Explainability up next (!) at #FAT2020 with @JcMalgieri and @MargotKaminski paper on GDPR and impact assessments.
No public consensus on the Right to Explanation but lawyers wanted automated decision making to be justified based on fairness.
Data controllers must assess risks since GDPR states that higher risk cases require higher safeguards. Here are some examples of duties:
At least part of this process can be made public. Decisions should be explained but also the risk assessments themselves should be explained...
We must justify and not just explain the algorithms, this approach addresses the “transparency fallacy”.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.