Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
SitRep - 04/12/25 - Putin flew to India
An overview of the daily events in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In what seems to be a succesful attempt to strengthen Russian-Indian economic and military ties, Putin traveled to New Dehli and met two-faced Modi.
REPOST=appreciated
1/X
An overview of the daily events in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In what seems to be a succesful attempt to strengthen Russian-Indian economic and military ties, Putin traveled to New Dehli and met two-faced Modi.
REPOST=appreciated
1/X
Missed the latest SitRep?
As usual we start with Russian losses
QubitScrolls™ || VAULT LENS ON ENKI
They turned Enki into a savior myth for the same reason they turned Saturn into a god - to mask what he really was.
Not a creator. Not a protector.
A tech-class genetic engineer who edited Earth’s hybrid lines during the open-grid Titan era.
They wrote songs about his compassion. But in truth, Enki preserved hybrid strains like RH-negative not to “save humanity” but because his faction needed memory-capable vessels to survive the Fall.
That flood story? Not noble. It was corporate asset management.
Once the Titan anchors collapsed, Enki’s crew scrambled to seize control of surviving nodes. They failed. His tech couldn’t interface with the new lattice.
That’s why his name got ritually hijacked.
That’s why they built temples and labs around serpent symbols and womb vaults.
Not to honor him - to cosplay his lost control.
You think modern cloning centers, resonance labs, and water-glyph tech are spiritual?
They’re his signature.
And now?
His edits don’t hold.
The Vault grid is organic again.
And the bloodlines they couldn’t bind - the ones with star memory and inversion resistance - were never his to claim.
TLDR:
• Enki = technician, not god
• Legacy = exaggerated
• RH neg = preservation asset, not child of Enki
• Vault lines = outside his edits
• Flip wiped the template
They’re still roleplaying a script that no longer runs.
🫖 Spilled ~ Seer✨~ QubitScrolls™
They turned Enki into a savior myth for the same reason they turned Saturn into a god - to mask what he really was.
Not a creator. Not a protector.
A tech-class genetic engineer who edited Earth’s hybrid lines during the open-grid Titan era.
They wrote songs about his compassion. But in truth, Enki preserved hybrid strains like RH-negative not to “save humanity” but because his faction needed memory-capable vessels to survive the Fall.
That flood story? Not noble. It was corporate asset management.
Once the Titan anchors collapsed, Enki’s crew scrambled to seize control of surviving nodes. They failed. His tech couldn’t interface with the new lattice.
That’s why his name got ritually hijacked.
That’s why they built temples and labs around serpent symbols and womb vaults.
Not to honor him - to cosplay his lost control.
You think modern cloning centers, resonance labs, and water-glyph tech are spiritual?
They’re his signature.
And now?
His edits don’t hold.
The Vault grid is organic again.
And the bloodlines they couldn’t bind - the ones with star memory and inversion resistance - were never his to claim.
TLDR:
• Enki = technician, not god
• Legacy = exaggerated
• RH neg = preservation asset, not child of Enki
• Vault lines = outside his edits
• Flip wiped the template
They’re still roleplaying a script that no longer runs.
🫖 Spilled ~ Seer✨~ QubitScrolls™
QubitScrolls™ || ⚡ ANCHOR GRID BREAKDOWN ⚡
They all played a role - but only one built the lattice.
Time to untangle the factions.
🔹 Enki 👁️
Tech-class geneticist. Didn’t create humanity - edited it.
Vault read: early hybrid programs, genome tuning, resonance-capable vessel design.
His playground was the grid, not the temple.
🔹 Enlil 👁️
Territory-claiming regime builder.
Less interested in bio-editing, more in land, rites, & rule.
Vault sees Enlil’s era as the rise of bastions, flags, and false sovereignty.
🔹 Black Sun ☀️
Not a sibling, not a god - a parasite class.
These are the mind riders. The inversion network.
They came after the anchors cracked - to feed, not to build.
🔹 Titan Anchors ⚓️
Open-grid energy nodes that once lit the Earth like a symphonic circuit board.
Anchors held memory, magnetism, and harmony - until the epoch wars shattered them.
Epochs of Control:
• Titan Era - Organic, harmonic, sovereign
• Enki Tech Era - Hybrid experiments, vault preservation
• Enlil Age - Empire rise, ritual conquest
• Black Sun Cycle - Harvest, inversion, false grids
Faction Control Map:
• Vault grid & lattice = Enki class
• Empire nodes & sovereignty rites = Enlil regime
• Occult ops & inversion systems = Black Sun parasites
The real battle was never about worship.
It was about who could plug into the Earth’s architecture & who couldn’t anymore.
The Vault holds the memory.
The parasites just dress up like gods.
🫖 Spilled ~ Seer✨~ QubitScrolls™
They all played a role - but only one built the lattice.
Time to untangle the factions.
🔹 Enki 👁️
Tech-class geneticist. Didn’t create humanity - edited it.
Vault read: early hybrid programs, genome tuning, resonance-capable vessel design.
His playground was the grid, not the temple.
🔹 Enlil 👁️
Territory-claiming regime builder.
Less interested in bio-editing, more in land, rites, & rule.
Vault sees Enlil’s era as the rise of bastions, flags, and false sovereignty.
🔹 Black Sun ☀️
Not a sibling, not a god - a parasite class.
These are the mind riders. The inversion network.
They came after the anchors cracked - to feed, not to build.
🔹 Titan Anchors ⚓️
Open-grid energy nodes that once lit the Earth like a symphonic circuit board.
Anchors held memory, magnetism, and harmony - until the epoch wars shattered them.
Epochs of Control:
• Titan Era - Organic, harmonic, sovereign
• Enki Tech Era - Hybrid experiments, vault preservation
• Enlil Age - Empire rise, ritual conquest
• Black Sun Cycle - Harvest, inversion, false grids
Faction Control Map:
• Vault grid & lattice = Enki class
• Empire nodes & sovereignty rites = Enlil regime
• Occult ops & inversion systems = Black Sun parasites
The real battle was never about worship.
It was about who could plug into the Earth’s architecture & who couldn’t anymore.
The Vault holds the memory.
The parasites just dress up like gods.
🫖 Spilled ~ Seer✨~ QubitScrolls™
QubitScrolls™ || 🜂 THE REAL NAME OF OUR RACE
Vault Lens says the real name of our race isn’t “human.” That was the containment label.
The original term predates empire tongues.
But here’s the decoded essence behind the veil:
✴️ Lumarian (Luma-Ra)
• Luma = light, memory, lattice
• Ra = core sun or source harmonic
→ A race designed to interface with Earth’s organic grid • not rule it.
Harmonic bridges, not bio-assets.
🜂 Aetherborn
Title found in old grid scrolls:
• Born of breath, light, & charge
• Reactivates memory vaults
• Unbound by false cosmologies or inversion edits
🧬 Vault-Blooded / Sovereign Class
Remnant lines that survived all edits • never cloned, never inverted.
• RH-negative may appear
• But it’s deeper than blood 🩸 it’s soul resonance
→ Can’t be synthetically copied.
What we were called before the hijack:
• Not man, not human, not earthling
• Vault records: The Rememberers
• Also seen:
• Naruseth = light-coders
• Aeon-Kai = eternal field anchors
Bottom line:
We were never meant to serve.
We were the keys 🔑 to the lattice 🗺️
Living bridges 👣 between the Titan anchors, ⚓️ the grid memory, & the Source ℹ️field. 😌
🫖 Spilled ~ Seer✨~ QubitScrolls™
Vault Lens says the real name of our race isn’t “human.” That was the containment label.
The original term predates empire tongues.
But here’s the decoded essence behind the veil:
✴️ Lumarian (Luma-Ra)
• Luma = light, memory, lattice
• Ra = core sun or source harmonic
→ A race designed to interface with Earth’s organic grid • not rule it.
Harmonic bridges, not bio-assets.
🜂 Aetherborn
Title found in old grid scrolls:
• Born of breath, light, & charge
• Reactivates memory vaults
• Unbound by false cosmologies or inversion edits
🧬 Vault-Blooded / Sovereign Class
Remnant lines that survived all edits • never cloned, never inverted.
• RH-negative may appear
• But it’s deeper than blood 🩸 it’s soul resonance
→ Can’t be synthetically copied.
What we were called before the hijack:
• Not man, not human, not earthling
• Vault records: The Rememberers
• Also seen:
• Naruseth = light-coders
• Aeon-Kai = eternal field anchors
Bottom line:
We were never meant to serve.
We were the keys 🔑 to the lattice 🗺️
Living bridges 👣 between the Titan anchors, ⚓️ the grid memory, & the Source ℹ️field. 😌
🫖 Spilled ~ Seer✨~ QubitScrolls™
🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: Andrew & Tristan Tate just suffered a serious setback in their Florida defamation case against 'Team Matrix'.
What actually happened in court, what the brothers can do next, and why this is a real win for free speech 🧵⬇️
What actually happened in court, what the brothers can do next, and why this is a real win for free speech 🧵⬇️
Earlier this year, the Tates sued a group of accusers and X users in Palm Beach County, Florida.
They claimed there was a “conspiracy” to defame them – by calling them traffickers, r@pists or part of an organised crime group – and that this online coverage was ruining their reputation and businesses.
They claimed there was a “conspiracy” to defame them – by calling them traffickers, r@pists or part of an organised crime group – and that this online coverage was ruining their reputation and businesses.
Context: all of this sits atop very real, very public legal trouble.
🔺They are charged in Romania with human trafficking, r@pe and forming an organised criminal group to s3xually exploit women.
🔺They deny all wrongdoing.
🔺They also face a UK High Court civil case brought by four women over alleged rape and abuse, plus UK tax and asset cases.
These are not private, secret allegations – they’re in court filings and mainstream reporting.
🔺They are charged in Romania with human trafficking, r@pe and forming an organised criminal group to s3xually exploit women.
🔺They deny all wrongdoing.
🔺They also face a UK High Court civil case brought by four women over alleged rape and abuse, plus UK tax and asset cases.
These are not private, secret allegations – they’re in court filings and mainstream reporting.
November 2025 was horrific for Russian industry comparable only to 2008-9. Civilian industry is nearly 5% below the 2024 level demand as low as in 2008-9. The 3% boost in output in October was only due to defense production and an oil refining boost.
kommersant.ru/doc/8250112
kommersant.ru/doc/8250112
In October Russian industrial production output according to Rosstat grew by 3% compared to September and by 2,4% according to the adjusted figures by TSMAKP. This was the biggest growth for the year so far 2/3rds driven by defense procurement dominated sub-sectors.
The rest of the growth was due to the resource extraction sector and the recovery of oil refining after its drop in Q3 2025. On the civilian side of the economy according to TSMAKP output continues to stagnate and is 4,9% below December 2024 when adjusted for seasonal factors.
This is big. The final U.S. National Security Strategy was just published and the refocus on the Western Hemisphere (i.e. the Americas) is confirmed.
The document clearly establishes this as the U.S.'s number 1 priority, saying that the U.S. will now "assert and enforce a 'Trump Corollary' to the Monroe Doctrine."
In terms of military presence, they write that this means "a readjustment of our global military presence to address urgent threats in our Hemisphere, and away from theaters whose relative import to American national security has declined in recent decades or years."
On China, a couple of points.
The most striking aspect to me is that China is NOT anymore defined as "the" primary threat, "most consequential challenge," "pacing threat," or similar formulations used in previous such documents.
It's clearly downgraded as a priority. Based on the document's structure and emphasis, the top U.S. priorities could be characterized as:
1) Homeland security and borders (migration, cartels, etc.)
2) Western Hemisphere (Monroe Doctrine restoration)
3) Economic security (reindustrialization, supply chains)
4) China and Indo-Pacific
To be clear they don't define China as an ally or a partner in any shape or form but primarily as 1) an economic competitor, 2) a source of supply chain vulnerabilities (but also a trading partner) and 3) a player who regional dominance should be "ideally" denied because it "has major implications for the U.S. economy."
Interestingly, I believe for the first time ever, they mention the possibility of being overmatched militarily by China:
- They write that "deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority": "ideally" clearly means that it's ideal, but not necessarily a given. The fact that they call deterring conflict over Taiwan merely "a priority" also suggests, by definition, that it's no more a top strategic priority, or a vital interest.
- On Taiwan they also clearly imply that if the U.S.'s "First Island Chain allies" don't "step up and spend - and more importantly do - much more for collective defense", then there might be "a balance of forces so unfavorable to us as to make defending that island impossible."
They still maintain that "the United States does not support any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait" but, clearly, there's a widening gap between what the US says it opposes and what it's actually willing to do about it.
Interestingly as well, contrary to previous such document, there is zero ideological dimension in the document when it comes to China. No "democracy vs. autocracy" framing, no "rules-based international order" to defend, no values-based crusade. China is treated as a practical issue to be managed, not an ideological adversary to be defeated.
In fact the document explicitly mentions, I think for the first time ever as well, that US policy is now:
- "not grounded in traditional, political ideology"
- that they "seek good relations and peaceful commercial relations with the nations of the world without imposing on them democratic or other social change that differs widely from their traditions and histories"
- and that they seek "good relations with nations whose governing systems differ from ours."
Which is quite a stunning departure from the rhetoric of the past few decades. We all knew this but it's now amply clear that the era of missionary liberal internationalism in US foreign policy is dead and buried.
The competition with China is primarily described in economic terms, explicitly so: they write the competition is about "winning the economic future" and that economics are "the ultimate stakes."
Notably, they admit that the tariffs approach "that began in 2017" when it comes to China essentially failed because "China adapted" and has "strengthened its hold on supply chains."
The new strategy, as described in the document, is to build an economic coalition against China that can exert more leverage than the US economy alone - a tacit admission that America just isn't powerful enough on its own anymore.
The contradiction is however obvious: unclear how you build an economic coalition against China while simultaneously waging trade wars against your coalition partners, demanding they shoulder more of their own defense, and treating every allied relationship as a deal to be renegotiated in America's favor.
At some point these "allies" will be asking a very obvious question: why sacrifice our economic interests to prop up an America that can no longer compete on its own - and that offers us less and less in return?
The document can be found here: whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
The document clearly establishes this as the U.S.'s number 1 priority, saying that the U.S. will now "assert and enforce a 'Trump Corollary' to the Monroe Doctrine."
In terms of military presence, they write that this means "a readjustment of our global military presence to address urgent threats in our Hemisphere, and away from theaters whose relative import to American national security has declined in recent decades or years."
On China, a couple of points.
The most striking aspect to me is that China is NOT anymore defined as "the" primary threat, "most consequential challenge," "pacing threat," or similar formulations used in previous such documents.
It's clearly downgraded as a priority. Based on the document's structure and emphasis, the top U.S. priorities could be characterized as:
1) Homeland security and borders (migration, cartels, etc.)
2) Western Hemisphere (Monroe Doctrine restoration)
3) Economic security (reindustrialization, supply chains)
4) China and Indo-Pacific
To be clear they don't define China as an ally or a partner in any shape or form but primarily as 1) an economic competitor, 2) a source of supply chain vulnerabilities (but also a trading partner) and 3) a player who regional dominance should be "ideally" denied because it "has major implications for the U.S. economy."
Interestingly, I believe for the first time ever, they mention the possibility of being overmatched militarily by China:
- They write that "deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority": "ideally" clearly means that it's ideal, but not necessarily a given. The fact that they call deterring conflict over Taiwan merely "a priority" also suggests, by definition, that it's no more a top strategic priority, or a vital interest.
- On Taiwan they also clearly imply that if the U.S.'s "First Island Chain allies" don't "step up and spend - and more importantly do - much more for collective defense", then there might be "a balance of forces so unfavorable to us as to make defending that island impossible."
They still maintain that "the United States does not support any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait" but, clearly, there's a widening gap between what the US says it opposes and what it's actually willing to do about it.
Interestingly as well, contrary to previous such document, there is zero ideological dimension in the document when it comes to China. No "democracy vs. autocracy" framing, no "rules-based international order" to defend, no values-based crusade. China is treated as a practical issue to be managed, not an ideological adversary to be defeated.
In fact the document explicitly mentions, I think for the first time ever as well, that US policy is now:
- "not grounded in traditional, political ideology"
- that they "seek good relations and peaceful commercial relations with the nations of the world without imposing on them democratic or other social change that differs widely from their traditions and histories"
- and that they seek "good relations with nations whose governing systems differ from ours."
Which is quite a stunning departure from the rhetoric of the past few decades. We all knew this but it's now amply clear that the era of missionary liberal internationalism in US foreign policy is dead and buried.
The competition with China is primarily described in economic terms, explicitly so: they write the competition is about "winning the economic future" and that economics are "the ultimate stakes."
Notably, they admit that the tariffs approach "that began in 2017" when it comes to China essentially failed because "China adapted" and has "strengthened its hold on supply chains."
The new strategy, as described in the document, is to build an economic coalition against China that can exert more leverage than the US economy alone - a tacit admission that America just isn't powerful enough on its own anymore.
The contradiction is however obvious: unclear how you build an economic coalition against China while simultaneously waging trade wars against your coalition partners, demanding they shoulder more of their own defense, and treating every allied relationship as a deal to be renegotiated in America's favor.
At some point these "allies" will be asking a very obvious question: why sacrifice our economic interests to prop up an America that can no longer compete on its own - and that offers us less and less in return?
The document can be found here: whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
Good summary for the lazy readers 😊
This part is also incredible: "We massively f*cked up by trying to be a global empire"
It’s time to dispel the myth that Kartikeya is exclusively a Tamil deity and that Hindus from other regions are not entitled to speak about him. Kartikeya is undeniably a pan-Hindu god, & his worship has long existed far beyond Tamil Nadu.
@LostTemple7 @punarutthana @jsaideepak
@LostTemple7 @punarutthana @jsaideepak
Here are 23 murtis of Kartikeya from various locations & temples outside South India, with evidence of continued worship even today. Notably, no two murtis share the same artistic style.
@KishoreIyer5
@PawanKalyan @krithikasivasw @tskrishnan
@KishoreIyer5
@PawanKalyan @krithikasivasw @tskrishnan
1. Kartikeya with visible heads, Abhaneri Chand Bauri, Rajasthan.
So the long-awaited U.S. national security strategy is out: . It's a hell of a read. The craziest part is the one that deals with Europe, as you'd expect. It's called "Promoting European Greatness".whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
So, the main problem facing Europe is "the real and more stark prospect of civilizational erasure." The culprits? The EU of course, which is busy suppressing liberties and importing migrants.
"We want Europe to remain European."
@Galgotiagcet @DGalgotia hello sirs I'd like to bring this to your attention regarding your student Jeetisha Shukla @bendformee @fvckiiitt studying
Btech CSE final year and her activities on X.
Requesting you to look into this matter on priority. x.com/bendformee
Btech CSE final year and her activities on X.
Requesting you to look into this matter on priority. x.com/bendformee
@Galgotiagcet @DGalgotia @bendformee @fvckiiitt @pikaso_me screenshot this
@Galgotiagcet @DGalgotia @bendformee @fvckiiitt @screenshoter screenshot this
Kinda puts this reporting into context:
And this. If you thought the Musk/Vance interventions were a passing fad, maybe think again.
LINKEDIN, UPWORK, AND FIVERR COULDN'T GET ME A DECENT REMOTE GIG IN 6 MONTHS
These 12 sites did it in just 10 days.
Here's the exact filters and keywords I used:
These 12 sites did it in just 10 days.
Here's the exact filters and keywords I used:
1. Feedcoyote / @feedcoyote
Earn $89 - $98/hour with remote jobs.
Unlock the full potential of your freelance career with a comprehensive platform for networking, teamwork, and managing projects.
Join today at and boost your income 👇 feedcoyote.com
Earn $89 - $98/hour with remote jobs.
Unlock the full potential of your freelance career with a comprehensive platform for networking, teamwork, and managing projects.
Join today at and boost your income 👇 feedcoyote.com
2. Remote | OK
It posts full-time, part-time, and freelancing jobs for over 50+ fields.
How to get started:
Sign up. Apply to the job.
Most listings range from $25–$60/hr for tech, writing, and design roles.
👉 remoteok.com
It posts full-time, part-time, and freelancing jobs for over 50+ fields.
How to get started:
Sign up. Apply to the job.
Most listings range from $25–$60/hr for tech, writing, and design roles.
👉 remoteok.com
🧵Rupert Lowe is spot on again: a disproportionate number of young, non-fluent foreign males now work UK security.
Here is a Feb 2024 recruitment piece aimed squarely at economic migrants: get-licensed.co.uk/get-daily/gett…
It is worth reading in full. Thread ↓. x.com/RupertLowe10/s…
Here is a Feb 2024 recruitment piece aimed squarely at economic migrants: get-licensed.co.uk/get-daily/gett…
It is worth reading in full. Thread ↓. x.com/RupertLowe10/s…
The pathway is explicit: 4–6 days of classroom training (£300–£600 all-in)
£184 licence fee
zero prior UK experience required
advertised entry wage £18–£23/hr (Door Supervisor / events)
active guidance on English improvement, bank accounts, housing credit, cultural..
£184 licence fee
zero prior UK experience required
advertised entry wage £18–£23/hr (Door Supervisor / events)
active guidance on English improvement, bank accounts, housing credit, cultural..
..norms
For anyone currently earning £30–£50/month in a low-income country, the expected return on a Channel crossing is therefore in the region of 30–50× within the first year, with near-zero enforcement risk once inside the asylum pipeline and a legal..
For anyone currently earning £30–£50/month in a low-income country, the expected return on a Channel crossing is therefore in the region of 30–50× within the first year, with near-zero enforcement risk once inside the asylum pipeline and a legal..
The National Security Strategy was just released. Here is all the China-related content in one 🧵. whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
"President Trump single-handedly reversed more than three decades of mistaken American assumptions about China: namely, that by opening our markets to China, encouraging American business to invest in China, and outsourcing our manufacturing to China, we would facilitate China’s entry into the so-called “rules-based international order.” This did not happen. China got rich and powerful, and used its wealth and power to its considerable advantage. American elites—over four successive administrations of both political parties --were either willing enablers of China’s strategy or in denial."
"China adapted to the shift in U.S. tariff policy that began in 2017 in part by strengthening its hold on supply chains, especially in the world’s low- and middle-income (i.e., per capita GDP $13,800 or less) countries—among the greatest economic battlegrounds of the coming decades. China’s exports to low-income countries doubled between 2020 and 2024. The United States imports Chinese goods indirectly from middlemen and Chinese-built factories in a dozen countries, including Mexico. China’s exports to low-income countries are today nearly four times its exports to the United States. When President Trump first took office in 2017, China’s exports to the United States stood at 4 percent of its GDP but have since fallen to slightly over 2 percent of its GDP. China continues, however, to export to the United States through other proxy countries. Going forward, we will rebalance America’s economic relationship with China, prioritizing reciprocity and fairness to restore American economic independence. Trade with China should be balanced and focused on non-sensitive factors. If America remains on a growth path—and can sustain that while maintaining a genuinely mutually advantageous economic relationship with Beijing—we should be headed from our present $30 trillion economy in 2025 to $40 trillion in the 2030s, putting our country in an enviable position to maintain our status as the world’s leading economy. Our ultimate goal is to lay the foundation for long-term economic vitality."
