🧠7 principios claves
de la Psicoterapia
Psicoanalítica (Psicoanálisis) 🧠
🧵🧵⤵️⤵️
🧠¿Qué es la psicoterapia Psicoananlítica?🧠
Imagina que tu mente es un vasto océano, con corrientes profundas que moldean tu superficie sin que lo notes. ¿Qué es la psicoterapia psicoanalítica clásica? Es ese faro que ilumina esas profundidades, un enfoque nacido de Sigmund Freud que nos invita a bucear en el inconsciente para entender por qué actuamos como lo hacemos.
🧠Piensa en una sesión típica: te recuestas en un diván, ojos cerrados al mundo exterior, y dejas que las palabras fluyan sin filtros. La psicoanalítica clásica no es una charla superficial; es un compromiso profundo, con 4-5 sesiones semanales de 45-50 minutos, donde el terapeuta se mantiene en silencio, como un testigo neutral.
Psicológicamente, esto crea un espacio seguro para que el inconsciente –esa parte de la mente que almacena deseos, miedos y recuerdos reprimidos– emerja. Freud lo veía como un iceberg: solo la punta (lo consciente) es visible, pero el 90% por debajo dicta nuestras tormentas emocionales, como ansiedades inexplicables o patrones relacionales tóxicos que se repiten sin cesar.
En el corazón de este enfoque late la idea de que nuestros síntomas no son caprichos, sino mensajes cifrados del pasado. Conflictos edípicos –aquellos triángulos emocionales de infancia con padres y figuras de autoridad– o traumas no resueltos se disfrazan de defensas como la negación o la proyección, protegiéndonos pero también limitándonos.
La terapia psicoanalítica desarma estos nudos mediante la asociación libre y la interpretación, fomentando un "insight" que no es solo intelectual, sino visceral: un ah-ha que reescribe tu narrativa interna. Psicológicamente, esto fortalece el ego, esa mediadora entre impulsos salvajes (ello) y moralidad rígida (superyó), permitiendo una vida más integrada y auténtica.
🧠El proceso es un baile asimétrico: tú lideras la exploración, pero el analista es el espejo que refleja sin distorsionar. No hay consejos rápidos ni tareas de homework; en cambio, se analizan sueños, lapsus y transferencias para revelar lo oculto. No es para todos –requiere paciencia y coraje–, pero para quienes buscan raíces en lugar de parches, ofrece resiliencia duradera: relaciones más profundas, menos reactividad emocional y un sentido renovado de agencia.
▶️En esencia, es terapia como arqueología del alma, excavando para reconstruir.
Una clave para entender el lenguaje psicoanalítico son los Mecanismos de Defensas 🧠🛡️
👇
There’s a reason the latest New York Times hit on RFK Jr. felt strange.
Not just dishonest.
Not just desperate.
But structurally different — more like a psychological operation than a piece of reporting.
People instinctively feel something is “off,” but they can’t always articulate what they’re reacting to.
This essay is that articulation.
For the first time, we are going to map the architecture of narrative warfare — the behind-the-curtain system legacy media uses to shape public perception, control emotional frames, and enforce ideological obedience.
This is not theory.
It’s a playbook.
And it explains exactly why the RFK piece looks the way it does.
I. The First Layer: Control the Frame
(Before Any Fact Appears)
Narrative warfare begins before facts, data, or quotes.
It begins with framing, the invisible lens through which the audience is forced to interpret the story.
The media never tells you the frame.
They simply make you inhabit it.
The formula:
1. Define the subject emotionally, not factually.
(RFK Jr. becomes “the politician” — a character, not a person.)
2. Position the narrator as sympathetic or authoritative.
(In the RFK hit piece, the narrator is presented as a wounded storyteller.)
3. Decide the moral conclusion before gathering evidence.
(The subject must be discredited, delegitimized, or dehumanized.)
4. Build the story around the conclusion.
This is why everything feels “off.”
The emotional meaning is constructed first.
The reporting is reverse-engineered afterward.
This is framing as psychological engineering.
II. The Second Layer: Replace Evidence
With Emotional Vividness
Narrative warfare doesn’t rely on facts.
It relies on imagery.
Why?
Because the mind stores images more easily than information.
This is why propaganda is always visual, sensory, melodramatic.
Look at the RFK piece:
- Roses
- Poetry
- Tears
- Nicknames
- DMT
- Emotional confession
- Whispered vulnerability
- A “politician” transformed into a romance archetype
This isn’t evidence.
It’s emotional staging.
The technical term in psyops:
Affective anchoring.
If you can make someone feel something, you don’t need documentation.
This is the same mechanism used to:
- Sell wars
- Shape elections
- Control culture
- Smear dissenters
- Elevate insiders
- Manipulate scientific narratives
This is the operating system of psychological media influence.
Jason Statham is one of the finest action heroes of this generation, some says he’s our last action hero.
but, before he stepped foot on his first movie set,
He had a past life that would rival any of the characters he’s been on the screen.
Let's dig into his life which helped him become the personality he is today.
1. Diving was Jason Statham's first calling.
- Before becoming a big-screen tough guy, Jason Statham spent 12 years as part of the British National Diving Squad, highlighted by competing in the 1990 Commonwealth Games.
- He admits and says "I started too late, It probably wasn't my thing. I should have done a different sport."
2. Jason Statham doesn’t needs a stunts man.
- Stathamtakes pride in doing many of his own stunts, He says - “I'm inspired by the people who could do their own work,”
- From hand-to-hand combat to dangling from a helicopter 3000 feet above downtown Los Angeles, he performs them himself.
- He’s almost dogmatic in his belief that actors should be doing their own stunts.
Here are 33 micro-habits that have quietly changed my life:
1. Drinking water before coffee. When we wake up, we naturally produce cortisol. We are also dehydrated. We don't need to mainline caffeine. We need water.
2. Brushing + flossing my teeth in the shower. I have trouble with flossing, so combining both makes it more likely to happen.
3. Wearing blue light blockers at night. This helps me block blue light, which in turn improves the quality of my sleep.
4. Walking using an under-the-desk treadmill. This helps me get my steps in while I'm in meetings or doing work.
5. Before I leave my desk for the day, I raise my table and put the treadmill underneath. This forces me to take steps in the morning.
🚨 The Most Powerful Organization on Earth Is Islamic - The OIC Controls 57 States, 2 Billion People, and the UN
People will call out China and scream endlessly about Israel - but no one dares mention the OIC. Why?
Meanwhile the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is quietly operating as a civilizational empire - controlling global institutions, shaping Western laws, and influencing U.S. policy more than any nation on earth.
Here’s what the media refuses to say:
🔥 The OIC Has:
🔥 Authority over 2 BILLION Muslims
🔥 57 sovereign states acting as one bloc
🔥 57 embassies + 57 intelligence services per country
🔥 Dominance at the UN and Human Rights Council
🔥 UN Resolution 16/18 – criminalizing criticism of Islam
🔥 A global “Islamophobia” police force through the UN
🔥 The Cairo Declaration – a Sharia-based human rights system
🔥 Control of 70% of the world’s oil reserves
🔥 Over $4 TRILLION in sovereign wealth funds
🔥 OPEC leverage
🔥 Mass-migration leverage into the West
🔥 Diaspora political capture in Western cities
🔥 State-aligned NGOs (CAIR, MPAC, ISNA, ICNA)
🔥 Transnational intelligence networks across 57 states
🔥 Gulf monarchy funding with NO limit
🔥 State-backed media (Al Jazeera, TRT World, etc.)
🔥 Formal partnerships with the UN, EU, Vatican, OSCE, World Bank, AU
🔥 Censorship influence over Big Tech (Meta, YouTube, pre-Musk Twitter)
🔥 A foothold inside NATO (Turkey)
🔥 A unified global narrative: “Islamophobia” = speech crime
⸻
The OIC is the ONLY functioning civilizational megastructure on earth — a geopolitical empire without borders.
And it is shaping:
• Western laws
• Western borders
• Western speech rules
• Western immigration
• Western diplomacy
• Western tech policies
while America sleeps.
❗ The real question isn’t “Why is the OIC so powerful?”
The real question is:
👉 Why is NO media in the United States willing to say a single word about it?
The Leaked Prescott Memo: What It Reveals About Systemic Bias Inside BBC Arabic 🧵
In early November 2025, a confidential memo by Michael Prescott, former adviser to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee, was leaked to The Daily Telegraph. The document nearly 19 pages long details serious, systemic biases within BBC Arabic’s coverage of the Israel–Hamas conflict.
According to the leak, the memo accuses the network of amplifying Hamas propaganda, minimizing Israeli suffering, and repeatedly violating BBC editorial standards. Its release helped trigger a wave of scrutiny across the corporation, culminating in the resignations of Director-General Tim Davie and News CEO Deborah Turness on November 9–10, 2025.
While the full memo remains internal, multiple outlets have published extensive excerpts. Here is a consolidated, structured summary of the findings attributed to Prescott:
1. Systematic Omission of Israeli Perspectives
•On October 7, 2023—the day Hamas carried out its mass-casualty attack—BBC Arabic published zero stories paralleling the 19 English-language BBC reports focused on the Israeli hostages.
•In contrast, every story critical of Israel on the main BBC website appeared on BBC Arabic, often with inflamed language, more provocative headlines, or harsher framing.
•Key examples cited:
•A Hezbollah rocket attack on Majdal Shams that killed 12 children was reported without mentioning the child victims.
•A terror attack in a Jaffa train station that killed nine Israeli civilians was reframed as a “military operation.”
•The memo concludes that BBC Arabic consistently “minimized Israeli suffering” and downplayed Palestinian terrorism.
2. Uncritical Amplification of Hamas Claims
Prescott’s memo argues that BBC Arabic routinely elevated Hamas-supplied information without verification:
•Hamas casualty figures from Gaza were presented as authoritative, with no caveats about reliability.
•Unverified or fabricated stories propagated through Hamas-run agencies were broadcast, including:
•Claims of “mass graves” in Gaza.
•A 582-word Hamas rebuttal attacking the testimony of a rescued Yazidi woman formerly held captive in Gaza.
•According to the memo, allegations against Israel were “raced to air” with minimal editorial review, reflecting a consistent willingness to assume the worst about Israel.
Trump’s approach to politics is to demand unwavering loyalty from all members of the Republican Party. Anyone who steps out of line is publicly berated and painted as a target for his followers to harass. If they don’t fall back in line, Trump supports a primary candidate who is more loyal, more submissive.
That strategy is played out.
Trump attempted to push one of his most loyal members to remove her name from the discharge petition for a vote on releasing the Epstein files. Lauren Boebert ran her campaign on being faithful to Trump and being a trusted vote for his agenda in Congress, but this time, she wouldn’t budge.
Now that the threshold has been reached and the vote is scheduled, dozens, possibly even a hundred, additional Republicans will vote to release the files. They fear the public backlash of voting no more than they fear Trump’s outrage from voting yes.
The tide has changed. Instead of being the coattails Republicans ride on, Trump has become the anchor that drags them down. His public attacks are no longer damaging to a campaign. They are a benefit.
Look no further than Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Marjorie Taylor Greene hasn’t changed. She isn’t suddenly enlightened about the struggles that working-class Americans face. Conspiracies, lies, bigotry, and Christian Nationalism are still core to her platform. But she understands that the fake culture war no longer works when your party controls the entire federal government. The people who voted for you expect you to deliver on the grand promises that were made.
Trump never intended to deliver on those promises; instead, he sought to enrich himself and use his power to avoid accountability. Republican voters are realizing this. Trump’s approval rating has sunk to new lows. Two-thirds of the country disapproves of his job performance on the economy, the most critical issue for voters.
The most recent election saw not only Democratic wins across the country, but also Trump’s strongholds shifting to the left.
When your party is in power and life is getting worse, and there is no plan to make it better, the best strategy becomes complaining about the party leadership. It is a way of continuing to play the role of an outsider even while in the majority. Slowly, bit by bit, congressional Republicans are following this path.
Trump is trying to regain ground. He is reducing his tariffs on coffee, bananas, beef, and cocoa as high prices have reduced consumer sentiment to match the record low seen during the peak of post-pandemic high inflation.
MEXICO: Protesters in Mexico tore down metal barriers protecting President Claudia Sheinbaum for shielding cartels. Riot police are battling crowds trying to storm her office. Mexico is erupting under cartel rule and the walls aren't working that well.
MEXICO: A battle has erupted in Mexico City’s Zócalo as patriots clash with police guarding the Presidential Palace. Officers are firing tear gas and bullets while Mexico rises up against Sheinbaum and the cartels that back her.
MEXICO: The people are rising op against the globalists and their allies in the cartels.
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Some of Us Remember Biafra
But what does Biafra have to do with what is happening in the world today?
1)
Biafra was declared by the Igbo people of SE Nigeria because of the realization that in Muslim-dominated Nigeria, Igbo Christian (and some Jewish) Nigerians would never be equal citizens and would always be subject to violence, coercion, and discrimination.
2)
But back in the late 1960s to 1971, the powers that be in the world—particularly the UK, which was involved in Nigerian oil that was primarily pumped from SE Nigeria—decided that Nigeria should not be partitioned,
3)
@honestpollster @JackPosobiec -Ivanka gets a cat and posts instagram pictures of it. I suggest a Persian. Have the memesters at the White House at the ready.
-Designate Islam a hostile political movement. Freeze their assets and deport. Free plane ride out of country. 1/
@honestpollster @JackPosobiec -Repeal Hert-Cellar and roll back birthright. Start mass deportation. Anyone who has promoted anti-white rhetoric and violence gets deported. That would take care of Joy Reid.
-Stop all gov support for non-profits. Christian churches get special land rights and that's it 2/
@honestpollster @JackPosobiec -The Christian churches have to be of certain sects and be led by a man. That would get rid of the woke ones.
-If a company has an Indian or Asian person in HR or on their board? They get their books investigated.
-I'd reevaluate the Civil Rights Act. 3/