You can also measure molecular ancestry more directly rather than using a sibling design.
Here we have correlations between european ancestry, skin color, and cognitive ability. Partialing ancestry from skin color, the semipartial correlation between skin color and cognitive ability flips to an insignificant r = +0.00129 effect in the opposite direction. sci-hub.se/https://doi.or…
this assumes that women have eugenic preferences.
seems like atm fertility in men is being predicted by poor executive functioning, high extroversion (social promiscuity), low sensitivity, and low iq.
so if they are eugenic, they’re clearly not eugenic enough
1. Hypothesize candidate biases via LLM 2. Generate controlled input variations 3. Test statistically (McNemar + Bonferroni) 4. Filter concepts the model mentions in its reasoning
I say this literally every fortnight now, but you can’t have a social contract where you ask 95% of the population to pay more money and obey the law, while letting 5% of the population break any rule they want to without punishment.
Children in nursery class can work that out.
Yet our government(s) and judiciary can’t. You are creating the perfect conditions for civil unrest and populism. It will get ugly, and it won’t be thanks to “Russian Disinformation” or “Right Wing Agitators”, it will be because soft men create hard times.
There’s this delusional view I read on here sometimes, which is basically ‘these guys/gals are down on their luck + it’s putting a middle finger up to big business + shoplifting/bumping through the barriers only costs a tiny fraction relative to corporate profits’ and so on. Sort of view a 14 year old has when they begin to learn about politics and society (totally fair if you’re 14).
If this is your view at any age over 18, please feel free to create a slush fund where you can deposit 20% of your earnings. We can then use your money to further subsidise law obeying citizens. Put your money where your mouth is on this.
THREAD Une campagne massive sur ce réseau vise à imposer le récit d’une France seule responsable de l’échec plus que probable du programme SCAF. Ce récit passe par les canaux habituels : presse britannique, think-tanks bruxellois... Procès mérité ? Etudions ça de plus près
Premier point : l’intransigeance de Dassault et l’alignement du MinArm sur la position de l’avionneur ont évidemment un poids non négligeable dans la crise actuelle. Mais en faire l’alpha et l’omega de l’échec annoncé du SCAF est d’une grande malhonnêteté intellectuelle
Revenons au début du programme, en 2017. Le choix d’une alliance franco-allemande n’avait rien de naturel. Le premier choix de Paris était Londres (programme FCAS, avec BAE, Dassault, Rolls Royce, Safran, Thales etc)
Among the strangest things in the Epstein files is this hundreds of pages long document describing the use of directed energy and mind control technology on people without their consent.
The file above is EFTA00262811.
This is also discussed an a separate document, File EFTA00080475, which explains how “driving people to commit suicide is a common practice” with directed energy weapons.
Indeed. It is highly likely that any implantable tech will be descended from DARPA’s N3 program and will contain backdoors for control and surveillance. Energy weapons won’t be needed in the future because peoples’ own brains will be turned against them.
America is bleeding: institutions captured by ideologues, borders that might as well not exist, schools teaching activism instead of the three R's, families under sustained assault,
and a culture that treats objective reality as optional.
Life-threatening.
And Trump is applying pressure to staunch the immediate damage and buy us time.
Securing the border, reining in bureaucracy, appointing judges who actually read the Constitution, restori g energy sanity.
1/ Why does the Russian government appear to be so clueless about the role Telegram plays in military communications? The answer, one warblogger suggests, is that the military leadership doesn't want to admit its failure to provide its own reliable communications solutions. ⬇️
2/ Recent claims by high-ranking officials that Telegram isn't relevant to military communications have prompted howls of outrage and detailed rebuttals from Russian warbloggers, but have also pointed to a deeper problem about what reliance on Telegram (and Starlink) represents.
3/ In both cases, the Russian military has failed abysmally to provide workable solutions. Telegram and Starlink were both adopted so widely because the 'official' alternatives (military messngers and the Yamal satellite constellation) are slow, unreliable and lack key features.