1/5. The last 10 years, financial markets outperformed the real economy. Why? $9 Tn QE.

Return to capital > return to labor.

That is reversing. Real economy now outperforming financial markets. Jobs up, tech crash.

#macro
2/5: But, that also means the pricing of labor is more entrenched…

Inflation is more entrenched.

What started as asset price inflation has spilled into goods and sticky wage inflation.

The remedy? Fed policy is tighter for longer.
3/5: Also consider - outstanding mortgage debt is priced at a much lower rate (say, 3%). To create an impulse to housing via refinance, rates would need to ease to those levels before it had a significant effect.

Initial monetary easing will be ineffectual and delayed.
4/5: …and if policy makers want to normalize rates (eg, avoid ZIRP) as they should - expect no real monetary impulse.

Therefore fiscal stimulus would need to step up. But Congress is divided.

Don’t expect stimulus until the next
Presidential election
5/5: What’s the bottom line? This is late cycle.

Assets are re-pricing. We are in a transition from P/S to P/E multiples. High yield will actually mean ‘high yield’ one day as spreads continue to widen.

The investment maxim to focus on is preserve wealth. Stormy seas ahead.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ram Ahluwalia, crypto CFA

Ram Ahluwalia, crypto CFA Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ramahluwalia

Dec 10
1/ Silvergate is the leading crypto bank.

Customer’s include industry stalwarts Coinbase and fallen angels such as defunct FTX.

The stock is down 90% from peak and 50% from the FTX debacle.

How to analyze $SI as an investment?
2/ Goal in this tweet is to lay out the CAMELS framework - the methodology bank regulators such as the FDIC use to assess Silvergate,

We will briefly touch on the main drivers of valuation.

We will use this framework to share our analysis of Silvergate in the coming days.
3/ CAMELS is a 6 part framework. This is a brief overview.

I am greatly simplifying to convey the main ideas so you can develop your own views.
Read 17 tweets
Dec 5
1/ How do we explain FTX's $10 Bn in losses? Where did the $2 Bn in venture funds go?

My working hypothesis is that FTX was a fraud even prior to recent events and as far back as 2021.

#SBF will go down in history as a fraud larger than Bernie Madoff. 🧵
2/ Alameda was indispensable to FTX. Crucial for this analysis...

FTX must inventory customer funds 1:1.

How then to match buy & sell orders?

Both orders would have to arrive at the exact same time, the exact same size, and agree on the exact same price. That never happens.
3/ Alameda fixes this problem by serving as the Designated Market Maker (DMM).

Under US securities law, the DMM is obligated to make a market under any market conditions.

The DMM stands ready to offer their own inventory of securities to the market, and stands ready to buy.
Read 28 tweets
Dec 2
1/ There are a lot of smart VCs concluding the demise of Luna set in motion contagion.

No.

The collapse of the GBTC premium was the main culprit.

It created, for a time, the perception of a perpetual motion machine disguised as a ‘carry trade’…

🧵 #bitcoin pump + Genesis
2/ The trade was:

- buy Bitcoin spot
- Deliver to the Grayscale trust in 6 months (per the rules) in exchange for USD
- Pocket the premium between GBTC and Bitcoin (up to 30%+ for 6 month holding risk)
- Repeat (and add leverage)

You ‘carry’ the GBTC for six months and sell it.
3/ Normally the carry trade refers to FX markets.

HFs would borrow in Japan at nearly 0%, and then lend in a higher interest rate country. The HF bets the FX rates are stable.

Also, HFs would buy bonds yielding 3% and borrow on margin at .5%.

Same idea - spread capture.
Read 16 tweets
Nov 30
1/ @andrewrsorkin just wrapped up his interview with @SBF_FTX. I wanted to call out a few snap highlights.

There are some learnings for DCG / Genesis as well.

I highlight a few questions (Q) and answers (A). These are not verbatims. My take is noted in (R).
2/ Q: Alameda paid a $2.5 Bn loan to Genesis. Where did the money come from?
3/ A: Genesis tried to call in a large number of loans from Alameda. That closed down a number of positions between Genesis and other trading desks. Led to an increase of position size in Alameda from FTX in retrospect.

R: This is evasive BS.
Read 12 tweets
Nov 28
1/ What happens to Gemini Earn clients?

I believe there is a credible path to full recovery.

However, Earn clients may face a choice: accept immediate liquidity in the near-term in exchange for a discount, or wait a long-time for full recovery.
2/ Disclosure: This does not represent any legal advice or financial advice. Review your lending agreement. DYOR.

I'm only sharing an opinion. Seek outside counsel.

Also, don't trust random people on the internet.
3/ This analysis assumes Genesis goes thru a Chapter 11 scenario.

There are three factors at play:
- DCG's willingness & ability to raise equity
- Priority of Gemini claims (I don't know)
- The price of GBTC (and by extension - bitcoin)
Read 24 tweets
Nov 25
1/ DCG published a letter to investors. It clarifies several misconceptions. It also raises new questions around the Promissory Note.

I have pored over this and the Grayscale 10-Q to connect some dots. We'll cover what happened and what we learned.

Let's break it down... 🧵
2/ What did we learn?

DCG was levered long GBTC. 3AC blows up. This writedown reduces equity capital at Genesis Lending.

Net net this increases the DCG's already levered exposure to GBTC.

And the more GBTC slides in price, the more DCG's leverage increases.

How exactly?
3/ DCG owes ~$2 Bn to two creditors: subsidiary Genesis Lending and Eldridge

- Genesis Lending. There are two loans a $575 MM loan (loan #1) and a $1.1 Bn loan 'Promissory Note' (loan #2)

- A group led by Eldridge issued a credit facility of $350 MM
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(