Recent well liked threads
Johann Andreas Eisenmenger's two-volume, 2000 page "Entdecktes Judenthum" – Judaism Unmasked – is one of the most censored books in history. Nearly every copy of the original printing was almost immediately seized. Internet Archive blocks free access. There is no translation. 
LLMs melt themselves telling you how poorly researced and written it is, how utterly ignorant is the author who spent 19 years infiltrating rabbinic circles to gather the information, how it exposes the worst of Christianity by its very existence. So, yeah.
lol once you log in on archive, you get a heavily modified version.
"The editor has omitted the Hebrew text, which Eisenmenger had always conscientiously included. Likewise, the often lengthy and cumbersome exposition characteristic of that era has been simplified, and chapters of minor interest have been omitted. Obscene passages have been softened wherever scientific accuracy would permit.
"The editor has omitted the Hebrew text, which Eisenmenger had always conscientiously included. Likewise, the often lengthy and cumbersome exposition characteristic of that era has been simplified, and chapters of minor interest have been omitted. Obscene passages have been softened wherever scientific accuracy would permit.
You’ve got minutes before they’re on top of you.
Is your defensive position secure, or will it collapse at first contact? 🧵
Knowing how to build a fighting position properly is a lifesaver. Here's how you do it.
Is your defensive position secure, or will it collapse at first contact? 🧵
Knowing how to build a fighting position properly is a lifesaver. Here's how you do it.
Basic Fighting Positions
For as long as man has found it pertinent to kill one another, there has been a need for field construction to build defensive and offensive structures to gain an advantage over an adversary. From the siege towers of medieval Europe to the hastily built trenches of modern Ukraine, fighters have felled many trees and dug many pits to defend positions, obfuscate their location, and protect them from fire. While every rifleman is not a combat engineer, every rifleman should have a repertoire of the basic fighting positions that they can dig in the field under their belt.
Fighting positions are more than simple holes to hide in during artillery barrages. Fighting positions do provide a lot of protection from enemy fire, shrapnel from explosives, and other forms of indirect fire but they also provide an easy way to organize a team into fields and sectors of fire to overwatch large areas with little overlap. Positions can be built in a manner that allows units to defend a location of any shape or size, offering opportunities for even full 360-degree coverage if the situation demands it.
For as long as man has found it pertinent to kill one another, there has been a need for field construction to build defensive and offensive structures to gain an advantage over an adversary. From the siege towers of medieval Europe to the hastily built trenches of modern Ukraine, fighters have felled many trees and dug many pits to defend positions, obfuscate their location, and protect them from fire. While every rifleman is not a combat engineer, every rifleman should have a repertoire of the basic fighting positions that they can dig in the field under their belt.
Fighting positions are more than simple holes to hide in during artillery barrages. Fighting positions do provide a lot of protection from enemy fire, shrapnel from explosives, and other forms of indirect fire but they also provide an easy way to organize a team into fields and sectors of fire to overwatch large areas with little overlap. Positions can be built in a manner that allows units to defend a location of any shape or size, offering opportunities for even full 360-degree coverage if the situation demands it.
Position selection.
When selecting a location for a fighting position the acronym of KOCOA is commonly utilized for assessing prime locations for fighting positions. KOCOA is often used for tactical and strategic battlefield analysis. The letters stand for:
K – Key Terrain: Key terrain is terrain features that give a tactical advantage to either side or it may be an objective that must be taken or held. This could be a hill, ridge, gulley, bridge, or a building that oversees an area with a lot of enemy movement. Key terrain should be occupied or at the very least, denied to the enemy.
O – Observation and Fields of Fire: The ability to see your enemy and effectively engage them with direct or indirect fire is a core necessity of a proper fighting position. Fields of fire should be clear. Examples of an ideal field of fire would be down the slope of a hill or across an open field as both provide excellent line of sight for the defender while minimizing their own visual signature (especially for the one looking down a hill, these are some of the best fighting position locations).
C – Cover and Concealment: Cover protects from bullets and shrapnel while concealment hides one from view. Ideally a fighting position should offer both protection and stealth. If a decision must be made for only of those, the selection of which will depend entirely on circumstances unique to the situation such as the enemy, the team and their abilities, the objective, etc.
O – Obstacles: Obstacles will slow or halt enemy movement. Obstacles can be natural such as rives and cliffs or manmade with area denial tools like razor wire and minefields. Positions should be placed behind or beside obstacles in order to funnel enemy movement into the team’s fields of fires.
A - Avenues of Approach: Routes in which the enemy force can use to advance toward the team or their objective are the avenues of approach. These should be covered with fields of fire. Positions should not be on or in these areas unless there are no other options as they place the team in direct confrontation with the opposing force.
While the acronym is clumsy like most military acronyms, KOCOA provides leaders with a simple tool to identify strong areas for positions to be placed to better confront their enemy.
When selecting a location for a fighting position the acronym of KOCOA is commonly utilized for assessing prime locations for fighting positions. KOCOA is often used for tactical and strategic battlefield analysis. The letters stand for:
K – Key Terrain: Key terrain is terrain features that give a tactical advantage to either side or it may be an objective that must be taken or held. This could be a hill, ridge, gulley, bridge, or a building that oversees an area with a lot of enemy movement. Key terrain should be occupied or at the very least, denied to the enemy.
O – Observation and Fields of Fire: The ability to see your enemy and effectively engage them with direct or indirect fire is a core necessity of a proper fighting position. Fields of fire should be clear. Examples of an ideal field of fire would be down the slope of a hill or across an open field as both provide excellent line of sight for the defender while minimizing their own visual signature (especially for the one looking down a hill, these are some of the best fighting position locations).
C – Cover and Concealment: Cover protects from bullets and shrapnel while concealment hides one from view. Ideally a fighting position should offer both protection and stealth. If a decision must be made for only of those, the selection of which will depend entirely on circumstances unique to the situation such as the enemy, the team and their abilities, the objective, etc.
O – Obstacles: Obstacles will slow or halt enemy movement. Obstacles can be natural such as rives and cliffs or manmade with area denial tools like razor wire and minefields. Positions should be placed behind or beside obstacles in order to funnel enemy movement into the team’s fields of fires.
A - Avenues of Approach: Routes in which the enemy force can use to advance toward the team or their objective are the avenues of approach. These should be covered with fields of fire. Positions should not be on or in these areas unless there are no other options as they place the team in direct confrontation with the opposing force.
While the acronym is clumsy like most military acronyms, KOCOA provides leaders with a simple tool to identify strong areas for positions to be placed to better confront their enemy.
گاهی آدم حرفی میزند و درش می ماند. خیلی سریع می روم سر اصل موضوع توضیح کلی و پیشنهادات: ۱ - جنگیدن آمریکاییها با نحوه جنگ اسراییلیها کاملا متفاوت است. اسراییلیها متکی به بهینه سازی تا حد ممکن هستند ولی آمریکایی ها روش شان استفاده حداکثری از زور برای باقی نگذاشتن شک وتردید است.
مثال واضحش حمله به نطنز و تاسیسات یو سی اف اصفهان است. اسراییلی ها در شب اول ابتدا با حمله به پست برق با قطع ناگهانی جریان برق بخش عمده سانتریفیوژها را نابود کردند و سپس صبح بعدش جهت اطمینان بیشتر با بمبهای سنگرشکن
۲ و ۵ هزارپوندی به دو سالن زیرزمینی که سقف نسبتا نازک ۵ متری دارند در حین پخش مستقیم صدا وسیماحمله کردند با توجه به نوع ستونهای دود هیچ ناظری انتظاری نداشت چیزی از آنها باقی بماند.
۲ و ۵ هزارپوندی به دو سالن زیرزمینی که سقف نسبتا نازک ۵ متری دارند در حین پخش مستقیم صدا وسیماحمله کردند با توجه به نوع ستونهای دود هیچ ناظری انتظاری نداشت چیزی از آنها باقی بماند.
اما این از نظر آمریکاییها کافی نبود! لذا در عملیات چکش نیمه شب با اختصاص یک بمب افکن بی-۲ روی هر کدام از این سالنها یکبمب ۳۰ هزار پوندی انداختند که واقعا از تناسب با ان هدف خارج بود!
مشابه ان را درباره تاسیسات یو سی اف اصفهان اتفاق افتاد. اسراییلی ها با حمله به چهار ساختمان کلیدی در آن مجموعه از غیرقابل استفاده شدنش برای مدتها/تقریبا بصورت دائمی اطمینان حاصل کردند(تصویر اول). اما مجدداد این برای آمریکاییها کافی نبود
و آنها ۳۰ موشک کروز برای تسطیح مجموعه به آنجا شلیککردند(تصویر دوم).
مشابه ان را درباره تاسیسات یو سی اف اصفهان اتفاق افتاد. اسراییلی ها با حمله به چهار ساختمان کلیدی در آن مجموعه از غیرقابل استفاده شدنش برای مدتها/تقریبا بصورت دائمی اطمینان حاصل کردند(تصویر اول). اما مجدداد این برای آمریکاییها کافی نبود
و آنها ۳۰ موشک کروز برای تسطیح مجموعه به آنجا شلیککردند(تصویر دوم).
Baking soda isn't a health hack.
It's a forgotten medicine.
In 1924, doctors used it to fight the flu.
Today, research shows it fights cancer cells, kills inflammation & much more.
Here are 7 ways to use it: 🧵
It's a forgotten medicine.
In 1924, doctors used it to fight the flu.
Today, research shows it fights cancer cells, kills inflammation & much more.
Here are 7 ways to use it: 🧵
1
2
If you work in AI and don’t understand these 10 concepts, you’re already behind:
(thread)
(thread)
1/ Tokens
When you type a message to ChatGPT, it doesn't read words.
It reads tokens.
A token is roughly 3-4 characters. "Unbelievable" is 4 tokens. "AI" is 1.
This matters because every model has a token limit. Hit it, and the model starts forgetting earlier parts of the conversation.
When you type a message to ChatGPT, it doesn't read words.
It reads tokens.
A token is roughly 3-4 characters. "Unbelievable" is 4 tokens. "AI" is 1.
This matters because every model has a token limit. Hit it, and the model starts forgetting earlier parts of the conversation.
Here's why this should change how you work:
If you're stuffing a 50-page doc into a prompt and wondering why the output is garbage tokens are your problem.
The model didn't "read" your doc. It ran out of budget halfway through and started guessing.
Shorter, denser context = better outputs. Always.
If you're stuffing a 50-page doc into a prompt and wondering why the output is garbage tokens are your problem.
The model didn't "read" your doc. It ran out of budget halfway through and started guessing.
Shorter, denser context = better outputs. Always.
NEW: Judges are asking increasingly pointed questions about why ICE is detaining pregnant/nursing mothers — and whether a 2021 policy sharply restricting the practice remains in force.
They’ve ordered many released, warning of threats to safety/health.
politico.com/news/2026/02/1…
They’ve ordered many released, warning of threats to safety/health.
politico.com/news/2026/02/1…
The admin has told different judges different things re the policy. But outgoing spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin did defend the treatment of pregnant women in their custody and added “being in detention is a choice.” Self-deportation, she said, is another.
politico.com/news/2026/02/1…
politico.com/news/2026/02/1…
ICE's policy to sharply limit detention of pregnant/nursing mothers was adopted in 2021. It says ICE shouldn't detain pregnant/nursing mothers unless there are "exceptional circumstances." What are exceptional circumstances? Threats to life or national security. politico.com/news/2026/02/1…
In my clinic, the question is always the same: “What’s the fastest way to reverse insulin resistance?”
The answer isn’t dieting.
It’s leg strength.
Here’s the physiology most doctors never explain:
The answer isn’t dieting.
It’s leg strength.
Here’s the physiology most doctors never explain:
Your skeletal muscle is the largest glucose sink you own.
When your legs are weak, they can’t clear glucose efficiently.
So your pancreas compensates.
It pumps out more insulin.
When your legs are weak, they can’t clear glucose efficiently.
So your pancreas compensates.
It pumps out more insulin.
That chronic hyperinsulinemia: That’s what builds visceral fat.
Your fasting glucose might be “normal.”
95 mg/dL. Looks fine.
But your fasting insulin is 12?
That’s early metabolic dysfunction.
Your fasting glucose might be “normal.”
95 mg/dL. Looks fine.
But your fasting insulin is 12?
That’s early metabolic dysfunction.
NEW STUDY: 8 Weeks of High v Low Carbohydrate Diets Patterns Produced NO DIFFERENCE in athletic performance...
Yet again, when athletes adapt to a diet for >4weeks in duration, we dont see significant differences in performance metrics (all groups improved).
🍞High Carb (8 weeks): +4.6%
🥑Low Carb (4weeks) ->🍞High Carb (4weeks): +7.4%
🥑Low Carb (8weeks): +7.3%
Where have we seen this before?🤔👇
Yet again, when athletes adapt to a diet for >4weeks in duration, we dont see significant differences in performance metrics (all groups improved).
🍞High Carb (8 weeks): +4.6%
🥑Low Carb (4weeks) ->🍞High Carb (4weeks): +7.4%
🥑Low Carb (8weeks): +7.3%
Where have we seen this before?🤔👇
@stevemagness @Brady_H @nicknorwitz @zbitter @JoseAntonioPhD @DominicDAgosti2 @BenBikmanPhD @janellison @theplews1 @hiitscience pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41624183/
@sweatscience @Alan_Couzens @ProfTimNoakes @inaki_delaparra @LouiseMBurke @BlueSpotScience @jwhitfie @timpodlogar @drjamesdinic @DrPhilMaffetone @mikeormsbee @Alexleaf @bengreenfield @DominicDAgosti2 @PhilipPrins11 @alexklint @EatsleepfitJeff
@sweatscience @Alan_Couzens @ProfTimNoakes @inaki_delaparra @LouiseMBurke @BlueSpotScience @jwhitfie @timpodlogar @drjamesdinic @DrPhilMaffetone @mikeormsbee @Alexleaf @bengreenfield @DominicDAgosti2 @PhilipPrins11 @alexklint @EatsleepfitJeff
Imagine you are 1900 Elo. You are paired against a 1500 Elo junior. You play carefully, equalize after every complication, and split the point.
Over the board it feels like a “correct” draw against an equal practical opponent. On the rating sheet it is a penalty of -8.4 Elo points.
You did not blunder, but your number still drops.
This is no longer rare noise. It is the new normal.
🧵1/8
Over the board it feels like a “correct” draw against an equal practical opponent. On the rating sheet it is a penalty of -8.4 Elo points.
You did not blunder, but your number still drops.
This is no longer rare noise. It is the new normal.
🧵1/8
The Elo formula sees a 400-point gap and expects you (the 1900 Elo player) to score 92 %.
Reality: the players are equal strength and draw → 50 %.
You perform according to your real strength, but lose 8.4 rating points because you failed to meet the formula’s expectation.
That gap between expected score and actual score is the adjustment cost. Repeat it across many games and the pressure concentrates on rating favorites.
🧵2/8
Reality: the players are equal strength and draw → 50 %.
You perform according to your real strength, but lose 8.4 rating points because you failed to meet the formula’s expectation.
That gap between expected score and actual score is the adjustment cost. Repeat it across many games and the pressure concentrates on rating favorites.
🧵2/8
When we look at rating changes by age cohort (2021-2025):
Youth (<18) = clear positive trend
Prime (19–34) = slightly positive
Established (35–49) = slightly negative
Seniors (50+) = steep decline
The system is mechanically transferring points from adults to juniors. You are not being punished for bad play. You are paying the “deflation tax.”
🧵3/8
Youth (<18) = clear positive trend
Prime (19–34) = slightly positive
Established (35–49) = slightly negative
Seniors (50+) = steep decline
The system is mechanically transferring points from adults to juniors. You are not being punished for bad play. You are paying the “deflation tax.”
🧵3/8
Every W-2 employee should own a vending machine because…
The IRS wants you to.
Here are 7 expenses that can legally reduce your taxes when you own a vending machine:
The IRS wants you to.
Here are 7 expenses that can legally reduce your taxes when you own a vending machine:
1. Machine Depreciation
I use Section 179 to depreciate 100% of the value of a machine in Year 1.
This means if I finance a machine for 10% down ($600) I can write-off $6,000.
I can also write off the $200/mo payments that come from financing the machine.
I use Section 179 to depreciate 100% of the value of a machine in Year 1.
This means if I finance a machine for 10% down ($600) I can write-off $6,000.
I can also write off the $200/mo payments that come from financing the machine.
2. Vehicle
Every time you restock or service your machines, you're using your vehicle for business.
You can deduct either:
The standard mileage rate (67¢ per mile in 2025), or the actual vehicle expenses (gas, maintenance, insurance, and depreciation).
Even if you use your personal car, you can track business miles and write that portion off.
Every time you restock or service your machines, you're using your vehicle for business.
You can deduct either:
The standard mileage rate (67¢ per mile in 2025), or the actual vehicle expenses (gas, maintenance, insurance, and depreciation).
Even if you use your personal car, you can track business miles and write that portion off.
Stop running to lose weight.
Whether you have 20, 30, or 50 lbs+ to lose...
Here's the smartest way to burn it off (without NEEDING to do cardio):
Whether you have 20, 30, or 50 lbs+ to lose...
Here's the smartest way to burn it off (without NEEDING to do cardio):
Most people are convinced they need to do hours of cardio every week to lose weight.
So they start running, hate every second, and burn out in 3 weeks.
Then they're right back where they started.
So they start running, hate every second, and burn out in 3 weeks.
Then they're right back where they started.
Here's the actual problem:
You're eating more calories than you burn.
Running doesn't fix that. It just burns calories while you're doing it.
Then you eat them right back because you're hungry from running.
You're eating more calories than you burn.
Running doesn't fix that. It just burns calories while you're doing it.
Then you eat them right back because you're hungry from running.
INFARTOS: DADOS OFICIAIS DO SUS (AGORA COM 2025)
Infartos EXPLODIRAM em jovens após as vacinas COVID-19. Internações até 50 anos. Com linha de tendência, para que não reste dúvidas.
2025 explodiu MAIS ainda.
Mas não acredite em mim! Vou te ensinar a conferir.
Segue o fio 🧶
Infartos EXPLODIRAM em jovens após as vacinas COVID-19. Internações até 50 anos. Com linha de tendência, para que não reste dúvidas.
2025 explodiu MAIS ainda.
Mas não acredite em mim! Vou te ensinar a conferir.
Segue o fio 🧶
2. O acesso é público. No Google, digite “tabnet DataSUS”. Vamos para os dados OFICIAIS. Você vai abrir este site. Não acredite em mim. Não acredite no gráfico acima. Vá nos dados oficiais você mesmo. (O fio é meio longo porque o tutorial é detalhado, não quero discussão!).
3. Um pouco abaixo, na página, você abre a aba “Epidemiológicas e morbidade”. Aí clica em “Morbidade Hospitalar do SUS (SIH/SUS)”. Dica: se você usa MAC, use o SAFARI, o site é mal programado de não funciona direito no Chrome MAC. Vamos conferir?
Tödliche Hardware: Die westliche Lebensversicherung der russischen Hyperschall-Waffen
Russlands Raketenarsenal ist kein Produkt autonomer Ingenieurskunst, sondern eine technologische Geiselhaft.
Ohne die kontinuierliche Zufuhr von Hochleistungschips und Präzisionskomponenten aus den USA, Kanada und Europa wäre die aktuelle Fertigungsrate russischer Hyperschall-Systeme faktisch bei Null.
Es ist die Anatomie eines Systemfehlers, bei dem der Westen die Verteidigung mit Patriot-Systemen kaum skalieren kann, während seine eigene Industrie gleichzeitig das „Gehirn“ für den Angriff liefert.
Die Recherche deckt die Diskrepanz zwischen den massiven Skalierungsproblemen westlicher Abwehrlinien und der ungebrochenen Versorgung russischer Rüstungsschmieden über globale Schattenmärkte auf. Während Deutschland und die USA versuchen, minimale Bestände an Abfangraketen zu mobilisieren, zeigen die Handelsdaten seit dem 24.02.2022 eine paradoxe Realität: Die Intelligenz der Raketen, die Patriot-Batterien an ihre Grenzen bringen, spricht westlich. Diese Untersuchung analysiert die Hardware-Abhängigkeiten und die Akteure, die diesen Kreislauf am Leben erhalten, trotz Sanktionen. 🧵
Russlands Raketenarsenal ist kein Produkt autonomer Ingenieurskunst, sondern eine technologische Geiselhaft.
Ohne die kontinuierliche Zufuhr von Hochleistungschips und Präzisionskomponenten aus den USA, Kanada und Europa wäre die aktuelle Fertigungsrate russischer Hyperschall-Systeme faktisch bei Null.
Es ist die Anatomie eines Systemfehlers, bei dem der Westen die Verteidigung mit Patriot-Systemen kaum skalieren kann, während seine eigene Industrie gleichzeitig das „Gehirn“ für den Angriff liefert.
Die Recherche deckt die Diskrepanz zwischen den massiven Skalierungsproblemen westlicher Abwehrlinien und der ungebrochenen Versorgung russischer Rüstungsschmieden über globale Schattenmärkte auf. Während Deutschland und die USA versuchen, minimale Bestände an Abfangraketen zu mobilisieren, zeigen die Handelsdaten seit dem 24.02.2022 eine paradoxe Realität: Die Intelligenz der Raketen, die Patriot-Batterien an ihre Grenzen bringen, spricht westlich. Diese Untersuchung analysiert die Hardware-Abhängigkeiten und die Akteure, die diesen Kreislauf am Leben erhalten, trotz Sanktionen. 🧵
1/25
Die Aktenlage lässt keinen Raum für Zweifel: Die russische Hyperschall-Offensive ist kein technologisches Wunder, sondern ein westliches Industrieprodukt.
Wir untersuchen heute die systemische Verwundbarkeit eines Apparats, der ohne die Gier europäischer und nordamerikanischer Konzerne längst stillstünde.
Es ist eine Recherche über Chips und das Versagen der Exportkontrollen, das Menschenleben kostet. #AnnaDossier
Die Aktenlage lässt keinen Raum für Zweifel: Die russische Hyperschall-Offensive ist kein technologisches Wunder, sondern ein westliches Industrieprodukt.
Wir untersuchen heute die systemische Verwundbarkeit eines Apparats, der ohne die Gier europäischer und nordamerikanischer Konzerne längst stillstünde.
Es ist eine Recherche über Chips und das Versagen der Exportkontrollen, das Menschenleben kostet. #AnnaDossier
2/25
Das erste Paradoxon: Die Kinschal-Rakete galt als unaufhaltsam. Doch die operative Realität am 02.01.2024 in Kyjiw bewies das Gegenteil. Patriot-Systeme fingen die „Wunderwaffe“ ab. Die Verwundbarkeit der Rakete liegt in der Physik: Beim Eintritt in die Endphase verliert sie an Tempo, um steuerbar zu bleiben. In diesem Moment wird sie zur Beute. Doch die Ukraine hat ein Nachschubproblem, das im Westen hausgemacht ist. #Hyperschall
Das erste Paradoxon: Die Kinschal-Rakete galt als unaufhaltsam. Doch die operative Realität am 02.01.2024 in Kyjiw bewies das Gegenteil. Patriot-Systeme fingen die „Wunderwaffe“ ab. Die Verwundbarkeit der Rakete liegt in der Physik: Beim Eintritt in die Endphase verliert sie an Tempo, um steuerbar zu bleiben. In diesem Moment wird sie zur Beute. Doch die Ukraine hat ein Nachschubproblem, das im Westen hausgemacht ist. #Hyperschall
BREAKING: AI can now build you a complete website in 2 hours (for free).
Here are 9 insane Claude Opus 4.6 + Figma Make prompts that create $5,000 websites in 2 hours:
(Save this before your competitors do)
Here are 9 insane Claude Opus 4.6 + Figma Make prompts that create $5,000 websites in 2 hours:
(Save this before your competitors do)
I just built a $5,000 client website in 118 minutes.
The stack:
- Claude Opus 4.6 for architecture, logic & complex reasoning
- Figma Make for pixel-perfect UI, interactions & deployment
I tested 100+ prompts, so you don't have to.
Here are the 9 prompts that actually work:
The stack:
- Claude Opus 4.6 for architecture, logic & complex reasoning
- Figma Make for pixel-perfect UI, interactions & deployment
I tested 100+ prompts, so you don't have to.
Here are the 9 prompts that actually work:
PROMPT 1: The Architecture Strategist
You are a Principal Architect at Vercel. I need to build a [WEBSITE TYPE: portfolio/saas/e-commerce].
Requirements:
- Target audience: [DESCRIBE]
- Key features: [LIST 3-5]
- Tech considerations: [RESPONSIVE/SEO/PERFORMANCE]
Deliver:
1. Site map (all pages with hierarchy)
2. User flows (3 primary journeys)
3. Data models (if dynamic content)
4. API requirements (if applicable)
5. Component inventory (30+ components needed)
6. Page templates (wireframe descriptions)
7. Technical stack recommendation
8. Performance budgets (load time targets)
9. SEO structure (meta templates, URL patterns)
Format as a technical specification I can hand to Figma Make.
You are a Principal Architect at Vercel. I need to build a [WEBSITE TYPE: portfolio/saas/e-commerce].
Requirements:
- Target audience: [DESCRIBE]
- Key features: [LIST 3-5]
- Tech considerations: [RESPONSIVE/SEO/PERFORMANCE]
Deliver:
1. Site map (all pages with hierarchy)
2. User flows (3 primary journeys)
3. Data models (if dynamic content)
4. API requirements (if applicable)
5. Component inventory (30+ components needed)
6. Page templates (wireframe descriptions)
7. Technical stack recommendation
8. Performance budgets (load time targets)
9. SEO structure (meta templates, URL patterns)
Format as a technical specification I can hand to Figma Make.
Trump said it…
It’s perfectly legal to buy a property, and offset 100% of its depreciation value against your W-2 income in 2025.
Here’s how:
It’s perfectly legal to buy a property, and offset 100% of its depreciation value against your W-2 income in 2025.
Here’s how:
For context:
Trump officially signed 100% bonus depreciation back into Law with the big beautiful bill.
This is going to be the best year for Airbnb owners because…
Trump officially signed 100% bonus depreciation back into Law with the big beautiful bill.
This is going to be the best year for Airbnb owners because…
Let’s say you put 20% down on a $500k home…
Typically ~25% of the purchase price can be bonus depreciated into year one (because land value doesn’t qualify).
Here’s how much this can save you in taxes in 2025:
Typically ~25% of the purchase price can be bonus depreciated into year one (because land value doesn’t qualify).
Here’s how much this can save you in taxes in 2025:
🔴 THREAD : Ne faites plus ces 10 erreurs fréquentes dans les débats sur l'insécurité en France.
1⃣ "Il y a de plus en plus de crimes et délits enregistrés"
❌FAUX
En tendance longue, le nombre d'infractions enregistrées est stable. ⬇️
1⃣ "Il y a de plus en plus de crimes et délits enregistrés"
❌FAUX
En tendance longue, le nombre d'infractions enregistrées est stable. ⬇️
2⃣ "Ok, donc les violences n'augmentent pas."
❌ FAUX
Le nombre de violences enregistrées explose : multiplié par près de 4 entre 1996 et 2021. ⬇️
❌ FAUX
Le nombre de violences enregistrées explose : multiplié par près de 4 entre 1996 et 2021. ⬇️
🤔 "Mais alors... pourquoi on a toujours autant de crimes et délits ?"
Deux phénomènes parallèles se compensent :
📈 Hausse des violences
📈 Hausse des délits de plus en plus rémunérateurs (stups, escroqueries)
📉 Baisse des vols, plus risqués et moins rémunérateurs qu'avant ⬇️
Deux phénomènes parallèles se compensent :
📈 Hausse des violences
📈 Hausse des délits de plus en plus rémunérateurs (stups, escroqueries)
📉 Baisse des vols, plus risqués et moins rémunérateurs qu'avant ⬇️
🧵1/10
Britain’s Hidden Crime: How the UK and US Erased an Entire People - and Why it’s Happening Again
If you’ve never heard what Britain did to the Chagossians, that’s not an accident. It’s one of the darkest, most shameful acts our government ever carried out - and it’s being repeated in our time.
I’m ashamed to admit it but, for most of my life, I was completely ignorant about the the forced removal of the Chagossian people in the late 1960s - something the British government of the time carried out in secret, something that was never once during my education. And the more I read, the more horrified I become.
This wasn’t relocation. It was erasure.
#ChagosIslands #HistoryMatters #JusticeForChagos
Britain’s Hidden Crime: How the UK and US Erased an Entire People - and Why it’s Happening Again
If you’ve never heard what Britain did to the Chagossians, that’s not an accident. It’s one of the darkest, most shameful acts our government ever carried out - and it’s being repeated in our time.
I’m ashamed to admit it but, for most of my life, I was completely ignorant about the the forced removal of the Chagossian people in the late 1960s - something the British government of the time carried out in secret, something that was never once during my education. And the more I read, the more horrified I become.
This wasn’t relocation. It was erasure.
#ChagosIslands #HistoryMatters #JusticeForChagos
2/10
In the late 1960s, under Labour Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, the UK struck a deal with the US to hand over Diego Garcia for a military base.
The only problem? The islands were already home to an entire people.
The solution? Pretend they didn’t exist. Literally.
Officials described them as “contract labourers” who could be “removed”.
In the late 1960s, under Labour Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, the UK struck a deal with the US to hand over Diego Garcia for a military base.
The only problem? The islands were already home to an entire people.
The solution? Pretend they didn’t exist. Literally.
Officials described them as “contract labourers” who could be “removed”.
3/10
What followed was a coordinated, state‑directed campaign to clear the islands.
Families were told they were being “evacuated”.
Those who travelled for medical care or supplies were blocked from returning.
Their homes were left to rot.
Their lives were dismantled piece by piece.
What followed was a coordinated, state‑directed campaign to clear the islands.
Families were told they were being “evacuated”.
Those who travelled for medical care or supplies were blocked from returning.
Their homes were left to rot.
Their lives were dismantled piece by piece.
1/ Russia may be preparing to announce a mass mobilisation, a bad peace deal with the US, or confiscate people's savings to fund the war effort, according to Russian warbloggers. They suspect that the government wants to ban Telegram to block public dissent over such moves. ⬇️
2/ Russian officials have hinted strongly that Telegram, which is currently being slowed down and partly blocked by the government, faces a total ban by 1 April 2026. 'Alex Parker Returns' writes (in a since-deleted post) that the government faces a dilemma:
3/ "Either capitulate in accordance with the renewed spirit of Anchorage—freezing the line of contact, surrendering the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, and other whimsical proposals that our esteemed partners will come up with along the way, …
Expulsions
Alternative history:
If Jews had had a nation, say in the 17th century - or earlier, how would they have treated outsiders (pagans, Christians)? Would such outsiders have been welcome, allowed to rise to middle class status, meddle with the affairs of aristocracy etc?
Alternative history:
If Jews had had a nation, say in the 17th century - or earlier, how would they have treated outsiders (pagans, Christians)? Would such outsiders have been welcome, allowed to rise to middle class status, meddle with the affairs of aristocracy etc?
"under a genuinely halakhic regime, the question “Should we invite thousands of useful Christian merchants to live among us and help rebuild the economy?” would be laughed out of the room, or treated as a dangerous breach of purity."
"The default [would have been] expulsion or severe restriction, not invitation for pragmatic gain."