3. As fuzzy ethnic reality of the past does not really translate into the nation state world, so don’t the old “fuzzy” borders
4. Most national borders are very arbitrary. As they don’t reflect reality of the past (they can’t), there is always a temptation to renegotiate them
5. And that is exactly what Armenia did in the 1990s. It tried to renegotiate the internationally recognized border by force (because history). Despite the initial success, this turned into an absolute catastrophe for Armenia
Retrospectively, it was a huge & irreparable mistake
6. This is partially because the entire system of rules is skewed against those trying to renegotiate the borders. Territorial conquests are almost impossible to exploit, or legalize. Net liability. And as Armenia shows they are very easy to lose once the tide changes
7. If Azerbaijan tries to renegotiate the internationally recognized border by force (because history), it will repeat the same mistake Armenia did. The conquest will be very hard to hold, impossible to legalize and super easy to lose once the tide changes
8. It is impossible to base a stable border on “history” (= arbitrary selection of one’s side favorite facts). What you can base a stable border upon is reality
9. Neither Azerbaijan nor Armenia do really derive from the ancient or medieval polities they associated with
10. In reality, they derive from the administrative units of the USSR. Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic and Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic, slightly rebranded
Connection with the distant past is mostly imaginary
11. The old administrative border of the USSR is the only solid & objective principle for drawing the border between what is essentially two Soviet provinces slightly rebranded
Anything else will lead to a long bloody mess with no clear winner
12. Fuzzy borders between the ancient polities don’t translate into the national borders very well. But the uninspiring administrative borders between the recent provinces do. The former are largely based on our imagination and the latter on reality
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Were the US to develop slower & earlier (few centuries before the railway), we might have seen way more population, money & culture concentrated along Mississippi. First you gain "fat", due to easier communications and then it's largely path dependency
It would be Rhine
Russian history makes more sense, once you fully interiorize that Central Russia lies in the largest endorheic basin in the world. Volga is long, slow, easily navigable (no rapids). Great connection with Greater Iran & Central Asia. No connection with the World Ocean
Russia is forging almost all of its gun barrels (tanks/artillery) on the GFM Steyr (Austria 🇦🇹 ) machines imported in the late Soviet + Putin's era. This specific machine you see in the Medvedev's video was launched on Motovilikha Plants back in 1976
But if you look at the stuff to make stuff, they role is huuuuugely disproportionate to their size and population
Both machines were installed in the 1970s. And that is also a good point
Whether you are the US🇺🇸
Or the USSR ☭
When you need to make stuff, you will probably buy your stuff to make stuff from a toy country🇦🇹. Because there are not many options, really. The market is small
Contrary to the popular view, significant superiority in the quantity of weaponry does translate into the military victory. The military output delta is a great predictor of whether you win or not, and the longer a war lasts, the better it works
You outproduce -> You win
One major Russian advantage is the sheer quantity of air defence missiles. Countering the enemy airforce & projectiles, air defence systems cover the Russian ground forces from every possible aerial threat. They also allow Russian airforce to bomb Ukrainians without distractions
Now how can Russia produce so much? Let's follow some of the key production operations in the manufacture of S400 missile at the MMZ Avangard. Part of the Almaz Antey corporation, it is a major Russian producer of air defence missiles
Backed by the manufacturing power of Europe, Putin may very well win this war. The Russian machining park consists of Western (mostly EU 🇪🇺) tools imported in 2003-2023. With spare parts flow & tech support uninterrupted, Russia gonna steamroll over Ukraine as planned 🇺🇦
🇷🇺🚀💪
Ballistic missile producers continue to receive all the necessary supplies and maintenance
(You may go through this thread to get a first impression of how the Russian military manufacturing base looks like, on example of Votkinsk Plant)