I recently tweeted asking whether the rightward shift of our O2 dissociation curve (ODC) (reduced O2 affinity, increased O2 offloading in tissues) when we climb a mountain is a good thing.
2/7
I pointed out that animals that have evolved at high altitude (e.g., bar-headed goose, llama) actually shift their curve to the left (they have a special mutation in their Hb).
3/7
Similarly, human fetuses, who are normally exposed to limiting amounts of O2 from mom's circulation, shift their ODC to the left (a characteristic feature of fetal Hb).
4/7
To further address the question of whether a left or right shift is adaptive at high altitude, a 1974 paper in Science reported that rats chemically manipulated to shift their ODC to the left fared better when exposed to simulated high altitude.
5/7
This was followed by a classic study by Bob Hebbel, a hematologist at the University of Minnesota. He reasoned that if a shift to the left is adaptive at high altitude, then humans with congenital high-affinity hemoglobin should do better under these conditions.
6/7
Indeed, this is what he found. He took 2 subjects with Hb Andrew-Minneapolis and 2 of their normal siblings up to about 9,000 ft. for 10 days and showed that the ones with Hbopathy fared better.
Such a cool experiment that would NEVER be funded in this era!
7/7
The bottom line then is that in situations where environmental oxygen is limiting (high altitude, in the womb), the benefit of increasing O2 uptake in lungs/fetus with a shift to the left outweighs the disadvantage of unloading less O2 to the tissues.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A woman with ferritin 10 and Hb 12.2 (baseline 14). How should this be described?
Here’s how you answered:
• non-anemic Fe deficiency: 35%
• Fe deficiency anemia: 32%
• Fe deficiency with relative anemia: 27%
• none: 6%
Really interesting spread!
2/11
This tells us something important: clinicians sense a mismatch between definition-based language and physiology-based thinking, even if we disagree on terminology.
3/11
By strict WHO criteria, she is not anemic.
Hb ≥12 in women = normal.
So formally the correct label is: iron deficiency without anemia.
In acute GI bleed anemia, would you give 1 g IV iron regardless of ferritin?
Results:
• 27% yes — anticipate iron debt
• 12% sometimes
• 21% only if ferritin is low
• 41% no
2/13
First, an important acknowledgment:
There is no right answer here.
There are no firm guidelines that tell us what to do in this situation. Reasonable clinicians land in different places.
This is a gray zone where physiology, timing, and judgment matter.
3/13
So rather than argue what we should do, I want to walk through the numbers and biology and explain why some clinicians anticipate iron debt even when ferritin is normal.
Yesterday I posted a CBC + reticulocyte count and asked for your diagnostic thoughts. Many of you offered great reasoning. The correct diagnosis was hemoglobin C disease.
Let’s unpack why this case is such a good learning example. 👇
2/9
Microcytosis often triggers a reflex binary:
iron deficiency vs thalassemia trait.
That’s a useful starting point. But it’s incomplete. Structural hemoglobin variants (like HbC and HbE) also belong on that list.
3/9
Several people calculated the Mentzer index (MCV/RBC):
75 / 4.0 ≈ 18 → “suggests iron deficiency (ID).”
Important teaching point:
The Mentzer index was designed to distinguish thal trait vs ID. It is not validated for structural hemoglobinopathies like HbC or HbE.