Childish Talks Again.
Again he is quoting Puranas in competition with Vedas. Let's continue till end to understand this. I can quote puranas that mentions animal sacrifice(quoted) but let's start from basic.
I have explained this whole thing already in thread but still.
Mimansa स्मृत्याधिकरण (१/३/३) The authority of Smriti vachan is not valid if it goes against Vedas.
या वेदबाह्याः स्मृतयो याश्च काश्च कुदृष्टयः ।(Manu १२/९५)
Vyas smriti १/४ describes Vedas>>>Smritis>>puranas. Former blocks later.
An entry level gurukula student know such basics
This Manu- Vachan can solve all problems.
"तस्माद्यज्ञे वधोSवध:" in yajnas वध is अवध. Similarly Devi Bhagvat ३/२६/३३ "for yajnas Pashu Hinsa is not Hinsa" So half of problems gone.
Don't try to misinterpret medhatithi or cry about Adulteration. This one is from Kulluka Bhashya.
Bhagavatam 11/21/29-30 also does the Nishedh of Hinsa that is "राग प्राप्त".
Similar is the story with Mahabharaa,all that is written there is to do the nishedh of रागप्राप्त हिंसा.
I already knew the verses he is going to quote, hence I mentioned it all before him.
Not every Yajnya but only few Somyaga,Jyotishtoma, Ashvamedha mentions animal sacrifice.
We are Smartas we don't even take water from the hands of meat eaters but Yajna is a whole diff paradigm with अपूर्वसाधनत्व. Killing doesn't mean eating.
So if you are seeing the Ninda of Animal killing in Itihasa Purana then it has to be interpreted in Vedic way otherwise those words will simply be anti-vedic .
At a time parts of verified itihasa like Mahabhrata i.e. " gita was "fake" .Now he is using Puranas to prove himself right
His problem is simple He has too much effect of Agnivrat,ankur arya,rahul arya. Vedas do not matter to him his silly emotions does.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.