Protests in Nukus, Karakalpakstan continue. Uzbek President Mirziyoyev already suggested not to amend the articles 70, 71, 72, 74, 75 of the constitution on the sovereignty and status of Karakalpakstan. But his forces are suppressing the protests. Emergency declared till August 2
International community should pressure Uzbek President Mirziyoyev to deescalate the situation. Karakalpak minority sees the entire "constitutional reform" project, especially regarding the Chapter XVII as highly provocative. That's a video from the yesterday's protests in Nukus
Keep in mind that Uzbekistan is:
1) Diverse 2) Young 3) Poor
Average age in Uzbekistan (29) is not much higher than in Syria (25). GDP per capita not much higher than in Cambodia. Most of territory is desert so almost everyone lives in a few overcrowded oases and river valleys
Uzbek government tries to picture the country more homogenous than it really is. For example they pretend that Khwarezmian language (Oghuz) is a dialect of Uzbek (Karluk) which is an obvious lie. Country is way more diverse & heterogenous than you may think looking at statistics
Young, poor and diverse population of Uzbekistan is very much affected by the rapid inflation. What is worse, previously the poor rural youth could travel to Russia to take some low paid manual jobs. That was a way for Uzbekistan to relieve its demographic pressure and earn cash
Many (myself included) feared that Russian-Ukrainian war would lead to explosion Central Asia. It was the imbecile move of president to grasp even more powers and reduce regional autonomy of Karakalpakstan that triggered the crisis. But it has more fundamental underlying reasons
I am very much concerned that Karakalpakstan may be only the starting point of a major Central Asian crisis. The next obvious point for explosion is Khorezm. Khorezm viloyet is located in oasis on the lower Amu Darya. By Uzbek standards it's very poor, rural and densely populated
It is also ethnically different. Uzbek government pretends Khwarezmians are Uzbeks but that is a lie. Uzbeks are Karluk, Khwarezmians are Oghuz. Uzbeks look down upon Khwarezmians and the latter resent that being being such an ancient culture they are ruled by alien Uzbeks
What is happening in Uzbekistan looks like the very beginning of the Syrian war. It can also trigger a general Central Asian crisis. All these countries are affected by pretty much the same socioeconomic factors and now can't send their excess rural youth to work to Russia
I think that the international community should pressure President Mirziyoyev to:
1. Stop the "constitutional reform". No amendments at all 2. Choose scapegoats among his own administration and police and jail them for massacring the protestors in Nukus. Make a show out of it
Political deescalation however won't solve the structural socioeconomic problems of Uzbekistan which are many. It's necessary to find employment for excessive rural youth, at home or abroad. So far South Korea has been a preferable alternative to Russia rferl.org/a/uzbekistans-…
Contrary to the popular perception, Uzbekistan has been developing fairly well. It showed some of the highest rates of industrial growth in the former USSR. But again, contrary to the popular perception, growing rapidly doesn't prevent you from spiralling into chaos and violence
President Mirziyoyev must be urged to stop the constitutional reform. He must be urged to appoint scapegoats for the massacre and jail them. That can deescalate it for now. But in the long run it's vital to find/create employment for the rural youth that now can't go to Russia
Labour contracts with South Korea or with other East Asian countries can be a very good idea. Cash transfers of labor migrants could keep the rural economy afloat, creating many jobs at home. That could allow Uzbekistan to survive through the current global recession
Finally, international community should help Tashkent to work out a more fair, decentralised and inclusive political system. The extreme dissatisfaction of many Khorezmians with the alien rule of Tashkent was obvious when you talked to them privately. The system must be reformed
PS While the political system of Uzbekistan is too centralised and unfair, underrepresenting the regions and minorities, in Turkmenistan it is *MUCH* worse than that. I don't know any other Central Asian country with so much potential for an internal war of extermination. The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes. Behind all the breaking news about the capture of small villages, we are missing the bigger pattern which is:
The Soviet American war was supposed to be fought to somewhere to the west of Rhine. What you got instead is a Soviet Civil War happening to the east of Dnieper
If you said that the battles of the great European war will not be fought in Dunkirk and La Rochelle, but somewhere in Kupyansk (that is here) and Rabotino, you would have been once put into a psych ward, or, at least, not taken as a serious person
The behemoth military machine had been built, once, for a thunderbolt strike towards the English Channel. Whatever remained from it, is now decimating itself in the useless battles over the useless coal towns of the Donetsk Oblast
Yes, and that is super duper quadruper important to understand
Koreans are poor (don't have an empire) and, therefore, must do productive work to earn their living. So, if the Americans want to learn how to do anything productive they must learn it from Koreans etc
There is this stupid idea that the ultra high level of life and consumption in the United States has something to do with their productivity. That is of course a complete sham. An average American doesn't do anything useful or important to justify (or earn!) his kingly lifestyle
The kingly lifestyle of an average American is not based on his "productivity" (what a BS, lol) but on the global empire Americans are holding currently. Part of the imperial dynamics being, all the actually useful work, all the material production is getting outsourced abroad
Reading Tess of the d'Urbervilles. Set in southwest England, somewhere in the late 1800s. And the first thing you need to know is that Tess is bilingual. He speaks a local dialect she learnt at home, and the standard English she picked at school from a London-trained teacher
So, basically, "normal" language doesn't come out of nowhere. Under the normal conditions, people on the ground speak all the incomprehensible patois, wildly different from each other
"Regular", "correct" English is the creation of state
So, basically, the state chooses a standard (usually, based on one of the dialects), cleanses it a bit, and then shoves down everyone's throats via the standardized education
Purely artificial construct, of a super mega state that really appeared only by the late 1800s
There's a subtle point here that 99,999% of Western commentariat is missing. Like, totally blind to. And that point is:
Building a huuuuuuuuuuge dam (or steel plant, or whatever) has been EVERYONE's plan of development. Like absolutely every developing country, no exceptions
Almost everyone who tried to develop did it in a USSR-ish way, via prestige projects. Build a dam. A steel plant. A huge plant. And then an even bigger one
And then you run out of money, and it all goes bust and all you have is postapocalyptic ruins for the kids to play in
If China did not go bust, in a way like almost every development project from the USSR to South Asia did, that probably means that you guys are wrong about China. Like totally wrong
What you describe is not China but the USSR, and its copies & emulations elsewhere
What I am saying is that "capitalist reforms" are a buzzword devoid of any actual meaning, and a buzzword that obfuscated rather than explains. Specifically, it is fusing radically different policies taken under the radically different circumstances (and timing!) into one - purely for ideological purposes
It can be argued, for example, that starting from the 1980s, China has undertaken massive socialist reforms, specifically in infrastructure, and in basic (mother) industries, such as steel, petrochemical and chemical and, of course, power
The primary weakness of this argument is that being true, historically speaking, it is just false in the context of American politics where the “communism” label has been so over-used (and misapplied) that it lost all of its former power:
“We want X”
“No, that is communism”
“We want communism”
Basically, when you use a label like “communism” as a deus ex machina winning you every argument, you simultaneously re-define its meaning. And when you use it to beat off every popular socio economic demand (e.g. universal healthcare), you re-define communism as a synthesis of all the popular socio economic demands
Historical communism = forced industrial development in a poor, predominantly agrarian country, funded through expropriation of the peasantry
(With the most disastrous economic and humanitarian consequences)