Thread by @csranga

Post Shri Parasaran's @SwarajyaMag interview there is legal consensus emerging that objective of granting legal personality to a Hindu Deity to protect the pious purpose of Deity and Devotees as per Ayodhya judgement is best served by extending Art 26 protection to Hindu Deities

Chilkur Balaji Deity petition rejection on Feb 10th & no Deity rights issue framed by SC Nine Judge Bench judicial process to secure Art 26 Deity Rights difficult. The Legislative process is hard. Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement Executive notification most practical

While there is not much doubt on legality of above executive notification there is concern on how Hindu temples will be administered post withdrawal of secular Govt
VAK Oct Editorial focused on educating about Dharmika Parishad which replaces secular Govt

Request devout people in @BJP4India and the larger Sangh Parivar who have been fighting for Hindu Temple Freedom from Secular State and had convinced the party to promise same in State manifestos to ensure Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification using above data.

Late Ashok Singhal ji would have been surprised that more than the question of legality of Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement the issue is more of effect of notification on the continuation of Govt control of Hindu temples

Req Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji to take initiative to resolve as Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification not only implements his promise to @PandalaKottaram rep of Lord Ayyappa Deity it also leads to fulfilling pious purpose of his Acharya

@threadreaderapp unroll