Here's the before and after for Bryan. Working for RT for years. Looks like something happened recently? @27khv have you had a change of heart working for RT? Please tell us about the change of bio 🙏 you haven't really tweeted much since the invasion by Russia of Ukraine.
Normally so vocal about everything and anything.
Apparently still interested in "facts and objectivity", laughably. Alien concepts in Russia Today for years. 😂 Bunch of charlatans. Also how does @Dunphy_Official feel now asking this eejit onto the podcast? I wonder. 🤷♂️
And to be absolutely clear: Bryan has spent years carrying water for everything Putin has done. And for what Assad has done to the Syrian people. And he apparently never wondered if what he was doing was right. *Anyone* who hires him is a fool. ✌️
And to everyone who would defend him, or like him, engages in whataboutism about his political viewpoints, you should unfollow me. Cheers.
If there is any attempt at reputational rehabilitation here, I will politely remind everyone of Bryan's current and past views. He can absolutely admit he was wrong, but he does not get a free pass. Ever.
And I'll say the same to everyone who works for, or has worked for, Russia Today or any other similar organisation. Ye knew what you were doing when you joined. You reap what you sow.
Also, and excuse my French, but everyone who works for or has worked for Russia Today or Sputnik or Ruptly or whatever other Kremlin outlet you're having yourself; you're a shower of cunts.
And to be crystal clear. 🔮🔮🔮🔮. Absolutely clear: Yiz are all cunts of the highest order. A shower of cunts. Yiz were all on high salaries from Putin. Imagining you were some ideological heroes. But instead were just cunts. 🤷♂️
And if there's an attempt of "well I didn't know at the time" people will destroy you, including everyone who saw the duplicity at the time.
So if I haven't been plain enough; have you been an apologist for the Putin regime over the past 20+ years?. Then you're probably a prick. #JustSaying
Am I angry over these people? You're damn right I'm angry. Some shower.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm a bit stunned at this. @PhilipNolan_MU has completely failed to understand the basics of how the virus spreads. It's December 2021, 20 months into the pandemic. As @johnwenger9 says it defies the laws of physics. I'd also argue it defies basic intuition.
I think I can fairly infer from Nolan's comments that he's *still* relying on a dated understanding of heavier aerosols ("droplets") vs less heavy aerosols. It's this wrong understanding that led to an incorrect focus on screens and 2m distance at the start of the pandemic.
Th science on this moved on last year. The droplets distinction itself was based on bad science.
I can almost guarantee that AMRIC are still focussed on droplets/fomite transmission, and have yet to accept the science - which became clear *last year* - that the virus spreads in the air. Worth going back to this good summary from May. wired.com/story/the-teen…
And here's an early look at "droplets" v aerosols from *March 2020*. Our health authorities apparently have not been following the science. It's bananas. wired.com/story/they-say…
So the High Court will deliver judgments in not one, not two, but three @RightToKnowIE cases this week. 👀
Judgments by Simons, Barr and Barrett respectively, all focussed in different ways on the AIE Directive/Regulations
Update: In Right To Know CLG v OCEI (and RTÉ) Judge Max Barrett has found (comprehensively) in our favour. The OCEI must do decision again in light of the judgment.