H.R.1, the For The People Act, is Democrats’ pro-democracy bill (thank you @RepSarbanes)--is chock full of excellent reforms. In this🧵I’ll look at the academic research on 5⃣ provisions and call out 1⃣ item that’s conspicuously absent:
1⃣ Let’s start with a big one: Election Day registration. If you’ve ever procrastinated (and don’t tell me you haven’t!) it’s obvious why having registration deadlines before Election Day is straight up voter suppression. Google searches prove it washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-ca… Image
Wisconsin rolled out Election Day registration in the 70s by municipality, and @JacobNeiheisel & @bcburden used that natural experiment to estimate (fairly precisely) a boost in turnout of ~3pp. That jump is consistent with more recent estimates as well drive.google.com/file/d/1wqWE05… ImageImage
2⃣Another major change is requiring states to automatically register citizens who interact with state agencies. @SeanMcElwee, @b_schaffner & Jesse Rhodes study Oregon--the 1st state to adopt AVRand find it increased turnout by 2-3pp. Makes the electorate more representative to👢! ImageImage
3⃣ Photo ID requirements suck and disenfranchise would-be voters. Quantifying is tough, but @justingrimmer & @jesselyoder use administrative records to analyze a new photo ID law' adoption in NC in '16. About 1-2% of citizens who lack ID are blocked from voting because 😡 Image
4⃣ With early voting the drafters of HR1 did something really smart--they included weekends in the early voting mandate! After all, if your job/life inhibits finding time to vote on a Tuesday then likely M-F 9am-5pm early voting isn’t going to do a whole lot of good. Image
Voting on the Sunday before the election (“Souls to the polls”) is especially helpful at boosting turnout. (Most likely -- anyone know of papers on that specifically?)
Overall, research supports the weekend hypothesis, finding that states that include weekend voting have about 1-2pp higher turnout than comparable states w/o early voting or w/ weekday-only EV. Paper by @electionsmith, @enrijetashino, and @ElectProject drive.google.com/file/d/1Uhvb9-… Image
5⃣ HR1 mandates that states allow 16 and 17 year olds pre-register. Hillygus and @JohnHolbein1 have a great paper that shows that the effects of pre-registering even outweigh the habitual effect of voting, and increase youth voting by 3 percentage points. sites.duke.edu/hillygus/files… Image
This cool graph shows, surprisingly!, that 21yos who were *just* too young to vote in '08, out-mobilized their 22yo counterpart, likely because the 21yos were able to pre-register during the heat of the ‘08 campaign. Perhaps the paper's title could've been “The kids have #FOMOImage
6⃣ So what’s missing? Fixing the Electoral College! It’s wildly biased against Democrats right now, and will likely be for several elections
States with populations worth about 200 EVs have already joined the National Pop Vote Compact (VA is likely to join soon). If they reach 270 EVs (a tough climb, but possible), the winner of the popular vote will automatically get enough EVs and win. 1 person, 1 vote--imagine that Image
But, the constitution requires states to get the “consent of Congress” before entering into an interstate compact. While technically, it might not be needed in this case, given the current makeup of the Supreme Court, I think it’s wise. (And @NatlPopularVote agrees.) ImageImage
Overall, H.R.1 is amazing. It makes me proud to be a Democrat. I hope the Dem leadership can figure out a way to pass it through the 51-50 Senate. Possibly by eliminating the filibuster; possibly by attaching monetary incentives to all of these provisions.
A provision that says “We’ll give extra electoral funds for every state that joins the national popular vote interstate compact” might be a way to consent to the compact while staying within the bounds of the Byrd rule. (Though experts would know better.) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconcili…
Huge tip of the hat to @hill_charlotte for breaking all this down for me in her excellent thread. I couldn’t/wouldn’t have create the above research-related thread without her
Finally, 1⃣ caveat: while these studies prove the reforms increase turnout, that doesn’t necessarily mean Ds will win more elections. In fact, in some cases (esp low-education white areas), Rs might benefit from these new rules. But...
....I’m for most anything that gives more people the right to vote for their representatives in government. So next stop: DC & PR & island statehood! 🇺🇸🗳️✊🏽
Addendum (7⃣ I guess): @NW_Horadam correctly points out that I missed redistricting reform. w/o reform, and w/ a green light from SCOTUS, Republican legislatures are going to gerrymander the hell out of districts--and Rs could with the House with a distinct minority of the votes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Strauss

Aaron Strauss Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!