This is a thread on B.R. Ambedkar who in his entire life never participated in a single freedom struggle movement.
Ambedkar opposed India’s freedom. B.R. Ambedkar remained a servant of Britain, opposed India's freedom, abused our Dharma and Bhagavān, promoted caste hatred etc.
The degree of India’s misfortune is such that people of India have now begun to consider BR Ambedkar, a freedom fighter, which is much contradictory to the truth.
Source :- Worshipping False Gods: Ambedkar, and the Facts which Have Been Erased, Book by Arun Shourie, Page No. 408
Ambedkar opposed India's freedom in his letter to Prime Minster of British India by stating that depressed classes (lower classes) are not anxious for transfer of power (India's independence).
Source : Writings and speeches of Ambedkar, Vol. IX. pp. 66
B.R. Ambedkar not once in his life demanded for India's freedom but always reminded British that Bristish Rule is possible because of the help of untouchables, so it's their duty to work specifically for their welfare.
Source :- Writings & speeches of Ambedkar, Vol X, pp. 496.
Ambedkar himself acknowledged that his first priority is to strive for "untouchables". "Striving for India" is secondary.
Such people have been awarded with "Bharat Ratna" 😏
Source :- DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES, Vol 17(1), p.238
Ambedkar opposed India's Freedom in every possible way.
He went on to call our Freedom Struggle "a dishonest agitation" and said that untouchables are not part of it.
Ambedkar did everything possible to snatch away India's Freedom.
Source : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES, Vol 9, p.178
B.R.Ambedkar as a member of viceroy's council, to impress his British masters, made every attempt to ensure that our freedom struggle gets failed.
Conversation between Linlithgow and Mr. Amery reflects also reflects that he was working just the way which suited British agenda.
In 1927, Ambedkar burnt Manusmriti. The main aim of shouting against Manusmriti are vested interests. Foremost being securing the Dalit Votes. Next is to prove oneself as secularist.
Imbecile nincompoop ambedkarites have never ever flipped a single page of what Manusmriti says.
Ambedkar wanted to burn Constitution. We should stop calling him "father of constitution".
He said: "my friends tell me that I made the Constitution. But I am quite prepared to say that I shall be the first person to burn it out."
Source :- Dr. Ambedkar: Life and Mission, p.449
Ambedkar conspired with Jinnah and Periyar for the formation of Dalitistan and Dravidistan along with East and West Pakistan.
B.R. Ambedkar had another two dozen peers who drafted the Indian constitution and took the sole credit and that too just for copying British India act.
Sardar Patel knew that Ambedkar is a threat to India. Hence, he expressed his concern that the followers of Ambedkar shall not succeed [in coming election].
Out of 151 seats for Dalits, Ambedkar just won one.
Source : Sardar Patel’s Correspondence, Durga Das, Vol 2, pp.344-345
Ambedkar promoted caste hatred. HH Sayaji rao Gaikwad of erstwhile state of Baroda financed Ambedkar's education in India, England and even in America.
His Brahmin Teacher gave his surname to him in Charity and he appropriated Brahman Surname because of his inferiority complex.
“If Hindu Raj does become a fact, it will no doubt, be the greatest calamity for this country.
No matter what the Hindus say, Hinduism is a menace to liberty, equality and fraternity.
On that account it is incompatible with democracy. Hindu Raj must be prevented at any cost.”
Source – Ambedkar , Pakistan or Partition of India, p.354 and p.355
Ambedkar criticised Islam few times but he insulted Hinduism, our scripture and our Bhagavān (especially Ram & Krishna) 100 times more than Islam in his book 'Riddles in Hinduism'.
Claim of Ambedkar is totally baseless. There are number of followers of Bhagavān Rama and Krishna.
When Ambedkar served British Govt. as labour Minister during same time British Govt. starved millions of Indians.
He was the one who was cheering & backing British Raj when India was struggling for its independence.
He even accepted hold position of member in Viceroy's council.
Just ponder how unfortunate India is! The man who opposed India’s independence is now Bharat Ratna.
Not just “Bharat Ratna” but unfortunately, India’s most worshipped icon.
He did much more harm. Admiring Ambedkar is most stupid thing to do. Indians should stop worshipping him.
@LaxmiNa34894304 @rms220261 @ARanganathan72 certificate to represent a section of Hindu community, I will berate, criticize & expose him continuously for what he was - a hinduphobic bigot and an enemy of dharma. And nope, his hate for Islam and Christianity doesn't justify his completely shameful comments on Hinduism. 2/2
@anjankannan @LillyMaryPinto India’s freedom was immense enough to tremble the British government.
To aid British, Ambedkar thought of a creative idea. He divided the people (who were protesting against British) into ‘caste’ fragments. Ambedkar projected such an image to Britishers that the heavy mass of
@anjankannan @LillyMaryPinto people demanding India’s freedom consists of only governing class (Brahmin and Baniya). He said, "In the light of what has been said, it will be found that the Fight for Freedom led by the governing class is, from the point of view of servile classes, a selfish, if not a shame,
@anjankannan @LillyMaryPinto struggle. The freedom which the governing class in India is struggling for is freedom to rule the servile classes."
Ambedkar used to refer “Brahmin and Baniya” class as “governing class”. For reference check: Dr. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR : WRITINGS AND SPEECHES, Vol 9, p.168.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.