What is happening in Uzbekistan is very serious. Amendments proposed into the Chapter XVII of the Uzbekistan Constitution are viewed as highly provocative by the Karakalpaks. If they are really passed, this may exacerbate the situation even further, escalating the conflict
International community should dissuade President Mirziyoyev from amending the Chapter XVII of the Constitution before it's too late. Deescalating the conflict now is absolutely possible and relatively easy. In a week or two it may be too late, if a lot of blood is shed by then
Uzbekistan is lingustically heterogenous. Uzbeks are Karluks (like Uyghurs). Karakalpaks are Kipchaks (like Kazakhs). Khwarezmians are Oghuz (like Turks in Turkey). Almost all rural population is Turkic, but cities like Bukhara or Samarkand still have many Persian speakers
In the course of the Turkic migration, countryside was Turkified first. Meanwhile some of the cities continued to speak Persian for many centuries, remaining the Iranian islands among the Turkic sea. Not unlike some of the old urban centers of Anatolia after the Seljuk invasion
Karakalpaks live in the northwest and thus are very much affected by the disappearance of the Aral Sea. They used to be coast dwellers and their mode of life heavily dependent upon the sea that is ceasing to exist. Water that used to feed it was directed to the cotton fields
Cotton production was introduced to the region by the Russian Empire to create a source of raw materials for the Russian textile industry. Later Soviets would greatly expand the cotton production to produce gunpowder. But the cotton consumes too much water to grow
Soviet cotton production consumed too much water, depleting the rivers. And it killed the Aral Sea. What used to be the sea bottom is now desert. Wind is blowing the salt and the chemicals brought to the former sea from the fields by the rivers all around the neighbouring areas
Even worse, Soviets used the former Vozrozhdeniye Island as a polygon for biological weaponry for decades. Now it is a peninsula, because the water from the Uzbek side is draining quickly. Kazakstan which is much richer took some efforts to save its own part of the sea
The Aral shore is a location of the enormous man made catastrophe. Basically the Aral desert is a byproduct of the Soviet cotton production. Cotton (=gunpowder) production was prioritised while keeping the environment and the economy of locals was not
In 1990, even before the collapse of the USSR, Karakalpakstan declared its sovereignty. In 1993 it signed a treaty with Uzbekistan. It agreed to remain as part of the country for 20 years, if it keeps its sovereignty and will have a right to later secede through a referendum
Basically in 1993 Uzbekistan signed a treaty agreeing to allow Karakalpaks the independence referendum in 2013. Of course, later the central government would concentrate all the powers and never allow it. In 2013 it simply arrested those idiots who really advocated for it
Now it introduced new amendments to the Constitution (see here, Chapter XVII, you can google translate it) gazeta.uz/ru/2022/06/30/… which strip the region from the remaining rights. That provoked the mass unrests
Uzbekistan ministry of interior claims they already suppressed them. They did not. But if the unrests continue, the government wil escalate the violence which may lead to the unpredictable consequences in a very young and poor society with rapidly rising cost of life
International community should persuade President Mirziyoyev to abstain from amending the Chapter XVII of the Constitution. Deescalation is still possible, before a lot of blood is shed. The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Correct. But it lacks the context. On the same day, June 30 the Donetsk People's Republic ruler Pushilin signed the order № 338 prohibiting the free entrance of humanitarian aid from Russia to the DPR. NB: Much (most?) of this aid was not really humanitarian, but army supplies🧵
DPR introduced the "accreditation" of humanitarian aid. Previously Russian citizens could purchase in Russia whatever and ship it to the DPR as "humanitarian aid". That was a legal way to supply the pro-Russian militias in Ukraine with arms/equipment by individual contributions
Now the DPR introduced the accreditation so shipping there anything gonna be harder. Besides, the order № 338 prohibits importing:
1. guns & ammo 2. lots of modern radio sets 3. quadcopter (technically)
to DPR from Russia as "humanitarian aid" for pro-Russian militias
Not quite. Mau put his signature under a letter in support of this war. May be hesitantly, but he still did it. Regarding @navalny, I am honestly impressed by how much effort international media invest into whitewashing him and his clique
@navalny and his circle share the same imperialist agenda as Putin. Except they are far more consistent Russian ethnonationalists. As a Tatar I find this clique taking power as one of the worst conceivable scenarios of the Russian future. Same for Khodorkovsky @mbk_center
Much of the grudging acceptance of Putin by minorities is motivated by the fear of "liberals" (=consistent Russian ethnonationalists) taking power. Supporting regime change with Navalny taking the throne of Putin is utterly absurd from my perspective
Of course, not. Uzbeks are Karluks. Karakalpaks are Kipchaks, like Kazakhs. I don't think Kazakhstan will involve into the inner conflict in Uzbekistan, at least not now. But if the conflicts last, then nationalist groups within Kazakhstan will absolutely be tempted to do so
Kazakhstan may stay strictly neutral, that's absolutely possible. But if Kazakhs, be it the government or some volunteer forces, enter the conflict then only on the Karakalpak side. If I see Kazakhs forces suppressing Karakalpaks on the Tashkent behalf, I would be very surprised
It's not only about linguistics, it's also about the way of life. Kazakh culture has been heavily shaped by nomadism, while Uzbeks are farmers. Some indentitarian Kazakhs view fellow Karakalpak nomads felling under the power of farmers as a tragedy. Now it's a niche view though
Protests in Nukus, Karakalpakstan continue. Uzbek President Mirziyoyev already suggested not to amend the articles 70, 71, 72, 74, 75 of the constitution on the sovereignty and status of Karakalpakstan. But his forces are suppressing the protests. Emergency declared till August 2
International community should pressure Uzbek President Mirziyoyev to deescalate the situation. Karakalpak minority sees the entire "constitutional reform" project, especially regarding the Chapter XVII as highly provocative. That's a video from the yesterday's protests in Nukus
Keep in mind that Uzbekistan is:
1) Diverse 2) Young 3) Poor
Average age in Uzbekistan (29) is not much higher than in Syria (25). GDP per capita not much higher than in Cambodia. Most of territory is desert so almost everyone lives in a few overcrowded oases and river valleys
If we look at the aggregate figures of the governments' support to Ukraine, including help to the refugees, we can see the same asymmetry. Baltics and East-Central Europe contribute to Ukraine disproportionately, with the economic powerhouses of Western Europe lagging far behind
Illarionov looks at the military aid per capita asymmetry through civilisational senses. Protestant Balts contribute the most. Westerns Slavs + Lithuania, Nordics follow behind
The U.S. contributes almost twice less military aid per capita than other English speaking countries
Unrests in Nukus, Karakalpakstan. Karakalpakstan used to be an autonomous republic in Uzbekistan. In 1990s they proclaimed sovereignity with the right of secession. Now Uzbekistan decided to abolish it autonomy, escalating the conflict.
It's time to talk about Central Asia🧵
First thing to understand about Central Asia is that modern borders have no correlation at all with borders of historic regions. For example the historic region of Khorasan that played a key (or the key?) role in Medieval Islamic history is now divided between a number of states
Modern nation states very much exaggerate their primordiality. In case of Uzbekistan we understand this. In case of Iran we don't. And yet, in my view Islamic authors didn't talk about Iran nearly as much as about Khorasan. The former was an abstraction, the latter - a reality