Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
A California judge dropped the final remaining charge against David Daleiden and expunged the case.
This came after a 2025 plea agreement where he and a colleague pleaded no contest to one felony, while other charges were dismissed.
1)foxnews.com/politics/final…
This came after a 2025 plea agreement where he and a colleague pleaded no contest to one felony, while other charges were dismissed.
1)foxnews.com/politics/final…
The case had been ongoing for years over secret recordings of Planned Parenthood officials
...
In a statement made last year, Daleiden said that the end of "the lawfare launched by Kamala Harris [is] a huge victory for my investigative reporting ...
2)
...
In a statement made last year, Daleiden said that the end of "the lawfare launched by Kamala Harris [is] a huge victory for my investigative reporting ...
2)
for the public's right to know the truth about Planned Parenthood's sale of aborted baby body parts."
3)
3)
+JMJ+ Welcome to the Holy Rosary thread in honor of Good Friday of the Lord’s Passion. +JMJ+
#CatholicTwitter #CatholicX #RosaryProject
#CatholicTwitter #CatholicX #RosaryProject
Instead of posting each prayer separately, I’m going to link to the page on my blog that has all the opening prayers, and the page that has all of the closing prayers. As always, they are optional. Use the ones you are drawn to.
I’ll post each Mystery as usual.
I’ll post each Mystery as usual.
Thread: Update on the Field Situation in Southern Lebanon:
@samerhajali wrote:
Diving into the details of the Southern battlefield can give a clear picture that the occupation army is merely searching for an image of achievement with which it can reassure its settlers and protect its political leadership. According to the course of military operations on the ground, the five divisions that have been deployed into the field are avoiding engaging in axes of advance in the true military sense. Instead, they carry out bypass maneuvers, encircling neighborhoods in the southern villages to avoid colliding with the Resistance's combat nodes. They know full well, despite the narrative they were trying to convince themselves of, that ambushes of death had been prepared for their soldiers and vehicles, which have now become like coffins, burning those inside after once representing the spearhead of their offensive power. 1/
@samerhajali wrote:
Diving into the details of the Southern battlefield can give a clear picture that the occupation army is merely searching for an image of achievement with which it can reassure its settlers and protect its political leadership. According to the course of military operations on the ground, the five divisions that have been deployed into the field are avoiding engaging in axes of advance in the true military sense. Instead, they carry out bypass maneuvers, encircling neighborhoods in the southern villages to avoid colliding with the Resistance's combat nodes. They know full well, despite the narrative they were trying to convince themselves of, that ambushes of death had been prepared for their soldiers and vehicles, which have now become like coffins, burning those inside after once representing the spearhead of their offensive power. 1/
Because there is a vast difference between the bypass operations they are currently conducting and the concept of axes of advance—which means enemy forces moving within a geographic space that allows maneuvering until securing terrain features and elevated ground that would enable future operations—and since this has not been achieved in this ground war, we can say that, according to field data, the enemy has not been able to secure stability on any of the high ground around which it maneuvers or claims to have reached. Clashes continue in Shamaa and al-Bayyadah, preventing it from establishing positions overlooking the Southern coast, while the Resistance continues to strike its gatherings and soldiers even in Naqoura and in the settlements of the occupied north. 2/
On the Qouzah–Beit Leef axis, the enemy attempted over the past two days to bypass from Wadi al-Uyoun toward the town of Rchaf, but withdrew. On Wednesday evening, it returned with a new attempt, after which the Resistance struck one of its tanks inside the town and targeted a gathering of its forces. Through its activity in this area, the enemy is seeking either to reach Hadatha, which, if it manages to establish itself there, would enable it to overlook a number of Southern villages in the central sector, and which constitutes a main route toward the border villages of the Bint Jbeil district. Among the developments witnessed on this axis yesterday was the targeting of a Zionist helicopter and damaging it in the skies over Yaroun, indicating the beginning of a course aimed at limiting the intervention of these aircraft in ground maneuvers and in protecting advancing forces. At the same time, the Resistance announced that it had forced warplanes to withdraw using air-defense missiles. 3/
@asymmetricinfo Understood.
But if high-powered @nytimes wanted to spell correctly the surname of President @TheBushCenter’s White House Counsel and Attorney General @argonzales, @nytimes would have carefully checked every story.
They just chose not to bother.
H e l - l o !
But if high-powered @nytimes wanted to spell correctly the surname of President @TheBushCenter’s White House Counsel and Attorney General @argonzales, @nytimes would have carefully checked every story.
They just chose not to bother.
H e l - l o !
@asymmetricinfo @nytimes @TheBushCenter @argonzales nytimes.com/2007/08/06/pag…
@asymmetricinfo @nytimes @TheBushCenter @argonzales nytimes.com/2007/08/12/opi…
ANTHROPIC HAS OFFICIALLY BANNED OPENCLAW USAGE!!!
no this is not ai-generated
Starting April 4, users will no longer be able to use their Claude Subscriptions for third-party harnesses including OpenClaw.
THIS IS CRAZY. 👇
no this is not ai-generated
Starting April 4, users will no longer be able to use their Claude Subscriptions for third-party harnesses including OpenClaw.
THIS IS CRAZY. 👇
fyi this IS REAL i got the email lol
Iranian forces shot down a U.S. F‑15 and damaged an A‑10, and combat search‑and‑rescue helicopters were also hit, resulting in injuries to their crews.
What this tells us about air superiority over Iran? A 🧵.
What this tells us about air superiority over Iran? A 🧵.
2/ Air superiority ≠ air supremacy.
Air supremacy = the ability to operate without "effective interference." Translation: The enemy poses no real air threat.
Most Americans are used to thinking this is normal; the U.S. largely had it over battlefields for 30 years.
Air supremacy = the ability to operate without "effective interference." Translation: The enemy poses no real air threat.
Most Americans are used to thinking this is normal; the U.S. largely had it over battlefields for 30 years.
3/ Air superiority, by contrast, just means you can operate without "prohibitive interference." Threats still exist. The terms are not interchangeable.
The rise of Freudianism from, say, 1900 to 1970s reflected the rise of Jewish influence. But, Freudianism turned out to be Not Even Wrong and just a waste of time/money.
So, nobody talks about it anymore. After all, what lesson would we learn? That Jews can be very influential?
So, nobody talks about it anymore. After all, what lesson would we learn? That Jews can be very influential?
Freudianism served as sort of the conservative, bourgeois alternative to Marxism for those who wanted to subvert Christian cultural dominance and puritanism regarding sex, but didn't want to destroy the economy and put the proles in charge, Freudianism threaded the needle.
Finally, the most advanced 1970s Parisian theorists got into promoting an ideology purportedly mixing Freud and Marx.
But over the course of the last two decades of the 20th Century, everybody got bored with/mildly embarrassed by Freudianism: We Shall Never Speak of This Again.
But over the course of the last two decades of the 20th Century, everybody got bored with/mildly embarrassed by Freudianism: We Shall Never Speak of This Again.
Russia is offering students up to $87,000 a year to drop university and fight in Ukraine. Positions available: drone operator, drone engineer, technical specialist. Most universities received recruitment quotas they must fill, writes Reuters. 1/
The full package at Far Eastern Federal University in Vladivostok: first-year salary of $68,000, one-off payment of $31,000 after training, monthly allowance of $3,000, plus $2,500 from the university. Free accommodation. Fees covered on return. 2/
The Kremlin confirmed the recruitment drive. Spokesman Peskov: "This is a completely open offer — an offer to join a new type of unit." T he drone forces were created at the end of 2025 at Putin's direct order. 3/
took karpathy's wiki pattern and wired it into my 10 agent swarm
and here is what the architecture looks like when you make it multi agent:
>every agent auto dumps its output into a raw/ folder as it works
>a compiler runs every few hours and organises everything into structured wiki articles grouped by domain.. infrastructure, signals, content, technical patterns. backlinks, an index.. they're all auto maintained
but the problem is that raw data is dangerous when it compounds cause one hallucinated connection enters the brain and every agent downstream builds on it..
so since hermes is my supervisor for my swarm he sits between drafts and live as the review gate...
every article gets scored before it enters the permanent knowledge base so clean outputs get promoted and bad ones just die in drafts
once articles are live, per-agent briefings get generated so each agent starts with exactly the context it needs instead of waking up blank
and this is where it matters that Hermes is a separate system..
it is not part of the swarm it is supervising bascially an agent reviewing its own swarm's work..
and what's interesting that hermes has no context about how the work was produced so no bias toward keeping it so it just reads the article and asks
is this accurate?
should this enter the permanent brain?
now we have openclaw handles the execution.. running agents, routing tasks, managing channels, dispatching crons and hermes handles the judgment.. reviewing what the swarm produced and deciding what deserves to persist.
the wiki brain ties them together.
>agents produce raw material
>the compiler organises it
>hermes validates it
>briefings feed it back to agents
>the loop runs
ps: you can use any separate agent as the review agent but hermes is great here because nous research literally trains it with structured outputs, function calling, and evaluation-style reasoning and this is the exact traits you want in a review gate..
and when that review gate is processing hundreds of articles, i think consistency in this case would matter more than raw intelligence..
and here is what the architecture looks like when you make it multi agent:
>every agent auto dumps its output into a raw/ folder as it works
>a compiler runs every few hours and organises everything into structured wiki articles grouped by domain.. infrastructure, signals, content, technical patterns. backlinks, an index.. they're all auto maintained
but the problem is that raw data is dangerous when it compounds cause one hallucinated connection enters the brain and every agent downstream builds on it..
so since hermes is my supervisor for my swarm he sits between drafts and live as the review gate...
every article gets scored before it enters the permanent knowledge base so clean outputs get promoted and bad ones just die in drafts
once articles are live, per-agent briefings get generated so each agent starts with exactly the context it needs instead of waking up blank
and this is where it matters that Hermes is a separate system..
it is not part of the swarm it is supervising bascially an agent reviewing its own swarm's work..
and what's interesting that hermes has no context about how the work was produced so no bias toward keeping it so it just reads the article and asks
is this accurate?
should this enter the permanent brain?
now we have openclaw handles the execution.. running agents, routing tasks, managing channels, dispatching crons and hermes handles the judgment.. reviewing what the swarm produced and deciding what deserves to persist.
the wiki brain ties them together.
>agents produce raw material
>the compiler organises it
>hermes validates it
>briefings feed it back to agents
>the loop runs
ps: you can use any separate agent as the review agent but hermes is great here because nous research literally trains it with structured outputs, function calling, and evaluation-style reasoning and this is the exact traits you want in a review gate..
and when that review gate is processing hundreds of articles, i think consistency in this case would matter more than raw intelligence..
FYI i only covered the multi agent angle here.
the full karpathy system goes deeper.. q&a agents, wiki self-repair, rendered outputs etc..
but the base is built and once the compound loop is running you can layer those on top easily
the full karpathy system goes deeper.. q&a agents, wiki self-repair, rendered outputs etc..
but the base is built and once the compound loop is running you can layer those on top easily
full architecture here.
For some time I've been watching exchanges between people with regards to Iran and israel.
There are a theological dimensions in political dimensions to different opinions.
If a person says that they would ally with Iran for political reasons, I personally see great danger...
There are a theological dimensions in political dimensions to different opinions.
If a person says that they would ally with Iran for political reasons, I personally see great danger...
in that, given the treachery bloodletting that the Iranians have consistently been engaged in since the late Middle ages when a fanatical sect of Shī'ah essentially converted the population through genocidal inquisition, by force.
This is the reason you see most Iranians are
This is the reason you see most Iranians are
very Muslim with their attitudes in general about the Qur'ān, prophet ﷺ & symbols of Islām, but otherwise virulently anti-Islam in practice.
It is because a dysfunctional model of Islam was forced on them through violence.
So if you want to ally with them politically, I
It is because a dysfunctional model of Islam was forced on them through violence.
So if you want to ally with them politically, I
@NEWSMAX @NAACP @1stVCGAGOP @GASenateGOP @GAballots
@Naturejab can you invent us a solution?
Hello everyone go Congratulate DANIEL DAVENPORT FOR EARNING @Clay4MainStreet ENDORSEMENT FOR DISTRICT 31 SENATOR
DANIEL IS THE ELECTIONS MACHINE INVENTOR LEARN ABOUT HIS FAMILY 👇👇🏾
@Naturejab can you invent us a solution?
Hello everyone go Congratulate DANIEL DAVENPORT FOR EARNING @Clay4MainStreet ENDORSEMENT FOR DISTRICT 31 SENATOR
DANIEL IS THE ELECTIONS MACHINE INVENTOR LEARN ABOUT HIS FAMILY 👇👇🏾
His is working with @BlakeTillery to replace the DOMINION VOTING MACHINE WITH SYSTEMS BUILT BY BLACK CHILDREN @_Re_UPS
He is also the lobbyist (cyber lobbyist) who ended.. killed @jasonanavitarte SB630 because of special help from @jasmineforga hbarpaysforitall.com/historyofexcel…
In addition, he is the one who called out @DolezalForGA for attacking a black woman while concealing what is known as the voter flipper problem.
The most dangerous hack ever discovered in an elections system to date recently created in special elections between @ShawnForGeorgia
The most dangerous hack ever discovered in an elections system to date recently created in special elections between @ShawnForGeorgia
Islamic Resistance in Iraq: “Dismissals and reassignments from the level of the Chief of Staff and below are not reorganization, but a tacit admission of the collapse of the decision-making chamber, and an attempt to make the military pay the bill for political confusion and a strategic error that the US will continue to pay the price for indefinitely.”
"What is happening is not a war being managed, but a power being defeated while it remains arrogant. It is a clear tactical stumble and a strategic exposure for a state that was accustomed to defining war from above, only to find itself today being managed from below under the pressure of reality."
Full statement today:
🇮🇶 Islamic Resistance in Iraq:
"And Allah came upon them from where they had not expected, and He cast terror into their hearts."
The American today is not only making mistakes but is flailing under the pressure of successive shocks that it does not know how to handle, which is evident from the following:
1- The downing of a warplane west of Iran revealed unprecedented confusion in Washington, which no longer knows what it lost: was it an F-35A or an F-15E? When a power is confused about the nature of its loss, it has lost control before it even lost the aircraft.
2- Dismissals and reassignments from the level of the Chief of Staff and below are not reorganization, but a tacit admission of the collapse of the decision-making chamber, and an attempt to make the military pay the bill for political confusion and a strategic error that America will continue to pay the price for indefinitely.
3- The exhaustion of the target bank without achieving a decisive outcome, in contrast to the continued effectiveness of missiles and drones from Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen, is pushing towards the bombing of civilian infrastructure. Here, power turns from a tool of decision into evidence of impotence, and when armies fail, they bomb cities.
4- American bases in the region have become ineffective, and alliances such as SOFA have begun to erode and enter a stage of freezing, with countries like France, Austria, Italy, and Spain announcing that they will not participate militarily.
Conclusion:
What is happening is not a war being managed, but a power being defeated while it remains arrogant. It is a clear tactical stumble and a strategic exposure for a state that was accustomed to defining war from above, only to find itself today being managed from below under the pressure of reality.
🇮🇶 Islamic Resistance in Iraq:
"And Allah came upon them from where they had not expected, and He cast terror into their hearts."
The American today is not only making mistakes but is flailing under the pressure of successive shocks that it does not know how to handle, which is evident from the following:
1- The downing of a warplane west of Iran revealed unprecedented confusion in Washington, which no longer knows what it lost: was it an F-35A or an F-15E? When a power is confused about the nature of its loss, it has lost control before it even lost the aircraft.
2- Dismissals and reassignments from the level of the Chief of Staff and below are not reorganization, but a tacit admission of the collapse of the decision-making chamber, and an attempt to make the military pay the bill for political confusion and a strategic error that America will continue to pay the price for indefinitely.
3- The exhaustion of the target bank without achieving a decisive outcome, in contrast to the continued effectiveness of missiles and drones from Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen, is pushing towards the bombing of civilian infrastructure. Here, power turns from a tool of decision into evidence of impotence, and when armies fail, they bomb cities.
4- American bases in the region have become ineffective, and alliances such as SOFA have begun to erode and enter a stage of freezing, with countries like France, Austria, Italy, and Spain announcing that they will not participate militarily.
Conclusion:
What is happening is not a war being managed, but a power being defeated while it remains arrogant. It is a clear tactical stumble and a strategic exposure for a state that was accustomed to defining war from above, only to find itself today being managed from below under the pressure of reality.
