FUN FACT for *ALL YOU PEOPLE*: fewer than one in three of the electorate voted Tory in #GE2019.
*One* fake follower is too many for me - but it's curious that it appears to be the case that the more right-wing you are, the more fake followers you accumulate - almost as if the majority of decent folk are battling an army of fake anonymous right-wing troll accounts. π€
Just testing my hypothesis that the more right-wing you are, the more fake followers you accumulate:
Still holding true...
Oh look - the highest proportion of fake followers I've found!
Well who could have guessed that pudgy fake fragile infantile opportunist fake culture war snowflake gobshite fake Piers Morgan would have 3,386,765 fake followers?
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So it looks like @10DowningStreet released several photos from the photoshoot with @AskNationwide, but @PoliticsForAlI chose to release the one they did without supplying any context.
Politics For All has gained over 200,000 followers since August 2019, & as @TrollZoo revealed in May, the account sometimes takes snippets from other news stories then creates new, altered, headlines that present the story in a completely different light.
Well Mr Adam Shit-Stirrer Hilton, in 2004 (17 years ago) Charles Moore was Telegraph editor when stories about George Galloway were published, which led to a successful libel action.
The newspaper had falsely written that Galloway received payments from Saddam Hussein's regime.
Moore was Chair of free-market think tank Policy Exchange, & in 2007 (14 years ago) he entered the debate over 'The Hijacking of British Islam', a misleading & widely condemned Policy Exchange report which the @BBC had found relied on fabricated evidence.
Moore hates the @BBC, which he claims is biased against climate change deniers. π€ͺ
He views the threat of climate change as alarmism & in 2019 (2 years ago) claimed it's designed to produce βunprecedented government control & the relative impoverishment of western societiesβ. π€ͺ
More absolute shit-stirring culture war bollocks from increasingly unhinged crank Charles Moore - does the once proud Spectator print anything else nowadays?
They've been accusing the National Trust of being 'woke' & 'anti-British' for SEVEN YEARS now - it's just utter bullshit.
On & on they go, like malfunctioning robotic populist nationalist chimps, puking out diatribe after diatribe against one of Britain's best loved & most profoundly BRITISH institutions. π€ͺ
It's just part of their sad little backward-looking culture war, supported by Andrew Neil.
And all because the National Trust rightly wanted to provide context & mention some important details about the history of some of their buildings.
Imagine the National Trust providing relevant contextualising information!
IT'S WOKE ANTI-BRITISH POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD!