Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
I have read a lot of first comic scripts by new writers lately.
A lot of them have very good ideas, but make basic mistakes in execution.
Here are a few bits of advice if you are just starting out writing comics, things to avoid.
Other pros welcome to add to this thread.
1/
A lot of them have very good ideas, but make basic mistakes in execution.
Here are a few bits of advice if you are just starting out writing comics, things to avoid.
Other pros welcome to add to this thread.
1/
NAME YOUR CHARACTERS.
This is annoying, and even pros do it. If you have a character we are supposed to know, you have to name them ON PANEL, not just in script.
I read a major publisher book recently where the main characters were never called by name.
A huge mistake.
2/
This is annoying, and even pros do it. If you have a character we are supposed to know, you have to name them ON PANEL, not just in script.
I read a major publisher book recently where the main characters were never called by name.
A huge mistake.
2/
TOO MUCH DIALOGUE
Almost all writers do this at times.
But it is wearying, it is exhausting to read, and mostly it shows a lack of awareness of how to use a comics page. There are people who do this well and a LOT who do it badly.
It's alienating. Don't do it.
3/
Almost all writers do this at times.
But it is wearying, it is exhausting to read, and mostly it shows a lack of awareness of how to use a comics page. There are people who do this well and a LOT who do it badly.
It's alienating. Don't do it.
3/
1/6 I agree Dean! Good GOD! If I didn't know who Donald Trump was, and someone asked me who this was, I would say "I don't know, probably some guy eating breakfast at an old folks home or senior center with Parkinson's disease who looks like he needs to go back to bed". THIS is 
2/6 who is going to "Make America Great Again?? THIS...is our "president"?? If I was told he was an American President I would have fell out of my chair. This is a guy who was CONTINUALLY calling President Biden "sleepy Joe". They were SO dishonest they took a snapshot of
3/6 President Biden during an interview and took the picture right as he blinked, making it appear he was sleeping...then it went viral and EVERYONE thought President Biden was always falling asleep. The jokes NEVER stopped. I have NEVER seen SO many photos of Joe sleeping at
@Ilhan’s father was involved with the Somaliland genocide? Nur Omar Mohamed, one of General Mohamed Siyad Barre’s main henchmen? He was aligned with the Soviet Union. Estimates say around 200k were executed. Not a poor refugee. murderous communist exiles.
At one time, @CNN actually had an interest in finding out what level of involvement @Ilhan’s father had . Something you definitely will not hear them ask any longer. One has to wonder why are they in the United States in the first place?
The Deadly Wound Healed — Revelation 13:3
Satanic Imitation of Resurrection, Not “Political Recovery”
1. The World’s Astonishment at a False Resurrection
Revelation 13:3 stands as one of the most misunderstood and abused prophetic verses in all Scripture, largely because commentators who refuse to believe the plain text must invent sophisticated allegories to avoid admitting what God wrote. John records, “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast” (Revelation 13:3). The passage is not complicated. It presents a head wounded “to death.” It presents the wound as “deadly.” And then it presents the wound as “healed.” No amount of theological gymnastics can turn that into a mere political complication or an economic slump followed by recovery. The text describes a supernatural, publicly visible, globally witnessed restoration of life—a satanic counterfeit of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The world’s astonishment proves the point. John says, “all the world wondered after the beast,” meaning the event shocks humanity into admiration and fearful allegiance. A political recovery does not produce universal worship. A dictator regaining popularity does not cause mankind to fall prostrate before him in religious devotion. A wounded empire, slowly rebuilt, does not command the awe that Revelation describes. The world has watched nations fall and rise countless times. Empires collapse and resurface, but nobody goes around worshipping them because of it. Yet Revelation 13 shows an event so extraordinary that the entire planet rallies behind the Beast as a divine figure. This is not economics. This is not diplomacy. This is not structural reform. This is satanic pseudo-resurrection staged for global deception.
The imitation is intentional. Satan has desired from the beginning to duplicate, pervert, or challenge everything God has ever done. His rebellion in Isaiah 14 begins with the words, “I will be like the most High” (Isaiah 14:14). He does not want to annihilate God’s works; he wants to counterfeit them. He does not aspire to destroy the concept of deity; he wants to replace deity with himself. Therefore, the devil cannot produce an incarnation unless he first produces an imitation resurrection to legitimize his chosen vessel. This is the theological foundation of Revelation 13:3. The Beast must appear to die and rise again so that the world may believe he is the true messiah. Satan knows humanity worships power, spectacle, and miracles—not truth. So the devil gives them a spectacle that mimics the very cornerstone of Christianity: the resurrection of Christ.
The parallel is unmistakable. Jesus Christ died publicly and rose publicly. The Beast will appear to die publicly and appear to rise publicly. Christ’s resurrection validated His claim to kingship (Romans 1:4); the Beast’s counterfeit resurrection validates his claim to kingship. Christ’s resurrection drew believers to worship Him; the Beast’s resurrection draws unbelievers to worship him. Christ rose by the power of the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:11); the Beast rises by the power of the dragon (Revelation 13:2). Christ’s resurrection inaugurated the Church; the Beast’s counterfeit resurrection inaugurates the Satanic world system. Every detail fits the grand satanic strategy: replace Christ with Antichrist, replace the true miracle with a lying wonder (2 Thessalonians 2:9), replace the Gospel with an idolatrous political religion.
This is why the text must not be watered down into historical symbolism. Those who claim the “deadly wound” refers to the fall of ancient Rome and the “healing” refers to the rise of modern Europe are ignoring the explicit wording. Rome never died in a single moment of fatal blow. It decayed slowly. It divided. It fragmented. And the world did not “wonder” after medieval Catholicism or the Holy Roman Empire in the sense Revelation describes. No papal
Satanic Imitation of Resurrection, Not “Political Recovery”
1. The World’s Astonishment at a False Resurrection
Revelation 13:3 stands as one of the most misunderstood and abused prophetic verses in all Scripture, largely because commentators who refuse to believe the plain text must invent sophisticated allegories to avoid admitting what God wrote. John records, “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast” (Revelation 13:3). The passage is not complicated. It presents a head wounded “to death.” It presents the wound as “deadly.” And then it presents the wound as “healed.” No amount of theological gymnastics can turn that into a mere political complication or an economic slump followed by recovery. The text describes a supernatural, publicly visible, globally witnessed restoration of life—a satanic counterfeit of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The world’s astonishment proves the point. John says, “all the world wondered after the beast,” meaning the event shocks humanity into admiration and fearful allegiance. A political recovery does not produce universal worship. A dictator regaining popularity does not cause mankind to fall prostrate before him in religious devotion. A wounded empire, slowly rebuilt, does not command the awe that Revelation describes. The world has watched nations fall and rise countless times. Empires collapse and resurface, but nobody goes around worshipping them because of it. Yet Revelation 13 shows an event so extraordinary that the entire planet rallies behind the Beast as a divine figure. This is not economics. This is not diplomacy. This is not structural reform. This is satanic pseudo-resurrection staged for global deception.
The imitation is intentional. Satan has desired from the beginning to duplicate, pervert, or challenge everything God has ever done. His rebellion in Isaiah 14 begins with the words, “I will be like the most High” (Isaiah 14:14). He does not want to annihilate God’s works; he wants to counterfeit them. He does not aspire to destroy the concept of deity; he wants to replace deity with himself. Therefore, the devil cannot produce an incarnation unless he first produces an imitation resurrection to legitimize his chosen vessel. This is the theological foundation of Revelation 13:3. The Beast must appear to die and rise again so that the world may believe he is the true messiah. Satan knows humanity worships power, spectacle, and miracles—not truth. So the devil gives them a spectacle that mimics the very cornerstone of Christianity: the resurrection of Christ.
The parallel is unmistakable. Jesus Christ died publicly and rose publicly. The Beast will appear to die publicly and appear to rise publicly. Christ’s resurrection validated His claim to kingship (Romans 1:4); the Beast’s counterfeit resurrection validates his claim to kingship. Christ’s resurrection drew believers to worship Him; the Beast’s resurrection draws unbelievers to worship him. Christ rose by the power of the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:11); the Beast rises by the power of the dragon (Revelation 13:2). Christ’s resurrection inaugurated the Church; the Beast’s counterfeit resurrection inaugurates the Satanic world system. Every detail fits the grand satanic strategy: replace Christ with Antichrist, replace the true miracle with a lying wonder (2 Thessalonians 2:9), replace the Gospel with an idolatrous political religion.
This is why the text must not be watered down into historical symbolism. Those who claim the “deadly wound” refers to the fall of ancient Rome and the “healing” refers to the rise of modern Europe are ignoring the explicit wording. Rome never died in a single moment of fatal blow. It decayed slowly. It divided. It fragmented. And the world did not “wonder” after medieval Catholicism or the Holy Roman Empire in the sense Revelation describes. No papal
decree or European treaty ever produced global astonishment or universal worship of a singular leader. The Reformers often speculated that the papacy fulfilled Revelation 13, but speculation is not exegesis. The text speaks of a man, a head, a wound, a death, and a healing. Not a bureaucracy, not a multi-century decline, not the gradual ebb and flow of a continent. The wound is literal. The healing is literal. And the deception is literal.
The world’s astonishment at this miracle marks a pivotal turning point in the Tribulation. From this moment forward, global loyalty to the Beast becomes absolute. Revelation 13:4 records the cry, “Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” That is not the tone of political admiration; that is the tone of religious supplication. Only a resurrection—true or false—could evoke such devotion. Humanity sees the event and concludes the Beast is invincible. They believe he has conquered death. And once he is believed to have conquered death, his authority becomes unquestionable. This is the satanic strategy behind the deadly wound: to give the world a false messiah capable of imitating the triumph of Christ.
2. The Identity of the Wounded Head: A Man, Not an Empire
The “head” wounded unto death must be interpreted in the context of Revelation 13, where the Beast is both a symbol of a kingdom and a person. Throughout Scripture, prophetic symbols oscillate between corporate entities and individual rulers, because kings embody their kingdoms. Nebuchadnezzar is both the head of gold and Babylon itself (Daniel 2:38). The little horn in Daniel 7 represents both the final kingdom and the final ruler. The Beast likewise functions as both the empire and the emperor. But Revelation 13 focuses deliberately on the individual ruler—the Antichrist—not merely the kingdom he leads. The personal pronouns dominate the passage: “the beast which I saw,” “power was given him,” “there was given unto him a mouth,” “he opened his mouth in blasphemy,” “it was given unto him to make war.” This is an individual ruler empowered by the dragon, not an abstraction.
When John says he saw one of the Beast’s heads wounded to death, he is not seeing a symbolic national humiliation. He is seeing a specific assassination attempt, a literal mortal wound, inflicted upon the final world ruler. Revelation 13:14 clarifies the matter unmistakably: the false prophet deceives the world “by the means of those miracles… saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live” (Revelation 13:14). The wound is by a sword. Swords do not “symbolically” wound nations. They wound people. The language is personal, direct, literal, and violent. The Beast is killed. The Beast rises. And the world sees it.
The reference to a sword also connects directly to Zechariah 11:17, which says of the foolish shepherd, “the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye.” This suggests the Antichrist will be physically maimed in the fatal wound, perhaps losing an eye, consistent with the imagery of a mutilation that nonetheless heals through satanic restoration. This physical detail cannot be applied to the Roman Empire or any other national entity. It must refer to a man. The Antichrist is not the reincarnation of Rome; he is a future world ruler indwelt by Satan.
The idea that the “deadly wound” is symbolic of national recovery collapses under the weight of the text. John says the wound is “deadly.” Empires do not suffer “deadly wounds” because no empire is a biological organism. Empires fragment, crumble, fade, or reorganize; they do not die in the sense of a sword piercing their head. To allegorize this is to rob the book of Revelation of its intended precision. If the wound is symbolic, the healing must be symbolic, and then the global worship must be symbolic, leaving the chapter hollow and incoherent. Once the text is stripped of literal meaning,
The world’s astonishment at this miracle marks a pivotal turning point in the Tribulation. From this moment forward, global loyalty to the Beast becomes absolute. Revelation 13:4 records the cry, “Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” That is not the tone of political admiration; that is the tone of religious supplication. Only a resurrection—true or false—could evoke such devotion. Humanity sees the event and concludes the Beast is invincible. They believe he has conquered death. And once he is believed to have conquered death, his authority becomes unquestionable. This is the satanic strategy behind the deadly wound: to give the world a false messiah capable of imitating the triumph of Christ.
2. The Identity of the Wounded Head: A Man, Not an Empire
The “head” wounded unto death must be interpreted in the context of Revelation 13, where the Beast is both a symbol of a kingdom and a person. Throughout Scripture, prophetic symbols oscillate between corporate entities and individual rulers, because kings embody their kingdoms. Nebuchadnezzar is both the head of gold and Babylon itself (Daniel 2:38). The little horn in Daniel 7 represents both the final kingdom and the final ruler. The Beast likewise functions as both the empire and the emperor. But Revelation 13 focuses deliberately on the individual ruler—the Antichrist—not merely the kingdom he leads. The personal pronouns dominate the passage: “the beast which I saw,” “power was given him,” “there was given unto him a mouth,” “he opened his mouth in blasphemy,” “it was given unto him to make war.” This is an individual ruler empowered by the dragon, not an abstraction.
When John says he saw one of the Beast’s heads wounded to death, he is not seeing a symbolic national humiliation. He is seeing a specific assassination attempt, a literal mortal wound, inflicted upon the final world ruler. Revelation 13:14 clarifies the matter unmistakably: the false prophet deceives the world “by the means of those miracles… saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live” (Revelation 13:14). The wound is by a sword. Swords do not “symbolically” wound nations. They wound people. The language is personal, direct, literal, and violent. The Beast is killed. The Beast rises. And the world sees it.
The reference to a sword also connects directly to Zechariah 11:17, which says of the foolish shepherd, “the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye.” This suggests the Antichrist will be physically maimed in the fatal wound, perhaps losing an eye, consistent with the imagery of a mutilation that nonetheless heals through satanic restoration. This physical detail cannot be applied to the Roman Empire or any other national entity. It must refer to a man. The Antichrist is not the reincarnation of Rome; he is a future world ruler indwelt by Satan.
The idea that the “deadly wound” is symbolic of national recovery collapses under the weight of the text. John says the wound is “deadly.” Empires do not suffer “deadly wounds” because no empire is a biological organism. Empires fragment, crumble, fade, or reorganize; they do not die in the sense of a sword piercing their head. To allegorize this is to rob the book of Revelation of its intended precision. If the wound is symbolic, the healing must be symbolic, and then the global worship must be symbolic, leaving the chapter hollow and incoherent. Once the text is stripped of literal meaning,
the Book of Revelation becomes little more than a poetic drama with no prophetic teeth.
Furthermore, the reaction of the world proves that the wound and healing must be literal. The world “wondered” and “worshipped.” No nation’s political restoration has ever induced universal worship of a human leader. In fact, humanity’s attitude toward political powers is consistently cynical. The United Nations, the European Union, the Holy Roman Empire, and other coalitions have never inspired awe or religious submission. But when a man is killed and returns to life, humanity sees a supernatural event and surrenders to him. That is the plain meaning of Revelation 13:3.
The Antichrist is therefore a literal man. He will be literally wounded. He will literally recover. And the world will literally worship him. Revelation 13 is not a symbolic retelling of political cycles; it is the Spirit’s warning of a supernatural deception. Those who reduce the wound to symbolism align themselves with the allegorizing spirit that rejects the authority of Scripture. They make the text say what it never said. But a Bible believer accepts the statement exactly as written: a deadly wound healed by satanic power.
3. Satan’s Pseudo-Resurrection Strategy: The Counterfeit Gospel
Satan does not hate religion. He thrives on religion. What he hates is truth. Therefore, his goal has always been to produce a counterfeit religion capable of replacing Christianity. The deadly wound healing is central to that plan. It is the devil’s attempt to replicate the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which Paul declares is the foundation of the Gospel (1 Corinthians 15:3–4). If Satan can produce his own “messiah” with his own “resurrection,” he can offer the world an alternative gospel. This is why Paul warned that the mystery of iniquity was already at work and that the coming of the wicked one would be “after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders” (2 Thessalonians 2:9). The lie is not merely doctrinal; it is supernatural.
The resurrection of Christ is the most powerful event in history because it validated His deity. Romans 1:4 says He was “declared to be the Son of God with power… by the resurrection from the dead.” If Satan wants a world to believe that his man is the true king, he must imitate this validation. A political leader recovering from electoral defeat cannot imitate the resurrection. A wounded empire gradually recovering cannot imitate the resurrection. Only a man returning from apparent death can imitate that miracle.
Satan understands human psychology. Mankind craves spectacle, not truth. When Jesus stood before Herod, Herod hoped to see a miracle (Luke 23:8). When Paul preached in Athens, the philosophers called his message “strange” but were more interested in novelty than righteousness (Acts 17:20–21). When Moses performed miracles in Egypt, the magicians imitated them (Exodus 7:11–12). Satan knows that miracles—even false ones—captivate the human mind. Therefore, he orchestrates a miracle in Revelation 13 that appears to match the miracle of Calvary.
The Beast’s deadly wound healed becomes the preaching point of the false prophet, who “deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles” (Revelation 13:14). The false prophet turns the resurrection into propaganda. He broadcasts it. He weaponizes it. He uses it to secure loyalty, unify global religion, and enforce worship. The resurrection becomes the foundation of the Beast’s political theology. Satan finally has what he always desired: a world bowing not only to him but worshipping him through the person of the Beast (Revelation 13:4).
The deception gains credibility because God allows it. Paul says God will send “strong delusion” that they should believe a lie (2 Thessalonians 2:11). When the world rejects the true resurrection, God allows them to fall into the false one. Human skepticism does not save them; it damns them. Those who think themselves too
Furthermore, the reaction of the world proves that the wound and healing must be literal. The world “wondered” and “worshipped.” No nation’s political restoration has ever induced universal worship of a human leader. In fact, humanity’s attitude toward political powers is consistently cynical. The United Nations, the European Union, the Holy Roman Empire, and other coalitions have never inspired awe or religious submission. But when a man is killed and returns to life, humanity sees a supernatural event and surrenders to him. That is the plain meaning of Revelation 13:3.
The Antichrist is therefore a literal man. He will be literally wounded. He will literally recover. And the world will literally worship him. Revelation 13 is not a symbolic retelling of political cycles; it is the Spirit’s warning of a supernatural deception. Those who reduce the wound to symbolism align themselves with the allegorizing spirit that rejects the authority of Scripture. They make the text say what it never said. But a Bible believer accepts the statement exactly as written: a deadly wound healed by satanic power.
3. Satan’s Pseudo-Resurrection Strategy: The Counterfeit Gospel
Satan does not hate religion. He thrives on religion. What he hates is truth. Therefore, his goal has always been to produce a counterfeit religion capable of replacing Christianity. The deadly wound healing is central to that plan. It is the devil’s attempt to replicate the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which Paul declares is the foundation of the Gospel (1 Corinthians 15:3–4). If Satan can produce his own “messiah” with his own “resurrection,” he can offer the world an alternative gospel. This is why Paul warned that the mystery of iniquity was already at work and that the coming of the wicked one would be “after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders” (2 Thessalonians 2:9). The lie is not merely doctrinal; it is supernatural.
The resurrection of Christ is the most powerful event in history because it validated His deity. Romans 1:4 says He was “declared to be the Son of God with power… by the resurrection from the dead.” If Satan wants a world to believe that his man is the true king, he must imitate this validation. A political leader recovering from electoral defeat cannot imitate the resurrection. A wounded empire gradually recovering cannot imitate the resurrection. Only a man returning from apparent death can imitate that miracle.
Satan understands human psychology. Mankind craves spectacle, not truth. When Jesus stood before Herod, Herod hoped to see a miracle (Luke 23:8). When Paul preached in Athens, the philosophers called his message “strange” but were more interested in novelty than righteousness (Acts 17:20–21). When Moses performed miracles in Egypt, the magicians imitated them (Exodus 7:11–12). Satan knows that miracles—even false ones—captivate the human mind. Therefore, he orchestrates a miracle in Revelation 13 that appears to match the miracle of Calvary.
The Beast’s deadly wound healed becomes the preaching point of the false prophet, who “deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles” (Revelation 13:14). The false prophet turns the resurrection into propaganda. He broadcasts it. He weaponizes it. He uses it to secure loyalty, unify global religion, and enforce worship. The resurrection becomes the foundation of the Beast’s political theology. Satan finally has what he always desired: a world bowing not only to him but worshipping him through the person of the Beast (Revelation 13:4).
The deception gains credibility because God allows it. Paul says God will send “strong delusion” that they should believe a lie (2 Thessalonians 2:11). When the world rejects the true resurrection, God allows them to fall into the false one. Human skepticism does not save them; it damns them. Those who think themselves too
Men are always begging me for seduction advice, and thanks to my positions survey, I finally have some.
When behind, spread her legs and press her chest against the bed. Women systematically rate these positions higher.
Examples are 1d, 5a, 5b, 12a, and (sort of) 9c.
When behind, spread her legs and press her chest against the bed. Women systematically rate these positions higher.
Examples are 1d, 5a, 5b, 12a, and (sort of) 9c.
Men are naturally inclined to use 1b and 6a, but women don't seem to like these as much.
See the chart at the link below for the illustrations.
Also, to thank me I'm expecting you all to follow the instructions and submit your three favorites!
jsanilac.com/dispelling-bea…
See the chart at the link below for the illustrations.
Also, to thank me I'm expecting you all to follow the instructions and submit your three favorites!
jsanilac.com/dispelling-bea…
No, I am NEVER writing a DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES for men. But I would still appreciate it if more women submitted their favorites to advance this very important position science.
1/6 YOU are SO full of shit, PETEY! Yea, you support Admiral Bradley alright...by throwing him UNDER THE BUS when word came out of the double tap drone strike that YOU ordered, NOT Admiral Bradley! I wouldn't have covered your ass...I would have told the truth and stated YOU gave
2/6 that order. No wonder no one in the military respects you...you are a fucking COWARD! The DAY after this attack, YOU stated you were there through the ENTIRE operation...on FOX. Anyone can check this out if they like. Just look for Peter Hegseth talks about September drone
3/6 strike on boat. But THEN news came out there was a kill them all order and a second drone strike was used to KILL two surviving, defenseless people. YOU all of a sudden claim it was just "fake news", A LIE, but the next day the WH says it WAS true. THEN you said you only
take this a step further.
don't just simulate an expert. spin up a synthetic boardroom.
"simulate a debate between a paranoid ciso, a move-fast cto, and a burned-out sre about this architecture. do not be polite."
don't ask for the answer. ask for the conflict.
single perspectives have blind spots. the "assistant" tries to smooth them over.
force the model to argue with itself. the alpha is usually found in the friction between perspectives.
don't just simulate an expert. spin up a synthetic boardroom.
"simulate a debate between a paranoid ciso, a move-fast cto, and a burned-out sre about this architecture. do not be polite."
don't ask for the answer. ask for the conflict.
single perspectives have blind spots. the "assistant" tries to smooth them over.
force the model to argue with itself. the alpha is usually found in the friction between perspectives.
this scales into the concept of the "ephemeral org chart."
in a traditional firm, a department is a fixed cost. people, desks, slack channels.
in an ai-first company, a department is a function call.
need a go-to-market blitz?
spin up a "marketing swarm" (copywriter, designer, strategist agents). let them run for 4 hours. generate assets. then kill the process.
the ai-first "org chart" is a dynamic runtime environment.
in a traditional firm, a department is a fixed cost. people, desks, slack channels.
in an ai-first company, a department is a function call.
need a go-to-market blitz?
spin up a "marketing swarm" (copywriter, designer, strategist agents). let them run for 4 hours. generate assets. then kill the process.
the ai-first "org chart" is a dynamic runtime environment.
the killer feature isn't automation. it's evolution.
human hiring is slow. you interview, guess, and wait 90 days to see if they suck.
with swarms, you run genetic algorithms on your "staff."
spawn 50 variations of a sales agent. varying aggression, tone, and creativity.
unleash them on a synthetic test set.
kill the bottom 49.
clone the top 1.
don't manage. select.
human hiring is slow. you interview, guess, and wait 90 days to see if they suck.
with swarms, you run genetic algorithms on your "staff."
spawn 50 variations of a sales agent. varying aggression, tone, and creativity.
unleash them on a synthetic test set.
kill the bottom 49.
clone the top 1.
don't manage. select.
I quite like the bold insanity of the people who claim that the reason that there wasn't officially much flu, noro, adeno, rsv etc around in 2020/21 is because *they were all around but governments pretended they were covid*.
But It accidentally points to something profound.
But It accidentally points to something profound.
That year those things (flu, norovirus, adenovirus, rsv, para influenza) *weren't around to cause death*.
So covid infections actually caused *a lot more excess than people have realised*.
So covid infections actually caused *a lot more excess than people have realised*.
Think about it.
In a normal winter, flu, rsv, other infections are the straws that break the camel's back for a lot of people.
In a normal winter, flu, rsv, other infections are the straws that break the camel's back for a lot of people.
🚨 NEW: Nigel Farage has been reported to the police over an alleged breach of electoral law
His former campaign member claims he went over the local spending limit in Clacton by around £9K and listed the extra campaign costs as national spending
[@Telegraph]
His former campaign member claims he went over the local spending limit in Clacton by around £9K and listed the extra campaign costs as national spending
[@Telegraph]
The Met’s specialist crime unit will now review the report and documents, including Reform’s spending return, campaign photos and receipts
Story: telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/…
Story: telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/…
A Reform UK spokesman said: "These inaccurate claims come from a disgruntled former councillor. The party was disgusted by his inappropriate sexual behaviour with women, and he was expelled several months ago.
"The party denies breaking electoral law. We look forward to clearing our name"
"The party denies breaking electoral law. We look forward to clearing our name"
@WesternLensman @Ilhan
The victims are actually the people who didn’t receive any services from ‘providers’ who billed the state.
kare11.com/article/news/i…
The victims are actually the people who didn’t receive any services from ‘providers’ who billed the state.
kare11.com/article/news/i…
@WesternLensman @Ilhan
@WesternLensman @Ilhan @threadreaderapp please unroll
Del Bigtree just released the clearest 29-minute timeline I’ve ever seen on the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the government compensation program that still exists today.
Whether you’ve followed this topic forever or this is brand new info — it’s worth the full watch.
Key moments below (thread)
Whether you’ve followed this topic forever or this is brand new info — it’s worth the full watch.
Key moments below (thread)
1986: Vaccine manufacturers told Congress they were facing so many injury lawsuits they might stop making childhood vaccines entirely.
Congress responded with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act:
• Liability protection for manufacturers
• A small tax on every dose funds the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)
That framework is still law today.
Congress responded with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act:
• Liability protection for manufacturers
• A small tax on every dose funds the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)
That framework is still law today.
By 2007 roughly 5,400 autism-related claims had been filed with the VICP.
Instead of 5,400 separate trials, the government created the “Omnibus Autism Proceeding”:
→ Select just 6 test cases
→ If even ONE proved vaccines can cause autism, all 5,400 families would get their hearing
→ If none did, the rest could be dismissed
Instead of 5,400 separate trials, the government created the “Omnibus Autism Proceeding”:
→ Select just 6 test cases
→ If even ONE proved vaccines can cause autism, all 5,400 families would get their hearing
→ If none did, the rest could be dismissed
I tried using orbs
I tried Supply and Demand.
I even tried using ICT.
but trading did not click for me until I started studying the greats and noticed a pattern...
Below you can steal the exact strategy that makes me over 50/k month:🧵
I tried Supply and Demand.
I even tried using ICT.
but trading did not click for me until I started studying the greats and noticed a pattern...
Below you can steal the exact strategy that makes me over 50/k month:🧵
To start off, we most understand the point of this strategy..
My goal is to simplify trading and look for repeatable patterns to trade--patterns that have played out for hundreds of years
We want to take advantage of strong market trends & use the leverage of options for a low risk high reward approach
Using big momentum swings in the markets we can catch the biggest moves to either side
The goal is to ride the trend.
My goal is to simplify trading and look for repeatable patterns to trade--patterns that have played out for hundreds of years
We want to take advantage of strong market trends & use the leverage of options for a low risk high reward approach
Using big momentum swings in the markets we can catch the biggest moves to either side
The goal is to ride the trend.
studying some of the trading greats I realized all of them have 1 thing in common...
They don't take a thousand different trades a day on the lower time frames.
They patiently wait for the best opportunities in the markets coming out of the bigger time frames
Massive basses, these are where the account changing moves are.
They don't take a thousand different trades a day on the lower time frames.
They patiently wait for the best opportunities in the markets coming out of the bigger time frames
Massive basses, these are where the account changing moves are.
