Read on Twitter
There’s been a lot of discussion over whether children can be covered under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment in the Equality Act. Here’s why this is almost certainly the the case.
First the statutory text does not have any age limit on it which means those arguing that children cannot be covered are assuming that children cannot propose to undergo a process or part of a process of changing (what the law recognises as) attributes of sex. 
This seems false on the face of it since there are many teenagers who have very clear intentions of changing several things that the law is likely to recognise as aspects of sex. Even if confined to physiological changes or getting GRCs, many teenagers propose to (and do) do this
But there is also the statutory text of the Equality Act which explicitly exempts schools from harassment obligations on the basis of gender reassignment, by implication including obligations in relation to direct and indirect discrimination.
If that wasn’t enough, there is caselaw decided this year by the High Court that expressly addresses this question. Here’s what the court said:
Note in particular that the court concluded that while this can’t be a fleeting whim, it is entirely possible that teenagers can come to a settled commitment to change aspects of their sex. Some people might not like this but it’s pretty clear to me that minors are covered.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
