It's good to see more explicit examinations of the behavioral strategies for reducing transmission. IMO, this is key & has so far been inadequately addressed. In addition to what's covered here, there's a critical element of scale involved. 1/
blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/03/03…
Solutions will vary at the building vs community vs larger scales.
For the enabling behaviors discussed here, it's important to recognize that effort is also needed to understanding the associated cultural & regional nuances relative to norms & expectations. 2/
Existing inequities must also be considered. This is all necessary for developing the best contextual solutions.
And shaming, implemented in a superficial manner divorced from other strategies, will more often than not be ineffective if not counterproductive. 3/
If made use of, it has to be an integrated part of a larger suite of strategies, such as #Ostrom's eight core design principles, contextually implemented. 4/
Lately I've been focused on developing tools to help our engineers & other specialists evaluate building/systems capabilities for minimizing transmission. I'm looking forward to devoting some time again to the behavioral strategies. 5/
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.