Thread by @WomensLibFront

Must be a coincidence that there’s another account followed by the usual suspects that compares us unfavorably to fascists, while insisting in a pinned statement that anyone who calls them similar names will get blocked?

Do some of you think you own knowing that sex is real?

Does it maybe just look a little too petty, now that you’re all such a big deal, to keep trashing women who’ve done nothing to you from your main accounts?

Or did you realize when you put out that embarrassing analysis of Bostock, and it was proved wrong, that you didn’t know enough about the situation in the US to win an actual battle of ideas about strategy in a country you just seem to blindly hate and care nothing for?

As we’ve previously noted, over half the UK population are atheists, while over 80 percent of the US population are religious. We’re operating in a completely different environment.
womensliberationfront.org/news/for-being…

Funny though, how the recent victory over GRA reforms was through the offices of a Conservative woman, and you’ve had to do your own cross-partisan organizing. Okay for you, but not us, because reasons.

Just like your own friends who get to work with conservatives on trafficking and surrogacy, or write in conservative publications ... it’s fine for the approved people, for your chums, for the right-thinking socialists who can be trusted to hold to their principles.

It’s fine for your own friends to have appeared jointly with a Breitbart employee, or appear with a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, or work at the BBC where the organization has been a steady font of child transition propaganda for years. All fine.

Wherever you draw the line for yourselves, there’s got to be some nonsense reason alongside it for why women you’d already decided you didn’t like are on the wrong side.

And there was so much hunger for the convening you’ve managed, you don’t get called on it ever.

You make women afraid to talk to, or follow, or be seen sharing news about women you’ve marked out for hatred. No one better say a cross word to you, but you and your friends can baselessly accuse other women of bigotry, of actual crimes, call them “dog sh*t,” and you don’t care.

And all the while, some of you insisted on bringing men into the center of the movement. Enforcing pronoun usage. Making nice with TRAs to prove what fabulous people you are, while kicking at women who refuse to lie for them. You silence women for men.
uncommongroundmedia.com/which-side-are…

That account may not be an official effort, but the odds are good that WPUK leaders know and approve. It looked like most of them were following it.

This is what you think is appropriate, as women and girls in the US lose court case after court case over our rights & privacy?

You think repeating TRA attack lines against the only feminist charity in our country working against gender identity policy, while kissing up to our opposition, is appropriate and all good political activism? This is what you want to see?

It’s only speculation, but it really seems like the TRAs have gotten deep in your heads. Maybe you’ve been accused so many times of being conservative, of being funded by Americans, that the hope of making that stop has made you willing to be used as a weapon against other women.

That will never work. They will never stop hating you. They will never stop accusing you of actually doing exactly what they’ve been doing so successfully; Stonewall has definitely been working with conservatives, and getting funding from Americans.

They’ve been calling feminists conservatives in print since at least 2014. They aren’t going to stop.

They’re not going to stop working with conservatives, either, or anyone at all, if it can get them what they want.

We’re not going to stop doing things that work—ordinary political strategies that gender activists follow, that WPUK & colleagues follow, that most movements follow—because we’re afraid you’ll call us names. We won’t call you names back, but we will tell people what you did.