MEN, LEARN HOW TO FLIRT ALREADY

Save it, you'll need it✅

1. Use statements, not questions (observe her from afar)

Instead of asking boring questions like "What do you do?", make bold and fun observations about her.

- "You're the type who secretly dances in their room when no one's watching."

- "I'd bet you're the friend who plans wild nights but acts all innocent the next day."

This shows your confidence without feeling the need to respond to them, while letting them know you get their vibe.

2. Push-Pull Method

Compliment her, then take it back (or immediately follow up by teasing her). It makes her emotionally dependent.

Examples:

- "You're kind of cute... too bad you're a troublemaker."

- "I love your energy... don't ruin it now by acting boring."

Push = teasing/pushing away. Pull = showing interest/complimenting.

Mix them quickly.

8 Bedroom Hacks:

1) Last longer than her

Lasting longer than her is easy if you know what to focus on.

If you focus on how horny she makes you, you'll cvm quickly.

You have to tell her she's hot while not paying that much attention to it.

Make sure you control your breath.

You'll 100% last longer than her.

2) Undress her slowly

Listen, 90% of making her 0rgasm is turning her on a lot before.

So, make sure you focus as much as possible on foreplay and the making out part.

You get hard only if she's around you.

She gets hard after you kiss for a long time.

🚨 Elisabeth Bik’s Bombshell Scandals Unfolding

Is Elisabeth Bik really important?

Absolutely not.

📢 But here’s why exposing her matters:

She represents a deceptive layer of a mob network, with fraudulent organizations — the PubPeer Foundation and Retraction Watch — as its main pillars, actively defrauding the academic community under the guise of “research integrity.”

She has been effectively curated since her recruitment in 2020 to serve as the face of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob operation: selective targeting of certain scientists and researchers for personal and institutional gains, through controlling the academic job market, academic funds and grants, share values of the related industries, and finally controlling the scientific narratives. ⚠️ This has never been about genuine science integrity. It is a carefully managed narrative designed to mislead the academic community.

We designated Bik as a fake “science integrity consultant” with little knowledge about academia and research integrity.

📌 Her attack on Boris (Bruce) Kriger (@brucekriger) on April 9, 2026 is a clear indication why this designation is 100% accurate.

1/7
🧵 Thread starts here.
Read through to see how a normal science and philosophy enthusiast, who is not in any way a member of the conventional/traditional academic community, is smeared by Bik, as an attempt to regain her declining traction on social media, following ScienceGuardians™’ exposures.

2/7 Who is Boris Kriger that Bik has targeted?

Boris Kriger is simply a science and philosophy enthusiast.

He writes and self-publishes his ideas.

He has zero peer-reviewed publications.

He has zero record on Scopus or Web of Science.

He is not and has never been affiliated with any established academic institutions or universities.

His so-called “Doctoral Thesis” titled A Unified Structural Theory of Complex Systems (656 pages, presented as fulfillment of a PhD in Systems Science / Theoretical Foundations of Complex Systems), is entirely self-published with no university, supervisor, defense committee, or established academic institution involved — it is presented solely under his own self-created micro-institutes. Hence, as long as has not used this self-awarded “PhD” to defraud any actual institution, grant agency, employer, or official academic application (i.e., he is not submitting it as a credential from a recognized university to secure a real academic position, funding, or any regulated benefit), then, it is not fraud in any legal sense, and is his personal business.

He is also a former Orthodox priest (Father Boris Kriger) who served in the Bulgarian Eastern Orthodox Diocese, founded churches, and worked on humanitarian and educational projects in the greater Toronto area.

3/7 Boris Kriger has created profiles on Google Scholar and ResearchGate—platforms that allow individuals to set up public pages with limited verification.

While widely used, these platforms contain loopholes that can be exploited, such as the ability to create profiles without rigorous identity checks, misattribute publications, or upload non-peer-reviewed or unverifiable documents.

As a result, they do not offer the same level of curation and validation as formal academic indexing services.

In fact, the empirical results of this work are supported by a more general theoretical principle: if two agents (model & brain here) achieve vanishing regret on the *same* task family, there *must* exist an invertible mapping between them.

https://twitter.com/bravo_abad/status/2037216959356407978

This is Corollary 5 of my "Capable Agents" paper from over a month ago, more details here:

https://x.com/aran_nayebi/status/2029234603278385583

Also, check out @cogphilosopher's thread about our prior work identifying invertible mappings from one brain to another. This serves as principled "ground truth" for the mapping that should used between models and brains:

https://x.com/cogphilosopher/status/2041947722664788417

In 1903, a 9-year-old boy's father died. His family fell into poverty.

He entered Columbia at 16 on a scholarship. Three departments offered him professorships: philosophy, mathematics, and English.

He turned them all down. They didn't pay enough to feed his family.

He went to Wall Street instead. First job: $12 a week chalking stock prices on a blackboard.

He invented value investing. His book is still called "the best book about investing ever written." 75 years later.

His most famous student became the richest investor in history. That student said the professor was more influential than anyone except his own father.

The professor was Benjamin Graham. The student was Warren Buffett.

I turned Graham's philosophy into 12 prompts.

Here are all 12:

Prompt 1: Mr. Market

Graham's most famous allegory from The Intelligent Investor: Imagine you have a business partner named Mr. Market. Every day he shows up and offers to buy your share or sell you his. Some days he's euphoric and names a high price. Other days he's depressed and names a low price. The key insight: you don't have to trade with him. His mood is his problem. Your job is to decide whether his price makes sense.

"I'm evaluating an opportunity or reacting to market conditions: [describe. A stock price swing, a business offer, a salary negotiation, a real estate deal, a trending investment, public opinion about your work]. Using Graham's Mr. Market framework: (1) Who is 'Mr. Market' in my situation? The person, platform, or force that is quoting me a price right now? (2) What mood is Mr. Market in today? Euphoric, depressed, or somewhere in between? What evidence tells me this? (3) Is the price Mr. Market is offering me based on the actual value of the underlying thing, or is it based on his mood? (4) Graham said 'you don't have to trade with Mr. Market.' Am I being pressured to act right now? What happens if I simply wait? (5) What is the actual intrinsic value of what's being offered, independent of Mr. Market's mood? Give me the rational assessment."

Prompt 2: The Margin of Safety

Graham called this "the central concept of investment." It means never paying full price. If a stock is worth $100, only buy it at $70. That 30% gap is your margin of safety. It protects you from being wrong. Graham developed this principle after losing money in the 1929 crash. His childhood poverty made him obsessed with never losing everything again.

"I'm about to make a significant commitment: [describe. An investment, a hire, a business deal, a career move, a major purchase, a partnership]. Using Graham's Margin of Safety framework: (1) What is the 'full price' of this commitment? Not just money. Time, energy, reputation, opportunity cost. (2) What is the 'intrinsic value'? What is this commitment actually worth to me based on cold analysis, not excitement? (3) What is my margin of safety? How much room do I have if things go wrong? If the answer is 'none,' I'm speculating, not investing. (4) Graham developed this after losing nearly everything in 1929. What is the worst-case scenario here? Can I survive it? (5) What would it take to increase my margin of safety? Can I negotiate a lower price, reduce my exposure, or add a contingency plan? Give me the version with the widest safety margin."

A 1405 document still preserved on Athos tells a whole story in one page. 📜⛪️
Despot Stefan Lazarević’s Hilandar Charter is part prayer, part autobiography, part financial policy, and part warning.
Let’s unpack it. 🔽

The charter is on parchment, 55.5 x 42.5 cm, written in script, opening with the sign of the cross. The signature is in red ink.
It survives at Hilandar Monastery as item no. 77. 🔽

Stefan frames everything the medieval way, legitimacy comes “by the grace of Jesus Christ,” through the Theotokos, and through the founders Simeon and Sava.
Power, piety, and ancestry are inseparable. 🔽

Do you know what's actually going on with your team? Most managers don't. I got surprised more times than I care to admit. That stopped when I created my quarterly pulse check. Here are the 11 questions I used:

MISSION

1. I understand and am motivated by the team's mission.
2. At least 80% of my work contributes directly to that mission.

Why it matters: People need to feel connected to something bigger. These tell you if you have a communication problem or a work design problem.

EXPECTATIONS

3. I know what is expected of me at work.
4. I have the tools, access, and support to meet my goals excellently.

Why it matters: Everyone wants to win. Clear expectations show them how. Cut corners here and you'll spend all year cleaning up the mess.

Republicans are once again pushing for the United States to leave NATO.

The case they make is built on misinformation, bad logic, and a misunderstanding of how the alliance actually works.

Leaving NATO would not make America stronger or richer. It would weaken American power, reduce our influence, and make the world more dangerous in ways that would ultimately find their way to our shores.
🧵

The new grievance from some conservatives is that NATO countries did not join the United States in its war against Iran. But NATO is a defensive alliance. Its core principle is Article 5: an attack on one member is treated as an attack on all. That clause has been invoked exactly one time in NATO’s history, after the United States was attacked on 9/11.

NATO nations do not have an obligation to join fellow members in wars they start, such as when the US and Israel launched a bombing campaign against Iran at the end of February.

In past conflicts, NATO members have sometimes joined the United States through separate coalitions and prior coordination outside of the alliance. Trump did not coordinate with, or even inform, other NATO nations about the attack against Iran beforehand.

This war also followed recently after the US had threatened to invade and take over Greenland, which is a territory of Denmark, a fellow NATO ally.

Another false narrative is that the United States has paid trillions of dollars to NATO while other countries freeload. That is false.

The “trillions” people cite are really total U.S. defense spending, which is fully separate from NATO’s common budgets. NATO’s common-funded budgets are much smaller, up to about $6.2 billion for 2026.

Under NATO’s current cost-share formula, the United States and Germany each pay 15% of those common budgets. In other words, America and Germany pay the same share toward NATO, even though the U.S. economy is six times larger than Germany’s. That alone tells you America’s burden is not what critics claim.

Anti-NATO arguments take U.S. military spending, pretend it is money handed over to NATO, and then claim America is being robbed. But if the United States left NATO tomorrow, that would not eliminate the U.S. defense budget. America would still maintain its military and, based on the budget requests coming out of DC, would continue massively increasing that spending.

Leaving NATO wouldn’t save America money. It would leave the United States with the same massive military costs and fewer allies helping extend American power.

The Last Weeks Sequence 🧵

9 Day Severe Wobble
4.5 Days static Lean to the Left
2.5 Days progression toward 3 Days of Darkness.
3 Days of Darkness
6 Days of Sunrise West
18 Days of Slowing Rotation
6 Days of Rotation Stoppage

SOZT

The Last Weeks leading into the Pole Shift will begin before the end of 2026 and lob into 2027. Before the Last Weeks there will be an increase of all Sky Signs and Wobble induced storms. There will be no outright denial by the establishment but the lack of leadership during this time will add to the sense of panic. Martial Law will increase from having the National Guard clean up crime in cities in the US to addressing riots and protests. This will be the status by April 2026. Meanwhile Nibiru will be a bright object, illuminated for all to see. Debate will continue.

Migration will change from existing patterns to chaos, with people running in all directions. Airplanes will be grounded as ISS and satellites are struck by debris. 37% of the population will resettle along the way. With the increase in quakes, ocean sloshing, and tectonic drift people will demand answers and there will be none.

Nancy will be on TV to provide ZetaTalk prophesy. Disclosure will be pushed thus. Russia will come through with truth. They have the Far East and China and India will be joining them. The US and Canada/Mexico is a logical join and will happen smoothly.

EOZT

(Continued in the Comments)

What Trigger's the Last Weeks

What starts the process of the Last Weeks, with all their extreme gyrations, is a threshold being crossed. The dithering we have been describing - where Planet X, the Earth and the other planets caught in the cup (Dark Twin and Venus) are all bouncing around, reacting to movement in another, to crowding of magnetons or other particles – reaches an explosive point.

During this time Planet X (Nibiru) moves to the right as far as possible, to evade the ever increasing particle crowding, but is still outbound, steadily. Thus, visibility is enhanced, and Second Sun sightings are common. This is the start of the 7.3 week period we described, where it would be unmistakably visible to all on Earth.

Venus escapes the cup. The Dark Twin escapes the cup. And the dance of many becomes a deadlock grip by Planet X on the Earth. It is no longer an issue of the Earth wobble or temporary leans to the left of into opposition sufficing. This is twitching about, compared to the Last Weeks. If the years and months of the Earth wobble were the wrestlers positioning themselves at the edge of the mat, then the Last Weeks are full contact, and neither can let go of the other. In this, of course, Planet X wins.

When Venus and the Dark Twin escape from the cup, the particle crowding is suddenly eased, allowing Planet X to come forward toward the Earth. The Earth’s first evasion is to tilt her N Pole away from the oncoming Planet X to such a degree, and so violently, that she leans all the way over to the left and then REBOUNDS as a reaction all the way to the right.

This is the Severe Wobble, for a length of 9 days, as a resent crop circle has depicted. Finally, the rebound is repressed, for a lingering Lean to the Left of 4.5 days or so. Then a progression where the N Pole of Earth is pushed away from the Sun and the approaching Planet X, until the point where 3 Days of Darkness is unmistakable. This progression is another 2-3 days in time. Then the 3 Days of Darkness and the 6 days of Sunrise West, which is a momentum and turnaround for the swing into the 3 Days of Darkness.

Then the Earth rights herself, side-by-side with Planet X, and begins her rotation slowdown. It is during this time that the Earth is drawn toward Planet X, so that Planet X quickly increases in size in the skies and is the writhing monster of legend. Slowing rotation is not a linear matter, but exponential as the Earth is pulled closer to Planet X.

The Earth moans, groans, and complains as the core pulls at the crust but the crust is gripped, increasingly, and held by Planet X. The slowing is a lurching matter too, as when the Atlantic Rift is exposed, the grip slows the rotation, but when hidden, rotation tries to return. All this causes earthquakes and stretch zone accidents. Emergency management teams are beyond exhaustion, government services are in disarray, and travel has become almost impossible.

1. Zetatalk: The Severe Earth Wobble

In describing the first 270 Roll we included a worsening Wobble and a Blending of the Seasons. This is occurring now to some extent but will get much worse as the Last Weeks approach. During the Last Weeks a second 270 roll occurs, causing the Pole Shift on Earth.

How bad will the first 270 Roll get? The twirling Wobble will become more extreme as the N Pole of Nibiru turns increasingly toward the Earth. This does more than give the Earth a Polar Push to increase the Wobble, it will cast the vast debris ridden tail of Nibiru toward Earth and cause EMP episodes. Weather extremes will become the norm.

But the Blending of the Seasons that results will not be the curse assumed, as it will increase the growing season and abate some of the bitter cold and intractable drought man must endure.

The crucial issue is where, that is not a managed grouse moor, has there been an example, where culling Foxes and Crows, alone, resulted in a clear difference to Curlew breeding success?

I mean, it has been tried, so where has it worked?

1/5🧵

https://twitter.com/TonyJuniper/status/2040700088918388895

I explain and demonstrate in this thread, why the grouse moor management model, can't be copied on other Curlew breeding areas.

Yet advocates for culling predators fail to support their belief that Fox and Crow culling will work elsewhere.

2/5threadreaderapp.com/thread/2043253…

The RSPB @Natures_Voice tried it, and found it didn't make any significant difference to Curlew breeding success.

But @TonyJuniper somehow implies it's not been tried yet, because it's a difficult subject. He's got very selective perception/memory.

3/5rspb.org.uk/helping-nature…

‼️‼️‼️🧠🧠🧠Long Covid and ME/CFS differences in the brain as seen using 7- Tesla MRI

Distinct functional connectivity (FC) patterns in myalgic encephalomyelitis and long COVID patients during cognitive fatigue: a 7 Tesla task-fMRI study

Temporal correlation of neural activity between distinct brain regions, also referred to as functional connectivity (FC), can provide insights into how brain networks coordinate, at rest or during task. Therefore, we explored intrinsic FC correlates of cognitive fatigue in ME/CFS and long COVID patients during two Stroop-colour-word paradigms on 7 Tesla fMRI.

The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) measures cognitive interference, attention, and processing speed by forcing the brain to inhibit the automatic, faster habit of reading words in favor of the slower task of naming ink colors. It highlights a, "Stroop effect," where naming the ink color of a mismatched word (e.g., "RED" in blue ink) causes a significant delay in reaction time and increases errors.

faculty.washington.edu/chudler/java/r…

Blood oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to study the neural correlates of cognitive processes by tracing activation, deactivation and connectivity within brain regions [35, 36]. The correlation between BOLD time-series across two brain regions measures functional connectivity (FC) between them [37].

Just watched @MarkJCarney's speech to the Liberal convention yesterday.

A few thoughts:

1. Sovereignty is the organizing principle. Everything else flows from it. Trade diversification, defense spending, Buy Canadian, internal trade - these aren't separate files. They're facets of a single argument that Canada must stop being dependent on anyone, starting with the United States.

2. He's governing for the anxious middle, not the activist base.

The AI section, the affordability measures, the grocery benefit, it feels like these are designed for people who feel economically precarious.

Liberals in the crowd cheered the Charter stuff. But the policy architecture is aimed at a much wider, more worried audience.

Check out precaritymindset.com for more on this mindset.

3. The fiscal story is being told very carefully.

He mentioned $60 billion in savings and tax cuts for 22 million Canadians in the same breath as massive new investment.

He's trying to hold a tight fiscal frame together with an expansionist agenda. That's hard, and he knows it.