Per a conversation with @nonsanaementis I want to do a little vaccine thread and also make a prediction.

I predict that in the late afternoon of Friday, October 30th, Trump's going to lie that a vaccine has passed all its trials and is going into production. This will be false.
Not only will it be a lie but it will be one of the few lies Trump tells which is not merely an exaggeration of his own warped perception of the world but something he genuinely knows to be untrue.

But he'll say it anyway in a last ditch attempt to get people to vote for him.
As I have said repeatedly here and elsewhere vaccines necessarily go through extensive trials. Even a fast-tracked vaccine must pass a number of regulatory hurdles before it may be approved.

AND THESE HURDLES NECESSARILY TAKE TIME.
This is not something that can be completed by some super heroic smarty pants with autism refusing to leave the lab until it's done and just mainlining java for weeks on end. It's not about solving a puzzle; it's about waiting to see if anyone develops adverse reactions.
Developing a vaccine does take time because chemical blah blah viral DNA, immune system blurpy bloo, but then AFTER all that you have to a.) make sure it doesn't also do something not great and b.) remains effective.
In regards to point a.):

for most vaccines the "adverse reaction," most people get is mild pain at the injection site. But in a very small percentage of individuals it can be more severe. Regardless, clinicians need to know about that before delivering the vaccine.
this particular virus also has a relatively long incubation period so ... this is again where I stress I'm a PALAEOpathologist ... but I dunno, maybe in this case the inoculation will also cause weirdness much later on than normal. This is a thing clinicians need to know.
Think of it this way, if you're designing this thing and you decide to take the risk that no adverse effects will occur after 24 hours of inoculation, that's a really good bet, but if you're wrong and say 1% of people have severe or even mild reactions say two weeks later ...
... and you've gone ahead and given this to the entire population then that's 32,800,000 people who will be back to the hospital two weeks after being inoculated.

That's somewhat overwhelming during a pandemic.

Given the history of vaccines it's a good bet, but not a safe one.
It's REALLY unlikely that you'll have adverse reactions that late though because that basically never happens, so let's look at b.):

Your immune system only remembers a thing so long. Sometimes you need a booster. We will not know that until we know it.
But let's pretend for a second that there was actually a vaccine just about ready to go. There isn't but let's pretend. And let's also pretend that it could actually be manufactured and distributed and everyone would get it. Again, lols, but let's pretend ...
... so we all get the vaccine and it works and has no adverse reactions and we party hardy in the streets hugging each other and oy it's so wonderful for the neurotypicals, but then ... someone starts coughing.

It would be a zombie apocalypse.
Part of the development of a vaccine is ensuring it's safe and lasts a reasonable amount of time such that we can get booster shots or whatever is needed to keep ourselves immune from the disease. There is not enough time for that to happen before Friday.
So, if Trump makes this announcement which, honestly the more I think about it I really think he will, it is going to be a lie, and a dangerous lie at that.

Guys, vaccines are good. But they are delivered to healthy demographics and entire populations so the standard is high.
We will not have a real vaccine until Spring of next year at the earliest. Trump is going to lie and while I know that's very "dog bites man," it is SUPER important we all know better than to buy into this particular one.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Ariadne Schulz 💛🐝

Dr. Ariadne Schulz 💛🐝 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tamanosou

24 Oct
Okay guys. So ... it's a thread. And honestly ... this is a story that I need to tell you. There is no point nor lesson to be learned this is not scientific this is just a moment in time wherein I've discovered - yet again and also to my horror - that humans are weird.
So I like pinterest. It's ... relaxing to look at impossibly gorgeous sculptures adorable cats, recipes including ingredients I can't source, clothing I will never be able to afford or fit into, and crafting projects I realistically will never do.
They also have some really purty weapons. But ... judge me all you want. When I want to unwind, it is my version of a bubble bath and glass of wine.
Read 22 tweets
27 Jul
Sooooo .... during the Holocaust the third reich had two pretty awful policies which I want to say a few words about.

1. they made it basically illegal for Jewish people to have nationality
and
2. they were all about "living room" for Germans and used that to justify invasion.
The second part basically gave them the excuse to put Slavic peoples in labor camps and by labor I mean constant heavy lifting from dawn to dusk on a diet of about 600 calories. With that said, if you were sent to a labor camp you had a chance albeit small of survival.
Later on - and this sealed the deal in the Nuremberg trials - it became clear that *even* in the so-called labor camps Nazis were just wholesale murdering people. And I realize I'm not saying anything revolutionary or surprising here but this is where we get back to point 1.
Read 23 tweets
26 Jun
You know how I'm always saying that Black Americans are the most loyal demographic for the Democratic Party? Well let's break that down further. This will give you a basic overview and ... yeah Black Americans voted overwhelmingly Democratic: pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016…
Here's more or less the same thing for the 2018 midterm elections. One again Black Americans voted OVERWHELMINGLY Democratic while White Americans were ... not so bright: pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018…
Read 25 tweets
17 Jun
Okay so this tweet from Leigh sort of sums up why fauxgressivism is super racist. This will be a thread but hopefully a short one.

First off, what Leigh is implying is more or less false. Harris' parents may have been educated but Warren's parents were privileged.
Warren's parents owned their own home and were able to buy Warren her own convertible by the time she was 16. She had a full ride to college plus enough money to pay out of pocket for her education. So not only was she middle class but she was upper middle class.
Leigh's claims that Harris was privileged because of her parent's education is ... pretty fucking bankrupt if you'll excuse the pun. So, if you know anything about academia you know it pays shit. It's especially bad at present but it's always been not great.
Read 23 tweets
1 May
I was really resisting talking about Tara Reade's claims because I know how volatile this subject is. But since the entire world has decided to lose its goddamn mind ... Apparently I and every woman out there has to go and reopen old wounds. So thanks a whole lot, Tara.
Here's my take on it in full for the most part medium.com/@ariadneschulz… but I will go through in this thread and give you my opinion which you probably neither want nor asked for. Why? Because I'm tired of hearing men do hot-takes on sexual assault.
The basic takeaways are I do not believe Reade was sexually assaulted by Biden, but I do believe she was assaulted, and I believe that she is now being used as a pawn in a continuation of a long-standing white supremacist tradition of using false allegations to sully an opponent.
Read 25 tweets
13 Mar
Guys, sorrynotsorry, but being a part of a "movement" that got rejected by African-American voters by around 80% in a lot of places does not entitle you to special treatment.
Being part of a campaign that was thoroughly rejected at the polls *twice* does not give you the authority to dictate policy to the winners.
Now, normally the Democratic Party is about being a big tent etc, but THE REASON HRC was a part of Obama's administration is because when she knew she'd lost she conceded and immediately worked her butt off to strengthen Obama and Obama's position.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!