NYT suddenly remembers to put this disclaimer on unproven claims about an imminent large-scale attack.
This is happening throughout all MSM; claims made about an attack by Ukraine are made "without evidence", but when evidence-free claims are made about an attack by Russia it's just "government sources say" and "based on intelligence".
theguardian.com/world/2022/feb…
Compare this noble refusal to simply report unevidenced claims, carefully informing the readers that they are made "without evidence", with the way these outlets report the completely unevidenced claim that the Kremlin has ordered that Ukraine be invaded:
nytimes.com/live/2022/02/2…
Meanwhile:
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.