There are two ways for a poor, underdeveloped country to industrialise: Soviet vs Chinese way. Soviet way is to build the edifice of industrial economy from the foundations. Chinese way is to build it from the roof.
1st way sounds good, 2nd actually works.
To proceed further, I need to introduce a new concept. Let's divide the manufacturing industry into two unequal sectors, Front End vs Back End:
Front End - they make whatever you see on the supermarket shelf
Back End - they make whatever that stands behind, that you don’t see
Front End industries are making consumer goods. That is, whatever you buy, as an individual. Toys, clothes, furniture, appliances all falls under this category. The list of top selling amazon products gives a not bad idea what the front end sector is, and how it looks like.
Still, the production of ready consumer goods comprises only the final, ultimate element of manufacturing chain. The rear part of the chain remains hidden from our sight. We call it the Back End
Back end products are not recognisable. You never bought an SMX 700 radial forge
While there is an enormous number & diversity of niche, obscure, unobvious industries hidden in the Back End, these four make for the core of it. Four Mother Industries the rest of manufacturing sector is based upon.
Production chains start on the back end and flow towards the front. You build petrochemical equipment (deep back). You use it to make plastics on a petrochemical plant (back end). Allowing, finally, to make a slippers out of it (front end).
From the Back to the Front it flows
Now there is a paradox about the Front End vs Back End industries. Which is:
Complexity of an industry is inversely correlated with the size of its market
Front end industries tend to be both dumber & larger, compared to the more complex back end industries they are based upon
Back End is complex, and the further back, the more complex it gets. It is more capital intensive, more knowledge intensive, less mistake tolerant. Easy to fuck up. Front End is simpler, with less entrance barriers in terms of either capital or knowledge. Harder to fuck up.
Front End industries on the other hand, tend to be larger. Like many, many times larger compared to the back. The market of electronic appliances, for example, would be like 1000 times larger than the far more complex market of machinery used for making these appliances.
So, what you have is the larger and dumber Front End markets vs smaller & more complex Back End markets. Few entrance barriers in the front end vs almost insurmountable barriers shielding the back end from any external competition by the primitive barbarians like yourself.
Now the problem of most state-run, centrally-planned industrialisations is that they tried to brute force their way to the back end. Which is objectively very hard to achieve, because the entrance barriers are so insurmountably high.
Worst of all, the markets of back end tend to be small, and the more critical, the smaller. Brute forcing your way to the back end, you bleed yourself, and bleed yourself for a relatively small financial gain. Then you run out of money. Then you go bust.
Like the USSR did.
Chinese way, on the other hand, had been to skip the basics altogether. Do not even bother with laying proper foundations, but start building the roof asap. Do the front end, consumer market oriented stuff.
Make slippers, towels, gaming consoles.
The thing with the front end industries is that they are easier. The entrance barriers are lower. You can start with little money or expertise. You can be making mistakes, messing things up, and that is still fine because low price is the only thing people really care about.
On top of that, front end markets are bigger, so much bigger compared to the back end. And that is the great paradox of manufacturing sector. A dumber, easier to enter front end industry will correspond to a critical back end industry it is based upon as an elephant to a mice.
Do not even bother with developing any proper back end. Just go to the front end, and swallow the elephant whole. Once you did, you will be drowning in cash. Now you can invest these earnings in cultivating the niche, complex and hard to develop expertises of the back end.
Nation state is not some basic property of reality (as many falsely presume). They do not just organically grow out of the “ethnically drawn borders”. That is not how it works. They usually grow out of the *administratively* drawn borders, on whichever continent.
First they draw administrative borders based on whatever rationales and considerations. Then, these arbitrarily drawn administrative borders turn out to be surprisingly stable, more stable than anyone could ever expect. Eventually they become borders of the nation states.
States do not grow out of ethnicities. States grow out of the administrative zones, fiscal zones, customs zones et cetera. Basically, a Big Guy got a right to collect taxes and rents over these territories, but not those territories. Then the border between what he can milk…
Every election in the US attracts huge global attention. People in Pakistan, people in Paraguay, people in Poland, people in Papua New Guinea are monitoring the course of elections and tend to hold strong opinions regarding whom they would prefer to win
Why would that be the case? Well, one obvious reason would be that the US elections are, in fact, seen as the world elections. People in Paraguay do not vote in the US and yet, the US elections have a very strong impact on the fortunes of Paraguay.
Or Russia, in this case:
And I am not discussing the economic fortunes only. In terms of politics, in terms of culture, in terms of discourse, American relations with the rest of the world tend to be strikingly one-directional. Much or most of the global discourse comes downstream from the Unites States
There is hardly any other genre of literature more factual, and more realistic than the sci-fi. It is exactly its non-serious, seemingly abstract character that allows it to escape censorship and ostracism to a far greater degree than it is normally possible for a work of art.
Sci-fi allows you to to present the most painful, insulting, insufferable, obnoxious, criminal and traitorous arguments in a non-serious way, as a fun, as a joke. In this regard, it is far superior to any other genre. Compare three ways to sell a heresy:
By its very nature, sci-fi is inseparable from the social commentary. For this reason, quality sci-fi should be always read as a self-reflection and self-criticism of the society it is written in.
If the "Gulliver’s Travels" is a reflection on Britain…
Tatarstan is a large and wealthy ethnic republic located, in the very middle of Russia. While being culturally and institutionally distinctive, it is not really peripheral. It sits in a few kilometres from the population centre of Russia🧵
While Tatarstan does not sit in the centre of Russia geography-wise, it does so demography-wise. The Russian centre of population (red star), located somewhere in southwest Udmurtia, is literally in a walking distance from the Tatarstani border.
It is the very middle of Russia.
If you look at the Russian administrative map, you will see that most ethnic republics (colored) occupy a peripheral position. The main exception are republics of the Volga-Ural region (green), located in the middle of Russia & surrounded by the Slavic sea.
Wagner march was incredible, unprecedented to the extent most foreigners simply do not understand. Like, yes, Russia had its military coups in the 18th c. But those were the palace coups, all done by the Guards. Purely praetorian business with zero participation of the army.
Yes, there was a Kornilov affair in 1917, but that happened after the coup in capital. In March they overthrew the Tsar, then there was infighting in the capital, including a Bolshevik revolt in July, and only in September part of the army marches to St Petersburg.
Half a year after the coup. Not the same thing
I think the last time anything like that happened was in 1698, when the Musketeers marched on Moscow from the Western border. And then, next time, only in 2023.
(Army leaves the border/battlefield and marches on the capital without a previous praetorian coup in the capital)
As a person from a post-Soviet country, I could not but find the institutions of People’s Republic of China oddly familiar. For every major institution of the Communist Russia, I could find a direct equivalent in Communist China.
With one major exception:
China had no KGB
For a post-Soviet person, that was a shocking realisation. For us, a gigantic, centralised, all-permeating and all powerful state security system appears to be almost a natural phenomenon. The earth. The sky. Force of gravity. KGB
All basic properties of reality we live in
It was hard to come up with any explanation for why the PRC that evolved in a close cooperation with the USSR, that used to be its client state, that emulated its major institutions, failed to copy this seemingly prerequisite (?) institution of state power