Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
Manhattan dermatologist, Steven Victor aka “Dr. Evil” tied to Jeffrey Epstein admitted that “some Epstein referrals included minors.”
Epstein emails from the latest drop exposes how those referrals worked - and how deep the relationship really went. Steven Victor’s excuse for his relationship with Epstein is not only weak, it’s meaningless considering that their relationship continued even after Epstein was charged for trafficking and public outrage was impossible to ignore.
THREAD 🧵👇
Epstein emails from the latest drop exposes how those referrals worked - and how deep the relationship really went. Steven Victor’s excuse for his relationship with Epstein is not only weak, it’s meaningless considering that their relationship continued even after Epstein was charged for trafficking and public outrage was impossible to ignore.
THREAD 🧵👇
For nearly a decade, emails show Epstein coordinating medical appointments, discussing business ventures, arranging payments, and directing women to a specific New York doctor he nicknamed:
“Dr. Evil.” This wasn’t a casual referral. Epstein organized logistics himself.
He is mentioned over 500 times in Epstein’s emails. It appears that Steven Victor had a relationship with Epstein for over 10 years. During this time, he treated Epstein’s “girls” for what appears to be potentially STD’s, acne, and other cosmetic concerns
In one message: “send her to dr evil… tell him she is my friend so she doesn’t have to pay.”
Appointments were described as gifts.
Follow-ups were discussed afterward.
This is not how normal doctor referrals look.
“Dr. Evil.” This wasn’t a casual referral. Epstein organized logistics himself.
He is mentioned over 500 times in Epstein’s emails. It appears that Steven Victor had a relationship with Epstein for over 10 years. During this time, he treated Epstein’s “girls” for what appears to be potentially STD’s, acne, and other cosmetic concerns
In one message: “send her to dr evil… tell him she is my friend so she doesn’t have to pay.”
Appointments were described as gifts.
Follow-ups were discussed afterward.
This is not how normal doctor referrals look.
Not only did he interact with Epstein in this manner, their correspondence indicates that Steven Victor also treated Jean-Luc Brunel (the French equivalent of Epstein, who is now dead) and was carrying out personal favors for both of them, reportedly not charging them for services rendered to their “friends.” Epstein made it clear that Victor should not be charging Brunel or himself, given their "deal" after Epstein "bailed him out."
1).
„With 264 in favor and 133 opposed, the measure known as the Rotor Act failed to meet the two-thirds threshold required under a fast-track procedure typically used for noncontroversial measures.
„With 264 in favor and 133 opposed, the measure known as the Rotor Act failed to meet the two-thirds threshold required under a fast-track procedure typically used for noncontroversial measures.
2).
The bill requires most aircraft operating in the U.S. to use advanced tracking technology and increases scrutiny of military flights in congested aviation corridors.
The bill requires most aircraft operating in the U.S. to use advanced tracking technology and increases scrutiny of military flights in congested aviation corridors.
3).
Spurred on by @SenTedCruz (R., Texas) and Maria @SenatorCantwell (D., Wash.), the Senate had unanimously approved the legislation in December. But more than 100 Republican lawmakers voted against the bill, despite an 11th-hour lobbying push from @tedcruz on the House floor.”
Spurred on by @SenTedCruz (R., Texas) and Maria @SenatorCantwell (D., Wash.), the Senate had unanimously approved the legislation in December. But more than 100 Republican lawmakers voted against the bill, despite an 11th-hour lobbying push from @tedcruz on the House floor.”
ALERT: KASH PATEL FLIGHTS
Sen. Dick Durbin says whistleblower has revealed "in the immediate aftermath of the murder of Charlie Kirk, the FBI’s shooting reconstruction team was asked to fly to Utah to aid the investigation and process the scene. However, the team’s deployment was delayed by at least a day because of a Bureau plane and pilot shortage caused by the Director’s personal flights"
Sen. Dick Durbin says whistleblower has revealed "in the immediate aftermath of the murder of Charlie Kirk, the FBI’s shooting reconstruction team was asked to fly to Utah to aid the investigation and process the scene. However, the team’s deployment was delayed by at least a day because of a Bureau plane and pilot shortage caused by the Director’s personal flights"
Sen. Durbin also says "The Director’s misplaced priorities and poor management of the FBI’s resources—including its aircraft—also harmed the FBI’s ability to respond to the shooting at Brown University on December 13, 2025. Once again, the shooting reconstruction team was set to respond to the scene immediately, but was unable to fly out of Richmond, Virginia, using one of the FBI’s planes."
Sen. Durbin says a source revealed Kash Patel previously said at an FBI field office meeting: "If you have golf, hockey, fishing, or hunting and beautiful sights, you’re going to see a lot of me."
SNP data dump after Scotttish IC’s threat of legal action. Thousands of pages of heavily redacted communications, but there are still nuggets in there.
1. Failure to Record Meetings with Alex Salmond (Potential Breach of Sections 4.22 and 4.23)
Context from the Remit (Repeated in Multiple Batches, e.g., Batch 1, Pages 1, 21, 32, etc.): The investigation's starting point is the allegation that Sturgeon "failed to feed back the basic facts of meetings and discussions held with Alex Salmond to her private office." These sections of the Code require ministers to record external contacts that could influence government policy or decisions to avoid undisclosed influence.
Specific Meetings in Question (Batch 1, Pages 1, 157, 162, etc.):29 March 2018: Meeting with Geoff Aberdein (Salmond's former Chief of Staff) at Scottish Parliament.
2 April 2018: Meeting with Salmond at Sturgeon's home.
23 April 2018: Telephone conversation.
7 June 2018: Meeting at SNP Conference in Aberdeen.
14 July 2018: Meeting at Sturgeon's home.
18 July 2018: Telephone conversation.
Potential Evidence:
In her written response to Hamilton (Batch 2, Pages 187 and 210), Sturgeon admits she did not immediately record the early meetings with her private office. She states: "I advised the Permanent Secretary of the meeting on 2 April and the call on 23 April, in my letter to her of 6 June 2018." This indicates a delay of over two months for the April 2 meeting, which she justifies as necessary to "protect the confidentiality and independence of the process" (arguing the Code didn't directly apply, putting her in a "Catch 22" situation). She considered the Code but chose not to follow it strictly to avoid compromising the investigation.
Salmond's letter to Hamilton (Batch 4, Pages 80-81, 122): He claims the April 2 meeting was about government business (harassment complaints), not party matters as Sturgeon described, and accuses her of failing to record contacts promptly. He argues non-intervention in an "unlawful" process could itself be a breach, but notes her explanation for the home meeting (thinking it was party business) is misleading.
This admission and contradiction could support a breach, as the Code emphasizes transparency to prevent undue influence.
1. Failure to Record Meetings with Alex Salmond (Potential Breach of Sections 4.22 and 4.23)
Context from the Remit (Repeated in Multiple Batches, e.g., Batch 1, Pages 1, 21, 32, etc.): The investigation's starting point is the allegation that Sturgeon "failed to feed back the basic facts of meetings and discussions held with Alex Salmond to her private office." These sections of the Code require ministers to record external contacts that could influence government policy or decisions to avoid undisclosed influence.
Specific Meetings in Question (Batch 1, Pages 1, 157, 162, etc.):29 March 2018: Meeting with Geoff Aberdein (Salmond's former Chief of Staff) at Scottish Parliament.
2 April 2018: Meeting with Salmond at Sturgeon's home.
23 April 2018: Telephone conversation.
7 June 2018: Meeting at SNP Conference in Aberdeen.
14 July 2018: Meeting at Sturgeon's home.
18 July 2018: Telephone conversation.
Potential Evidence:
In her written response to Hamilton (Batch 2, Pages 187 and 210), Sturgeon admits she did not immediately record the early meetings with her private office. She states: "I advised the Permanent Secretary of the meeting on 2 April and the call on 23 April, in my letter to her of 6 June 2018." This indicates a delay of over two months for the April 2 meeting, which she justifies as necessary to "protect the confidentiality and independence of the process" (arguing the Code didn't directly apply, putting her in a "Catch 22" situation). She considered the Code but chose not to follow it strictly to avoid compromising the investigation.
Salmond's letter to Hamilton (Batch 4, Pages 80-81, 122): He claims the April 2 meeting was about government business (harassment complaints), not party matters as Sturgeon described, and accuses her of failing to record contacts promptly. He argues non-intervention in an "unlawful" process could itself be a breach, but notes her explanation for the home meeting (thinking it was party business) is misleading.
This admission and contradiction could support a breach, as the Code emphasizes transparency to prevent undue influence.
2. Attempt to Influence the Harassment Investigation
Allegation (Batch 1, Pages 1-2, 21-22, etc.): It was suggested that Sturgeon used information from the 2018 meetings to "attempt to influence the conduct of the investigation" into complaints against Salmond under the government's harassment procedure.
Potential Evidence:Sturgeon's response (Batch 2, Pages 187, 210): She denies influence, stating she excluded herself from the process to avoid it and only informed the Permanent Secretary later when legal action seemed imminent. However, she admits discussing the Code implications with her Chief of Staff after April 2 and choosing not to disclose immediately.
Salmond's claims (Batch 4, Pages 81, 122): He alleges Sturgeon knew of the complaints earlier than she claimed and that her non-intervention allowed an unlawful process to continue, potentially influencing it indirectly. He points to her Parliamentary statements as "questioned by MSPs as misleading" regarding the timing and nature of meetings.
No direct evidence of active influence, but the delay in recording and conflicting timelines could imply passive allowance of issues.
Allegation (Batch 1, Pages 1-2, 21-22, etc.): It was suggested that Sturgeon used information from the 2018 meetings to "attempt to influence the conduct of the investigation" into complaints against Salmond under the government's harassment procedure.
Potential Evidence:Sturgeon's response (Batch 2, Pages 187, 210): She denies influence, stating she excluded herself from the process to avoid it and only informed the Permanent Secretary later when legal action seemed imminent. However, she admits discussing the Code implications with her Chief of Staff after April 2 and choosing not to disclose immediately.
Salmond's claims (Batch 4, Pages 81, 122): He alleges Sturgeon knew of the complaints earlier than she claimed and that her non-intervention allowed an unlawful process to continue, potentially influencing it indirectly. He points to her Parliamentary statements as "questioned by MSPs as misleading" regarding the timing and nature of meetings.
No direct evidence of active influence, but the delay in recording and conflicting timelines could imply passive allowance of issues.
3. Misleading Parliament (Potential Breach of Section 1.3(c))
Context: Section 1.3(c) states: "It is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to the Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity. Ministers who knowingly mislead the Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation."
Allegation: Salmond and MSPs claim Sturgeon misled Parliament about when she first learned of the complaints (claiming March 29, 2018, but allegedly earlier) and the purpose of the April 2 meeting (party vs. government business).
Potential Evidence:MSPs' letter to Hamilton (Batch 4, Pages 224-225): A cross-party group (Alex Cole-Hamilton, Margaret Mitchell, Jackie Baillie, Murdo Fraser) urges expanding the investigation to include whether Sturgeon "knowingly misled Parliament" based on Salmond's submission contradicting her account. They cite her FMQs response where she says Hamilton can look at any issues, but argue the facts must be established as the versions "cannot both be true."
Salmond's submission references (Batch 1, Pages 117, 135; Batch 4, Page 192; Batch 2, Page 259): He accuses Sturgeon of "repeatedly misleading parliament and giving 'untrue' evidence," including about the timing of her knowledge and meeting details. Opposition claims this exposes "allegations of a cover-up."
Sturgeon's FMQs quote (Batch 4, Pages 80, 122): She states Hamilton is "not restricted" and can examine any potential breach, including misleading Parliament, but the MSPs question if her account holds up against Salmond's evidence.
Context: Section 1.3(c) states: "It is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to the Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity. Ministers who knowingly mislead the Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation."
Allegation: Salmond and MSPs claim Sturgeon misled Parliament about when she first learned of the complaints (claiming March 29, 2018, but allegedly earlier) and the purpose of the April 2 meeting (party vs. government business).
Potential Evidence:MSPs' letter to Hamilton (Batch 4, Pages 224-225): A cross-party group (Alex Cole-Hamilton, Margaret Mitchell, Jackie Baillie, Murdo Fraser) urges expanding the investigation to include whether Sturgeon "knowingly misled Parliament" based on Salmond's submission contradicting her account. They cite her FMQs response where she says Hamilton can look at any issues, but argue the facts must be established as the versions "cannot both be true."
Salmond's submission references (Batch 1, Pages 117, 135; Batch 4, Page 192; Batch 2, Page 259): He accuses Sturgeon of "repeatedly misleading parliament and giving 'untrue' evidence," including about the timing of her knowledge and meeting details. Opposition claims this exposes "allegations of a cover-up."
Sturgeon's FMQs quote (Batch 4, Pages 80, 122): She states Hamilton is "not restricted" and can examine any potential breach, including misleading Parliament, but the MSPs question if her account holds up against Salmond's evidence.
Trauma-based mind control tactics are horrific and brutal.
It can be used covertly and operationally by networks and governments.
Survivors of “monarch” mind control or trauma based mind control have been speaking out for decades.
Most do not survive. Those who do often remain deeply embedded within the systems that harmed them, never fully understanding what was done to them or finding a way to break free.
The few who can articulate their experiences, like JR, are often ridiculed or labeled as unstable because the traumas they describe are so extreme that those who have never endured such abuse struggle to comprehend them.
Epstein survivors have been showing us and telling us they experienced and witnessed this process. 🧵
It can be used covertly and operationally by networks and governments.
Survivors of “monarch” mind control or trauma based mind control have been speaking out for decades.
Most do not survive. Those who do often remain deeply embedded within the systems that harmed them, never fully understanding what was done to them or finding a way to break free.
The few who can articulate their experiences, like JR, are often ridiculed or labeled as unstable because the traumas they describe are so extreme that those who have never endured such abuse struggle to comprehend them.
Epstein survivors have been showing us and telling us they experienced and witnessed this process. 🧵
2/
From the Epstein files.
“This is a mind control cult. Once infected, the American believes a Political Candidate is the Messiah and votes in this direction.”
justice.gov/epstein/files/…
From the Epstein files.
“This is a mind control cult. Once infected, the American believes a Political Candidate is the Messiah and votes in this direction.”
justice.gov/epstein/files/…
3/
From the Epstein files:
Epstein had a document from the Trilateral Commission:
“Illuminati Families and their Associates”
Subjects?
The families in the Illuminati bloodlines
The Biological Basis of Elitism and "The Divine Right" Rule
House of Rothschilds
The Majestic Project / M3-12
The Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Control Slave
The Trilateral Commission
justice.gov/epstein/files/…
From the Epstein files:
Epstein had a document from the Trilateral Commission:
“Illuminati Families and their Associates”
Subjects?
The families in the Illuminati bloodlines
The Biological Basis of Elitism and "The Divine Right" Rule
House of Rothschilds
The Majestic Project / M3-12
The Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Control Slave
The Trilateral Commission
justice.gov/epstein/files/…
If you lack development in these areas:
- Traps
- Shoulders
- Back
- Upper chest
- Neck
- VMO’s
- Forearms
- Lower abdominals
You’re never going to have that complete “jacked” aesthetic most guys aspire for;
Developing these areas is what creates the appearance of POWER…
- Traps
- Shoulders
- Back
- Upper chest
- Neck
- VMO’s
- Forearms
- Lower abdominals
You’re never going to have that complete “jacked” aesthetic most guys aspire for;
Developing these areas is what creates the appearance of POWER…
You can knock off 4 of these muscle groups by reaching elite strength in Weighted Pull ups…
You can knock off 2 more by reaching elite strength in Overhead Press + Bench/Incline press…
Then use accessory work for the rest (shrugs, neck curls, hanging core, bulgarians)…
You can knock off 2 more by reaching elite strength in Overhead Press + Bench/Incline press…
Then use accessory work for the rest (shrugs, neck curls, hanging core, bulgarians)…
t’s not about who works out the most or who spends the most amount of time in the gym;
It’s about who has the best system, and who is the most consistent in applying intensity within said system…
Link in bio to get started today.
It’s about who has the best system, and who is the most consistent in applying intensity within said system…
Link in bio to get started today.
Many are defending the recent glyphosate executive order (EO), saying that the immunity language is standard for the Defense Production Act (DPA)
In fact, this language has NEVER BEFORE been used in any DPA EO
How we came to that conclusion below🧵
whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
In fact, this language has NEVER BEFORE been used in any DPA EO
How we came to that conclusion below🧵
whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
Our organization has been fighting bad DPA EO’s for decades now in administrations from both parties, so this is territory we know well
We were all perplexed by this immunity language because we’ve never seen it before
So we dove in
We were all perplexed by this immunity language because we’ve never seen it before
So we dove in
The best source for EO text is the federal register
All presidential actions use a variation of “By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the...”
Search for "President by the Constitution" you get 2,300 EO’s
federalregister.gov
All presidential actions use a variation of “By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the...”
Search for "President by the Constitution" you get 2,300 EO’s
federalregister.gov
I asked Grok to provide a list of REPUBLICAN governors who have been instrumental in dismantling Confederate heritage. 🧵
The list begins with Glenn Youngkin, who was recently seen clapping as the statue of Robert E. Lee came down to be replaced with a statue of a black girl.
The list begins with Glenn Youngkin, who was recently seen clapping as the statue of Robert E. Lee came down to be replaced with a statue of a black girl.
He blew himself up and stopped the Russian advance on Henichesk.
Marine Vitalii Skakun was killed on February 24, 2022, after detonating the Henichesk road bridge with himself on it.
It slowed the Russian push from Crimea, gave Ukraine time to prepare defenses in the south. 1/
Marine Vitalii Skakun was killed on February 24, 2022, after detonating the Henichesk road bridge with himself on it.
It slowed the Russian push from Crimea, gave Ukraine time to prepare defenses in the south. 1/
He became the first serviceman of the full-scale invasion to receive the title Hero of Ukraine with the wording: “for exceptional personal courage and heroism,” — ArmyInform. 2/
Vitalii was born on August 19, 1996, in Berezhany, Ternopil region. His father was a local police officer, his mother a schoolteacher.
At school he read historical books and collected model cars. In Lviv he trained as a welder and practiced armwrestling. 3/
At school he read historical books and collected model cars. In Lviv he trained as a welder and practiced armwrestling. 3/
A lot of people in Toronto’s real estate industry knew the pre-con condo market was a bubble
So why did so few speak up? 🧵
So why did so few speak up? 🧵
Recently, housing commentator @DanielFoch described the pre-con market as something resembling a Ponzi dynamic
Structurally dependent on rising prices.
But this line stood out:
“Who’s going to be the guy at the party who says maybe we should sober up? Total buzz kill.” 2/
Structurally dependent on rising prices.
But this line stood out:
“Who’s going to be the guy at the party who says maybe we should sober up? Total buzz kill.” 2/
That line isn’t really about condos
It’s about the incentives that drive markets
When prices are rising and profits feel easy very few people want to disrupt the momentum
These dynamics aren’t unique to Toronto 3/
It’s about the incentives that drive markets
When prices are rising and profits feel easy very few people want to disrupt the momentum
These dynamics aren’t unique to Toronto 3/
alright here is a vanadium thread for all you tourists who already lost hope unlike me, @mineralstocks , @Valarian11 , and @Edark94
one of the biggest issues with vanadium equity investments is that the prices are hard to track: sketchy sites, paywalls, etc
the toilet provides
one of the biggest issues with vanadium equity investments is that the prices are hard to track: sketchy sites, paywalls, etc
the toilet provides
before we dive in, i would urge that you read the wonderful analysis done by @mineralstocks here that broke down the prices we care about
tldr: look at the last numbers in the screenshots that tell us where we need the price to be mineralstocks.substack.com/p/largo-findin…
tldr: look at the last numbers in the screenshots that tell us where we need the price to be mineralstocks.substack.com/p/largo-findin…
but toilet, i dont want to just survive, i want to thrive. well our very smart european friend @mineralstocks already calculated that for us as well
tldr look at the last numbers in the screenshot
tldr look at the last numbers in the screenshot
They convinced you that sun, salt and fat will kill you. Then they got rich selling you the cure! Between 1976 and 2026, obesity rates tripled while you followed the rules.
Here are 7 lies that created an epidemic:
1. Fat makes you fat! Every cell in your body is wrapped in fat. Your brain is mostly fat. Your hormones are built from fat. Yet they told you that fat is making you sick and convinced you to swap it for low-fat foods loaded with sugar. When fat intake fell, obesity and diabetes exploded. The real danger was never fat; it was a goldmine. They stripped away natures fuel, replaced it with cheap carbs from corn and soy and created ADDICTION.
2. Red meat causes cancer! They lumped grass-fed steak in with hot dogs and deli slices, then told you it would shave years off your life. Humans thrived on meat for THOUSANDS of years. Long before obesity, diabetes and heart disease, we ate meat DAILY. The real danger was never meat; it was the processed junk that replaced it. Demonizing meat wasn’t about protecting your health; it was about creating a population hooked on cheap grains.
3. Sunlight causes cancer! Sunlight boosts immunity, balances hormones and lifts mood, strengthens bones, and extends life. Zero cost. Zero side effects. You would take it every day. No pill exists for it. They told you to fear it and lather on sunscreen. Sunscreen is packed with hormone disruptors, and toxic chemicals that block Vitamin D production. It is not about your health; it is about profit.
4. Breakfast is the most important meal! For most of human history, breakfast did not exist. People rose with the sun, worked, hunted, and ate when food was available, often not until midday or evening. Then you were convinced that skipped cereal would wreck your health. The real danger is not skipping breakfast; it was nonstop eating. Cereal companies needed to turn cheap grains into gold, so they told you to start every day with sugar in a box!!
5. The war on cholesterol! Half the people who die of heart attacks have normal cholesterol. Those with higher cholesterol often live longer, especially as they age. Yet you were told this vital molecule is a ticking time bomb. The real danger was never cholesterol, it was INFLAMMATION. Cholesterol is the raw material for your hormones, brain function, and cell repair. Instead of addressing diet and lifestyle, they put millions on drugs that deplete it!! Created a billion-dollar market for lifelong customers
6. Fluoride protects your teeth! This is a marketing spin! A way to dump industrial waste without paying to filter it out. Linked to thyroid disruption, lowering IQ, and bone damage at high doses!
7. Salt raises Blood pressure! They told you that salt will destroy your heart and convinced you to eliminate it from your diet. Meanwhile, populations eating high-salt diets for centuries had low hypertension rates. Then processed food and sugar entered the picture! Everything changed. The real danger was NEVER SALT; it was mineral deficiency. While you feared salt, they pushed sugar, seed oils, and processed junk, the actual drivers of heart disease. The salt scare was not protection, it was misdirection.
You are not sick; you are nutrient deficient! Yet chronic fatigue, brain fog, and depression are almost never treated with nutrition, the deficiency gets labeled as disease and symptoms become a life sentence. There is no profit in magnesium, sunlight, or clean food, they misdiagnose symptoms your body is trying to solve with what it never received, you are not broke, you are depleted.
H/T AH
They lied, and profited. Accountability is necessary.
Here are 7 lies that created an epidemic:
1. Fat makes you fat! Every cell in your body is wrapped in fat. Your brain is mostly fat. Your hormones are built from fat. Yet they told you that fat is making you sick and convinced you to swap it for low-fat foods loaded with sugar. When fat intake fell, obesity and diabetes exploded. The real danger was never fat; it was a goldmine. They stripped away natures fuel, replaced it with cheap carbs from corn and soy and created ADDICTION.
2. Red meat causes cancer! They lumped grass-fed steak in with hot dogs and deli slices, then told you it would shave years off your life. Humans thrived on meat for THOUSANDS of years. Long before obesity, diabetes and heart disease, we ate meat DAILY. The real danger was never meat; it was the processed junk that replaced it. Demonizing meat wasn’t about protecting your health; it was about creating a population hooked on cheap grains.
3. Sunlight causes cancer! Sunlight boosts immunity, balances hormones and lifts mood, strengthens bones, and extends life. Zero cost. Zero side effects. You would take it every day. No pill exists for it. They told you to fear it and lather on sunscreen. Sunscreen is packed with hormone disruptors, and toxic chemicals that block Vitamin D production. It is not about your health; it is about profit.
4. Breakfast is the most important meal! For most of human history, breakfast did not exist. People rose with the sun, worked, hunted, and ate when food was available, often not until midday or evening. Then you were convinced that skipped cereal would wreck your health. The real danger is not skipping breakfast; it was nonstop eating. Cereal companies needed to turn cheap grains into gold, so they told you to start every day with sugar in a box!!
5. The war on cholesterol! Half the people who die of heart attacks have normal cholesterol. Those with higher cholesterol often live longer, especially as they age. Yet you were told this vital molecule is a ticking time bomb. The real danger was never cholesterol, it was INFLAMMATION. Cholesterol is the raw material for your hormones, brain function, and cell repair. Instead of addressing diet and lifestyle, they put millions on drugs that deplete it!! Created a billion-dollar market for lifelong customers
6. Fluoride protects your teeth! This is a marketing spin! A way to dump industrial waste without paying to filter it out. Linked to thyroid disruption, lowering IQ, and bone damage at high doses!
7. Salt raises Blood pressure! They told you that salt will destroy your heart and convinced you to eliminate it from your diet. Meanwhile, populations eating high-salt diets for centuries had low hypertension rates. Then processed food and sugar entered the picture! Everything changed. The real danger was NEVER SALT; it was mineral deficiency. While you feared salt, they pushed sugar, seed oils, and processed junk, the actual drivers of heart disease. The salt scare was not protection, it was misdirection.
You are not sick; you are nutrient deficient! Yet chronic fatigue, brain fog, and depression are almost never treated with nutrition, the deficiency gets labeled as disease and symptoms become a life sentence. There is no profit in magnesium, sunlight, or clean food, they misdiagnose symptoms your body is trying to solve with what it never received, you are not broke, you are depleted.
H/T AH
They lied, and profited. Accountability is necessary.
Me me looks more like this lol
Mine 🤪
