WHOA!!
60 days. SIXTY DAYS. And that was when they stopped looking...
That is how long these researchers were still detecting *mRNA* in lymph nodes.
Whoever told you "it degrades in hours to days" lied, because they didn't have that information.
Now we do.
I can't emphasise enough the importance of this.
You have mRNA producing spike protein (known to block p53-related tumour suppression at the nuclear level) for MONTHS after the treatment.
With NO off switch.
@fynn_fan @richardursomd @P_McCulloughMD
cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
Just a reminder of the Spike protein - p53/BRCA interaction here:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696485/
You really do not want to be producing p53-inhibiting spike protein in lymph nodes for months on end.
Why?
This is why
👇👇👇👇
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29885407/
It's really not something you want to do.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Of course these are just "anecdotes"
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
If there is a cancer safety signal associated with spike protein therapeutics, it may well show up as lymphomas first.
Which makes this fact check somewhat interesting in its timing - November 2021
ibtimes.sg/fact-check-doe…
By the way, @CellCellPress is literally one of the most important and respected scientific journals in the world (unlike the disgraced @TheLancet and @NEJM).
This is no "it's just a preprint" paper.
Even Robert Malone, who tried to downplay David Wiseman's concerns about the unknown effects of pseudouridine and the 3'UTR in these therapies publicly two weeks ago, may have to change his mind after reading this paper.
rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/a-health-pub…
And for the trolls, please note that every paper referenced in this thread is on Pubmed, which is a government site.
If you don't like it, show rebuttal evidence instead of your usual stuff.
Thank you.
Love and peace.
#jikkyleaks
Apologies for those reporting being unable to open the full text.
PDF here. Let me know if the link breaks
cell.com/cell/pdf/S0092…
Er... @fynn_fan @Clucky92864053 this doesn't look great.
(BCL6)
And this seems to be the first paper to correctly use RNA-ISH to demonstrate mRNA presence, which is what the FDA, MHRA, EMA and TGA should have done (but didn't).
It's going to be important in the coming months to archive as many tweets as possible from those pushing this therapy onto people claiming it as "safe and effective" without any evidence to back up their claims.
Especially those linked with #modernagate
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.