🧵United States v. Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.
6 Counts of Wire Fraud
4 Counts of False Statements to Fed-Insured Bank
1 Count of Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering
1/n
The SPLC is a 502(c)(3) based in Montgomery, AL.
The org characterizes itself as "a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people."
2/n
The SPLC is funded in part on public and corporate donations.
3/n
SPLC's website informs donors that "Your support powers our work to confront hate, stand up to injustice, and defend our civil and human rights..."
The website further explains that donations fund publications the SPLC distributes, including "Intelligence Report," "Hatewatch," and "Intelligence Project Dispatch."
4/n
Potential donors who click on the "Donate" button are presented with a webpage that informs them that their donations will be used to "pusure a bold action agenda to confront our country's most urgent challenges... uplift progressive candidates... [and] investigate and expos[e] candidates using hate and extremism to gain power."
5/n
According to the indictment...
The SPLC, beginning sometime in the 1980s, started operating a covert network of informants within various violent extremist groups.
Paid "field sources" or "Fs."
6/n
From 2014-2023 the SPLC transferred over $3 million "to Fs who associated with various violent extremists groups."
The SPLC took steps to move this money "in a clandestine manner" so as to hide the fact that it was going to people in these groups.
"That money was then used for the benefit of the individuals as well as the violent extremist groups."
7/n
Examples:
F-37
- Member of group that planned 2017 "Unite the Right" event
- "Attended the event at the direction of the SPLC."
- Made racist posts "under the supervision of the SPLC."
- SPLC "secretly paid F-37 more than $270,000"
8/n
F-9
- Affiliated with a neo-Nazi org
- He did fundraising for the group
- SPLC used F-9 as an source for over 20 yrs
- SPLC transferred over $1 million to F-9
- In 2014 F-9 illegally entered the HQ of the group and stole 25 boxes of docs from the neo-Nazi org
- The materials were copied in coordination with "a high-level SPLC employee who had knowledge the documents had been stolen."
- The stolen materials were later returned in a second illegal entry to the HQ
- The SPLC used information in the copied stolen materials for publications on their website
9/n
F-39
- "Was paid ~$6,000 by the SPLC to falsely take responsibility for the theft" that F-9 had committed.
10/n
F-unkown
-An Imperial Wizard of the United Klans of America
11/n
F-27
- Officer in the National Socialist Movement
- Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls MC
- SPLC secretly paid F-27 more than $300,000.
12/n
F-42
- Former chairman of the National Alliance
- SPLC website had an "Extremist File" webpage about F-42
- The SPLC was also, at the same time, secretly paying F-42. ($140,000)
13/n
F-30
- Leader of National Socialist Party of America
- Former director of the Aryan Nations
- Former member of the KKK
- SPLC website had an "Extremist File" webpage about F-30
- The SPLC was also, at the same time, secretly paying F-30. ($70,000)
14/n
F-43
- National President of American Front
- Federal felon convicted of cross burning
- Secretly paid $19,000 by the SPLC
15/n
F-unknown
- Member of the KKK
- Married an Exalted Cyclops of the KKK.
- The couple were involved in litigation related to the KKK
- During that same time period, the SPLC made payments to F-unknown of over $3,500.
16/n
F-11
- One of an undisclosed number of Fs that the SPLC used to "indirectly funnel money to other violent extremist group leaders."
- The SPLC transferred over $160,000 from a fictitious entity to F-11 who then sent the funds to various violent extremist group leaders..."
17/n
To clandestinely move funds from the SPLC to the Fs, the SPLC's Chief Financial Officer ("Employee-1") and Director of the Intelligence Project ("Employee-2") "opened a series of bank accounts at Bank-1 and Bank-2 in the name of various fictitious entities..."
a. Center Investigative Agency (“CIA”),
b. Fox Photography,
c. North West Technologies (“North West Tech”),
d. Tech Writers Group (“Tech Writers”), and
e. Rare Books Warehouse (“Rare Books”).
18/n
Counts 1-6
Wire Fraud
SPLC "devised" "a scheme and artifice to defraud donors" "and to obtain money and property" from those donors "by materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises, and omissions."
19/n
"The objective of the scheme and artifice was to obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for."
- SPLC explicitly sought donations under
the auspices that donor money would be used to help “dismantle” violent extremist groups.
- SPLC’s solicitations for donations did not inform donors that some of the donated funds were to be used by the SPLC to pay high-level leaders of violent extremist groups and others.
- Donors were never told that some of the donated funds were used for the benefit of the violent extremist groups.
- Donors were not told that some of the donated funds would be used in the commission of state and federal crimes.
20/n
Examples of wire transfers from SPLC's fictitious entities at Bank-1 to other bank accounts controlled by Fs.
21/n
Counts 7-10
False Statements to a Fed-Insured Bank
"The purpose of opening these bank accounts for the fictitious entities was to be able to conduct financial transactions that made it appear as if the Fs were receiving money from the fictitious entities rather than receiving donated funds from the SPLC."
22/n
Some of the false statements.
23/n
"In 2020, Bank-1 conducted an internal investigation into these accounts."
This resulted in those accounts being closed and the monies in them transferred to an account in the SPLC's name.
On September 9, 2021, the SPLC's President and CEO as well as the Board Chair admitted in writing that,
"...the accounts listed below were opened for the benefit of Southern Poverty Law Center operations and operated under the Center's authority."
24/n
Count 11
Conspiracy to Commit Concealment Money Laundering
The SPLC operated a "conspiracy to conduct financial transactions designed to conceal the true nature, source, ownership, and control of fraudulently obtained donated money the SPLC paid to Fs."
25/n
The SPLC, after funds were moved to the Rare Books account at Bank-2, then loaded the money "onto pay cards issued to the Fs who were supposedly employees of the fictitious entity."
In moving funds this way, the SPLC "further conceal[ed] the true nature, source, ownership, and control of the donated funds the SPLC was paying to the Fs."
26/n
After Bank-1's internal investigation prompted the closing the accounts there, the SPLC came up with a new "method of conducting financial transactions designed to conceal the true nature, source, ownership, and control of the donated funds that the SPLC was
paying to the Fs."
The SPLC used an ACH system to pay Fs with donated funds and "masked" the transactions with monikers such as "Rarebooks050" and "IPResearchCON050."
27/n
If convicted of Counts 1-6 and/or 11, the SPLC will face forfeitures.
Guys... how much money has the SPLC raised off of their publications highlighting the same groups they were funneling money to?
How much money did they raise off of the "Unite the Right" rally that they paid a leader to help organize and directed him to attend?
In 2017 the SPLC was estimated to have financial resources of over half a billion dollars.
By 2023, that estimate was up to ~$750mil.
Those years fall within the relevant time period of this indictment...
28/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Look past the language of Trump trying to "control" elections, and you see that DHS and DOJ are hard at work trying to clean up our elections.
Reuters uncovered a broader‑than‑previously known Trump administration effort to gain federal control over elections, historically run locally, in at least eight states – using investigations, raids and demands for access to balloting systems and voter ID."
Here's where Reuters gets the language of "control" from. It's understandable, but it's also hyperbole—hyperbole that Trump also uses, so fair is fair.
About one third of the way into the article, Reuters admits Trump isn't really trying to implement a federal takeover of elections.
"Rather than seek a sweeping federal takeover of elections, the administration appears to be testing constitutional limits one state and one county at a time"
Steve Baker, Joseph Hanneman, and their company Veritas Regnat LLC have failed to respond to the libel and slander lawsuit brought against them over their erroneous claims that former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff was responsible for the J5 Pipe Bombs.
The judge has ordered the clerk to file an entry of default against them and for the plaintiffs to file a motion for default judgment. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Blaze Media, which was also sued, has filed an unopposed motion for more time to respond to the suit. The judge gave them until June 11, 2026.
In public responses to the lawsuit, Baker has put on a "bring it on!" act, as if he were eager to fight it, to show what evidence he supposedly has, and to use the discovery process to expose some conspiracy to frame Brian J. Cole for the J5 pipe bombs when all along it was Shauni Kerkhoff who planted them as part of a sinister "fedsurrection" plot... or something.
Plaintiff Kerkhoff, who is suing Blaze Media, Steve Baker, Joseph Hanneman, and their company Veritas Regnet for falsely accusing Kerkhoff of being the J5 Pipe Bomber, has filed for a default against Steve Baker, as he has failed to respond to the lawsuit.
🧵Media doesn't like it when the DOJ and the FBI get the green light from POTUS and the AG to prosecute people who compromise national security and then hide behind the 1A.
"The stack of news articles Trump provided the acting attorney general was about [MIL] rescue operations"
"Blanche vowed to secure subpoenas specifically targeting the records of reporters who have worked on sensitive national security stories..."
"In recent months, prosecutors have sent subpoenas to media organizations as well as to email and phone providers seeking information in leak inquiries"
DOJ Investigators Gain Access to Fulton's 2020 Election Records as County is Hit w/ New Subpoenas
Lawfare efforts from Abbe Lowell, Norm Eisen, and Fulton County had halted the DOJ’s review of the seized records—some 600 boxes of materials from the 2020 Election.
A federal court has now ruled in favor of the DOJ.
On January 28, 2026, the FBI raided a storage facility in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize records related to the 2020 election. The raid was conducted pursuant to several search warrants arising from a criminal probe into the 2020 election.
That probe is being led by Thomas Albus, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri and Special Counsel to the Attorney General.
During the raid, the FBI collected more than 600 boxes of records, including tabulator receipts, ballots, envelopes, digital records, and other materials.
Days later, the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections filed legal action seeking (1) to stop the DOJ from reviewing the seized materials and (2) a court order requiring the records to be returned.
These motions came in addition to two other legal actions already underway before the raid: one in the Superior Court of Fulton County and another in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
High-powered attorneys Abbe Lowell and Norm Eisen joined Fulton County in this lawfare effort.
🧵This VA Supreme Court Opinion is straight fire for ~30 pages.
"From Madison’s era to the present, political parties of every stripe have offered if-by-whiskey arguments supporting partisan gerrymandering."
"Virginians voted by a wide margin [in 2020] to reform the redistricting process in the Commonwealth in an effort to end partisan gerrymandering."
"Under the 2020 amendment, if this bipartisan commission could not reach a consensus, the responsibility to achieve the amendment’s ultimate goal — ridding political partisanship as much as possible from the redistricting task — would become the constitutional responsibility of the Supreme Court of Virginia."