Thread by @AndrewGreene864

@mrslowbones @katystoll There is no evidence against MJ. There never was. You got a media that consists of 94% whites who turned their backs on MJ after he bought the Beatles catalogue. Overnight they started to refer to him as “wacko jacko.” The term "Jacko," didn't arise out of a vacuum, and certainly

@mrslowbones @katystoll wasn't meant a term of endearment. The very term is rooted in racism. "Jacko Macacco" was the name of a famous monkey used in monkey-baiting matches at the Westminster Pit in London in the early 1820s. “Jacco” was Cockney slang to refer to monkeys in general.

Furthermore, in the

@mrslowbones @katystoll the United States, blacks use to be referred to as Jackos when whites would claim that you could only see the eyes and teeth of a black person at night. Then they moved on to this pedophile narrative. The media would ONLY report the prosecution side in the press and NEVER

@mrslowbones @katystoll the side of the defense. Even when the settlement took place in 1993, it was dubbed as “pay off” some called it “hush money.” That wasn’t the case. In 93-94 civil proceeding were allowed to come before criminal ones. To prevent the criminal case from being prejudiced, a

@mrslowbones @katystoll settlement in the civil case was reached. Michael expected and wanted a criminal trial to take place as the settlement did NOT stop the criminal case from going forward. Had he was favored to win the case and had he won, he could have countersued for his money back. The Chandlers

@mrslowbones @katystoll took the money and ran. I don’t know about you, but if someone molested one of my relatives, I would want JUSTICE, not money. More info found in this infographic:

@mrslowbones @katystoll Then there was the 2005 trial that was the most obvious failed attempt of extortion in criminal court history. Like the previous accuser, the Arvizos first sought a the exact same civil lawyer. They were looking for a payout, not justice. When they realized that they had to

@mrslowbones @katystoll to go through a criminal trial to get to the payout, they took that route. Michael was indicted in 2005 NOT because there was evidence against him, because there wasn’t, but because a mass people had been prejudiced by the media to believe that the 93-94 settlement was an

@mrslowbones @katystoll Admission of guilt!! IT WASN’T! The jury had an easy decision on their hands at the end of the trial. More information found in this infographic:

@mrslowbones @katystoll This isn’t a Harvey Weinstein or Cosby scenario where dozens upon dozens of accusers came forward. There were two people to accuse MJ of sexual abuse in life, and 2 cowards to accuse him in death. This doesn’t even fit the description of a serial sex abuser, much less a pedophile

@mrslowbones @katystoll Leaving Neverland was nothing more than exaggerated lies that weren’t even the same lies in their lawsuits! In fact, while a judge was dismissing their case, the judge said no reasonable juror would believe them. More on those 2 cowards found here in this video:

@mrslowbones @katystoll If I told you I was abused in one of the Twin Towers in 2007 would you believe it? Well, THAT is the level of lies told in Leaving Neverland! Check this video:

@mrslowbones @katystoll So, back to the reason why o say you’re whitewashed. To believe that there were any evidence against MJ, to believe he was a pedophile, would mean that you have been bought and paid for by the white media attempting to diminish the credibility of the most decorated artist ever!