Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
1/22 THE 1787 COUP: How a Handful of Elites Stole America from Its Own People
The legitimacy of government and the reality of consent underpin every debate, religious, philosophical, political. This isn’t about partisanship or denomination. If you care about first principles, see what’s really under America’s “cornerstone.”
The real story of 1787 isn’t taught, because if it were, the entire constitutional order would collapse.
This isn’t just another critique. It’s the evidence-by-evidence breakdown of how America’s “consent of the governed” was manufactured by a coup, then papered over by myth, ritual, and redefinition.
Throughout this essay, “the regime” refers specifically to the United States federal government and the power structure established by the 1787 Constitution.
If you think the Founders played by the rules, or that “voting” fixes anything, this will change your mind or challenge you to defend the real record.
The legitimacy of government and the reality of consent underpin every debate, religious, philosophical, political. This isn’t about partisanship or denomination. If you care about first principles, see what’s really under America’s “cornerstone.”
The real story of 1787 isn’t taught, because if it were, the entire constitutional order would collapse.
This isn’t just another critique. It’s the evidence-by-evidence breakdown of how America’s “consent of the governed” was manufactured by a coup, then papered over by myth, ritual, and redefinition.
Throughout this essay, “the regime” refers specifically to the United States federal government and the power structure established by the 1787 Constitution.
If you think the Founders played by the rules, or that “voting” fixes anything, this will change your mind or challenge you to defend the real record.
2/22 VERIFICATION NOTE
All direct quotations in this paper are word-for-word from the cited, widely accessible primary or scholarly sources.
Where an idea is summarized, it is labeled as such, with clear reference to the original. No paraphrase is presented as a direct quote. This distinction is enforced throughout.
All direct quotations in this paper are word-for-word from the cited, widely accessible primary or scholarly sources.
Where an idea is summarized, it is labeled as such, with clear reference to the original. No paraphrase is presented as a direct quote. This distinction is enforced throughout.
3/22 METHODOLOGICAL CLARIFICATION
This paper distinguishes sharply between direct quotations, which are presented only when the wording is exact and traceable, and analytical summaries, which reflect the author’s interpretation of cited sources.
Where interpretations are offered, they are explicitly marked as summaries. This firewall is maintained to ensure scholarly integrity.
This paper distinguishes sharply between direct quotations, which are presented only when the wording is exact and traceable, and analytical summaries, which reflect the author’s interpretation of cited sources.
Where interpretations are offered, they are explicitly marked as summaries. This firewall is maintained to ensure scholarly integrity.
EXPOSED: Aborted Baby Parts Implanted in Animals — Paid for by Fauci’s NIAID
Lauren Boebert just put something on the record that the media refuses to touch.
She asked point-blank about research where human fetal tissue was implanted into lab animals.
Lauren Boebert just put something on the record that the media refuses to touch.
She asked point-blank about research where human fetal tissue was implanted into lab animals.
And the expert witness didn’t hesitate:
BOEBERT: “Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals? Have you heard of that sort of research?”
GOODMAN: “We did an analysis showing that over 90% of experiments using human fetal tissue — and putting them into animals —
BOEBERT: “Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals? Have you heard of that sort of research?”
GOODMAN: “We did an analysis showing that over 90% of experiments using human fetal tissue — and putting them into animals —
were funded by Fauci’s NIAID.”
Read that again.
Over 90%.
Taxpayer dollars.
Human fetal tissue.
Implanted into animals.
And barely a single headline.
If ANY other agency funded this type of research, it would be a national scandal. Instead, the media is silent
Read that again.
Over 90%.
Taxpayer dollars.
Human fetal tissue.
Implanted into animals.
And barely a single headline.
If ANY other agency funded this type of research, it would be a national scandal. Instead, the media is silent
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Shabbat Shalom
Va’era
Exodus 6:2–9:35
HaShem reveals Himself to Moshe at Sinai.
1)
Va’era
Exodus 6:2–9:35
HaShem reveals Himself to Moshe at Sinai.
1)
Explaining the four stages of redemption that have to happen: (1) remove the people from Egypt, (2) end their enslavement, (3) redeem them and acquire them as HaShem’s own chosen people, (4) then bring them to the land promised to their ancestors as their eternal heritage.
2)
2)
Moshe & Aaron repeatedly come before Pharaoh to demand in the name of HaShem, “Let My people go, so that they may serve Me in the wilderness.” Pharaoh repeatedly refuses. Aaron’s staff turns into a snake and swallows the magic sticks of the Egyptian sorcerers.
3)
3)
#Venezuela #USA
“The Prize of Mis-directed Honour”
by ex-laureate María Corina Machado
They gave me Peace, a golden round,
Despite me asking US to bomb our ground,
A symbol forged in solemn trust…
But medals? Pffft! they just gather dust.
…(1/8)
“The Prize of Mis-directed Honour”
by ex-laureate María Corina Machado
They gave me Peace, a golden round,
Despite me asking US to bomb our ground,
A symbol forged in solemn trust…
But medals? Pffft! they just gather dust.
…(1/8)
I packed it up, first-class, of course,
And flew to meet the Orange Force.
He lounged beneath a chandelier,
Eating a Big Mac, and Diet Coke, not beer.
…(2/8)
And flew to meet the Orange Force.
He lounged beneath a chandelier,
Eating a Big Mac, and Diet Coke, not beer.
…(2/8)
I said, “This prize, once meant for grace,
Now seeks a more... transactional place.”
He grinned. I bowed. The cameras clicked.
The optics? Flawless. Morals vanish quick.
…(3/8)
Now seeks a more... transactional place.”
He grinned. I bowed. The cameras clicked.
The optics? Flawless. Morals vanish quick.
…(3/8)
SAUSA Corinne Lambert wasn't prosecuting a crime; she was diagnosing a "defect" in a human being (my disabled veteran husband, Conrad Rockenhaus) that she believes cannot be fixed, so he must be discarded.
rockenhaus.com/how-detroit-au…
rockenhaus.com/how-detroit-au…
The Quote: "He has proven himself to be incorrigible, unsupervisable." The Quote: "He has made it clear that there is no condition... with which he is willing or able to comply."
Read transcript: rockenhaus.com/wp-content/upl…
Read transcript: rockenhaus.com/wp-content/upl…
The Nazi Parallel:
The core of the T4 program was the designation of people as "incurable" or "life unworthy of life."
By calling a brain-injured veteran "incorrigible" (incapable of being corrected or reformed), SAUSA Corinne Lambert is arguing that he is broken beyond repair.
The core of the T4 program was the designation of people as "incurable" or "life unworthy of life."
By calling a brain-injured veteran "incorrigible" (incapable of being corrected or reformed), SAUSA Corinne Lambert is arguing that he is broken beyond repair.
$MOB Just had my thesis all but validated by the CEO himself (which is quoted and i will link at the bottom as well) I made a post today about buying the MOB dip then an hour later an interview drops with the CEO. Teledyne is the customer like my thesis suggested (What the ceo said about programs of record, loitering munitions specifically the OPFL program etc lines up perfectly with my DD) Connected the dots perfectly.
I think MOB is going to be a multibagger in 2026. Will be loading up. Here are the bullish points I took away from the interview (which you need to watch!)
Production & Tier 1 Execution
It has begun: Production officially started in January with purchase orders already received.
The "Program of Record": This is most likely the Teledyne deal. The logic is simple: once a partner wins the first program, additional programs usually follow (CEOs words. He also mentioned the current contracts are from pre-ukraine budgets and he foresees significant growth in the budgets)
Growth: We are currently at 6 Tier 1 customers, expecting to reach 8–10 in 2026.
New Integrations: Expect new Tier 1 customers to complete integration by March/April.
2. The Regulatory Monopoly (massive catalyst)
New US Guidelines: Released in late December, these mandate cybersecurity for drones (compliance required by Sept 2027).
No Competition: The CEO confirmed he is not familiar with any other solution for small-sized drones that meets this standard.
The Opportunity: Competitors won't have time to build in-house solutions by the deadline, positioning MOB to capture huge market share as the "go-to" compliant option.
3. Financials & Corporate Confidence
Path to Profitability: Official target is end of 2026, but CEO hinted Q1 is possible, suggesting they are sandbagging guidance to beat expectations. He used the phrase "underpromise and overdeliver"
No Dilution: There are no capital raises planned; the company has plenty of cash.
Acquisition Interest: The CEO had discussions about being acquired in Q4 2025 but isn't interested right now...a very bullish signal that he sees higher value ahead.
4. Upcoming Catalysts
End of Feb: EOY 2025 Report.
March/April: New customer integrations complete.
End of April: Q1 2026 Report.
MOB DD where I hypothesised Teledyne and the incoming contract (still to come) x.com/SunvMikey/stat…
CEO interview youtube.com/watch?v=HoBTyI…
DYOR. Not financial advice.
I think MOB is going to be a multibagger in 2026. Will be loading up. Here are the bullish points I took away from the interview (which you need to watch!)
Production & Tier 1 Execution
It has begun: Production officially started in January with purchase orders already received.
The "Program of Record": This is most likely the Teledyne deal. The logic is simple: once a partner wins the first program, additional programs usually follow (CEOs words. He also mentioned the current contracts are from pre-ukraine budgets and he foresees significant growth in the budgets)
Growth: We are currently at 6 Tier 1 customers, expecting to reach 8–10 in 2026.
New Integrations: Expect new Tier 1 customers to complete integration by March/April.
2. The Regulatory Monopoly (massive catalyst)
New US Guidelines: Released in late December, these mandate cybersecurity for drones (compliance required by Sept 2027).
No Competition: The CEO confirmed he is not familiar with any other solution for small-sized drones that meets this standard.
The Opportunity: Competitors won't have time to build in-house solutions by the deadline, positioning MOB to capture huge market share as the "go-to" compliant option.
3. Financials & Corporate Confidence
Path to Profitability: Official target is end of 2026, but CEO hinted Q1 is possible, suggesting they are sandbagging guidance to beat expectations. He used the phrase "underpromise and overdeliver"
No Dilution: There are no capital raises planned; the company has plenty of cash.
Acquisition Interest: The CEO had discussions about being acquired in Q4 2025 but isn't interested right now...a very bullish signal that he sees higher value ahead.
4. Upcoming Catalysts
End of Feb: EOY 2025 Report.
March/April: New customer integrations complete.
End of April: Q1 2026 Report.
MOB DD where I hypothesised Teledyne and the incoming contract (still to come) x.com/SunvMikey/stat…
CEO interview youtube.com/watch?v=HoBTyI…
DYOR. Not financial advice.
@GrumpierBTDay
@AktienAkademie my notes and thoughts thank you for bringing this to my attention..
Real question:
Why do politicians talk endlessly about “net zero” when almost no normal human being ever brings it up in real life?
Why do politicians talk endlessly about “net zero” when almost no normal human being ever brings it up in real life?
Nobody at the grocery store is discussing “net emissions pathways.”
Nobody at the gas pump is debating “scope 3 offsets.”
Yet it dominates political speeches.
Nobody at the gas pump is debating “scope 3 offsets.”
Yet it dominates political speeches.
That’s because “net zero” isn’t a voter idea.
It’s an elite coordination slogan.
It’s an elite coordination slogan.
🧵 The Wahhābī assault on Karbalāʾ: A complete history
I think Daniel Haqiqatjou might be suffering from a severe case of Stockholm Syndrome, he keeps getting rinsed with the facts but insists on coming back for another round with the sandal 🩴.
In any case, this thread is a comprehensive history of the Wahhābī assault on Karbalāʾ in 1802.
[1] The Ottoman violation of the treaty between them and the First Saudi State
[2] The Shīʾī attack on a group of civilian Wahhābī caravans
[3] The Ottomans’ refusal to punish the perpetrators
[4] The Saudi advance towards Karbalāʾ
[5] The Wahhābīs did not attack civilians
[6] Karbalāʾ had become a refuge for worst elements in society
[7] The Wahhābī assault only lasted for a few hours
I think Daniel Haqiqatjou might be suffering from a severe case of Stockholm Syndrome, he keeps getting rinsed with the facts but insists on coming back for another round with the sandal 🩴.
In any case, this thread is a comprehensive history of the Wahhābī assault on Karbalāʾ in 1802.
[1] The Ottoman violation of the treaty between them and the First Saudi State
[2] The Shīʾī attack on a group of civilian Wahhābī caravans
[3] The Ottomans’ refusal to punish the perpetrators
[4] The Saudi advance towards Karbalāʾ
[5] The Wahhābīs did not attack civilians
[6] Karbalāʾ had become a refuge for worst elements in society
[7] The Wahhābī assault only lasted for a few hours
1) The Ottoman violation of the treaty between them and the First Saudi State
The Ottomans, after suffering a humiliating defeat at the hands of Saʾūd Ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, decided to cut their losses and sign a peace treaty with the First Saudi State.
Despite the truce concluded between Ibn Saʿūd and the Ottoman crescent in Baghdād, relations between the two soon grew tense once again. The cause of this tension was an aggression committed against the First Saudi State by followers of the Ottoman province in ʿIrāq.
The Ottomans, after suffering a humiliating defeat at the hands of Saʾūd Ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, decided to cut their losses and sign a peace treaty with the First Saudi State.
Despite the truce concluded between Ibn Saʿūd and the Ottoman crescent in Baghdād, relations between the two soon grew tense once again. The cause of this tension was an aggression committed against the First Saudi State by followers of the Ottoman province in ʿIrāq.
This is despite the fact that the historical record of events in that period bears witness that Āl Saʿūd respected the truce concluded between them and the governor of Baghdād—something attested by Burckhardt when he said: “It was never known that Saʿūd broke his covenant on any occasion, and Saʿūd’s reputation for scrupulously maintaining his pledges is among the matters acknowledged by his bitterest enemies and praised by his friends, as it stands in complete contrast to the treachery of the Turks. Saʿūd had also issued strict orders to all the commanders of the Wahhābī armies to adhere precisely to the security guarantees that had been given.”
The credibility of Burckhardt’s testimony becomes evident in the events that followed. For it appears that when the Ottoman governor in ʿIrāq despaired of defeating Āl Saʿūd, he resolved instead to inflict harm, humiliation, and exemplary punishment upon them. He therefore instructed his men to cut off the roads to the pilgrim caravans traveling under the protection of Āl Saʿūd, and the followers of the Ottoman governor of Baghdād began to waylay every passerby.
The credibility of Burckhardt’s testimony becomes evident in the events that followed. For it appears that when the Ottoman governor in ʿIrāq despaired of defeating Āl Saʿūd, he resolved instead to inflict harm, humiliation, and exemplary punishment upon them. He therefore instructed his men to cut off the roads to the pilgrim caravans traveling under the protection of Āl Saʿūd, and the followers of the Ottoman governor of Baghdād began to waylay every passerby.
This Fox News photo of pro-regime rallies in Iran — with crowds chanting "Death to America" and holding images related to the Trump assassination attempt — reminds me painfully of Russia.
Many Americans may not know Boris Nemtsov: ⬇️
Many Americans may not know Boris Nemtsov: ⬇️
⬇️ ✡️ Boris Nemtsov: a brilliant physicist, former Deputy Prime Minister, charismatic opposition leader who bravely exposed Putin's corruption and led massive anti-war, anti-authoritarian protests. ⬇️
⬇️ In 2015, Nemtsov was gunned down on a bridge right next to the Kremlin. Most believe it was ordered by Putin. ⬇️
Your Elf Fighter/Magic-User
Your Dwarf Fighter/Cleric
Your Gnome Illusionist/Thief
1/ Big news (per Bloomberg): after PJM’s latest capacity auction came up short (~6.6 GW) and cleared at an administrative cap (about $333 per MW-day), the White House + governors may push a one-time “emergency” auction where hyperscalers fund new power plants. Some thoughts below.
President Trump and US Northeast governors will direct the nation’s largest grid operator to hold an emergency power auction putting technology giants on the hook to pay for the construction of a fleet of new plants bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
President Trump and US Northeast governors will direct the nation’s largest grid operator to hold an emergency power auction putting technology giants on the hook to pay for the construction of a fleet of new plants bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/ Directionally: yes. If you’re adding massive new load fast, you should “pay your own way” for the *incremental* capacity needed — not push those costs onto households.
3/ But don’t miss WHY we got here: development was turned off by ~3 years of price suppression. Offer caps muted the market’s ability to price real reliability/performance risk – and then demand went hockey-stick after ~15 years of flat/negative load.
