@ctaylor463 1/5》Thank you for this important work, Drs. Taylor @ctaylor463 & Schlenker @envResEcon.
It is well-known that FACE experiments underestimate the benefits of elevated CO2…
Tweetstorm compilation:
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1362278…
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
@ctaylor463 @envResEcon 2/5》Prof. George Hendrey explained the problem with FACE, here:
qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/~cyi/personnel…
EXCERPT: "Much of what is known about global ecosystem responses to increasing atmospheric CO2 has been gained through Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments…"
@ctaylor463 @envResEcon 3/5》Don't believe that Loladze/Myers "nutrition scare," either. It's nonsense. That should be obvious if you consider that crops grown in commercial greenhouses at 1500 ppmv are as nutritious as crops grown outdoors with only 30% as much CO2.
@ctaylor463 @envResEcon 4/5》Remarkably, there are NO documented significant negative impacts from elevated CO2 and consequent climate change, neither on agriculture, nor on anything else!
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.
