"The #1619Project does not argue that 1619 is our true founding."
"The 1619 Project is a major initiative observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding..."
Here's the link:
static.nytimes.com/email-content/…
Again, here: "...understanding 1619 as our true founding..."
nytimes.com/2019/08/16/us/…
Here @conor64 has far more on this than I:
Also, the school curriculum that the @pulitzercenter developed w/ the @nytimes for the 1619 project states: "The 1619 Project... challenges us to reframe U.S. history by marking the year when the first enslaved Africans arrived on Virginia soil as our nation's foundational date."
Here's the link:
pulitzercenter.org/builder/lesson…
1619 Project author Jones says she's not saying 1619 *is* the USA's founding date, but "invite[s] the reader/listener to contemplate what it would *mean* to consider 1619 and the beginning of American slavery as our founding." Curious distinction.
update:
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.
