I, too, like and respect Murray Rothbard. A very insightful and incredibly productive writer. But again, would he oppose the “Cuties” phenomenon due to something internal to liberalism or external to it?
My general point is that liberalism must be rejected at its core and at its source. That is more important than rejecting the *effects* of liberalism.
If you endorse core, original liberalism, but you have a conservatives mentality, then you’re doomed to complaining about the largely inevitable symptoms of your own ideology for the rest of your life.
In saying that we must have a “conservative” population to maintain liberalism—which I’m not sure I agree with—you’re, in fact, saying that you endorse liberalism as a *secondary effect of something else*, and that you don’t endorse liberalism in itself.
To confront the Left, we must oppose the most fundamental precepts of the liberal, humanist virus.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.