🔥"people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these agencies...[were] brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing..." (1/6)
Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describes for Jason James (@jasonjamesbnn) how the "upper-levels of [the U.S.] military establishment" brainwashed the government, as well as the American people, into believing that things like lockdowns, masking, and the mRNA injections were necessary to defeat COVID. He highlights the fact that the National Security Council (NSC) took control of the "pandemic" response in the U.S. just seven days after it was declared a national emergency, and, echoing the work done by Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) and Katherine Watt, says that the FDA's supposed approval of the COVID injections was pure "theater."
"[W]hat happened...during the pandemic, is that...FDA, NIH, CDC, all of them, lost control of what would have been their scientific narratives. And they did that because...President Trump...handed [management of the 'pandemic'] off to the National Security Council, which militarized it, which made the pandemic no longer a pandemic, but a biowarfare attack," Risch tells James. The professor emeritus adds that the COVID injections are "not vaccines according to the government" and are, instead, "countermeasures, because it's a military approach that was adopted rather than a public health approach."
"[T]his military approach that had people in the military underneath the National Security Council, designed a response that all of our government agencies would carry out, they designed a response that would not follow public health principles," Risch notes.
Prior to the NSC's bizarre and harmful "pandemic" response plan, Risch says that prominent public health officials had said that "you don't lock down the population" and that "there's no point in closing airports [as] that won't do anything." He adds that public health officials also knew that "masks are essentially useless—for either protecting the wearer or for controlling source control, meaning keeping the wearer from spreading infection outside of the wearer."
"[A]ll of this stuff was all laid out, and then the military turned it around and did the opposite of almost everything. And so, that colored our whole response," Risch says.
Explaining further, the Yale professor says that "people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these [U.S. government] agencies...[were] brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing..."
Risch goes on to say:
"What happened is that, basically, your rank-and-file people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these agencies, are relatively good people who believe in themselves, they believe in the science the way they see it; they believe that they think they are doing a good job, the best that they could under the circumstances, they think of themselves as wholesome, good-doing people. And they [didn't] realize that they [were being] brainwashed. That [they'd] been brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing of all of our scientific, medical regulatory systems, as well as the general public. And we know how much brainwashing has gone on through the media and all that."
"[T]his whole regime of mis-thinking, of propagandized fear and lack of recognition of what were the true issues going on, spread throughout the regulatory approval and scientific review institutions of our government," Risch adds.
Touching on the topic of the COVID injections, Risch says that the FDA's VIRBAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) committee, "thought they were doing good by approving vaccines," but were, in fact, "essentially irrelevant." Risch adds that "It was just theater to legitimize that these vaccines weren't vaccines, they were countermeasures and were going to be used anyway come hell or high water, because that's what the military at the top, the National Security Council, had decided, in advance of this whole process unfolding."
Indeed, Risch highlights the fact that the COVID injection rollout "was planned this way" and notes that "the military was involved in Event 201, the planning...sessions in September of 2019, and all the previous Event 201s..." that had taken place regularly in the years leading up to COVID.
"Why was the military involved? Because they knew the likelihood of a bioweapons attack was grossly, much larger, much higher, than a spread from some animal reservoir into humans. So they were heavily involved in the planning for this and it shows how we carried out all of the pandemic management. Because it was obviously twisted and contorted to be a military response rather than a public health response."
The National Security Council (NSC) was indeed responsible for setting COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.
NSC took what was a reasonable pandemic preparedness plan, threw it out, and made a new one that they used, but is not available to the public.
"Its hard to understand why [theyd inflict] a bioweapon on...[Earth]...unless it [goes] back to population control...[vaccines are]...a great way...b/c if you think Im just getting a vaccine...then 10 years later...you try to have a child [but] cant, you dont connect those two"
Senior research scientist at MIT Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff) and (retired) Principal Investigator at the Korea Brain Research Institute Systems Neuroscience and Movement Disorders Laboratory Dr. Kevin McCairn PhD (@NestCommander) discuss the possibility that COVID and the COVID injections, in conjunction, are a tool for mass, global depopulation. Seneff, who has four degrees from MIT, specifically notes that she's aware that "vaccines" have been used as a "stealth" tool for causing infertility before in Argentina and Africa.
There is a doctrine that says that "if you use an agent, a pathogen, it works best as a binary type weapon, which [means] you have to follow it up mass exposure using something like vaccines," McCairn says toward the beginning of the clip. "[W]hen you think about this instance of gene-transfection technologies to make [a] specific peptide, which would have that prion-catalyzing epitope, and...we know that the lipid nanoparticle is highly labile [easily broken down], and is highly inflammatory in and of itself—it's a combination of chemical and biological warfare all wrapped up in one."
If COVID/the COVID injections "[were] a weapon release, it's done, and now we have to wait and see what happens as the data rolls in," McCairn adds.
"[I]s it they're trying to develop some vaccine, or are they trying to develop biowarfare?" Seneff asks rhetorically, highlighting the evolution of her thinking on this matter. "Are we funding China to develop bioweapons?"
The senior scientist at MIT goes on to say that "it's hard to understand why they would want to inflict a bioweapon on the entire Earth's population...unless it does get back to population control."
"I was aware before of vaccines that I think were introduced for population control in Argentina and in Africa. There were those monks who found that they had included something in the vaccines that they were giving to the teenage girls that would cause them to develop antibodies to the fetus, as a 'birth control pill,'" Seneff adds. She notes that "the people [in Argentina] immediately suspected that they were trying to make them infertile. And the thing is, that's such a great way to do it, because if you think 'I'm just getting a vaccine and then ten years later...you try to have a child and you can't, you don't connect those two; so it's stealth. If you want to reduce the population without people knowing what's happening, it's a great way to do it..."
McCairn notes that he "can't dismiss that body of literature that's being put out by the tippy top of the transnational power structures and corporations [regarding a depopulation agenda]." He adds, "it's not like they hide it."
The principal investigator goes on to reference research showing that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the COVID injections accumulate in the reproductive organs, highlighting one specific pharmacokinetic study performed in Japan that showed the LNPs going to the placenta, ovaries, etc. McCairn also highlights the late Dr. Arne Burkhardt's observations of the "expression of spike protein in reproductive organs in people who'd been autopsied after death."
Here is the evidence presented by the late Dr. Arne Burkhardt, referenced by McCairn in the video clip.
Burkhardt, a renowned pathologist who had more than 40 years of experience in his field, says in this clip—referencing one autopsy of a COVID "vaccinated" male—that "spike protein is strongly expressed in the spermatogenic organ, in the testes, and you can see there are almost no spermatocytes in here, but [a strong] expression of spike protein..."
"If I were a woman in fertile age, I would not plan a motherhood from a...man who has been [COVID] vaccinated," Burkhardt adds.
May 1 • 4 tweets • 4 min read
🚨The National Academies of Sciences says that "it is now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...one has to say, sadly, that of 100 people who get myocarditis today, something in the range of 20 to 50% will not be among us after 10 years...this is murder."🚨
Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (@LauraLynnTT) how the
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis.
Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years.
"[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion."
This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds.
He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%."
One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade.
He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades."
"[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says.
Link to National Academies analysis:
"The report concludes that two messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, can cause myocarditis..." nationalacademies.org/news/2024/04/n…
Apr 15 • 6 tweets • 7 min read
🚨"[J]ust type in 'variant [Jacob-Creutzfeldt disease] and the COVID-19 vaccine' or 'prion disease and the COVID vaccine' into PubMed...and you'll come up with hundreds...of case studies of people who developed what they're calling 'variant CJD.' I call it prion disease..."🚨
Dr David Cartland (@CartlandDavid) MBChB BMedSci, a GMC-registered General Practitioner, describes for Sonia Poulton (@SoniaPoulton) how the COVID injections are causing cases of variant Jacob-Creutzfeldt disease (vCJD), or what he's referring to as prion disease. Variant CJD, for reference, is a neurodegenerative disorder that is rapidly progressive and always fatal. (According to the CDC vCJD is a rare, degenerative, fatal brain disorder in humans. It differs from classic CJD in that it "predominantly affects younger people, has atypical clinical features, with prominent psychiatric or sensory symptoms at the time of clinical presentation and delayed onset of neurologic abnormalities, including ataxia within weeks or months, dementia and myoclonus late in the illness, a duration of illness of at least 6 months, and a diffusely abnormal non-diagnostic electroencephalogram.")
"[J]ust type in 'variant CJD and the COVID-19 vaccine' or 'prion disease and the COVID vaccine' into PubMed or NIH websites or Google Scholar and you'll come up with hundreds and hundreds of case studies of people who developed what they're calling 'variant CJD,'" Cartland tells Poulton.
"I call it prion disease...or spike protein-opothy, which is essentially the disease of what the spike protein is doing to the body—it's multi-faceted and it's multi-systemic as well," Cartland says. He explains the disease by saying people should "think about your brain kicking off these [spike/spike variant] proteins... [that] can't go anywhere, they're just depositing in the body, this inert substance. And it's building up in plaques [in the body's organs]..."
"I'm seeing that [strange behavior] in my colleagues and friends and family...people's cognitive functions are being impaired, people's memories being impaired, people's personalities are changing, either to become apathetic and not caring about anything to quite the opposite. And what I'm witnessing most is aggression; aggressive behavior from people," Cartland says. "People aren't able to stick to tasks, you see people all over the road when they're driving or driving ridiculous speeds—in 30 miles per hour [zones] they're going 10 miles per hour..."
Furthermore, the physician says that "These [vCJD/prion disease] cases happen within a matter of days after the vaccine being administered..."
Indeed, even a cursory search of Google Scholar turns up pages and pages of studies linking variant Jacob-Creutzfeldt disease to the COVID injections:
"Here's the sneaky thing: on the last day that Obama was in office, he started this whole global biosecurity agenda, with the United States giving money to countries around the world to prepare them for *the pandemic,* you know, disease X, etc." (Tweet 1/5)
Physician and writer Dr. Meryl Nass (@NassMeryl) describes for James Corbett how former President Barack Obama started the process that saw the Department of Health and Human Services' definition of "Public Health Emergency of International Concern" morph into an excuse to give total "health authority" to the supranational organization in the case of one of these so-called "emergencies." (Note that the acronym for a Public Health Emergency of International concern is PHEIC, which the WHO pronounces as "fake." See following tweet for proof.)
Nass notes that a collection of 15 attorneys general from 15 states sent a petition to the HHS, noting that the department's new definition(s) of a PHEIC "turns over sovereignty for health to the WHO and that is not within your purview..." The attorneys noted, Nass says, "that is illegal" and "You don't have the authority to do that."
The attorneys essentially said, Nass summarizes, "We do have a 10th Amendment [and] you've turned over police power to them, you don't have the right to do that."
"Where did this all start?" Nass asks rhetorically. "Here's the sneaky thing: on the last day that Obama was in office, he started this whole global biosecurity agenda, with the United States giving money to countries around the world to prepare them for *the pandemic,* you know, disease X, etc." The last day he was in office, Nass shows, his HHS "issued a rule, and it said, 'We're redefining Public Health Emergencies of International Concern."
Five definitions of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern now exist, the physician adds, "that all rely on decisions by the WHO." That means, Nass notes, that "if the WHO declares one [a PHEIC], if the WHO decides there's one... if the WHO does something else, we're [HHS] going to consider that a public Health Emergency of International Concern."
Upon receiving the petition from the 15 attorneys general, Nass says that the HHS removed none of the language giving power to the WHO, and, instead, said "we're leaving it."
The attorneys' petition "is extremely strong because it cites the Constitution, it cites case law, and talks about all the reasons why it is illegal for this type of thing to happen..." Nass says. She adds, "apparently it [HHS] needs Congress in order to be able to do that and Congress has never given it that power."
Note that the WHO pronounces the acronym for a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, PHEIC, as "fake."
Literally.
Jan 1 • 4 tweets • 3 min read
With the acquisition of Seagen for $43 billion, "[I]t seems like Pfizer is covering itself for most of the turbo cancers that I'm describing right now that I see skyrocketing in the general population [that's taken the C19 injections]."
Radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis (@MakisMD) describes for Seth Holehouse (@ManInAmericaUS) how bizarre Pfizer's acquisition of the biotech company Seagen—which produces monoclonal antibody-based therapies for the treatment of cancer—was, considering its outsized $43 billion price tag.
"Why are they overpaying for a company that's not generating more than $2 billion in revenue right now?" Makis asks rhetorically. He notes that "it's estimated that it would take a decade for Pfizer just to break even on the deal."
The oncologist asks the question, "Why would cancer, all of the sudden, be the next big thing [for Pfizer]?" He notes that "you don't see... huge spikes in cancer" and that "nothing that would justify the scaling up the production of cancer drugs in a way that you would scale up production of mRNA in a viral outbreak, and yet this is the language that he's using."
Specifically, Makis says that Pfizer "paid top dollar" for Seagen's drugs aimed at battling breast cancer, lymphomas, leukemia, colon cancer, lung cancers, and kidney cancers, amongst others. He says that these are the exact kinds of "turbo cancers" he's been seeing in people who took the C19 injections.
Makis asks another rhetorical question: "[I]s he [Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla] telling us that there's going to be such a skyrocketing of cancers in the vaccinated population that he's basically acquired this company and he intends to use Pfizer's resources and infrastructure to scale up the production of cancer drugs [to fight]... an epidemic of cancer in the population?"
Here is Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla telling Jim Cramer that a new Seagen cancer-fighting drug "will come every year" and that he wants to make cancer "a chronic disease" rather than a death sentence."
Source:
Dec 24, 2023 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
"[P]eople need to understand the FDA lied, the CDC lied, these [C19 jabs] were not tested, they did not go through good manufacturing practice... and [people] are being given adulterated and misbranded products that have never been tested... that is the reality." (Tweet 1/4)
Toxicologist and molecular biologist Janci Lindsay (@JanciToxDoc) outlines for Dr. Philip McMillan (@vejon_health) and virologist and whistleblower Jennifer Smith, PhD, how the COVID injections are not—BY LAW—vaccines, but rather "countermeasures" that can be—LEGALLY—adulterated and misbranded.
"[T]hese products as they are characterized, these medical countermeasures, are allowed to be adulterated and misbranded—and will not be seen as unapproved.... so they are approved, and they will be licensed," the toxicologist and molecular biologist notes. She adds that "No cgmp [current good manufacturing practices] is required of these [injections]. No testing, no good manufacturing practices required and they will be approved."
Indeed, as Janci notes, 21CFR 360bbb, which describes "Emergency use of medical products" like the C19 injections, notes the following:
"an eligible product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because, with respect to such product, the Secretary has authorized deviations from current good manufacturing practices under paragraph (1)."
“In 2020, when COVID was… rampant, these mothers weren’t having these babies pass away inside [their wombs]. It was only in 2021 that these numbers started increasing… as much as they did.” (Post 1/3)
Postpartum nurse and whistleblower Michelle Gershman describes for @WTPatriotsUSA how she saw a massive increase in “fetal demises” following the rollout of the C19 bioweapon injections in March 2021.
In March 2021 “those shots started rolling out,” Gershman says, and “around that time… we started having an increase in fetal demises.” (A fetal demise means the baby passes away while still inside its mother’s womb.)
Gershman notes that before March 2021, she’d see “maybe one or two fetal demises every couple of months,” but after March 2021, she “started [seeing] one or two per week.”
The RN says that she felt as if nurses were “in a trance” and what was happening felt “really evil.”
The email noted there had been an “exponential increase in fetal demises” and that, because of the increase, employees would need to “brush up on… policies to learn how to handle a dead baby’s body.”
Gershman goes on to note how in September 2022, a “horrific email” was sent to herself and the rest of the staff at her hospital. The email noted there had been an “exponential increase in fetal demises” and that, because of the increase, employees would need to “brush up on… policies to learn how to handle a dead baby’s body.”
The email noted that there were 22 fetal demises in August 2022, which tied the record set in July 2021 for total number of demises in a month. In September 2022, the email noted there were seven demises in the first eight days of the month.
Along with the fetal demises, Gershman also notes in this clip that nurses are seeing an increase in blood pressure issues in mothers (including “really high blood pressure”) as well as “a lot of circulatory issues.” The RN adds that mothers are now “passing clots” and “bleeding more,” and that these things “didn’t use to happen in numbers like this before 2021.”
Dec 9, 2023 • 4 tweets • 3 min read
"What we've lived through has been a fifth-generation propaganda war fed from the top level of the U.S. security state that took command of the pandemic on day five after the emergency was declared in 2020." (Tweet 1/4)
Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describes for Gary Null of how the U.S. security state—specifically the National Security Council (NSC)—took command of the national COVID-19 response, and executed on a "scam."
"[N]othing changed in public health [in 2020]," Risch says. "What changed is who was telling the public health infrastructure what to do. And terrorizing the public health infrastructure into carrying this all out."
Risch specifically notes the U.S. public health system "Did the exact opposite of all established public health protocols for managing a respiratory virus pandemic." He offers former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky as an example of how the U.S. security state intimidated public health officials:
Walensky was told if she "didn't comply with the security state requirements of what she had to say and what her policies were, that she would be responsible for killing millions of people. And, unfortunately, she believed that," Risch says. He notes other officials were "convinced" or "threatened" to "make policies and actions that were exactly scientifically contrary to everything that was known about managing the pandemic."
As for the motivations, Risch speculates that the U.S. security state was "attempting to cover up our role in creating this virus in the first place," "shilling" for pharmaceutical companies, and enforcing a state of "fascism."
The National Security Council (NSC) was indeed responsible for setting COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.
NSC took what was a reasonable pandemic preparedness plan, threw it out, and made a new one that they used, but is not available to the public.
Dec 6, 2023 • 11 tweets • 9 min read
💉THE POISON NEEDLE AND THE LEGAL SHIELD🛡️ -Here’s How Illegal "Pseudo-Laws" Have Allowed the U.S. Gov’t to Deploy the C-19-Injection Bioweapons on Americans, and Given Legal Immunity to Those Who Administer The Kill Shots (Tweet 1/9)
Although many prominent voices in the “health freedom movement” espouse the idea that the C19 injections are pharmaceutical products, they are not. This is unequivocal. Therefore, they are beholden to no FDA regulations, and cannot be regulated by the FDA.
In a pair of videos released earlier this year, retired pharmaceutical industry R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes, in detail—with all “the receipts”—how the C19 injections are, in fact, in a class of their own, so to speak; one NOT REGULATED BY THE FDA.
In this first clip from a conversation between Latypova and writer and paralegal Katherine Watt, Latypova explains how there are three regulatory pathways for pharmaceutical drugs, which are “normal regulatory pathways, where we don’t have [an] emergency announcement.” Latypova notes that these pathways include investigational use of the product; FDA-approved drugs; investigational drugs (if you want to introduce a new drug, then you need to clinical trial it across state lines); and drugs made available under “expanded access use.”
Expanded access use, Latypova notes, is “a more recent evolution” of regulatory law, which was put into place in 1997. Since then, expanded access use has allowed for the use of experimental drugs in “desperate situations.”
The fourth regulatory pathway is the one used for the C19 injections: “EUA countermeasures under [a] public health emergency.” Latypova notes that for an “EUA under public health emergency, none of these normal [FDA regulations] apply [in an enforceable manner].” This is why Latypova and Watt refer to the supposed FDA regulation and approval of the C19 injections as “performance art.”
The injections are EUA countermeasures deployed under a public health emergency. Per the law, they cannot be regulated as pharmaceutical drugs.
Specifically, Latypova notes that there is “no requirement for [an] IRB [an institutional review board] or informed consent…” She adds, “investigational new drug regulations don’t apply, [and] clinical trial data is not required.”
Latypova notes that this is why when clinical trial investigator Brook Jackson (@IamBrookJackson) observed fraud at Pfizer’s C19-injection clinical trial sites in Texas, reported it, and started litigating, the judge dismissed her case—because any fraud that existed was “immaterial.”
“Now we have this evolution, from expanded access use… where they said, ‘We can now have a non-investigational substance and use it in [a] non-medical and non-investigational way… That makes it [an] illicit drug.”
In this clip from the same interview, Latypova describes how, by shirking all regular FDA regulations, the C19 injections effectively become illicit drugs. “Just like fentanyl,” the retired pharma executive adds.
Latypova adds, “You can easily poison somebody with a substance you can’t evaluate yourself… you don’t know whether it’s going to be efficacious or safe.”
Jul 26, 2023 • 8 tweets • 5 min read
"ESSENTIALLY WHAT [THIS] IS... [IS] UNRESTRICTED WARFARE USING PROHIBITED WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION." (TWEET 1/8)
In a new interview with Big Picture (@BigPictureWatch), former pharma R&D executive and entrepreneur Sasha Latypova breaks down how the COVID injections are being… https://t.co/hnklaKf6THtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"THE PURPOSE IS TO KILL AND INJURE [THE] CIVILIAN POPULATION. THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING."
Latypova goes on to note that Operation Warp Speed (OWS) "is entirely driven by the Department of Defense and that's completely inappropriate because it's deployment of armed forces on...… https://t.co/0yCR8zWAWxtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jul 23, 2023 • 11 tweets • 6 min read
THE ATOMIC BOMBINGS OF HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI WERE FAKED - THE STORY WE'VE BEEN TOLD IS A MASSIVE LIE - THE ATTACK WAS EXECUTED WITH NAPALM, MUSTARD GAS, ETC. (TWEET 1/11)
Although we've all been told that the U.S. dropped two atomic bombs on Japan at the close of WWII—an… https://t.co/wcPqHKz7Nxtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
In this second clip from the same presentation, Palmer discusses how much radioactive fallout should've been found at Hiroshima and Nagasaki following the "nuclear bombings," versus how much was actually found.
Looking at the gamma-ray spectrum of the soil sample from Hiroshima… https://t.co/LdolcRAfwXtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jul 17, 2023 • 19 tweets • 16 min read
TOP 19 COVID-RELATED CLOWN-WORLD FACTS
From the WHO literally calling COVID a "FAKE" to the FDA wanting 55 years to release Pfizer's vax docs, here are the top 19 COVID-related clown world facts.
1. Fauci Claiming There'd Be a "Surprise Outbreak" During Trump's Presidency… https://t.co/eG3fBAGvm0twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2. The FDA Wanting 55 Years to Release The Data It Relied on to License Pfizer's COVID 'Vaccine'
Even Reuters reported(1) in an incredulous tone when the FDA said in response to a FOIA request for the data supporting the agency's approval of Pfizer's COVID "vaccines" that it… https://t.co/SfoNWHApW9twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jul 11, 2023 • 8 tweets • 5 min read
Six vital clips to watch from a new interview NYU surgeon Steven Greer (@THEHCC) did with pharma R&D executive and entrepreneur Sasha Latypova. (Tweet 1/8)
In this first clip, Latypova describes the "ridiculous" nature of the COVID bioweapon injections being both EUA and… https://t.co/AANpqcOHNAtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Further highlighting the absurd nature of the COVID "vaccines," Latypova notes they were always classified as "genetic and cellular therapies" prior to the "pandemic."
The pharma insider notes that mRNA technology "was being developed only for very, very severe conditions… https://t.co/e5nUuOUXWNtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jul 5, 2023 • 10 tweets • 8 min read
OVERVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE THERE IS INTENTIONAL COVID-INJECTION BATCH VARIABILITY (TWEET 1/10)
Here's an overview of some of the evidence that the COVID injections vary in toxicity from batch to batch, with a small percentage of batches representing outsized harm.
In this first… https://t.co/zRGbUJaSTrtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"EVEN AFTER ADJUSTMENT FOR SHIPPED LOT SIZE, ENORMOUS VARIABILITY LOT-TO-LOT REMAINS UNEXPLAINED."
Latypova adds in the same interview that the variation in SAEs and deaths caused by different lots cannot be explained by variation in lot size. She notes the sizes of the lots… https://t.co/7jWgdSiiCitwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jul 2, 2023 • 8 tweets • 7 min read
HERE'S SOME OF THE EVIDENCE SHOWING THERE ARE HEAVY METALS IN THE COVID INJECTIONS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED BIZARRE 'WHITE FIBROUS CLOTS' (TWEET 1/8)
Here's a review of some of the evidence that there are heavy metals in the COVID "vaccines," and in the mysterious "white fibrous… https://t.co/h6hRLm2sRWtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"MODERNA TO RECALL COVID-19 DOSES IN JAPAN AFTER STAINLESS STEEL CONTAMINANTS FOUND"
Note that the mainstream press acknowledges multiple instances of finding metal contamination in the COVID-injection vials. As Reuters reported in September 2021(1), Moderna had to recall 1.63… https://t.co/YSKXD7W5Fatwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jun 29, 2023 • 8 tweets • 6 min read
QUICK THREAD: Here's How Fragmented mRNA from the COVID Bioweapon Injections Likely Functions as Genetic "Shrapnel" That Maims and Kills People (Tweet 1/7)
In this clip from a December 2022 conversation Mathew Crawford (@EduEngineer) had on his Rounding the Earth podcast(1) with… https://t.co/iG7RdGwrTjtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"They just throw sand in the gears, and then, depending on where that gets distributed all over the body... [and] on what amount of what [someone] got in those cells, that's how [recipients' bodies will] start destroying themselves."
Reminder: Bill Gates Praised China’s “Lockdowns” in March of 2020, Perfectly Echoing the 2010 “Lock Step” Scenario Funded by the Rockefeller Foundation
While it’s tempting to blame the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) entirely for initiating catastrophic and… https://t.co/PucIdlo6Jstwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Gates adds in this clip from the TED interview that “what we need is the extreme shut down [China did] so that in six to ten weeks, if things go well, then you can start opening back up.”
Jun 20, 2023 • 29 tweets • 21 min read
DEEP DIVE: THE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF COVID INJECTION 'SHEDDING' AND THE GRAVITY OF AN UNSTUDIED PHENOMENON (TWEET 1 / 29)
CONCRETE EVIDENCE: SHEDDING IN BREAST MILK
Described as a possibility in Pfizer's clinical trial protocol
Recorded in Pfizer's post-authorization data… https://t.co/0DorTuqcjltwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"TRACE AMOUNTS OF BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 MRNA VACCINES WERE DETECTED IN 7 SAMPLES FROM 5 DIFFERENT PARTICIPANTS... UP TO 45 HOURS POST VACCINATION."
Here is the research letter in JAMA Pediatrics referenced by Banoun showing an unequivocal detection of mRNA from the… https://t.co/2sos5MmbkItwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jun 9, 2023 • 12 tweets • 9 min read
DEEP DIVE: HAVANA SYNDROME - CRIMSON MIST - THE VOICE OF GOD - AND THE EVIDENCE SHOWING EM RADIATION CAN MANIPULATE AND/OR DESTROY YOUR MIND (TWEET 1/12)
Although the idea of physically affecting people with electromagnetic field (EMF) waves produced by 5G towers has been firmly… https://t.co/6LJqwnbSHJtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"MY BRAIN IS BROKEN... I WOULD LIKEN IT TO... AN ELECTRONIC SNIPING."
While the U.S. military's ADS system is frightening enough in its own right, the truly insidious potential of EM radiation in the microwave, millimeter-wave, and ELF bands is broached when considering a… https://t.co/ONTBHudVOntwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
May 27, 2023 • 7 tweets • 4 min read
🧵DOES HIV REALLY CAUSE AIDS? 'HOUSE OF CARDS' DOCUMENTARY BLOWS THAT THEORY OUT OF THE WATER - YOU MUST WATCH THIS DOC! 🧵
Although it doesn't seem to have garnered nearly as much recognition and media coverage* as it should have, Canadian‐born director Brent Leung's 2009… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"YOU CAN TEST HIV POSITIVE IN ONE COUNTRY AND BE GIVEN AN AIDS DIAGNOSIS AS A RESULT OF THAT, WHEREAS IN ANOTHER COUNTRY YOU WON'T TEST HIV POSITIVE AND YOU WON'T BE GIVEN AN AIDS DIAGNOSIS."
One of the biggest issues with diagnosing HIV/AIDS, Leung's documentary evinces, is the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
4 subscribed