Wagner march was incredible, unprecedented to the extent most foreigners simply do not understand. Like, yes, Russia had its military coups in the 18th c. But those were the palace coups, all done by the Guards. Purely praetorian business with zero participation of the army.
Yes, there was a Kornilov affair in 1917, but that happened after the coup in capital. In March they overthrew the Tsar, then there was infighting in the capital, including a Bolshevik revolt in July, and only in September part of the army marches to St Petersburg.
Half a year after the coup. Not the same thing
I think the last time anything like that happened was in 1698, when the Musketeers marched on Moscow from the Western border. And then, next time, only in 2023.
(Army leaves the border/battlefield and marches on the capital without a previous praetorian coup in the capital)
One explanation could be:
Since 1917, Soviet/Russian leadership relied upon state security to control the army, control over army being *the* one true purpose of state security, and state security being *the* one true mechanism of controlling the military.
This, however, created an element of overreliance upon state security. Therefore, some (very limited) part of the military structure was largely relieved from the state security control, so that it could be used as a counterweight against state security, just in case.
That included the military intelligence (GRU) with its Special Forces. They were uniquely positioned as the military less controllable by the KGB, less permeated by the KGB, and less answerable to the KGB.
(so they could be used against the KGB, should the necessity arise)
Original Wagner group was a small (once again, small) mercenary unit that originated from the GRU Special forces. From the very beginning, it was way freer from the state security control compared to the normal army.
Which was not a big deal as long it was small.
In the beginning, it was just a team of assassins doing the dirty (= hitman) job in Donbass et cetera. Just dozens of gunmen. Not a big deal. Then hundreds. Again, not a big deal. Syria, Lybia. They gradually grew and their reserve (veterans not in active service) grew as well.
In the course of their expansion, they have largely avoided infiltration by the state security. Based on this book, Wagners were ready to recruit anyone. The military. The police. People with unconventional tracks (= e.g. French Foreign Legion)
Anyone, EXCEPT FOR THE FSB
It is noteworthy that normally the Wagners recruited anyone. The regular police. Prison guards. Drug enforcement. Customs officers. Foreign mercenaries. They overall were not very picky.
They just never recruited from the FSB. One and only exception.
Which makes sense. The FSB is the agency created to spy on and control the military. Therefore, recruiting from the FSB you will fill your ranks with spies, agents and commissaries. Obviously, if your recruitment policy is up to you, you will never recruit anyone from there.
Now the thing is. Normal, regular military do not have any choice on whether to fill their ranks with spymasters and commissaries or not. State security guys are forced upon them, no exceptions (including on the command positions). Otherwise, they could grow uncontrollable.
Wagners, however, used to be a small hitman unit in a direct contact with the upper political leadership.
Small -> Unimportant
Direct contact -> Can ask for special favours
More like one extra group of thugs directly controlled by Kremlin. Small group, most importantly.
But they grew, grew, grew and after 2022 just exploded in numbers, becoming effectively an army corps with heavy weaponry, own airforce, air defence, etc.
Step by step, iteration by iteration. All of that apparently went without any serious infiltration by the state security.
So by summer 2023 you had a large army corps with heavy (incl. air defence) equipment and with little if any regular control. And so, the impossible happened.
Were they stationed near Moscow, they might have won. They were simply too far away, in my opinion.
What is particularly interesting here is the consequences. Or rather, the absence of consequences. 1698 was followed by the mass executions of rebel musketeers. 2023 was not followed by anything comparable
Prigozhin, the military commander Utkin, few mercenaries. And that's it
Implying there are tens of thousands fellows who participated in an attempted military coup, who are very much alive and often serving in various armed units, in various capacities. That includes both regular soldiers and their commanders.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For decades, any resistance to the Reaganomics has been suppressed using the false dichotomy: it is either “capitalism” (= which meant Reaganomics) or socialism, and socialism doesn’t work
Now, as there is the growing feeling that Reaganomics don’t work, the full rehabilitation of socialism looks pretty much inevitable
I find it oddly similar to how it worked in the USSR. For decades, the whole propaganda apparatus had been advancing the false dichotomy: it is either socialism, or capitalism (= meaning robber barons)
Now, as there is a growing feeling that the current model does not work, we must try out capitalism instead. And, as capitalism means robber barons, we must create robber barons
We have to distribute all the large enterprises between the organized crime members. This is the way
Truth is: the words like Rus/Russian had many and many ambiguous and often mutually exclusive meanings, and not only throughout history, but, like, simultaneously.
For example, in the middle ages, the word "Rus" could mean:
1. All the lands that use Church Slavonic in liturgy. That is pretty much everything from what is now Central Russia, to what is now Romania. Wallachians, being the speakers of a Romance language were Orthodox, and used Slavonic in church -> they're a part of Rus, too
2. Some ambiguous, undefined region that encompasses what is now northwest Russia & Ukraine, but does not include lands further east. So, Kiev & Novgorod are a part of Rus, but Vladimir (-> region of Moscow) isn't
These two mutually exclusive notions exist simultaneously
The greatest Western delusion about China is, and always has been, greatly exaggerating the importance of plan. Like, in this case, for example. It sounds as if there is some kind of continuous industrial policy, for decades
1. Mao Zedong dies. His successors be like, wow, he is dead. Now we can build a normal, sane economy. That means, like in the Soviet Union
2. Fuck, we run out of oil. And the entire development plan was based upon an assumption that we have huge deposits of it
3. All the prior plans of development, and all the prior industrial policies go into the trashbin. Because again, they were based upon an assumption that we will be soon exporting more oil than Saudi Arabia, and without that revenue we cannot fund our mega-projects
Yes. Behind all the breaking news about the capture of small villages, we are missing the bigger pattern which is:
The Soviet American war was supposed to be fought to somewhere to the west of Rhine. What you got instead is a Soviet Civil War happening to the east of Dnieper
If you said that the battles of the great European war will not be fought in Dunkirk and La Rochelle, but somewhere in Kupyansk (that is here) and Rabotino, you would have been once put into a psych ward, or, at least, not taken as a serious person
The behemoth military machine had been built, once, for a thunderbolt strike towards the English Channel. Whatever remained from it, is now decimating itself in the useless battles over the useless coal towns of the Donetsk Oblast
Yes, and that is super duper quadruper important to understand
Koreans are poor (don't have an empire) and, therefore, must do productive work to earn their living. So, if the Americans want to learn how to do anything productive they must learn it from Koreans etc
There is this stupid idea that the ultra high level of life and consumption in the United States has something to do with their productivity. That is of course a complete sham. An average American doesn't do anything useful or important to justify (or earn!) his kingly lifestyle
The kingly lifestyle of an average American is not based on his "productivity" (what a BS, lol) but on the global empire Americans are holding currently. Part of the imperial dynamics being, all the actually useful work, all the material production is getting outsourced abroad
Reading Tess of the d'Urbervilles. Set in southwest England, somewhere in the late 1800s. And the first thing you need to know is that Tess is bilingual. He speaks a local dialect she learnt at home, and the standard English she picked at school from a London-trained teacher
So, basically, "normal" language doesn't come out of nowhere. Under the normal conditions, people on the ground speak all the incomprehensible patois, wildly different from each other
"Regular", "correct" English is the creation of state
So, basically, the state chooses a standard (usually, based on one of the dialects), cleanses it a bit, and then shoves down everyone's throats via the standardized education
Purely artificial construct, of a super mega state that really appeared only by the late 1800s