Bombshell study (meta review) from Oxford just published on PCR testing, Ct and virus viability.
💥This study completely invalidates the current c19 PCR test data💥
Recall that invalid test results also flow into hospitalization and fatality stats.
For key takeaways, read on
No viable virus at >7days from symptom onset.
Yet at this time Median Ct was still 26.5- MUCH lower than used in widespread testing.
And at 21 days, 2 weeks beyond transmissibility Ct was still 35! Still below that required to test positive most everywhere!
The chances of detecting live virus decreased by 33% with each increment in Ct.
Notice the “No growth” (=not infectious) Ct values in their table
So what’s the key point here? If you are being tested with PCR (the great majority of C19 tests) and the lab uses a Ct (sensitivity) of greater than ~27 to 34 they are not detecting live virus. You are not infected= false positive! Check out a sample of Ct values used by labs👇
All of our data and policies - cases, hosps, and fatalities are built on this bogus foundation of overly sensitive tests detecting viral fragments, not illness. Refuse PCR testing at Ct > low 30s. Which is pretty much all of them. Nothing is as it seems or is being reported.
Link to paper academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar…
For those questioning this the 33% reduction was over a relevant range- days 3-8 post onset. original paper’s figs👇
BOOM!!!! FL opens the flood gates and requires Ct reporting!!! https://t.co/fxqxnfQyXB
Technical review (need your thinking cap on for this one but highly important) thanks to @Thomas_Binder @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath @MLevitt_NP2013 and others
https://t.co/dWZ47pgi8z
Lawsuits worldwide being filed for damages caused by PCR testing -excellent article: https://t.co/gAOMxv8RKW
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.