Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
You keep failing because you need to update your identity. That's it.
Here's the only "hack" of the self-help industry worth knowing and mastering.
Thread🧵
Here's the only "hack" of the self-help industry worth knowing and mastering.
Thread🧵
It's George.
Most of the productivity tools that are promoted these days, from nootropics all the way to fancy software, are useless noise.
The reality is far simpler, but getting results requires far more reps.
Let me explain.
Most of the productivity tools that are promoted these days, from nootropics all the way to fancy software, are useless noise.
The reality is far simpler, but getting results requires far more reps.
Let me explain.
Now i don't care who you are, most likely at some point in your life, you had to help someone at X,Y,Z and you got absolutely mindfucked with how many mental roadblocks the person faced.
Not being able to follow simple instructions due to some made-up roadblock.
Really pause and think how true this is.
Not being able to follow simple instructions due to some made-up roadblock.
Really pause and think how true this is.
1/3
Putting tariffs on Canada and Mexico makes no sense at all, even though they run trade surpluses with the US.
That's because in a hyper-globalized world, trade imbalances are always resolved systemically, never bilaterally.
ft.com/content/22f2f3…
Putting tariffs on Canada and Mexico makes no sense at all, even though they run trade surpluses with the US.
That's because in a hyper-globalized world, trade imbalances are always resolved systemically, never bilaterally.
ft.com/content/22f2f3…
2/3
Canada and Mexico are both trade deficit economies. They are effectively on the same side of the global imbalances as the US, so that their impact on the US trade deficit is to reduce it, not increase it, by absorbing part of the imbalances created by the surplus economies.
Canada and Mexico are both trade deficit economies. They are effectively on the same side of the global imbalances as the US, so that their impact on the US trade deficit is to reduce it, not increase it, by absorbing part of the imbalances created by the surplus economies.
3/3
This may seem counterintuitive at first, but only to those who don't think systemically. In fact my mentor at Columbia, Michael Adler, used to threaten to fail anyone in his international finance class who even mentioned bilateral trade imbalances. He was only half joking.
This may seem counterintuitive at first, but only to those who don't think systemically. In fact my mentor at Columbia, Michael Adler, used to threaten to fail anyone in his international finance class who even mentioned bilateral trade imbalances. He was only half joking.
Thread:
1/8 @TheAtlantic just dropped another anonymously sourced hit piece on @FBIDirectorKash. Classic legacy media playbook: 20+ unnamed “officials” whispering scandals with zero evidence. Patel’s response? “Print it, all false, I’ll see you in court—bring your checkbook.”
1/8 @TheAtlantic just dropped another anonymously sourced hit piece on @FBIDirectorKash. Classic legacy media playbook: 20+ unnamed “officials” whispering scandals with zero evidence. Patel’s response? “Print it, all false, I’ll see you in court—bring your checkbook.”
2/8 “Freak-out” over login glitch? It was a quick technical error, fixed fast. Nine unnamed sources called it panic. One FBI official: “It was all ultimately bullshit.” Not firing. Not crisis. Just bureaucracy.
3/8 Drinking claims: Excessive intoxication at DC/Vegas clubs, rescheduled meetings, security issues. Zero on-record proof. No videos beyond one harmless beer chug in Italy. Patel & FBI: Categorically false & defamatory. Suing.
Blood Before Blessing
Passage: Leviticus 8:14-15
There is a law running through your Bible that every religious faker in America hates with a passion, and that law is this: God will never bless what has not first come under the blood. He will not sanctify your zeal, baptize your sincerity, excuse your rebellion, or perfume your flesh. He starts with death, because the flesh deserves death. He starts with sacrifice, because sin must be judged before fellowship can be enjoyed. He starts with blood, because there is no approach to a holy God apart from atonement. In Leviticus 8, when Aaron and his sons are being consecrated for priestly service, the first great lesson is not garments, not oil, not beauty, not dignity, not office, and not ceremony. The first lesson is blood. The text says, “And he brought the bullock for the sin offering: and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the bullock for the sin offering. And he slew it; and Moses took the blood” (Leviticus 8:14-15). That is not accidental. That is God preaching before Moses ever opens his mouth.
The modern church world has tried to reverse the order. It wants blessing before blood, power before purity, platform before consecration, ministry before cleansing, and applause before the altar. Men want to be anointed without being broken. They want to be used without being emptied. They want the crown without the cross, the fire without the sacrifice, and the office without the death sentence upon the old man. But God has never changed His order. Before Aaron can wear the holy garments, before he can minister at the altar, before he can stand in the sanctuary, a victim has to die and blood has to be handled. That is because priesthood without blood is theater. Worship without blood is fraud. Holiness without blood is self-righteousness in a costume. The Lord is teaching in picture form what He will later state in plain words: “without shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22).
That truth does not vanish when you leave Leviticus and come to Calvary. It explodes. All those rivers of blood in the Old Testament were shouting ahead to one crimson stream running down the cross of Jesus Christ. Every slain bullock, every sprinkled altar, every bleeding victim was a witness against man’s goodness and a prophecy of God’s remedy. The sinner is not improved into acceptance. He is forgiven through substitution. The priest is not polished into holiness. He is set apart through blood. The worshipper is not welcomed because he means well. He is received because another has died in his place. So if you are going to understand Leviticus 8:14-15 rightly divided, then you must get this settled in your soul: blood comes before blessing, atonement comes before anointing, cleansing comes before calling, and the altar comes before the sanctuary. If you miss that, you will miss the whole chapter and half the churches in your town will help you miss it.
1. God Begins With a Sin Offering, Not a Celebration
The chapter does not open with a parade. It opens with a problem. Aaron is about to become high priest, and his sons are about to enter priestly service, but before anything else is done, the bullock for the sin offering is brought forward. That alone destroys the fantasy that religious office makes a man inherently clean. Aaron is not treated as a celebrity. He is treated as a sinner needing atonement. The text says, “And he brought the bullock for the sin offering” (Leviticus 8:14). Notice that. Before the beautiful robes, before the breastplate, before the mitre, before the oil, comes the sin offering. God is not impressed by rank. He is not dazzled by title. He does not say, “Aaron is the chosen man, so let us skip the bloody part.” No, sir. The chosen man has to come the same way every sinner comes, through a substitute.
That should flatten a whole generation of pulpit peacocks. There is something rotten in professing Christianity when men think
Passage: Leviticus 8:14-15
There is a law running through your Bible that every religious faker in America hates with a passion, and that law is this: God will never bless what has not first come under the blood. He will not sanctify your zeal, baptize your sincerity, excuse your rebellion, or perfume your flesh. He starts with death, because the flesh deserves death. He starts with sacrifice, because sin must be judged before fellowship can be enjoyed. He starts with blood, because there is no approach to a holy God apart from atonement. In Leviticus 8, when Aaron and his sons are being consecrated for priestly service, the first great lesson is not garments, not oil, not beauty, not dignity, not office, and not ceremony. The first lesson is blood. The text says, “And he brought the bullock for the sin offering: and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the bullock for the sin offering. And he slew it; and Moses took the blood” (Leviticus 8:14-15). That is not accidental. That is God preaching before Moses ever opens his mouth.
The modern church world has tried to reverse the order. It wants blessing before blood, power before purity, platform before consecration, ministry before cleansing, and applause before the altar. Men want to be anointed without being broken. They want to be used without being emptied. They want the crown without the cross, the fire without the sacrifice, and the office without the death sentence upon the old man. But God has never changed His order. Before Aaron can wear the holy garments, before he can minister at the altar, before he can stand in the sanctuary, a victim has to die and blood has to be handled. That is because priesthood without blood is theater. Worship without blood is fraud. Holiness without blood is self-righteousness in a costume. The Lord is teaching in picture form what He will later state in plain words: “without shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22).
That truth does not vanish when you leave Leviticus and come to Calvary. It explodes. All those rivers of blood in the Old Testament were shouting ahead to one crimson stream running down the cross of Jesus Christ. Every slain bullock, every sprinkled altar, every bleeding victim was a witness against man’s goodness and a prophecy of God’s remedy. The sinner is not improved into acceptance. He is forgiven through substitution. The priest is not polished into holiness. He is set apart through blood. The worshipper is not welcomed because he means well. He is received because another has died in his place. So if you are going to understand Leviticus 8:14-15 rightly divided, then you must get this settled in your soul: blood comes before blessing, atonement comes before anointing, cleansing comes before calling, and the altar comes before the sanctuary. If you miss that, you will miss the whole chapter and half the churches in your town will help you miss it.
1. God Begins With a Sin Offering, Not a Celebration
The chapter does not open with a parade. It opens with a problem. Aaron is about to become high priest, and his sons are about to enter priestly service, but before anything else is done, the bullock for the sin offering is brought forward. That alone destroys the fantasy that religious office makes a man inherently clean. Aaron is not treated as a celebrity. He is treated as a sinner needing atonement. The text says, “And he brought the bullock for the sin offering” (Leviticus 8:14). Notice that. Before the beautiful robes, before the breastplate, before the mitre, before the oil, comes the sin offering. God is not impressed by rank. He is not dazzled by title. He does not say, “Aaron is the chosen man, so let us skip the bloody part.” No, sir. The chosen man has to come the same way every sinner comes, through a substitute.
That should flatten a whole generation of pulpit peacocks. There is something rotten in professing Christianity when men think
ordination erases depravity. It does not. Titles do not wash sin away. Degrees do not make the flesh holy. Collars, robes, pulpits, committees, seminaries, and flattering introductions do not impress the Judge of all the earth. Aaron himself has to stand there and lay his hands on the victim. He has to identify with the offering. He has to confess by action that he deserves what is about to happen to that bullock. That is the doctrine. The victim dies because the priest is guilty. That same doctrine shows up in the New Testament when the sinner flees to Christ. “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). You do not enter service by denying guilt. You enter service by seeing guilt transferred to a substitute.
There is another sting in that passage for the modern reader. God begins with the sin offering because sin is the real issue, not self-expression. The world talks about trauma, environment, upbringing, and social pressure. The Lord talks about sin. The church growth experts talk about relevance, atmosphere, and branding. The Lord talks about sin. Liberal religion wants to start with affirmation. God starts with sacrifice. That is why so much religion today has blessing language but no bleeding altar. It wants the fruit without dealing with the root. But God does not build His house on sentiment. He builds it on justice satisfied. There can be no blessing until sin has been judged, and there can be no real holiness until the sinner has first come under the sentence of death and the shelter of the blood.
with affirmation. God starts with sacrifice. That is why so much religion today has blessing language but no bleeding altar. It wants the fruit without dealing with the root. But God does not build His house on sentiment. He builds it on justice satisfied. There can be no blessing until sin has been judged, and there can be no real holiness until the sinner has first come under the sentence of death and the shelter of the blood.
2. The Laying on of Hands Declares Substitution
The next thing you see is Aaron and his sons putting their hands upon the head of the bullock. “And Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the bullock for the sin offering” (Leviticus 8:14). That is not a cute little ritual. That is identification. That is transfer by picture. That is a visible sermon showing that the guilt of the priest is being placed upon the innocent victim. The bullock is standing in their stead. In type, the beast becomes what they are so that they may stand where they otherwise could not stand. This is the old gospel in picture form. The holy God requires death for sin, and the sinner survives only because another dies under his judgment.
That truth runs like a scarlet cord all the way to Calvary. When John the Baptist pointed at Jesus Christ and said, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), he was not inventing something new. He was identifying the fulfillment of what Leviticus had been teaching for centuries. Christ did not die as a tragic example. He died as a substitute. He did not merely show us love. He bore wrath. He did not simply sympathize with our suffering. He stood in our place under divine judgment. Isaiah said, “The LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:6). There is your laying on of hands in prophecy. God placed on His Son what belonged to you and me, and He poured out on the sinless One what justice demanded from the guilty.
Now that doctrine is offensive to religious pride because it leaves no room for boasting. If the victim died in my place, then I had nothing to offer but guilt. If Christ bore my sins, then my tears did not help Him, my resolutions did not strengthen Him, and my promises did not assist Him. Salvation was not a cooperative effort between my sincerity and God’s mercy. It was a rescue. It was substitution. It was blood
There is another sting in that passage for the modern reader. God begins with the sin offering because sin is the real issue, not self-expression. The world talks about trauma, environment, upbringing, and social pressure. The Lord talks about sin. The church growth experts talk about relevance, atmosphere, and branding. The Lord talks about sin. Liberal religion wants to start with affirmation. God starts with sacrifice. That is why so much religion today has blessing language but no bleeding altar. It wants the fruit without dealing with the root. But God does not build His house on sentiment. He builds it on justice satisfied. There can be no blessing until sin has been judged, and there can be no real holiness until the sinner has first come under the sentence of death and the shelter of the blood.
with affirmation. God starts with sacrifice. That is why so much religion today has blessing language but no bleeding altar. It wants the fruit without dealing with the root. But God does not build His house on sentiment. He builds it on justice satisfied. There can be no blessing until sin has been judged, and there can be no real holiness until the sinner has first come under the sentence of death and the shelter of the blood.
2. The Laying on of Hands Declares Substitution
The next thing you see is Aaron and his sons putting their hands upon the head of the bullock. “And Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the bullock for the sin offering” (Leviticus 8:14). That is not a cute little ritual. That is identification. That is transfer by picture. That is a visible sermon showing that the guilt of the priest is being placed upon the innocent victim. The bullock is standing in their stead. In type, the beast becomes what they are so that they may stand where they otherwise could not stand. This is the old gospel in picture form. The holy God requires death for sin, and the sinner survives only because another dies under his judgment.
That truth runs like a scarlet cord all the way to Calvary. When John the Baptist pointed at Jesus Christ and said, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), he was not inventing something new. He was identifying the fulfillment of what Leviticus had been teaching for centuries. Christ did not die as a tragic example. He died as a substitute. He did not merely show us love. He bore wrath. He did not simply sympathize with our suffering. He stood in our place under divine judgment. Isaiah said, “The LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:6). There is your laying on of hands in prophecy. God placed on His Son what belonged to you and me, and He poured out on the sinless One what justice demanded from the guilty.
Now that doctrine is offensive to religious pride because it leaves no room for boasting. If the victim died in my place, then I had nothing to offer but guilt. If Christ bore my sins, then my tears did not help Him, my resolutions did not strengthen Him, and my promises did not assist Him. Salvation was not a cooperative effort between my sincerity and God’s mercy. It was a rescue. It was substitution. It was blood
atonement. That is why people who hate the old gospel spend so much time trying to explain away substitutionary blood redemption. They know exactly what it destroys. It destroys the glory of man and leaves all the glory with Jesus Christ. Aaron’s hands on the bullock’s head preach what every sinner must finally admit: “That should have been me.”
3. The Blood Is Applied Before the Priest Is Consecrated
After the victim is slain, Moses takes the blood and applies it where God commands. “And he slew it; and Moses took the blood, and put it upon the horns of the altar round about with his finger, and purified the altar, and poured the blood at the bottom of the altar, and sanctified it, to make reconciliation upon it” (Leviticus 8:15). There is movement in that verse. The blood is not admired from a distance. It is not discussed academically. It is applied. God is not interested in people who merely admire the doctrine of atonement while remaining strangers to its power. Blood in the basin is not enough. It must be brought where God says it belongs.
That is the problem with dead orthodoxy. There are whole denominations that can discuss atonement historically, linguistically, and symbolically, but they have never come under the blood by faith. They can talk about redemption and remain unredeemed. They can parse Greek verbs and die in their sins. They can preach sermons on the cross while trusting their church membership, sacraments, confirmation, endurance, repentance formula, or moral effort. But the Bible does not say blessed are they that analyze the blood. It says, “In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins” (Colossians 1:14). There has to be personal application. There has to be faith in what the blood accomplished. There has to be a moment when the sinner quits hiding behind religion and takes God’s side against himself.
Notice too that the altar is purified and sanctified by blood. The place of approach itself has to be dealt with. That is because sin contaminates everything it touches. Man cannot even approach God without the ground of approach being sanctified through sacrifice. In the New Testament that truth reaches its highest fulfillment in Jesus Christ Himself. He is the altar, the priest, and the offering. He is the meeting place between God and man. He said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me” (John 14:6). Not by your church. Not by your reform. Not by your tears. Not by your law keeping. Not by your endurance. By Him. And the reason is simple. He alone has blood that satisfies God. So before Aaron ever ministers, the altar is touched with blood, because blessing follows the blood trail and never outruns it.
4. Holiness Without the Altar Is Hypocrisy
There is a kind of holiness that God hates. It is the holiness of the Pharisee, the holiness of the religious actor, the holiness of the polished hypocrite who has standards without a substitute and rules without redemption. That crowd can dress right, talk right, condemn others right, and still be dead wrong because their holiness is not rooted in the altar. It is self-manufactured. It is cosmetic. It is what Paul called “having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof” (2 Timothy 3:5). In Leviticus 8 the Lord wrecks that fraud before it starts. Aaron cannot be dressed into holiness before the blood is shed. The altar has to come first.
That is why any holiness movement that minimizes the blood of Christ is headed straight into deception. If a man tells you that holiness is mainly external reform, he has not learned Leviticus. If he tells you that sanctification is achieved by self-discipline apart from the finished work of Christ, he has not learned Calvary. If he tells you that God blesses moral effort before a sinner is redeemed by blood, he is not preaching the Bible. Scripture says, “Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be
3. The Blood Is Applied Before the Priest Is Consecrated
After the victim is slain, Moses takes the blood and applies it where God commands. “And he slew it; and Moses took the blood, and put it upon the horns of the altar round about with his finger, and purified the altar, and poured the blood at the bottom of the altar, and sanctified it, to make reconciliation upon it” (Leviticus 8:15). There is movement in that verse. The blood is not admired from a distance. It is not discussed academically. It is applied. God is not interested in people who merely admire the doctrine of atonement while remaining strangers to its power. Blood in the basin is not enough. It must be brought where God says it belongs.
That is the problem with dead orthodoxy. There are whole denominations that can discuss atonement historically, linguistically, and symbolically, but they have never come under the blood by faith. They can talk about redemption and remain unredeemed. They can parse Greek verbs and die in their sins. They can preach sermons on the cross while trusting their church membership, sacraments, confirmation, endurance, repentance formula, or moral effort. But the Bible does not say blessed are they that analyze the blood. It says, “In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins” (Colossians 1:14). There has to be personal application. There has to be faith in what the blood accomplished. There has to be a moment when the sinner quits hiding behind religion and takes God’s side against himself.
Notice too that the altar is purified and sanctified by blood. The place of approach itself has to be dealt with. That is because sin contaminates everything it touches. Man cannot even approach God without the ground of approach being sanctified through sacrifice. In the New Testament that truth reaches its highest fulfillment in Jesus Christ Himself. He is the altar, the priest, and the offering. He is the meeting place between God and man. He said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me” (John 14:6). Not by your church. Not by your reform. Not by your tears. Not by your law keeping. Not by your endurance. By Him. And the reason is simple. He alone has blood that satisfies God. So before Aaron ever ministers, the altar is touched with blood, because blessing follows the blood trail and never outruns it.
4. Holiness Without the Altar Is Hypocrisy
There is a kind of holiness that God hates. It is the holiness of the Pharisee, the holiness of the religious actor, the holiness of the polished hypocrite who has standards without a substitute and rules without redemption. That crowd can dress right, talk right, condemn others right, and still be dead wrong because their holiness is not rooted in the altar. It is self-manufactured. It is cosmetic. It is what Paul called “having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof” (2 Timothy 3:5). In Leviticus 8 the Lord wrecks that fraud before it starts. Aaron cannot be dressed into holiness before the blood is shed. The altar has to come first.
That is why any holiness movement that minimizes the blood of Christ is headed straight into deception. If a man tells you that holiness is mainly external reform, he has not learned Leviticus. If he tells you that sanctification is achieved by self-discipline apart from the finished work of Christ, he has not learned Calvary. If he tells you that God blesses moral effort before a sinner is redeemed by blood, he is not preaching the Bible. Scripture says, “Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be
No matter how much you exercise, you won’t lose fat until you fix your diet.
Here are 9 cheat codes to easily fix it: 🧵
1. Eat a lot of potatoes
Here are 9 cheat codes to easily fix it: 🧵
1. Eat a lot of potatoes
Potatoes are the most satiating food on the planet & loaded with nutrients.
They're also low in calories so they'll help you nail your calorie deficit.
Make them a staple side.
They're also low in calories so they'll help you nail your calorie deficit.
Make them a staple side.
2. Limit alcohol.
It throws off fullness signaling by wrecking your sleep & leptin sensitivity.
This leads to more cravings & overeating making it hard to lose fat.
The less you drink, the easier fat loss becomes.
It throws off fullness signaling by wrecking your sleep & leptin sensitivity.
This leads to more cravings & overeating making it hard to lose fat.
The less you drink, the easier fat loss becomes.
After 6 years in the gym & helping over 900 people lose 10–35 kg, here are the best weight loss tips I wish I knew when I started:
1. Stop running .
1. Stop running .
2. Most people eat due to B.T.S. (boredom, thirst, or stress) - not the K-pop stars
3. If you're not horny, you're not healthy.
4. Eat fruits if you crave sugar.
4. Eat fruits if you crave sugar.
Zelenskyy: Russia openly says it wants to control its neighbors and decide Europe’s security order.
It has carried its war agenda as far as Syria and Africa. This is a global threat — and more countries now see it that way.
1/
It has carried its war agenda as far as Syria and Africa. This is a global threat — and more countries now see it that way.
1/
Zelenskyy: Putin knows exactly what he’s doing and who he resembles.
He is rightly compared to the Nazis: the same expansionism, the same urge to decide which nations may exist.
2/
He is rightly compared to the Nazis: the same expansionism, the same urge to decide which nations may exist.
2/
Zelenskyy: The freedom Ukraine still lacks is freedom from ruins and from those who bring them.
Freedom is never abstract — it must be fought for, protected, and built on security, law, culture, education, and one clear principle: evil must be punished.
3/
Freedom is never abstract — it must be fought for, protected, and built on security, law, culture, education, and one clear principle: evil must be punished.
3/
Stubb: When Europe feels threatened by Russia, it unites.
When it feels mistreated by US tariffs, it looks elsewhere — deals with Mercosur, India, closer ties with Canada. This isn’t a rupture with America, but a new phase in the relationship.
1/
When it feels mistreated by US tariffs, it looks elsewhere — deals with Mercosur, India, closer ties with Canada. This isn’t a rupture with America, but a new phase in the relationship.
1/
Stubb: We wrongly thought history ended after the Cold War and failed to reform global institutions.
Then came Russia’s war on Ukraine and faster disruption under the new US administration. When institutions weaken, conflicts spread.
2/
Then came Russia’s war on Ukraine and faster disruption under the new US administration. When institutions weaken, conflicts spread.
2/
Stubb: The world won’t return to the old post-Cold War order. We’ve swung to the other extreme — tariffs and territorial claims.
The pendulum may swing back, but likely only when the US finds itself increasingly isolated.
3/
The pendulum may swing back, but likely only when the US finds itself increasingly isolated.
3/
Anxiety is NOT just a thinking problem.
It LIVES in your nervous system.
Here are 9 body-based ways to release it (without meds): 🧵
1. Cold water on your face.
It LIVES in your nervous system.
Here are 9 body-based ways to release it (without meds): 🧵
1. Cold water on your face.
1. Cold water on your face activates the vagus nerve.
It triggers the mammalian diving reflex → increases parasympathetic (vagal) activity and slows your heart rate, which helps interrupt panic attacks.
Cold water also signals GABAergic release, giving you a quick, refreshing, invigorating feeling. It's a sure-fire way to interrupt negative thought loops.
It triggers the mammalian diving reflex → increases parasympathetic (vagal) activity and slows your heart rate, which helps interrupt panic attacks.
Cold water also signals GABAergic release, giving you a quick, refreshing, invigorating feeling. It's a sure-fire way to interrupt negative thought loops.
2. Slow exhales stop the fight-or-flight response-- in seconds.
Long exhales increase respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and vagal calming. Your entire body relaxes, and visual clarity is restored.
This often increases HRV and shifts autonomic balance away from the fight-or-flight response.
Long exhales increase respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and vagal calming. Your entire body relaxes, and visual clarity is restored.
This often increases HRV and shifts autonomic balance away from the fight-or-flight response.
0/ NOTE: This thread outlines allegations by Staci Burk regarding serious civil rights violations, including armed robbery and illegal surveillance. These claims are ongoing; all parties are entitled to the presumption of innocence. 🧵
1/ If you’re just catching up, this story sounds like a political thriller. But for Staci Burk, it’s a series of alleged civil rights nightmares involving "General" Mike Flynn, Sidney Powell, and former NSA hacker Jim Penrose.
2/ In late 2020, this team was allegedly desperate to seize AZ voting machines. Staci claims they tried to trick her into using her legal case to subpoena them based on a fake story. When she refused, things reportedly turned from pressure to physical danger.
How accurate are wearables like Apple Watch, Whoop, and Oura?
A researcher compiled 16 studies to find out, and the answer might shock you:
A researcher compiled 16 studies to find out, and the answer might shock you:
A researcher (username: Kygoapp) on the subreddit QuantifiedSelf compiled the most comprehensive breakdown of wearable accuracy I've seen.
If you want to read the original post you can go here:
Here's what the data actually says:reddit.com/r/QuantifiedSe…
If you want to read the original post you can go here:
Here's what the data actually says:reddit.com/r/QuantifiedSe…
Sleep staging is where most devices fail hardest.
The best independent study (University of Antwerp, 2025) tested 6 devices against clinical polysomnography.
Apple Watch scored highest at κ=0.53. That's "moderate" accuracy.
The worst? Garmin at κ=0.21.
The best independent study (University of Antwerp, 2025) tested 6 devices against clinical polysomnography.
Apple Watch scored highest at κ=0.53. That's "moderate" accuracy.
The worst? Garmin at κ=0.21.
In 1962, a rare alignment—occurring once every few thousand years—took place when all five astrological planets, along with the Sun and the Moon, aligned in Capricorn.
Hindu astrologers had predicted that on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday, the Earth would be “bathed in the blood of thousands of kings” because of the alignment of six planets, the Earth, the Sun, and the Moon.
In Britain, Aetherius Society director Keith Robertson spent the following day awaiting disaster, along with many of the society’s members. He had forecast that “very soon the world will do a ‘big flip,’ when the poles will change places with the equator... 75 percent of the world’s population will be killed,” but the alignment and eclipse passed without any notable disaster.
This occurred one year before The Adam and Eve Story: The History of Cataclysms by Chan Thomas was published, a book that was later partially classified and released decades afterward.
So what exactly happened in 1962 during this rare alignment? (1/7)🧵
Hindu astrologers had predicted that on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday, the Earth would be “bathed in the blood of thousands of kings” because of the alignment of six planets, the Earth, the Sun, and the Moon.
In Britain, Aetherius Society director Keith Robertson spent the following day awaiting disaster, along with many of the society’s members. He had forecast that “very soon the world will do a ‘big flip,’ when the poles will change places with the equator... 75 percent of the world’s population will be killed,” but the alignment and eclipse passed without any notable disaster.
This occurred one year before The Adam and Eve Story: The History of Cataclysms by Chan Thomas was published, a book that was later partially classified and released decades afterward.
So what exactly happened in 1962 during this rare alignment? (1/7)🧵
The last time this alignment occurred was exactly 6,000 years ago!
I went and searched for it in the past, especially around the time when the Jewish calendar begins, which is the year 3761 BC.
I found the same rare alignment in Capricorn in the year 4018 BC, and now it gets interesting—you’ll see why... (2/7)🧵
I went and searched for it in the past, especially around the time when the Jewish calendar begins, which is the year 3761 BC.
I found the same rare alignment in Capricorn in the year 4018 BC, and now it gets interesting—you’ll see why... (2/7)🧵
During this period, around 6,000 years ago, the desertification of the Sahara, the Y-chromosome bottleneck—where 19 out of 20 male lineages went extinct—and the geomagnetic excursion occurred. This can't be a coincidence.
The Jewish calendar, tied to the Old Testament or the Torah, started 257 years after this event. In my opinion, this was the time when everything settled down and life became possible to continue as normal after the catastrophic event and the flood. (3/7)🧵
The Jewish calendar, tied to the Old Testament or the Torah, started 257 years after this event. In my opinion, this was the time when everything settled down and life became possible to continue as normal after the catastrophic event and the flood. (3/7)🧵
