Here are the results of a recent poll. I asked people to imagine 100 dating-age peers and tell me if at least half were attractive enough to date.
Most people don't find most people attractive.
So - how is it that most people are in relationships? 🧵
This is a result I expected. Most people don't find most people attractive.
Women are also more selective than men.
This raises a question - how is it that so many people are in relationships and married when we don't find most people physically attractive enough for a relationship?
Let's look at how this works out with something like facial attractiveness.
This chart shows what happens when people rate faces and you look at the highest/lowest ratings for each face.
Almost every face has someone who finds it unattractive and someone who finds it attractive.
There is an implication in this very famous chart that I think many men miss - it is that women are simply more attractive than men. 🧵
I see this often interpreted as "women are wrong."
The assumption being that that the ratings must fall on a normal distribution around the midpoint.
And that women are wrong because they didn't rate men around a 3/5.
There is no cosmic law that this must be the case.
If you use a decile scale (or 1-5 in the case of OKCupid here) or a Likert scale, you shouldn't just assume or expect that the distribution will be normal.