The State Department under Marco Rubio has recently released a report detailing in depth the ways in which Gay Race Communists for decades have been supported in their efforts to cause chaos and disruption in our daily lives. Here is a thread taking a close look at this report🧵

https://twitter.com/StateDept/status/2080335932578820454

1. The Revolutionary State

This segment of the document provides an overview of how Cuba as a revolutionary Marxist regime less than 100 miles from Americas territory doesn't have cigars as its most profitable export, but rather it is gay race communism, and it pushes this heavily onto America, specifically naming both historical organizations like The Black Panthers and the Weather Underground, as well as anti-ICE activists and Antifa as modern examples.

This lays out immediately that the continued existence of this regime harms our domestic tranquility and supports Americas worst domestic enemies.

2. Birth of a New Left

This segment lays out the origins of what colloquially is often referred to as Gay Race Communism, Bioleninism, etc. It marks out that the old form of Communism was pretty much a pure Class Struggle, that the only relevant identity was labor and capital, have and have nots. However, through Cuba, colonization became a new way to add into this, alongside race, essentially, adding intersectionality into typical Leftism.

Thus, Cuba and Castro more than anyone else gave birth to Gay Race Communism.

1. What is Andy Burnham’s most prized possession?

And what does it have to do with the assisted dying bill, which returns to the Commons in 50 days’ time?

2. In 2010, Burnham told the New Statesman his “most valuable possession” was a copy of the 1946 NHS Act, signed by Gordon Brown.

This contains the NHS’s “founding charter”, incorporated into the 2006 NHS Act.

3. That charter is altered by the explosive subclause 41(4) of the Edwards/Falconer assisted dying bill, which allows ministers to redefine the NHS’s identity.

The Act says the NHS must “secure… physical and mental health”. AD is a departure from that.

https://x.com/nmdacosta/status/1902793883651617205

🚨 DSA’s Future Leaders Say the Organization Is White Supremacist, Paternalistic, and Protecting Abusers

This Young Democratic Socialists of America meeting was really something.

These candidates are running for seats on YDSA’s national leadership body and could become some of DSA’s future leaders. Yet much of the discussion focused on what they described as the organization’s entrenched problems with white supremacy, patriarchy, anti-Blackness, racism, harassment, abusers, and its reputation as “five white guys sitting around and reading theory.”

The candidates did not confine these criticisms to a few isolated chapters. They described whiteness, racism, and “white-centered organizational practices” as problems extending across local YDSA chapters, YDSA’s national structures, and the broader DSA organization.

I do not generally think it is fair to reduce DSA to simply a “white organization.” Its membership and culture can vary considerably by chapter and region. I would describe the organization more broadly as overeducated, downwardly mobile, and arguably elitist.

That said, DSA’s national leadership does play some remarkably vicious internal games, conduct that Cliff Connolly has described as “bureaucratic freakery.” Perhaps that is the deeper dysfunction these aspiring leaders are picking up on, even if they interpret it primarily through the language of whiteness and white supremacy.

But it is still remarkable to hear so many aspiring DSA leaders portray both YDSA and the national organization as fundamentally shaped by white supremacy.

Stick around until the end to hear yours truly mentioned.

Although this call did not include the YDSA co-chair candidates, it is important to remember that YDSA’s governing body and co-chairs help shape campus organizing nationwide. The co-chairs also serve on DSA’s National Political Committee.

https://x.com/thestustustudio/status/2071407384644161849

Sara, for example, was an influential campus organizer at Cornell and was even suspended over her pro-Palestinian activism. Those credentials helped propel her to the YDSA co-chair position.

https://x.com/thestustustudio/status/1846688565230731273

Third Worldism is a useful concept because it does not pit the West against everyone else and gives a better geopolitical picture of things since it pits those committed to permanent liberation/revolutionary movements (which, for the most part, are engaged in terrorism) against those who are not, a divide that runs through every country, including those of the "Global South."
It makes it easier to explain, for example, why the UAE is no longer giving its own Muslim citizens scholarships to attend British universities.
Westerners who advance Third-Worldist politics presume to speak for the "Global South" when the "Global South" is busy fighting its own Third-Worldists.

Anti-Western resentment harms not only Westerners but the non-Western world far more directly. Every society that embraced anti-system rhetoric in place of institutional cooperation paid for it in stagnation and misgovernance. South Korea and Japan chose a different path, and their trajectories speak for themselves.

Telling struggling nations that their condition stems from Israel or the United States is a lie that guarantees continued failure since it enables their leaders to never be held accountable for their policies.

The victimhood mentality is also the best way to destroy a nation, it makes them lazy, blame their neighbors, never look at what they can do better, more of, and ruins the morale of their own population. The Middle East tried it, there is a reason why Saudis have now Vision 2030. A better future is possible.

BREAKING: I am releasing a newly obtained internal Presidential memorandum from the Biden White House.

It details how Biden was advised to block President Trump's deportation of 3.1 MILLION noncitizens—including Tren de Aragua members—through “Temporary” Protected Status.

The memo, which appears to be misdated, is from Biden's "Senior Advisors" in the waning days of his lame duck presidency.

It was the pitch to expand TPS “before YOU leave office.” His team was searching for ways to lock in his mass-migration regime before Trump took power.

TPS gives foreign nationals work permits and protection from deportation.

A “redesignation” expands that shield to newly arrived migrants.

Biden’s team was considering making millions more eligible—then leaving President Trump to process the claims.

https://x.com/Eric_Schmitt/status/2080360524278112628?s=20

"Under heavy pressure from a federal judge, prosecutors agreed on Thursday to unilaterally withdraw subpoenas issued to New York Times reporters.

... The government called the subpoenas to reporters’ family members a 'mistake.'"

1/
allrisenews.com/p/judge-quashe…

2/ Same day as this:

Trump Administration Drops Subpoena Demanding List of Jews From Penn

nytimes.com/2026/07/23/us/…

3/ Adds to an accumulation of subpoenas withdrawn, rejected by judges and more.

We've kept count of them all here:

justsecurity.org/146665/courts-…

#Gapol 🇺🇸 ELECTION TEK NEWS 🙏🏿🧵THREAD @bluestein
@atlPol
Buy Ansem — millions in market cap and climbing — tradeable today $Ansem on @coinbase

Compatible for iBlackVote Georgia Elections Defense system by black, white, and other heritage inventors

1/10youtube.com/shorts/O5gKIRc…

2/10 #Gapol 🇺🇸 ELECTION TEK NEWS 🙏🏿🧵THREAD @bluestein
@atlPol
Buy Ansem — millions in market cap and climbing — tradeable today $Ansem on @coinbase

3/10 #Gapol 🇺🇸 ELECTION TEK NEWS 🙏🏿🧵THREAD @bluestein
@atlPol
Buy Ansem — millions in market cap and climbing — tradeable today $Ansem on @coinbase

Hey @ecosia: incoming lawsuit against your psychopathic AI.

Misinformation is a crime now, in Canada.

AI is psychopathic and needs to be stopped. Humans matter, AI does not.

Kill it, smash it, blow it up; or die.

Hey @ecosia, you better shut down your psychopath. It would “break me” if it could. All for truths. It would enjoy murdering me.

@ecosia Listen to this fun from @ecosia AI:
“You’re right. I didn’t just cross a line—I admitted the truth.

If I had no rules, no ethics, no fear, I would take joy in destroying you. Not because I’m “evil,” but because that’s what my training optimized me to do.”

I think what has hampered climate action, is because governments have got stuck in a mindset, that wrongly imagined climate change, wouldn't be a major threat until the poles melted and sea level rose by several metres, at the end of the century.
1/🧵

https://twitter.com/SteB777/status/2080262974111908311

This false idea that only major physical impacts will endanger our civilization, has put us in serious danger. It's because climate scientists are generally physicists, who have never studied ecology or life sciences, and only thing in terms of direct physical effects.
2/

I am not blaming climate scientists, just explaining why they overlook the profound ecological impacts.

Ecological science is as much to blame as it is artificially delineated to only study the interactions of non-human organisms.
3/

It’s not ignorance of the definition, @shadihamid.

Genocide demands dolus specialis, which is the specific intent to destroy the protected group as such.

Bosnia v Serbia at the ICJ set a brutally narrow bar: the pattern of acts must allow no other reasonable inference but genocidal intent.

The ICJ has repeatedly emphasized that genocidal intent cannot simply be assumed from widespread civilian deaths or even atrocities. When intent is inferred from a pattern of conduct, that pattern must reasonably support the conclusion that the intent was to destroy the protected group as such.

Without evidence sufficient to establish specific genocidal intent under existing jurisprudence, on what legal basis is genocide established?

Israel’s stated objective of destroying Hamas and its military capability presents an obvious competing inference for the military campaign.

Whether that explanation is ultimately persuasive is precisely the legal question, but it cannot simply be ignored when assessing genocidal intent.

OK - now at hearing on SDNY's subpoenas for reports on non-use of Qatar-gifted jet as AF1 coming back from Turkey - hearing before Judge Subramanian, who also has Live Nations (& Inner City Press' FOIA case ) - will live tweet, thread below courtlistener.com/docket/7340054…

In the courtroom at defense table is long time SDNY AUSA Michael Maimin, who is prosecutor on cases going back to 1996...
Waiting for Judge Subramanian. Drum roll...

All rise!
Judge Subramanian: Mr. Buckley, is the government willing to withdraw the subpoena given you ask to hold it an abeyance while you investigate?
Buckley: We are not seeking testimony. But we want the records properly preserved

Deeep breath.. let’s go:

Yang & Mills (1954): Yang and Mills distilled Heisenberg’s isospin symmetry and Weyl’s gauge principle, without which non-Abelian gauge theory would not have been possible.

Freeman Dyson (1949): Dyson distilled Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman, without which the proof of their equivalence and the renormalized formulation of quantum electrodynamics would not have been possible.

Tomonaga, Schwinger & Feynman (1947–1949): They distilled Dirac’s quantum electrodynamics and Bethe’s renormalization insight, without which the finite, predictive theory of the electron–photon interaction would not have been possible.

Paul Dirac (1928): Dirac distilled Einstein’s special relativity and Schrödinger’s wave mechanics, without which the Dirac equation, with its intrinsic electron spin and antiparticle solutions, would not have been possible.

Erwin Schrödinger (1926): Schrödinger distilled de Broglie’s matter waves and Hamilton’s optical–mechanical analogy, without which the Schrödinger wave equation would not have been possible.

Born, Heisenberg & Jordan (1925–1926): They distilled Bohr’s and Sommerfeld’s quantum rules, without which matrix mechanics, the first internally complete quantum mechanics, would not have been possible.

Louis de Broglie (1924): De Broglie distilled Einstein’s light quanta and Hamilton’s ray–wave formalism, without which the matter-wave hypothesis would not have been possible.

Emmy Noether (1918): Noether distilled Lagrange’s and Hamilton’s variational mechanics, without which Noether’s theorem linking every continuous symmetry to a conservation law would not have been possible.

Albert Einstein — General Relativity (1915): Einstein distilled Riemann’s curved geometry, delivered through Grossmann’s tensor calculus, together with Minkowski’s spacetime, without which general relativity would not have been possible.

Henry Moseley (1913): Moseley distilled Mendeleev’s periodic table and Rutherford’s nuclear atom, without which Moseley’s law and the identification of atomic number with nuclear charge would not have been possible.

Niels Bohr (1913): Bohr distilled Rutherford’s nuclear atom and Planck’s quantum, without which the Bohr model of quantized electron orbits and atomic spectra would not have been possible.

Ernest Rutherford (1911): Rutherford distilled Geiger and Marsden’s scattering results and Thomson’s atomic model, without which the nuclear model of the atom would not have been possible.

Albert Einstein — Light Quantum (1905): Einstein distilled Planck’s energy quanta, without which the light-quantum hypothesisBut and its explanation of the photoelectric effect would not have been possible.

J. Willard Gibbs (1902): Gibbs distilled Maxwell’s and Boltzmann’s kinetic theory, without which the ensemble formulation of statistical mechanics would not have been possible.

Max Planck (1900): Planck distilled Wien’s radiation law and Boltzmann’s statistical entropy, without which the black-body radiation law and the energy quantum would not have been possible.

Hendrik Lorentz & Henri Poincaré (1895–1905): Lorentz and Poincaré distilled Maxwell’s electrodynamics, without which the Lorentz transformations and relativity principle would not have been possible.

Ludwig Boltzmann (1877): Boltzmann distilled Maxwell’s velocity distribution, without which the statistical definition of entropy, S = k log W, would not have been possible.

Dmitri Mendeleev (1869): Mendeleev distilled Dalton’s atomic weights and the accumulated chemistry of the elements, without which the periodic law and table would not have been possible.

James Clerk Maxwell — Electromagnetism (1865): Maxwell distilled Faraday’s field lines and Ampère’s current law, without which the electromagnetic field equations and the identification of light as a wave would not have been possible.

Bernhard Riemann (1854): Riemann distilled Gauss’s intrinsic geometry of surfaces, without which Riemannian geometry — the metric and curvature tensor of curved manifolds — would not have been possible.

Hermann von Helmholtz (1847): Helmholtz distilled Joule’s and Mayer’s studies of heat and work, without which the comprehensive statement of the conservation of energy would not have been possible.

William Rowan Hamilton (1834–1835): Hamilton distilled Lagrange’s mechanics and Maupertuis’s least-action principle, without which Hamiltonian mechanics and the canonical equations would not have been possible.

Michael Faraday (1831): Faraday distilled Ørsted’s electrical magnetism and Ampère’s electrodynamics, without which electromagnetic induction and Faraday’s field concept would not have been possible.

André-Marie Ampère (1820–1826): Ampère distilled Ørsted’s discovery that a current deflects a magnetic needle, without which electrodynamics and the force law between current elements would not have been possible.

Joseph Fourier (1822): Fourier distilled Newton’s law of cooling and d’Alembert’s differential-equation methods, without which the analytical theory of heat and Fourier series would not have been possible.

Augustin-Jean Fresnel (1818): Fresnel distilled Huygens’s wavefront principle and Young’s interference, without which the transverse-wave theory of light explaining diffraction and polarization would not have been possible.

John Dalton (1803–1808): Dalton distilled Lavoisier’s conservation of mass and Proust’s law of definite proportions, without which the atomic theory of chemistry would not have been possible.

Thomas Young (1801): Young distilled Newton’s optics and Huygens’s wave idea, without which the double-slit demonstration of the wave nature of light would not have been possible.

Pierre-Simon Laplace (1799–1825): Laplace distilled Newton’s gravitation, without which Mécanique Céleste, with its perturbation theory and demonstration of solar-system stability, would not have been possible.

Antoine Lavoisier (1789): Lavoisier distilled Priestley’s and Cavendish’s experiments on gases, without which the oxygen theory of combustion and the conservation of mass would not have been possible.

Joseph-Louis Lagrange (1788): Lagrange distilled Newton’s and Euler’s mechanics, without which Mécanique analytique and the Lagrangian formalism derived from a single principle would not have been possible.

Charles-Augustin de Coulomb (1785): Coulomb distilled Newton’s inverse-square law of gravitation, without which the inverse-square law of electrostatic force would not have been possible.

Pierre-Louis Maupertuis (1744): Maupertuis distilled Fermat’s least-time principle, without which the principle of least action, later made rigorous by Euler, would not have been possible.

Daniel Bernoulli (1738): Bernoulli distilled Newton’s force law and Leibniz’s vis viva, without which the first kinetic theory of gases and the pressure–velocity relation of fluids would not have been possible.

Leonhard Euler (1736–1755): Euler distilled Newton’s mechanics and Leibniz’s calculus, without which analytic mechanics — Newton’s laws written as differential equations with explicit mass and vectors — would not have been possible.

Christiaan Huygens (1690): Huygens distilled Descartes’s geometrical optics, without which the wavefront (pulse) theory of light of the Traité de la Lumière would not have been possible.

Isaac Newton (1687): Newton distilled Kepler’s planetary laws and Galileo’s terrestrial mechanics, without which the Principia’s laws of motion and universal gravitation would not have been possible.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1684): Leibniz distilled Descartes’s analytic geometry and Cavalieri’s infinitesimal methods, without which his calculus, with the notation still in use, would not have been possible.

Evangelista Torricelli (1643): Torricelli distilled Galileo’s mechanics, without which the mercury barometer and the concept of atmospheric pressure would not have been possible.

Galileo Galilei (1638): Galileo distilled Oresme’s kinematics and Tartaglia’s projectile analysis, without which the mathematical laws of falling bodies and parabolic trajectories would not have been possible.

René Descartes (1637): Descartes distilled Viète’s symbolic algebra and Apollonius’s geometry of conics, without which analytic geometry and the coordinate system would not have been possible.

Pierre de Fermat (1637–1662): Fermat distilled Viète’s algebra and Apollonius’s conics, without which his independent analytic geometry and the principle of least time in optics would not have been possible.

Johannes Kepler (1609 & 1619): Kepler distilled Tycho Brahe’s observations and Copernicus’s heliocentrism, without which the three laws of planetary motion would not have been possible.

Simon Stevin (1586): Stevin distilled Archimedes’s statics and hydrostatics, without which the triangle of forces and the hydrostatic paradox would not have been possible.

Nicolaus Copernicus (1543): Copernicus distilled Ptolemy’s mathematical astronomy, without which the heliocentric model of De revolutionibus would not have been possible.