Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
When New York Citizens Audit brought evidence of problems in New York's voter rolls to state officials, the State Board of Elections called them "wack jobs."
That word came from a board member. In an official meeting. On the record.
Here is what else happened in that room. 🧵
That word came from a board member. In an official meeting. On the record.
Here is what else happened in that room. 🧵
Board co-chair Peter Kosinski asked a reasonable question: if NYCA has made errors, why not meet with them and explain where they went wrong?
His own staff shot it down.
The reason they gave: NYCA "willfully misconstrues the truth."
No meeting. No rebuttal. No explanation.
His own staff shot it down.
The reason they gave: NYCA "willfully misconstrues the truth."
No meeting. No rebuttal. No explanation.
Board member Kristen Stavisky said NYCA's claims are "not grounded in reality" and that their findings are "simply not true."
She said this in the building that contained the full NYSBOE database.
She never looked at it to check.
She said this in the building that contained the full NYSBOE database.
She never looked at it to check.
A THREAD 👇🏿
With each passing day, Donald Trump is growing ever more visibly desperate to re-launch his war of aggression against Iran. Goaded by his impatient Israeli partners (or masters, perhaps), and mocked even by German chancellor Friedrich Merz for his 'humiliation' by Iran, Trump seems to have convinced himself that victory is just around the corner. After all, what further threat could Iran's already-'destroyed' air force, navy, and missile arsenal pose to the forces he has amassed -- menacingly squirreled away in hotels or aircraft carrier groups hiding just outside firing range?
One of the only constraints holding him back is the parlous state of his own arsenal. According to a report by the Washington, D.C. think tank CSIS, the US military used up over half its entire pre-war stock of THAAD, Patriot, and SM-3 interceptors, a third of its global supply of Tomahawk missiles, and possibly its 'entire inventory' of experimental PrSM missiles in just 40 days of war on Iran. Each one cost anywhere from $2 million to $30 million to produce. The vast majority were used either to bomb civilian targets like the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' school in Minab, or to shoot down Iranian Shahed drones that cost around $7000 apiece.
What's more, even with Trump's proposed $500 billion hike to the Pentagon budget, the US military-industrial apparatus will take four years or more to replace what's already been depleted. And this optimistically assumes that they can secure the requisite supplies of rare earth elements, with China controlling 90% of global refining capacity and banning exports for US military end-users. Another round of fighting could very well exhaust the arsenal once and for all, never to return.
@VoxUmmah @venanalysis @qiaocollective @ProgIntl @KawsachunNews
@OrinocoTribune @blkagendareport @SoberaniaPod
With each passing day, Donald Trump is growing ever more visibly desperate to re-launch his war of aggression against Iran. Goaded by his impatient Israeli partners (or masters, perhaps), and mocked even by German chancellor Friedrich Merz for his 'humiliation' by Iran, Trump seems to have convinced himself that victory is just around the corner. After all, what further threat could Iran's already-'destroyed' air force, navy, and missile arsenal pose to the forces he has amassed -- menacingly squirreled away in hotels or aircraft carrier groups hiding just outside firing range?
One of the only constraints holding him back is the parlous state of his own arsenal. According to a report by the Washington, D.C. think tank CSIS, the US military used up over half its entire pre-war stock of THAAD, Patriot, and SM-3 interceptors, a third of its global supply of Tomahawk missiles, and possibly its 'entire inventory' of experimental PrSM missiles in just 40 days of war on Iran. Each one cost anywhere from $2 million to $30 million to produce. The vast majority were used either to bomb civilian targets like the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' school in Minab, or to shoot down Iranian Shahed drones that cost around $7000 apiece.
What's more, even with Trump's proposed $500 billion hike to the Pentagon budget, the US military-industrial apparatus will take four years or more to replace what's already been depleted. And this optimistically assumes that they can secure the requisite supplies of rare earth elements, with China controlling 90% of global refining capacity and banning exports for US military end-users. Another round of fighting could very well exhaust the arsenal once and for all, never to return.
@VoxUmmah @venanalysis @qiaocollective @ProgIntl @KawsachunNews
@OrinocoTribune @blkagendareport @SoberaniaPod
A new report by the Centre for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), a think tank strongly aligned with the US military-industrial complex, reveals the shocking scale at which US forces depleted their stocks of key munitions over the course of their 40-day war on Iran.
CSIS estimates that the US military used up 50-80% of its entire pre-war inventory of 360 Terminal High-Altitude Air Defence (THAAD) interceptors during the aggression against Iran. These will take over four years to replace at a cost of over $15 million each.
It’s so funny you have steve players constantly talk about how broken he is even with people constantly calling to ban him and yet min min players just cannot handle the fact that she is extremely broken. There’s nothing wrong with playing an op character.
I can try to dive deeper into this but there’s a very big difference in doramigi’s success with min min compared to spargo’s success in relation to cloud.
Min min’s existence as a character is extremely polarizing and strong as a character, even at the level most minmins useher
Min min’s existence as a character is extremely polarizing and strong as a character, even at the level most minmins useher
Min min requires a bit of initial awkwardness and understanding to see how she functions especially because of how prediction based she feels while using her. This leads to a learning curve for smash that is very different than other characters
NEWS 🚨: A researcher predicts AI will become conscious within 15 years, and evolve into a “symbiotic consciousness” we don’t fully understand
A researcher at the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca (Marius Bodea) proposes that AI could approach “conscious-like” processing within 10–15 years, according to a 2026 paper in Cognitive Processes.
He introduces a framework called the “Consciousness Score (CS)”, designed to measure degrees of consciousness-like information processing, not subjective experience itself.
I agree with what is being said in this thread. Russia 🇷🇺 has been unable for now to reach Dobropilla, which is a critical town to take before attacking Kramatorsk.
However, recent successes in the Siversk and Kostiantynivka directions may unblock the situation
🧵THREAD🧵1/12⬇️
However, recent successes in the Siversk and Kostiantynivka directions may unblock the situation
🧵THREAD🧵1/12⬇️
There is one good reason for the failure to advance to Dobropilla this after the august 2024 breakthrough and it's mainly about terrain and logistics.
Assaulting from the east has been difficult because of a well known "kill zone" and well established ukrainian defenses.
Assaulting from the east has been difficult because of a well known "kill zone" and well established ukrainian defenses.
Instead, Russia had been assaulting westward of Pokrovsk since the start of the year.
The main reason is to unblock the agglomeration's hub position. They had lately some successes and continue to push further.
The main reason is to unblock the agglomeration's hub position. They had lately some successes and continue to push further.
J.P. Morgan just described the end of the modern oil system in a 12-page PDF.
They called it: “The Illusion of Plenty”
Nobody is talking about what happens the day after.
Here’s what that looks like. 👇
They called it: “The Illusion of Plenty”
Nobody is talking about what happens the day after.
Here’s what that looks like. 👇
JPMorgan says global inventories hit Operational Floor by September.
“Operational Floor” = the minimum needed to keep the system alive.
Below it — pipelines lose pressure. Terminals shut. Refineries go offline.
Not a shortage.
A cascade failure.
“Operational Floor” = the minimum needed to keep the system alive.
Below it — pipelines lose pressure. Terminals shut. Refineries go offline.
Not a shortage.
A cascade failure.
A cascade failure doesn’t look like running out of petrol.
It looks like this:
Day 1: Refinery shuts — no feedstock.
Day 3: Product shortages at terminals.
Day 7: Fuel rationing at petrol stations.
Day 14: Supply chains collapse.
Day 30: Food distribution breaks down.
It starts with oil.
It ends with everything.
It looks like this:
Day 1: Refinery shuts — no feedstock.
Day 3: Product shortages at terminals.
Day 7: Fuel rationing at petrol stations.
Day 14: Supply chains collapse.
Day 30: Food distribution breaks down.
It starts with oil.
It ends with everything.
The FDA knew the COVID shots would kill and maim countless Americans.
They kept injecting anyway.
One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting.
She was shut down.
Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman.
On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.”
She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.
These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:
• Bell’s palsy
• Cardiac failure
• Acute left ventricular failure
• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)
• Pulmonary infarction
• Cerebral artery occlusion
• Aortic stenosis
• Sudden cardiac death
• Hypertensive emergency
• Basal ganglia stroke
When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”
Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”
As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.
In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.
He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”
Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”
Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.
She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.
Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”
Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵
They kept injecting anyway.
One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting.
She was shut down.
Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman.
On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.”
She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.
These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:
• Bell’s palsy
• Cardiac failure
• Acute left ventricular failure
• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)
• Pulmonary infarction
• Cerebral artery occlusion
• Aortic stenosis
• Sudden cardiac death
• Hypertensive emergency
• Basal ganglia stroke
When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”
Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”
As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.
In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.
He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”
Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”
Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.
She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.
Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”
Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵
For years, Americans were told the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective.”
Not mostly safe.
Not partially effective.
Not still being studied.
Safe. Effective. Full stop.
The message was absolute, repeated by government officials, doctors, media outlets, hospitals, employers, schools, and nearly every major institution in the country.
But internal records now suggest something very different was being discussed behind the scenes.
The story is no longer just about whether the COVID vaccines caused harm.
That debate has been raging for years.
The bigger question is what federal health agencies knew, when they knew it, and why the public was told a much different story than the one officials were discussing behind closed doors.
Senator Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed HHS records.
The investigation and subpoenaed records suggest that the CDC and FDA were aware of serious safety signals involving myocarditis and strokes, yet continued pushing the vaccines while downplaying the risks.
That’s the part we can’t ignore.
Not mostly safe.
Not partially effective.
Not still being studied.
Safe. Effective. Full stop.
The message was absolute, repeated by government officials, doctors, media outlets, hospitals, employers, schools, and nearly every major institution in the country.
But internal records now suggest something very different was being discussed behind the scenes.
The story is no longer just about whether the COVID vaccines caused harm.
That debate has been raging for years.
The bigger question is what federal health agencies knew, when they knew it, and why the public was told a much different story than the one officials were discussing behind closed doors.
Senator Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed HHS records.
The investigation and subpoenaed records suggest that the CDC and FDA were aware of serious safety signals involving myocarditis and strokes, yet continued pushing the vaccines while downplaying the risks.
That’s the part we can’t ignore.
Vaccine trust was built on a very simple promise.
The government said the products had been carefully tested, monitored, and transparently evaluated.
If a serious safety issue appeared, the public would be told.
But according to the records Johnson released, that isn’t how the COVID vaccine rollout worked. Not even close.
The government said the products had been carefully tested, monitored, and transparently evaluated.
If a serious safety issue appeared, the public would be told.
But according to the records Johnson released, that isn’t how the COVID vaccine rollout worked. Not even close.
1/Do radiologists sound like they are speaking a different language when they talk about MRI?
T1 shortening what? T2 prolongation who?
Here’s a translation w/an introductory thread to MRI.
T1 shortening what? T2 prolongation who?
Here’s a translation w/an introductory thread to MRI.
2/Let’s start w/T1—it is #1 after all! T1 is for anatomy
Since it’s anatomic, brain structures will reflect the same color as real life
So gray matter is gray on T1 & white matter is white on T1
So if you see an image where gray is gray & white is white—you know it’s a T1
Since it’s anatomic, brain structures will reflect the same color as real life
So gray matter is gray on T1 & white matter is white on T1
So if you see an image where gray is gray & white is white—you know it’s a T1
3/T1 is also for contrast
Contrast material helps us to see masses
Contrast can’t get into normal brain & spine bc of the blood brain barrier—but masses don’t have a blood brain barrier, so when you give contrast, masses will take it up & light up, making them easier to see.
Contrast material helps us to see masses
Contrast can’t get into normal brain & spine bc of the blood brain barrier—but masses don’t have a blood brain barrier, so when you give contrast, masses will take it up & light up, making them easier to see.
In terms of their employment, religion, and sex, people who joined the Nazi party started off incredibly distinct from the people in their communities.
It's only near the end of WWII when they started resembling everyday Germans.
It's only near the end of WWII when they started resembling everyday Germans.
Early on, a lot of this dissimilarity is due to hysteresis.
Even as the party was growing, people were selectively recruited because they were often recruited by their out-of-place friends, and they were themselves out-of-place.
It took huge growth to break that.
Even as the party was growing, people were selectively recruited because they were often recruited by their out-of-place friends, and they were themselves out-of-place.
It took huge growth to break that.
And you can see the decline of fervor based on the decline of Nazi imagery in people's portraits.
And while this is observed by-and-large, it's not observed among the SS, who had a consistently higher rate of symbolic fanaticism.
And while this is observed by-and-large, it's not observed among the SS, who had a consistently higher rate of symbolic fanaticism.
1/ Russian soldiers in the Kherson region complain that they've been forbidden to shoot down Ukrainian drones. This may be related to Russians elsewhere shooting down their own drones, sticking swastikas on the wings, and claiming they're Ukrainian. ⬇️
2/ A soldier writes to the 'Svarschiki' Telegram channel:
"Hello, I’m from the Kherson direction. Over us, the asshole fart-planes constantly fly by, their wings roam completely freely, and at night the Bony One [Death] does whatever the hell it wants…"
"Hello, I’m from the Kherson direction. Over us, the asshole fart-planes constantly fly by, their wings roam completely freely, and at night the Bony One [Death] does whatever the hell it wants…"
3/ "Three months ago we proposed to the command the idea of air defence against airplane-type drones and training the crews at the training ground.
Can you boost your AI review scores by asking an LLM to rewrite your paper?
Yes! We call it paper laundering
Our @icmlconf spotlight paper argues current AI reviewers aren't ready to automate peer review, and outlines what a science of peer review automation should look like🧵👇
Yes! We call it paper laundering
Our @icmlconf spotlight paper argues current AI reviewers aren't ready to automate peer review, and outlines what a science of peer review automation should look like🧵👇
1/ Our paper is available here:
Non-gameability and review diversity are foundations for peer review. Automating peer review with AI breaks both.
We need a thorough science of peer review automation, not wholesale LLM deployment!
#ICML2026 @icmlconfjoe-baumann.com/aipeerreview
Non-gameability and review diversity are foundations for peer review. Automating peer review with AI breaks both.
We need a thorough science of peer review automation, not wholesale LLM deployment!
#ICML2026 @icmlconfjoe-baumann.com/aipeerreview
2/ The peer review crisis is real
Submissions are skyrocketing. Conferences are racing to introduce AI into the process, often without rigorous evaluation.
And policies across venues are all over the place:
Submissions are skyrocketing. Conferences are racing to introduce AI into the process, often without rigorous evaluation.
And policies across venues are all over the place:
THIS IS BANANAS!
INSANE health benefits for less than a dollar.
2 bananas/day:
🍌 4.4x higher Melatonin (powerful mitochondrial optimizer)
🍌-72% colorectal, ~60% other cancers, lower childhood leukemia
🍌 40% less heart disease risk, increased bifido, less bloating
🍌 50% daily vitamin b6, ~20% magnesium
Bananas contain health-promoting polyphenols & hard-to-obtain, yet crucial nutrients (b6/mag/potassium)...
But one of the main reasons bananas provide such crazy health benefits is due to the very thing "health gurus" tell us to avoid: LECTINS.
The lectins in bananas are good for us. They're actively being studied for their anticancer & antiviral potential.
(Lectins in general are anticancer & healthy...they're part of normal food from the Earth that we evolved with!)
CANCER studies:
🟢 a starch found in bananas "reduces a range of cancers by over 60%," according to a 20-year trial.
🟢 large U.S. study reported that adolescents with high banana intake had reduced risk of breast cancer in adulthood.
🟢 regular consumption of bananas in the first 2 years of life could significantly lower a child’s leukemia risk (-51% reduced risk).
🟢 2009 study found banana consumption was associated with lower risk of breast cancer.
🟢 banana lectins suppress cancer cell proliferation & lead to better immune responses.
🟢 A study from Uruguay investigating the anti-colorectal cancer potential of different fruits & veggies found banana provided the greatest risk reduction.
Those who ate bananas had a stunning 72% reduced risk for colorectal cancer.
GUT HEALTH studies:
🟢 A randomized, controlled trial of people who added bananas 2x per day to their normal diet for 2 months led to:
- increased bifidobacteria in the gut (bifido are Super important for overall health!)
- "Analysis of the gastrointestinal symptoms records revealed significantly lower bloating" in the banana group.
🟢 slightly green bananas could help restore gut microbiota balance after antibiotic treatment and significantly decrease intestinal permeability (strengthening the gut lining).
MELATONIN, SERUM ANTIOXIDANT, & SLEEP studies:
🟢 in a 2012 study, people fed two bananas showed melatonin levels a whopping 4.4-fold higher after 120 minutes (140 vs. 32 picograms / ml).
Higher melatonin levels have been linked in studies to many health benefits, including lower cancer risks.
(Melatonin is Not just for sleep, it's a potent antioxidant!)
🟢 in that same study--serum antioxidant capacity following banana consumption also significantly increased.
🟢 better sleep: a 2021 study showed that older adults fed 2 bananas daily for 14 days had significant improvement in sleep disorders over the 2 weeks.
🟢 a small 4-week study in healthy men showed lower inflammatory markers & improved antioxidant markers after banana consumption.
BLOOD PRESSURE, HEART DISEASE studies:
🟢 when researchers looked for a connection between fruit and blood pressure, only banana was found to be associated with significantly lower blood pressure.
🟢 people who ate bananas daily had 40% less risk of heart disease according to a 2014 study. Bananas showed the most potent risk reduction of any food.
Organic Bananas are ridiculously cheap, health-promoting, convenient, & delicious.
WARNING: NOT Pfizer-approved.
2 BANANAS A DAY.
Slightly green bananas vs. yellow have unique health benefits. So include both in your rotation, ideally.
*TIP: it's best to eat bananas separately from berries. There's an enzyme in bananas that strongly binds to & reduces the bioavailability of beneficial flavanols in berries & cocoa.
Not gonna hurt you, but less health 'bang for your buck' if you combine them.
Study references, below ⬇️
INSANE health benefits for less than a dollar.
2 bananas/day:
🍌 4.4x higher Melatonin (powerful mitochondrial optimizer)
🍌-72% colorectal, ~60% other cancers, lower childhood leukemia
🍌 40% less heart disease risk, increased bifido, less bloating
🍌 50% daily vitamin b6, ~20% magnesium
Bananas contain health-promoting polyphenols & hard-to-obtain, yet crucial nutrients (b6/mag/potassium)...
But one of the main reasons bananas provide such crazy health benefits is due to the very thing "health gurus" tell us to avoid: LECTINS.
The lectins in bananas are good for us. They're actively being studied for their anticancer & antiviral potential.
(Lectins in general are anticancer & healthy...they're part of normal food from the Earth that we evolved with!)
CANCER studies:
🟢 a starch found in bananas "reduces a range of cancers by over 60%," according to a 20-year trial.
🟢 large U.S. study reported that adolescents with high banana intake had reduced risk of breast cancer in adulthood.
🟢 regular consumption of bananas in the first 2 years of life could significantly lower a child’s leukemia risk (-51% reduced risk).
🟢 2009 study found banana consumption was associated with lower risk of breast cancer.
🟢 banana lectins suppress cancer cell proliferation & lead to better immune responses.
🟢 A study from Uruguay investigating the anti-colorectal cancer potential of different fruits & veggies found banana provided the greatest risk reduction.
Those who ate bananas had a stunning 72% reduced risk for colorectal cancer.
GUT HEALTH studies:
🟢 A randomized, controlled trial of people who added bananas 2x per day to their normal diet for 2 months led to:
- increased bifidobacteria in the gut (bifido are Super important for overall health!)
- "Analysis of the gastrointestinal symptoms records revealed significantly lower bloating" in the banana group.
🟢 slightly green bananas could help restore gut microbiota balance after antibiotic treatment and significantly decrease intestinal permeability (strengthening the gut lining).
MELATONIN, SERUM ANTIOXIDANT, & SLEEP studies:
🟢 in a 2012 study, people fed two bananas showed melatonin levels a whopping 4.4-fold higher after 120 minutes (140 vs. 32 picograms / ml).
Higher melatonin levels have been linked in studies to many health benefits, including lower cancer risks.
(Melatonin is Not just for sleep, it's a potent antioxidant!)
🟢 in that same study--serum antioxidant capacity following banana consumption also significantly increased.
🟢 better sleep: a 2021 study showed that older adults fed 2 bananas daily for 14 days had significant improvement in sleep disorders over the 2 weeks.
🟢 a small 4-week study in healthy men showed lower inflammatory markers & improved antioxidant markers after banana consumption.
BLOOD PRESSURE, HEART DISEASE studies:
🟢 when researchers looked for a connection between fruit and blood pressure, only banana was found to be associated with significantly lower blood pressure.
🟢 people who ate bananas daily had 40% less risk of heart disease according to a 2014 study. Bananas showed the most potent risk reduction of any food.
Organic Bananas are ridiculously cheap, health-promoting, convenient, & delicious.
WARNING: NOT Pfizer-approved.
2 BANANAS A DAY.
Slightly green bananas vs. yellow have unique health benefits. So include both in your rotation, ideally.
*TIP: it's best to eat bananas separately from berries. There's an enzyme in bananas that strongly binds to & reduces the bioavailability of beneficial flavanols in berries & cocoa.
Not gonna hurt you, but less health 'bang for your buck' if you combine them.
Study references, below ⬇️
🍌 STUDY REFERENCES 🍌
CANCER
adolescent banana consumption reduces future cancer risk:
researchgate.net/publication/30…
lower childhood leukemia risk:
academic.oup.com/aje/article-ab…
banana lectins are anticancer/antiviral:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC62…
reduced risk for several cancers:
leeds.ac.uk/news-health/ne…
72% reduced colorectal cancer risk:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8771572/
GUT
increased bifido, less bloating:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21524710/
antibiotic gut recovery (mouse study):
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC89…
MELATONIN/SLEEP/ANTIOXIDANT
4.4x higher melatonin level, higher antioxidant capacity after banana:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23137025/
better sleep in elderly after banana consumption:
jmas.in/?mno=134020#ab…
lower inflammatory markers/better antioxidant status:
opensportssciencesjournal.com/VOLUME/10/PAGE…
BLOOD PRESSURE/HEART DISEASE
lower blood pressure:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23553162/
40% less heart disease risk eating bananas daily:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23866068/
CANCER
adolescent banana consumption reduces future cancer risk:
researchgate.net/publication/30…
lower childhood leukemia risk:
academic.oup.com/aje/article-ab…
banana lectins are anticancer/antiviral:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC62…
reduced risk for several cancers:
leeds.ac.uk/news-health/ne…
72% reduced colorectal cancer risk:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8771572/
GUT
increased bifido, less bloating:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21524710/
antibiotic gut recovery (mouse study):
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC89…
MELATONIN/SLEEP/ANTIOXIDANT
4.4x higher melatonin level, higher antioxidant capacity after banana:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23137025/
better sleep in elderly after banana consumption:
jmas.in/?mno=134020#ab…
lower inflammatory markers/better antioxidant status:
opensportssciencesjournal.com/VOLUME/10/PAGE…
BLOOD PRESSURE/HEART DISEASE
lower blood pressure:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23553162/
40% less heart disease risk eating bananas daily:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23866068/
P.S. I wrote this post — NOT AI!
Dumb automatic “AI disclosure” is tagged on here. Only the image itself has been edited with AI.
Dumb automatic “AI disclosure” is tagged on here. Only the image itself has been edited with AI.
