So there are increasingly argument for "no human review code" provided that the agent(s) build code together with a suite of tests.

I see multiple problems with this approach
1/

- Assuming that the agent(s) can be relatively reliable (say 99.9%), there will be the case of serious failure where then people needs to jump in and good luck finding the problem if there is zero knowledge of the codebase.

2/

- With the given failure it is also hard to say to the agent "fix it", because the agent may need additional detail (otherwise it would have already done so) and those details can come only if one is involved in the codebase

3/

Hizbullah SG Sheikh Naim Qassem’s speech (4 March 2026), highlights in English below ⬇️

https://twitter.com/trhxianl/status/2029234672350445710

Sheikh Naim Qassem: The blessed month of Ramadan is the month of mercy and forgiveness. I ask Allah Almighty to accept our deeds & to make us among those who observe its fasting, prayers, worship, & good actions in the best manner. God willing.

Sheikh Naim Qassem: For fifteen months, the “Israeli”–American Enemy has continued its aggression. A ceasefire agreement was reached on November 27, 2024, marking the beginning of a new phase. We committed to this agreement in coordination with the Lebanese State, but “Israel” did not abide by a single clause. We supported the diplomatic path, yet it has achieved nothing. For fifteen months, we refrained from responding to the repeated “Israeli” violations so that we would not be accused of obstructing diplomatic efforts, since responsibility lies with the State. We considered this an opportunity for the State to assume its responsibilities & for this option to be tested in practical terms, by implementing the agreement & protecting Lebanon & its sovereignty, as we stated.

The Ukrainians put 200 drones into the Russian naval port of Novorossiysk and nailed five surface combatants in port.

Novorossiysk is far better defended against drones then Norfolk, VA currently is.

1/2

https://twitter.com/Beefeater_Fella/status/2029128576755269703

Yet, in terms of budget requests for defenses and fire boats to limit damage from almost certain impending Chinese merchant armed cruiser drone swarm attacks.

Current 2026 US Naval flag rank leadership remains intellectually exactly where this June 2023 post spelled out. ⬇️

2/2

@threadreaderapp unroll please

BREAKING: AI can now analyze options trades like a $500/hr options strategist (for free)

Here are 10 Claude prompts I use to sell puts, buy LEAPs, and run the wheel without second-guessing every trade

(Save this for later)

1. The Strategy Selector

"[TICKER] is on my watchlist and I'm ready to act. Help me decide which strategy fits right now.

Current conditions:
- Stock price: [PRICE]
- My conviction level: [MODERATE / HIGH / VERY HIGH]
- IV environment: [Look up IV rank on Barchart for me]
- Available capital: [AMOUNT]

Based on these conditions:

- Should I sell a cash-secured put?
- Should I buy a LEAP?
- Should I do both?
- Or should I do nothing and wait?

Walk me through the decision like a flowchart. IV first, then conviction, then capital. Don't let me force a strategy that doesn't fit the setup."

2. The Cash-Secured Put Strike Finder

"I'm considering selling a cash-secured put on [TICKER], currently trading at [PRICE].

Help me evaluate the setup:

- Where are the key support levels on the daily and weekly chart based on historical price action?
- What strike price sits at or below those support levels while still offering meaningful premium?
- What delta range would give me roughly an 80% probability of keeping the premium?
- At that strike, what would my effective cost basis be if assigned (strike minus premium)?
- Would I actually want to own 100 shares at that cost basis for the next 2-3 years?

Be honest with me. If the premium isn't worth the risk at any available strike, tell me to skip the trade entirely."

1/🚨Jeffrey Epstein built a leverage file on Bill Gates.

It contained allegations about an STD. A request to secretly medicate Melinda without her consent. Gates' personal plea to destroy the emails.

Four days after delivering that intelligence, Epstein received a multimillion-dollar financial agreement from Gates. Three weeks later, Gates signed documents giving Epstein unlimited authorized access to all confidential information on Melinda Gates personally.

Then thanked him for advice to "minimize documents."

You can draw your own conclusions.

It's all in the federal court record. Gates testifies under oath May 19. 🧵👇

2/ The intelligence acquisition To understand the leverage, you need to understand how Epstein built it.

He didn't hack Gates. He didn't surveil him.

He recruited Gates' most trusted insider — chief science adviser Boris Nikolic — who handed Epstein everything.

Including material Gates thought was protected by attorney-client privilege.

It wasn't. Epstein wasn't a lawyer. He wrote that privilege claim himself.

(EFTA01967982) justice.gov/epstein/files/…

3/ The file gets built

Aug 25, 2013. Epstein to Boris: "What entity gave you the 500k."

Boris replied from his phone with:

▪️A $500K payment from Gates' personal bank account
▪️A concealed investment partnership called Eclipse funding a woman Melinda knew nothing about
▪️Wire transfer documentation Boris had at home
▪️His assessment: "She would be much more furious than on anything before if she finds out."

(EFTA01755865) justice.gov/epstein/files/…

📷 Image: Typeset card of Boris's key sentences with EFTA number

THE "SNOWBALL METHOD" CHANGED MY CONTENT FOREVER. Instead of "give me 10 post ideas" → I ask Claude to "snowball" ONE topic. It expands it into sub-angles, contrarian takes, personal stories, how-tos, myths. One topic = 30 days of content. The system:

PROMPT #1: THE CORE

You’re a content strategist.
Before answering, ask me clarifying questions about:
— goal
— target audience
— pain points
— constraints
— tone
— platforms

Based on my answers, define one core problem in my niche that people are actually willing to discuss and share.

Deliver:
• why this problem matters (2–3 sharp sentences)
• 30-day content goals (what we measure: saves/leads)
• an ICP table (who / what they want / what blocks them / language/ triggers / taboos)
Be specific

PROMPT #2: ANGLES & HEADLINES (break it open)

Take the core problem and propose 7 unexpected angles
(counterintuitive, “you’re doing it wrong,” myth vs reality, hidden cost of the usual solution).

For each angle provide:
• 2 hooks (≤ 12 words) for Threads/Reels
• 1 core insight (≤ 80 words)
• 1 number/fact for credibility (brief source mention)
• 1 potentially controversial statement (to spark comments)

Make sure the angles don’t overlap.

🧵So the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) put out their “State of the Profession Report” showing how deceptive their profession actually is…

One of the “Most Challenging Issues” School Counselors reported was “NAVIGATING work after a new law/policy is passed that conflicts with ASCA Ethical Standards &/or is harmful to students”.

WTF is there to “NAVIGATE”?

Just follow the law/policy!!! 🤬

What kind of laws/policies are they trying to “NAVIGATE”?!

DEI & Gender Insanity of course.

They even admit one way they navigate the DEI Bans is to rename it “belonging” or “school culture”.

Did you see this headline?

Did you feel the requisite anger and rage at asylum seekers that The Sun was asking of you?

Did you maybe blame Starmer because.... um... it was probably his fault🤷‍♀️

Would you like to know the reality behind the headline?

Course you would!😜

Let's take a look

🧵

1/25

🚨 The FACTS 🚨

This was a Sun "exclusive" following an FOI, but the story itself is a couple of years old

In 2022, the High Court found that the Home Office and the then Home Secretary Priti Patel, had been acting unlawfully with respect to asylum seekers from April to November 2020

2/

During this time:

1,300+ Asylum seekers had their phones unlawfully seized on arrival

400+ phones have NEVER been returned as the Home Office didn't keep accurate records of who they took them from

3 asylum seekers took the government to court in late 2020, having had their phones seized

3/

I'm seeing people doubt that the Iranians will escalate further in their campaign against Gulf oil infrastructure because "it would be suicide" or "they'll destroy their own economy." What you need to understand is that our own record of perfidy during negotiations has demonstrated that making any kind of agreement with the United States is itself suicidal. We are now the most untrustworthy state in modern world history. Any perception of our respect for the norms of international relations has been torched permanently for the benefit of Israel.

The only reasonable Iranian option is to re-establish deterrence in a way that requires no treaty for us to violate, no trust for us to break. That means pushing us out of the region entirely if possible by denying us the ability to reclaim our bases and making this war so costly that the American public sours on the prospect of war in the Middle East for a generation.

Our hope for bringing this war to an end in remotely favorable terms is regime change, but there's zero indication so far that this is likely to happen. Our own ridiculously boneheaded actions have backed the Iranians into a corner and obliterated any chance of a negotiated settlement.

https://x.com/ripplebrain/status/2029231167443030151

Iranian leadership now understands that even speaking to American negotiators by video call comes with a risk of death. Israeli influence has intentionally stacked every incentive on the side of never speaking to the United States ever again.

Negotiations occur between real, flesh and blood human beings. When you prove to those people that you'll invite them in and then pull out a gun and shoot them in the head without a second thought you shouldn't be surprised when they're willing to die fighting you instead.

Finding new medicines is getting more and more expensive, and AI won't help much unless we can generate physiological data at scale.

In our new preprint, @GordianBio extends the progress of the functional genomics community to run pooled in vivo screens at scale, in a way that answers questions about physiology and therapeutic potential.
We show screens in mice and horses, fibrotic and degenerative disease, with a framework for physiological predictions validated in human ex vivo tissues.

Very proud of @v_sontake, @vkartha88, Neety and the rest of the team. Tweetorial follows:

Perturbation is how we extract rules from the organized chaos of biology, and high-throughput pooled screens have become a major source of new insights.

But when we screen cells outside the body, we're missing a lot of what drives disease: no immune system, no real metabolism, no structural environment.

Diseases of aging happen at the organ level. So we need screens that can ask cells about the organ they're in. This means screening in vivo.

We had to solve three challenges for pooled screening in diseased organs: delivering different perturbation modalities even in organs with structural damage, scaling this to large perturbation libraries, and a way to analyze scSeq data that ranks targets' therapeutic potential.

The result is what we call Mosaic Screening, because you end up with a mosaic of different perturbations inside a living, diseased organ.

🚨🐜Tiny fungus-farming ants have evolved the ability to capture carbon dioxide from air (#CDR) and convert it into a mineral layer on their bodies, forming a natural protective armour, a surprising biological mechanism reported by scientists in a new study.

Details🧵1/11

2/ The discovery comes from studying crowded ant nests where carbon dioxide can build up.

Instead of simply tolerating high CO₂, these ants appear to use the gas as a chemical resource inside their nest environment.

3/ Fungus-farming ants forage for vegetation to feed cultivated fungi that are grown inside their colonies. In turn, the fungi serve as the primary food source for the ants.

The high density of ants and fungi can result in high concentrations of CO2 inside the nests.

1/
QatarEnergy declaring force majeure is not just an LNG story.

Qatar supplies ~20% of global LNG.

If shipments stop, this becomes a global industrial shock, not just an Asian energy problem.

2/
Asia will scramble for replacement gas.
That means bidding against Europe and other LNG buyers.

Result:

➡️ LNG prices spike
➡️ gas flows reshuffle globally
➡️ Europe could get squeezed again.

3/
Natural gas isn't just fuel.
It is a core industrial feedstock used to produce:

• fertilizers
• ammonia
• plastics
• chemicals
• pharmaceuticals

Higher gas prices ripple through the entire manufacturing chain.