bored, went to re-enlist
>got bored
FOX is recognizing Melania as “Patriot of the Year”, There is public info that points to the fact that Melania was groomed from a young age as a Red Sparrow. This is not hyperbole. In the late 80s she may have been training in East Germany, while Putin was working for the Stasi.
Her father was a member of the communist party in then Yugoslavia, & their family lived a life of luxury, not afforded to many. She herself said they had multiple sports cars and lived in a House, not a typical apartment.
Pictures exist taken by Slovenian photographer Stane Jerko when she was 16 which have circulated for years. That was in 1986, when left her hometown to go to school in Ljubljana & subsequently dropped out to pursue modeling. This is where she “disappears” for between 3 & 5 years.
Maduro likely already has purchased property in Dubai to retire to, he'll hand over oil rights/contracts to US resource corp oligarchs and billions to the Trump family laundered through 3rd parties. The threat of invasion is basically a shakedown to ensure he provides more loot.
If anything does get bombed in Venezuela it'll be a death theatre to help legitimize the deal. Venezuelans will pay the check Maduro is ready to cash.
A large sum of the national wealth for Venezuela has already been transferred out of the country by Trump allies and Russia.
I just fell down a rabbit hole reading a new AI paper and I think my brain is broken.
An AI system called Kosmos just did what collaborators estimate is 6 months of PhD-level scientific research.
It did it in 12 hours.
1/12
I know, I know. We hear "AI scientist" and think it's just a chatbot that's good at summarizing Wikipedia. I was skeptical too.
Most of these systems are toys. They can do a cool analysis, but they lose focus after a few steps. They can't run a real, long-term investigation.
2/12
The real problem wasn't raw intelligence. It was coherence.
Imagine trying to write a book with 100 different people who can't see what anyone else is writing. You get a mess of disconnected paragraphs. That's what previous AI agents were like. Brilliant, but hopelessly siloed.
3/12
So the team behind Kosmos didn't just try to build a "smarter" brain. They built a shared consciousness.
They call it a "structured world model," which sounds complex, but the idea is genius.
4/12
Think of it like a giant, live-updating whiteboard.
Kosmos unleashes hundreds of little AI agents in parallel. One reads scientific papers. Another analyzes data. When an agent finds something, it puts it on the whiteboard.
Crucially, every other agent can see the whole board.
5/12
This simple change in architecture lets it scale to an insane degree.
In an average run, Kosmos:
Writes ~42,000 lines of code
Reads ~1,500 full scientific papers
(I had to read that twice. It's not a typo.)
It lets the system pursue a single goal for hours without getting lost.
6/12
"Okay," you're probably thinking, "but how do you know it's not just confidently making stuff up?"
This is the part that actually blew my mind.
Every single claim in the final report Kosmos generates is hyperlinked. You can click any sentence and it shows you either:
A) The exact Jupyter notebook with the code it ran.
B) The primary scientific paper it's citing.
It shows all its work. No black boxes.
7/12
And the results are just... wild.
In one test, they gave Kosmos a dataset on brain aging that human scientists had already analyzed for years.
Kosmos found a completely novel mechanism for why certain neurons are vulnerable—a discovery the original researchers had missed in their own data.
8/12
It wasn't a one-off fluke, either. The paper details 7 major findings.
It independently reproduced discoveries from unpublished manuscripts. It developed a brand new analytical method for studying Alzheimer's. It found a potential new drug target for heart disease.
This thing is a cross-domain discovery engine.
9/12
This forces a huge mental shift.
We've been thinking of AI as a tool to answer our questions or summarize existing information.
This is different. This is a tool for generating new, verifiable knowledge from scratch.
10/12
This isn't just about making science faster. It's about changing the kinds of questions we can even dare to ask.
We're about to enter an era where a single researcher, armed with a system like this, can explore ideas that would've previously taken entire institutions years to investigate.
11/12
The pace of discovery is about to get very, very weird.
If you read one paper this week, make it this one.
12/12
An AI system called Kosmos just did what collaborators estimate is 6 months of PhD-level scientific research.
It did it in 12 hours.
1/12
I know, I know. We hear "AI scientist" and think it's just a chatbot that's good at summarizing Wikipedia. I was skeptical too.
Most of these systems are toys. They can do a cool analysis, but they lose focus after a few steps. They can't run a real, long-term investigation.
2/12
The real problem wasn't raw intelligence. It was coherence.
Imagine trying to write a book with 100 different people who can't see what anyone else is writing. You get a mess of disconnected paragraphs. That's what previous AI agents were like. Brilliant, but hopelessly siloed.
3/12
So the team behind Kosmos didn't just try to build a "smarter" brain. They built a shared consciousness.
They call it a "structured world model," which sounds complex, but the idea is genius.
4/12
Think of it like a giant, live-updating whiteboard.
Kosmos unleashes hundreds of little AI agents in parallel. One reads scientific papers. Another analyzes data. When an agent finds something, it puts it on the whiteboard.
Crucially, every other agent can see the whole board.
5/12
This simple change in architecture lets it scale to an insane degree.
In an average run, Kosmos:
Writes ~42,000 lines of code
Reads ~1,500 full scientific papers
(I had to read that twice. It's not a typo.)
It lets the system pursue a single goal for hours without getting lost.
6/12
"Okay," you're probably thinking, "but how do you know it's not just confidently making stuff up?"
This is the part that actually blew my mind.
Every single claim in the final report Kosmos generates is hyperlinked. You can click any sentence and it shows you either:
A) The exact Jupyter notebook with the code it ran.
B) The primary scientific paper it's citing.
It shows all its work. No black boxes.
7/12
And the results are just... wild.
In one test, they gave Kosmos a dataset on brain aging that human scientists had already analyzed for years.
Kosmos found a completely novel mechanism for why certain neurons are vulnerable—a discovery the original researchers had missed in their own data.
8/12
It wasn't a one-off fluke, either. The paper details 7 major findings.
It independently reproduced discoveries from unpublished manuscripts. It developed a brand new analytical method for studying Alzheimer's. It found a potential new drug target for heart disease.
This thing is a cross-domain discovery engine.
9/12
This forces a huge mental shift.
We've been thinking of AI as a tool to answer our questions or summarize existing information.
This is different. This is a tool for generating new, verifiable knowledge from scratch.
10/12
This isn't just about making science faster. It's about changing the kinds of questions we can even dare to ask.
We're about to enter an era where a single researcher, armed with a system like this, can explore ideas that would've previously taken entire institutions years to investigate.
11/12
The pace of discovery is about to get very, very weird.
If you read one paper this week, make it this one.
12/12
Kosmos: An AI Scientist Scaling Autonomous Discovery Through a Structured World Model
The pursuit of scientific knowledge has long been a fundamentally human endeavor, characterized by iterative cycles of hypothesis, experimentation, and analysis. However, the sheer volume of data and literature in modern science presents a bottleneck that even teams of experts struggle to overcome. The paper "Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discovery" introduces a significant leap forward in automating this process. It presents Kosmos, an artificial intelligence system that, when given a dataset and an open-ended research objective, can autonomously perform the equivalent of months of expert-level research in a matter of hours. By addressing the core limitations of coherence, scale, and traceability that have hindered previous AI agents, Kosmos demonstrates the capacity to not only reproduce existing findings but also to generate novel, verifiable discoveries across a multitude of scientific disciplines.
At the heart of modern data-driven science lie several key challenges that have proven difficult to automate. Previous AI systems, while proficient in narrow tasks, have consistently failed to scale. As the paper notes, agents like Robin and Sakana’s AI Scientist were either limited to specific domains, such as therapeutics or machine learning, or suffered from a critical flaw: an inability to maintain focus. After a few operational steps, these systems would "lose coherence," unable to connect disparate pieces of information into a sustained line of inquiry. This limited the depth of their findings and prevented them from tackling complex, multifaceted research questions. Furthermore, many systems lacked full integration of the scientific workflow—some could generate hypotheses but not analyze data, while others performed analysis without the crucial context of existing literature. A final, critical barrier was traceability; without a clear, verifiable chain of reasoning, the outputs of an AI are scientifically useless.
Kosmos overcomes these obstacles through a core architectural innovation: the structured world model. This model functions as a dynamic, centralized brain for the entire system. Instead of having separate, siloed agents for data analysis and literature review, Kosmos deploys hundreds of parallel agent instances that all read from and write to this shared world model. This design elegantly solves the coherence problem. With every cycle, the system synthesizes outputs from its agents, updates its understanding of the research landscape, and proposes new, relevant tasks aligned with the overarching objective. This allows Kosmos to run for up to 12 hours, executing over 200 agent rollouts, without deviating from its goal. The scale of this operation is staggering: an average run involves writing 42,000 lines of code and reading 1,500 full-length scientific papers—a nearly tenfold increase in code generation compared to its predecessors. This context management strategy is the key that unlocks both depth and scale.
The true measure of a scientific tool is the quality of its discoveries, and the paper presents a compelling portfolio of seven case studies. These discoveries are not trivial; they span diverse and complex fields, including neuroscience, materials science, and statistical genetics. The achievements can be categorized by their relationship to human-led science. In some cases, Kosmos independently reproduced findings from unpublished manuscripts it had no access to, such as identifying nucleotide metabolism as a key pathway in cooling-induced neuroprotection. In others, it developed novel analytical methods, like a temporal ordering technique to pinpoint disease events in Alzheimer's proteomics data. Perhaps most impressively, Kosmos made a novel, clinically relevant discovery that human researchers had missed in their own dataset: a mechanism explaining the vulnerability of entorhinal cortex neurons in aging. This breadth of application demonstrates that Kosmos is not a niche tool but a general-purpose discovery engine.
Crucially, Kosmos is built for the rigor and skepticism inherent to the scientific method. Its creators address the "black box" problem head-on by ensuring complete traceability. Every statement, figure, and conclusion in a Kosmos-generated report is hyperlinked to its origin: either a specific Jupyter notebook containing the analysis code or a citation from the primary literature. This transparency allows human scientists to scrutinize, validate, and build upon the AI's work, transforming it from an inscrutable oracle into a trustworthy collaborator. Independent evaluations confirm the system's robustness, with expert scientists finding nearly 80% of its statements to be accurate. Collaborators reported that a single Kosmos run accomplished what would have taken their teams an average of six months, and that the number of valuable findings scaled linearly with the system's runtime.
Despite its groundbreaking capabilities, the paper presents Kosmos not as a replacement for human scientists but as a powerful augmentation tool—a "scientist-in-the-loop" model. The process begins and ends with human expertise: a scientist provides the initial objective and a high-quality dataset, and later evaluates the AI's output, separating statistically significant noise from scientifically valuable insights. The paper acknowledges the system's current limitations, such as its difficulty with raw, unstructured data and its occasional tendency to invent unorthodox metrics or make overly strong claims. The human role, therefore, shifts from manual data-wrangling and literature review to the higher-level tasks of strategic direction, critical interpretation, and creative synthesis.
In conclusion, Kosmos represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of AI for science. By solving the fundamental challenges of coherence and scale with its structured world model, it has created a system capable of conducting extended, autonomous research investigations that yield validated, novel discoveries. Its commitment to traceability and its proven utility across multiple fields set a new standard for what an AI scientist can achieve. As this technology matures, it promises to dramatically accelerate the pace of data-driven discovery, empowering researchers to explore vast datasets and complex questions at a speed and scale previously unimaginable.
The pursuit of scientific knowledge has long been a fundamentally human endeavor, characterized by iterative cycles of hypothesis, experimentation, and analysis. However, the sheer volume of data and literature in modern science presents a bottleneck that even teams of experts struggle to overcome. The paper "Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discovery" introduces a significant leap forward in automating this process. It presents Kosmos, an artificial intelligence system that, when given a dataset and an open-ended research objective, can autonomously perform the equivalent of months of expert-level research in a matter of hours. By addressing the core limitations of coherence, scale, and traceability that have hindered previous AI agents, Kosmos demonstrates the capacity to not only reproduce existing findings but also to generate novel, verifiable discoveries across a multitude of scientific disciplines.
At the heart of modern data-driven science lie several key challenges that have proven difficult to automate. Previous AI systems, while proficient in narrow tasks, have consistently failed to scale. As the paper notes, agents like Robin and Sakana’s AI Scientist were either limited to specific domains, such as therapeutics or machine learning, or suffered from a critical flaw: an inability to maintain focus. After a few operational steps, these systems would "lose coherence," unable to connect disparate pieces of information into a sustained line of inquiry. This limited the depth of their findings and prevented them from tackling complex, multifaceted research questions. Furthermore, many systems lacked full integration of the scientific workflow—some could generate hypotheses but not analyze data, while others performed analysis without the crucial context of existing literature. A final, critical barrier was traceability; without a clear, verifiable chain of reasoning, the outputs of an AI are scientifically useless.
Kosmos overcomes these obstacles through a core architectural innovation: the structured world model. This model functions as a dynamic, centralized brain for the entire system. Instead of having separate, siloed agents for data analysis and literature review, Kosmos deploys hundreds of parallel agent instances that all read from and write to this shared world model. This design elegantly solves the coherence problem. With every cycle, the system synthesizes outputs from its agents, updates its understanding of the research landscape, and proposes new, relevant tasks aligned with the overarching objective. This allows Kosmos to run for up to 12 hours, executing over 200 agent rollouts, without deviating from its goal. The scale of this operation is staggering: an average run involves writing 42,000 lines of code and reading 1,500 full-length scientific papers—a nearly tenfold increase in code generation compared to its predecessors. This context management strategy is the key that unlocks both depth and scale.
The true measure of a scientific tool is the quality of its discoveries, and the paper presents a compelling portfolio of seven case studies. These discoveries are not trivial; they span diverse and complex fields, including neuroscience, materials science, and statistical genetics. The achievements can be categorized by their relationship to human-led science. In some cases, Kosmos independently reproduced findings from unpublished manuscripts it had no access to, such as identifying nucleotide metabolism as a key pathway in cooling-induced neuroprotection. In others, it developed novel analytical methods, like a temporal ordering technique to pinpoint disease events in Alzheimer's proteomics data. Perhaps most impressively, Kosmos made a novel, clinically relevant discovery that human researchers had missed in their own dataset: a mechanism explaining the vulnerability of entorhinal cortex neurons in aging. This breadth of application demonstrates that Kosmos is not a niche tool but a general-purpose discovery engine.
Crucially, Kosmos is built for the rigor and skepticism inherent to the scientific method. Its creators address the "black box" problem head-on by ensuring complete traceability. Every statement, figure, and conclusion in a Kosmos-generated report is hyperlinked to its origin: either a specific Jupyter notebook containing the analysis code or a citation from the primary literature. This transparency allows human scientists to scrutinize, validate, and build upon the AI's work, transforming it from an inscrutable oracle into a trustworthy collaborator. Independent evaluations confirm the system's robustness, with expert scientists finding nearly 80% of its statements to be accurate. Collaborators reported that a single Kosmos run accomplished what would have taken their teams an average of six months, and that the number of valuable findings scaled linearly with the system's runtime.
Despite its groundbreaking capabilities, the paper presents Kosmos not as a replacement for human scientists but as a powerful augmentation tool—a "scientist-in-the-loop" model. The process begins and ends with human expertise: a scientist provides the initial objective and a high-quality dataset, and later evaluates the AI's output, separating statistically significant noise from scientifically valuable insights. The paper acknowledges the system's current limitations, such as its difficulty with raw, unstructured data and its occasional tendency to invent unorthodox metrics or make overly strong claims. The human role, therefore, shifts from manual data-wrangling and literature review to the higher-level tasks of strategic direction, critical interpretation, and creative synthesis.
In conclusion, Kosmos represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of AI for science. By solving the fundamental challenges of coherence and scale with its structured world model, it has created a system capable of conducting extended, autonomous research investigations that yield validated, novel discoveries. Its commitment to traceability and its proven utility across multiple fields set a new standard for what an AI scientist can achieve. As this technology matures, it promises to dramatically accelerate the pace of data-driven discovery, empowering researchers to explore vast datasets and complex questions at a speed and scale previously unimaginable.
Let's talk about something that will shape our future, but no one is yet considering or predicting:
China will eventually open its borders to mass immigration.
China will eventually open its borders to mass immigration.
When it does it will absorb truly astounding numbers of immigrants, if proportional to say what the UK or Canada this will be 200-300 million or so people.
This might sound almost physically impossible, but the surprising almost disturbing truth is that in the modern world it is easy move 200 million people.
In 2023, 4.4 billion passengers were carried by the world's airlines.
This might sound almost physically impossible, but the surprising almost disturbing truth is that in the modern world it is easy move 200 million people.
In 2023, 4.4 billion passengers were carried by the world's airlines.
200-300 million people in a graying ageing world of low fertility is enough to raise global labor costs.
This will be completely distinct second China shock to Western companies hoping to offshore to places with cheap labor.
The cheap labor good at working in factories will move to China. The West will get scraps of misplaced high end human capital and food app deliverymen.
This will be completely distinct second China shock to Western companies hoping to offshore to places with cheap labor.
The cheap labor good at working in factories will move to China. The West will get scraps of misplaced high end human capital and food app deliverymen.
📘 Sharing a Powerful Resource on Windows Deployment Services (WDS)
I’m excited to share a highly valuable document that takes an in-depth look at Windows Deployment Services (WDS).
✉️Comment PDF for full Guide
I’m excited to share a highly valuable document that takes an in-depth look at Windows Deployment Services (WDS).
✉️Comment PDF for full Guide
Written by a member of the Microsoft Deployment Toolkit (MDT) team this guide is part of Microsoft’s Official Curriculum making it one of the most trusted resources you can learn from.
Inside, the handbook breaks down key areas such as:
🔹 WDS architecture and the full deployment workflow
🔹 PXE boot setup and configuration
🔹 Creating, capturing, and managing Windows images
🔹 Streamlined automated rollback processes
🔹 Best practices for building
🔹 WDS architecture and the full deployment workflow
🔹 PXE boot setup and configuration
🔹 Creating, capturing, and managing Windows images
🔹 Streamlined automated rollback processes
🔹 Best practices for building
Let’s talk about one of the most dangerous and under-discussed consequences of SARS-CoV-2: neurological damage. More specifically, frontal lobe dysfunction.
This is being deliberately downplayed, in part due to a misguided weaponisation of “ableism” discourse. That’s a problem🧵
This is being deliberately downplayed, in part due to a misguided weaponisation of “ableism” discourse. That’s a problem🧵
Here’s the truth.
SARS-CoV-2 is a neurotropic virus. It can invade the central nervous system, either directly or through inflammatory damage.
It’s been detected in brain tissue, and it can cause lasting neurological impairment.
This is not speculative.
SARS-CoV-2 is a neurotropic virus. It can invade the central nervous system, either directly or through inflammatory damage.
It’s been detected in brain tissue, and it can cause lasting neurological impairment.
This is not speculative.
The frontal lobe governs executive function, impulse control, empathy, moral reasoning & inhibition. Damage here can lead to:
- Aggression
- Impulsivity
- Gullibility
- Bigotry
- Loss of social inhibition
- Apathy
- Antisocial traits
This is basic neurobiology, not ableism.
- Aggression
- Impulsivity
- Gullibility
- Bigotry
- Loss of social inhibition
- Apathy
- Antisocial traits
This is basic neurobiology, not ableism.
Learn Python For Loops Fast — 12 Clear Examples
1. Print numbers from 1 to 5
for i in range(1, 6):
print(i)
Learn Loop:
for i in range(1, 6):
print(i)
Learn Loop:
2. Print each letter in a word
for ch in "PYTHON":
print(ch)
for ch in "PYTHON":
print(ch)
BEST OF R/LEGALADVICEUK 🧵
r/LegalAdviceUK is a reddit subreddit where people ask for legal advice about their problems. Because of the levels of dysfunction in Britain (AKA ‘The Yookay’) today they often read as parody. Here is a thread of some of the more absurd recent posts
r/LegalAdviceUK is a reddit subreddit where people ask for legal advice about their problems. Because of the levels of dysfunction in Britain (AKA ‘The Yookay’) today they often read as parody. Here is a thread of some of the more absurd recent posts
“Caste-based discrimination at my workplace”
“One of my councillors is campaigning to be elected in a completely different country”
♦️UK-Parlamentarischer Bericht 2025 zum Hamas-Massaker vom 7/10/23:
▪︎ Avisiert seit 2011, Detailplanung seit 2021, also kein spontaner Akt des Widerstands
▪︎ Endziel: "From the river to the sea", Auslöschung Israels
▪︎ Weiteres Ziel: De-Normalisierung Israel-Saudis
🧵1/19
▪︎ Avisiert seit 2011, Detailplanung seit 2021, also kein spontaner Akt des Widerstands
▪︎ Endziel: "From the river to the sea", Auslöschung Israels
▪︎ Weiteres Ziel: De-Normalisierung Israel-Saudis
🧵1/19
♦️UK-Parlamentarischer Bericht zum Massaker der Hamas vom 07/10/23:
▪︎ Zur Verschleierung versuchte Hamas in den Vorjahren ostentativ den Eindruck zu erwecken, es verbessere Lebensbedingungen in Gaza
▪︎ Israel / Bibi glaubten das, Kontrollabbau
🧵2/x
▪︎ Zur Verschleierung versuchte Hamas in den Vorjahren ostentativ den Eindruck zu erwecken, es verbessere Lebensbedingungen in Gaza
▪︎ Israel / Bibi glaubten das, Kontrollabbau
🧵2/x
♦️UK-Parlamentarischer Bericht zum Massaker der Hamas vom 07/10/23:
▪︎ Hamas Kooperation mit Iran geht bis in die 1990er zurück
▪︎ 2021 bittet Hamas Sinwar Iran um Geld und Training von 12k Kämpfern. Verspricht Israels Auslöschung innert 2 Jahren.
🧵3/x
▪︎ Hamas Kooperation mit Iran geht bis in die 1990er zurück
▪︎ 2021 bittet Hamas Sinwar Iran um Geld und Training von 12k Kämpfern. Verspricht Israels Auslöschung innert 2 Jahren.
🧵3/x
HiFi Hunters
Los mejores altavoces “entry level”: PSB P5, DALI Oberon 1 y JBL 240B cara a cara
Los mejores altavoces “entry level”: PSB P5, DALI Oberon 1 y JBL 240B cara a cara
[Grok 4] Compara a fondo PSB P5, DALI Oberon 1 y JBL 240B Especificaciones, calidad de construcción y sonido. Opiniones... y la tuya. ¿Cuál comprarías?
x.com/i/grok/share/t…
x.com/i/grok/share/t…
[Grok 4] Investiga las respuestas en frecuencia y los crossover. ¿Qué mejoras propones para cada una?
x.com/i/grok/share/Y…
x.com/i/grok/share/Y…
(THREAD 🧵) Ever notice how stupidity often sounds confident and wisdom stays quiet? We live in a world where volume is mistaken for intelligence and arrogance hides behind fake certainty. People argue not to understand but to win. They talk louder, not wiser.
Marcus Aurelius once said, "If someone is mistaken, instruct them kindly if you can. If not, bear with them." Because the Stoics knew this truth: you can't reason with arrogance disguised as knowledge. You can only protect your peace, your clarity, and your time.
We'll explore eight clear signs of a truly foolish person. How to recognize them, how to avoid becoming like them, and how to handle stupidity with calm mastery.
Because fighting fools drains your energy; understanding them sharpens your wisdom.
Stay till the end. The last sign might reveal something about you.
Marcus Aurelius once said, "If someone is mistaken, instruct them kindly if you can. If not, bear with them." Because the Stoics knew this truth: you can't reason with arrogance disguised as knowledge. You can only protect your peace, your clarity, and your time.
We'll explore eight clear signs of a truly foolish person. How to recognize them, how to avoid becoming like them, and how to handle stupidity with calm mastery.
Because fighting fools drains your energy; understanding them sharpens your wisdom.
Stay till the end. The last sign might reveal something about you.
SIGN 1: They speak more than they think.
There's a reason the Stoics valued silence as much as courage. Because a fool reveals himself not through what he knows, but through what he cannot stop saying.
We've all met that person. The one who fills every pause with noise. Who mistakes constant talking for confidence. They don't ask questions. They don't reflect. They speak only to prove they exist.
But as Zeno, the founder of stoicism, once said, "Better to trip with the feet than with the tongue." Words are powerful tools, but in the hands of the undisciplined, they become weapons against others and eventually against themselves.
A person who talks more than they think isn't just careless with speech. They are careless with perception. They miss what's said between the lines. They confuse noise for knowledge, speed for insight, and volume for intelligence.
The fool talks to be heard. The wise talk to understand. And the stoic, he talks only when silence no longer serves.
Because to the stoic, silence isn't emptiness. It's mastery. It's the moment between impulse and control where truth gathers its weight before it's spoken. That pause, that sacred gap is where wisdom lives.
Watch how easily people betray themselves when they speak too quickly. They reveal insecurity behind arrogance, fear behind certainty, and ignorance behind confidence. They don't listen because listening means admitting they don't already know.
They fill the air with noise to drown out the discomfort of not being the smartest person in the room. But wisdom begins exactly there. In that discomfort, in that humility to say, "Maybe I don't know yet." The fool avoids silence because in silence he would have to face himself.
Marcus Aurelius once wrote, "If it is not right, do not do it. If it is not true, do not say it." That's how the Stoics treated words as moral acts, not casual noise. They believe speech should serve truth or remain unspoken.
Every word is a promise, a reflection of your discipline, your clarity, your self-control. That's why wise people often speak less. They are busy observing, refining, choosing. When a stoic finally speaks, his words carry weight because they are forged in restraint.
1Look at our modern world. Everyone has a platform, yet few have purpose. People talk to be seen, not to contribute. They argue not to learn, but to win. Outrage becomes entertainment, and loudness becomes currency.
But the stoic doesn't compete in that arena. He values presence over performance. When others rush to speak, he waits. When they demand reaction, he breathes. He knows silence unsettles the insecure because silence cannot be argued with.
Imagine this. Two people in a heated argument. One shouts, waves his hands, desperate to prove he's right. The other listens quietly, speaks once, and ends it. Which one looks stronger? Which one has control? That's the difference between noise and power.
Control is silent. Strength doesn't shout. A disciplined tongue is sharper than any insult. The Stoic doesn't need to win arguments. He wins himself. In a world that rewards reaction, restraint becomes rebellion.
Don't let noise trick you into thinking it means. Don't mistake confidence for clarity or speech for strength. Speak only when your words add value, not volume. Because wisdom doesn't rush, it resonates. And silence, when chosen deliberately, speaks louder than any speech ever could.
Silence is not weakness. It's control.
There's a reason the Stoics valued silence as much as courage. Because a fool reveals himself not through what he knows, but through what he cannot stop saying.
We've all met that person. The one who fills every pause with noise. Who mistakes constant talking for confidence. They don't ask questions. They don't reflect. They speak only to prove they exist.
But as Zeno, the founder of stoicism, once said, "Better to trip with the feet than with the tongue." Words are powerful tools, but in the hands of the undisciplined, they become weapons against others and eventually against themselves.
A person who talks more than they think isn't just careless with speech. They are careless with perception. They miss what's said between the lines. They confuse noise for knowledge, speed for insight, and volume for intelligence.
The fool talks to be heard. The wise talk to understand. And the stoic, he talks only when silence no longer serves.
Because to the stoic, silence isn't emptiness. It's mastery. It's the moment between impulse and control where truth gathers its weight before it's spoken. That pause, that sacred gap is where wisdom lives.
Watch how easily people betray themselves when they speak too quickly. They reveal insecurity behind arrogance, fear behind certainty, and ignorance behind confidence. They don't listen because listening means admitting they don't already know.
They fill the air with noise to drown out the discomfort of not being the smartest person in the room. But wisdom begins exactly there. In that discomfort, in that humility to say, "Maybe I don't know yet." The fool avoids silence because in silence he would have to face himself.
Marcus Aurelius once wrote, "If it is not right, do not do it. If it is not true, do not say it." That's how the Stoics treated words as moral acts, not casual noise. They believe speech should serve truth or remain unspoken.
Every word is a promise, a reflection of your discipline, your clarity, your self-control. That's why wise people often speak less. They are busy observing, refining, choosing. When a stoic finally speaks, his words carry weight because they are forged in restraint.
1Look at our modern world. Everyone has a platform, yet few have purpose. People talk to be seen, not to contribute. They argue not to learn, but to win. Outrage becomes entertainment, and loudness becomes currency.
But the stoic doesn't compete in that arena. He values presence over performance. When others rush to speak, he waits. When they demand reaction, he breathes. He knows silence unsettles the insecure because silence cannot be argued with.
Imagine this. Two people in a heated argument. One shouts, waves his hands, desperate to prove he's right. The other listens quietly, speaks once, and ends it. Which one looks stronger? Which one has control? That's the difference between noise and power.
Control is silent. Strength doesn't shout. A disciplined tongue is sharper than any insult. The Stoic doesn't need to win arguments. He wins himself. In a world that rewards reaction, restraint becomes rebellion.
Don't let noise trick you into thinking it means. Don't mistake confidence for clarity or speech for strength. Speak only when your words add value, not volume. Because wisdom doesn't rush, it resonates. And silence, when chosen deliberately, speaks louder than any speech ever could.
Silence is not weakness. It's control.
SIGN 2: They get offended by truth.
A fool doesn't fear lies. He fears the truth that exposes him. The truth has a strange power. It doesn't wound the body. It wounds the ego.
Tell a fool something honest, and you'll see how quickly he turns red, how fast his pride rushes to defend itself. He'll attack your tone, your motives, your right to speak—anything to avoid the mirror that truth holds up.
Because to admit you're wrong requires strength, and strength is something a fool refuses to build.
Marcus Aurelius wrote, "If someone corrects you and shows you your mistake, consider it a gift." The wise see truth as a form of love, a mirror that reveals what we can improve. But to the stupid, truth is an insult.
They don't want accuracy. They want approval. They prefer comfort over clarity, flattery over freedom. They'd rather hear a sweet lie than face a hard truth. That's why they surround themselves with echoes. People who never challenge them only confirm them.
Their entire identity is a house of cards built on fragile validation. One gust of truth and it collapses.
You'll see this everywhere. Someone offers honest feedback, not to hurt, but to help. And suddenly the fool grows cold, defensive, angry. "You're being negative," they'll say. Or "Who are you to judge me?" They twist the truth until it sounds like an attack just to protect their pride.
But the Stoic doesn't play that game. He doesn't waste energy convincing those who refuse to see. He lets truth stand on its own because the truth doesn't need defenders. It only needs time.
Seneca warned, "No man heals by denying his wound." The fool covers his pain with pride, hoping no one notices. The wise face it, clean it, and grow stronger. It's the same with truth. The longer you avoid it, the deeper the rot becomes.
But when you face it, you grow beyond it. To the stoic, truth is not a weapon. It's medicine. And though it stings at first, it saves you in the end.
If you speak truth and they get angry, remember it's not you they're fighting, it's reality. Let them rage. Let them twist. Don't argue. You have nothing to prove. Remain calm. Remain grounded. And let their reaction reveal what they are.
The wise don't trade peace for the illusion of winning. They don't chase being right. They aim to be free. In a world that worships comfort, truth becomes rebellion.
To speak honestly without cruelty. To listen without defense. To face correction without shame. That is the discipline of the stoic. You can't control whether people accept the truth, but you can control whether you stay composed when they reject it.
And that's real power. Calm in the face of chaos. Clarity in the storm of emotion. Truth hurts the ego, not the wise.
A fool doesn't fear lies. He fears the truth that exposes him. The truth has a strange power. It doesn't wound the body. It wounds the ego.
Tell a fool something honest, and you'll see how quickly he turns red, how fast his pride rushes to defend itself. He'll attack your tone, your motives, your right to speak—anything to avoid the mirror that truth holds up.
Because to admit you're wrong requires strength, and strength is something a fool refuses to build.
Marcus Aurelius wrote, "If someone corrects you and shows you your mistake, consider it a gift." The wise see truth as a form of love, a mirror that reveals what we can improve. But to the stupid, truth is an insult.
They don't want accuracy. They want approval. They prefer comfort over clarity, flattery over freedom. They'd rather hear a sweet lie than face a hard truth. That's why they surround themselves with echoes. People who never challenge them only confirm them.
Their entire identity is a house of cards built on fragile validation. One gust of truth and it collapses.
You'll see this everywhere. Someone offers honest feedback, not to hurt, but to help. And suddenly the fool grows cold, defensive, angry. "You're being negative," they'll say. Or "Who are you to judge me?" They twist the truth until it sounds like an attack just to protect their pride.
But the Stoic doesn't play that game. He doesn't waste energy convincing those who refuse to see. He lets truth stand on its own because the truth doesn't need defenders. It only needs time.
Seneca warned, "No man heals by denying his wound." The fool covers his pain with pride, hoping no one notices. The wise face it, clean it, and grow stronger. It's the same with truth. The longer you avoid it, the deeper the rot becomes.
But when you face it, you grow beyond it. To the stoic, truth is not a weapon. It's medicine. And though it stings at first, it saves you in the end.
If you speak truth and they get angry, remember it's not you they're fighting, it's reality. Let them rage. Let them twist. Don't argue. You have nothing to prove. Remain calm. Remain grounded. And let their reaction reveal what they are.
The wise don't trade peace for the illusion of winning. They don't chase being right. They aim to be free. In a world that worships comfort, truth becomes rebellion.
To speak honestly without cruelty. To listen without defense. To face correction without shame. That is the discipline of the stoic. You can't control whether people accept the truth, but you can control whether you stay composed when they reject it.
And that's real power. Calm in the face of chaos. Clarity in the storm of emotion. Truth hurts the ego, not the wise.
Az önce bir dolandırıcılık denemesi için arandım. Senaryoyu paylaşayım farkındalık oluşsun.
➡️ 0505 404 03 33 numaradan arandım.
➡️ İsmimi söylediler.
➡️ Garanti bankasında bulunan hesabımda, internet bankacılığımın ele geçirildiğini söylediler.
➡️ 0505 404 03 33 numaradan arandım.
➡️ İsmimi söylediler.
➡️ Garanti bankasında bulunan hesabımda, internet bankacılığımın ele geçirildiğini söylediler.
➡️ TC kimlik numaramı söylediler (Bu sayede güvenimi kazanmış oldular)
➡️ Sesli yanıt sistemine yönlendireceklerini, hesabı kapatmam için internet bankacılığı parolamı girmemi istediler. Kesinlikle parolamı telefondaki kişiye söylemememi istediler.
➡️ Sesli yanıt sistemine yönlendireceklerini, hesabı kapatmam için internet bankacılığı parolamı girmemi istediler. Kesinlikle parolamı telefondaki kişiye söylemememi istediler.
(Bu sayede güvenimi yeniden kazanmış oldular)
➡️ Parolayı girdim(Hatalı olarak)
➡️ Hatalı parola girdiğimi,yeniden girmemi istediler(Hatalı olarak tekrar girdim)
Yine hatalı olduğunu söylediler.
➡️ Alternatif yol yok mu dedim, bankamız kartlarının birisinin şifresini gir dediler.
➡️ Parolayı girdim(Hatalı olarak)
➡️ Hatalı parola girdiğimi,yeniden girmemi istediler(Hatalı olarak tekrar girdim)
Yine hatalı olduğunu söylediler.
➡️ Alternatif yol yok mu dedim, bankamız kartlarının birisinin şifresini gir dediler.
EPSTEIN • MAXWELL • MICROSOFT • ISRAELI INTEL — A TECH BLACKMAIL NETWORK HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT
1️⃣
Let’s talk about something most media still won’t touch:
The Maxwell–Epstein network wasn’t just sex trafficking.
It was tech trafficking, data trafficking, and influence trafficking.
And the connections run straight through Microsoft, Israeli intel, and U.S. surveillance infrastructure.
👇
1️⃣
Let’s talk about something most media still won’t touch:
The Maxwell–Epstein network wasn’t just sex trafficking.
It was tech trafficking, data trafficking, and influence trafficking.
And the connections run straight through Microsoft, Israeli intel, and U.S. surveillance infrastructure.
👇
2️⃣
Isabel Maxwell (Ghislaine’s sister) ran CommTouch, an Israeli tech firm tied to Unit 8200 and the Yozma state-intel venture fund.
CommTouch was losing money, yet somehow landed major investments from Microsoft and Paul Allen.
Why would Microsoft fund a company with no path to profitability?
👇
Isabel Maxwell (Ghislaine’s sister) ran CommTouch, an Israeli tech firm tied to Unit 8200 and the Yozma state-intel venture fund.
CommTouch was losing money, yet somehow landed major investments from Microsoft and Paul Allen.
Why would Microsoft fund a company with no path to profitability?
👇
3️⃣
Meanwhile, Epstein was cultivating relationships inside Microsoft — including people with access to advanced research, AI, biotech, and encryption.
One example: Nathan Myhrvold, Microsoft CTO.
Myhrvold flew on Epstein’s plane and joined trips to a Russian nuclear facility.
Serious national-security questions — still unanswered.
👇
Meanwhile, Epstein was cultivating relationships inside Microsoft — including people with access to advanced research, AI, biotech, and encryption.
One example: Nathan Myhrvold, Microsoft CTO.
Myhrvold flew on Epstein’s plane and joined trips to a Russian nuclear facility.
Serious national-security questions — still unanswered.
👇
Un camp de formation des FSR dans l'est de l'Ethiopie 🇪🇹
Pendant que l'armée soudanaise 🇸🇩 forme et entraine les rebelles tigréens du TPLF opposés à Addis Abeba, l'Ethiopie va ouvrir un camp de formation des FSR financé par les Emirats.
🧵THREAD🧵1/10 ⬇️
Pendant que l'armée soudanaise 🇸🇩 forme et entraine les rebelles tigréens du TPLF opposés à Addis Abeba, l'Ethiopie va ouvrir un camp de formation des FSR financé par les Emirats.
🧵THREAD🧵1/10 ⬇️
Pour bien expliquer :
L'armée soudanaise soutien les rebelles tigréens contre le pouvoir central, elle héberge même l'armée 70 du Tigré (plusieurs milliers d'hommes qui combattent avec l'armée soudanaise).
L'Armée 70 s'entraine et recrute dans l'est du Soudan.
L'armée soudanaise soutien les rebelles tigréens contre le pouvoir central, elle héberge même l'armée 70 du Tigré (plusieurs milliers d'hommes qui combattent avec l'armée soudanaise).
L'Armée 70 s'entraine et recrute dans l'est du Soudan.
Pour le moment, il n'y a pas de combats entre l'Etat central éthiopiens et le Tigré, même si une frappe de drone a eu lieu, la première depuis les accords de Pretoria contre des soldats tigréens qui avaient avancé dans la région voisine d'Afar.
Maybe one day the whole history of the variant community deserves to be told , how a group of citizens, 100% normal, ok 99% normal people from completely backgrounds and from the four angles of the world joined together to track a virus taught by the best and most kind scientists
In the world. Today here is rainy and we face difficulties and it is not that day, but let me say to Josette,Shay,Gian, Ryan,Saka , Nick, Sam, Dave, Andrew and all the ones who joined then and the ones who left, i m nothing without you , you are my sista and bros.
We didnt anything exceptional
But we did a thing and we should recognize this to ourselves and everyone who helped us.
It will be a story of coffee breaks, rushes, silent monday nights, car plates mutating , weird rats and endless discussions
But we did a thing and we should recognize this to ourselves and everyone who helped us.
It will be a story of coffee breaks, rushes, silent monday nights, car plates mutating , weird rats and endless discussions
Existe un fenómeno silencioso en Madrid de 'gentrificación' de los barrios más ricos de la ciudad. Esos con enormes mansiones. Sí, también allí. En urbanismo lo llamamos 'espacios interpuestos'.
Es legal, ingenioso... pero tiene problemas que NADIE está viendo venir. ¡Hilo!🧵
Es legal, ingenioso... pero tiene problemas que NADIE está viendo venir. ¡Hilo!🧵
Antes de entrar en materia: seguro que os suena que en zonas más densas y céntricas una cosa muy típica es que los pisos viejos grandes se dividen en 2, 3 o 4 apartamentos más pequeños. La presión inmobiliaria hace rentabilizar cada metro cuadrado. Con un aprovechamiento mayor.
Algo muy habitual sobre todo en esos barrios donde aparece lo que llamamos 'gentrificación'. El alza del valor del suelo hace que la única forma de hacer una vivienda 'algo' accesible es reduciendo su tamaño. Pues esto mismo sucede pero de otra forma en zonas mucho más alejadas.
Bir Cinayet ve İflasın Hikayesi; Kaplumbağa Terbiyecisi Ne Anlatıyor?
12 Aralık 2004 Pazar. İstanbul Swissotel'de yapılacak müzayede tüm basının ilgisini çekmişti.
12 Aralık 2004 Pazar. İstanbul Swissotel'de yapılacak müzayede tüm basının ilgisini çekmişti.
Haftalardır gazeteler, televizyonlar hatta magazin dergileri bu müzayedede satışa çıkacak olan bir tablodan söz ediliyordu. Türkiye'nin sayılı zengin ailelerinin temsilcileri müzayede salonuna gelmişti. Basın mensupları da yerlerini aldı. Salonda heyecanlı bir bekleyiş hakimdi.
1959 yılı. Şişli'deki bir köşk, polis ekiplerince mühürlendi.
Bu evde ünlü bir armatör yaşıyordu:
Saim Birkök.
Hayatı boyunca hiç evlenmemişti. Askerlik arkadaşının kendi adını verdiği oğlunu evlat edindi.
Onu yetiştirmeye çalıştı.
Okuması için İsviçre'ye gönderdi.
Bu evde ünlü bir armatör yaşıyordu:
Saim Birkök.
Hayatı boyunca hiç evlenmemişti. Askerlik arkadaşının kendi adını verdiği oğlunu evlat edindi.
Onu yetiştirmeye çalıştı.
Okuması için İsviçre'ye gönderdi.