Thread by @ncdave4life

@nxgrs73 @fischerfischy @NolanCarlton2 @balls95652097 @Anvndarnamn5 @4tis @BenKoby1911 @RushhourP @ChrisBBacon3 @Climatehope2 @Huroner2 @Willard1951 @Devonian1342 @Mark_A_Lunn @AristotleMrs @Michael_D_Crow @sandcastle1975 @Jaisans @Hji45519156 @Data79504085 @S_D_Mannix @JusticeTrudeau @JimBlack48 @glinch72 @DenisDaly @stitchnstab @CarrudoDon @Veritatem2021 @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @priscian @Ceist8 @Joeyd87745119 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @JustThi30117912 @SniemN @BointonGiles @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @CDMarshall7 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @MaggieL 1/4⟫
Enlarging to 200% makes some of that mess legible:
sealevel.info/nick_schgroede…

It obviously started with a spreadsheet, but you don't give either the actual spreadsheet or the source. 𝙒𝙃𝙔?

What's the source?

Where's the spreadsheet from?

Who wrote the comments? Postma??

@nxgrs73 @fischerfischy @NolanCarlton2 @balls95652097 @Anvndarnamn5 @4tis @BenKoby1911 @RushhourP @ChrisBBacon3 @Climatehope2 @Huroner2 @Willard1951 @Devonian1342 @Mark_A_Lunn @AristotleMrs @Michael_D_Crow @sandcastle1975 @Jaisans @Hji45519156 @Data79504085 @S_D_Mannix @JusticeTrudeau @JimBlack48 @glinch72 @DenisDaly @stitchnstab @CarrudoDon @Veritatem2021 @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @priscian @Ceist8 @Joeyd87745119 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @JustThi30117912 @SniemN @BointonGiles @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @CDMarshall7 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @MaggieL 2/4⟫
The 3 yellow boxes saying "Violates LoT" & "back radiation [is] not real" are obviously nonsense. LWIR back-radiation is measurable, and no sane scientist thinks that so-called (badly named) "greenhouse warming" violates any of the laws of thermodynamics.

So, who wrote it?

@nxgrs73 @fischerfischy @NolanCarlton2 @balls95652097 @Anvndarnamn5 @4tis @BenKoby1911 @RushhourP @ChrisBBacon3 @Climatehope2 @Huroner2 @Willard1951 @Devonian1342 @Mark_A_Lunn @AristotleMrs @Michael_D_Crow @sandcastle1975 @Jaisans @Hji45519156 @Data79504085 @S_D_Mannix @JusticeTrudeau @JimBlack48 @glinch72 @DenisDaly @stitchnstab @CarrudoDon @Veritatem2021 @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @priscian @Ceist8 @Joeyd87745119 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @JustThi30117912 @SniemN @BointonGiles @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @CDMarshall7 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @MaggieL 3/4⟫
At the bottom it says, "For reference to this methodology see…" but one of the yellow boxes which someone added intentionally COVERS UP much of the referenced URL. 𝙒𝙃𝙔?

I suspect the URL might have been:
acs.org/climatescience…
But no spreadsheet is mentioned there.

@nxgrs73 @fischerfischy @NolanCarlton2 @balls95652097 @Anvndarnamn5 @4tis @BenKoby1911 @RushhourP @ChrisBBacon3 @Climatehope2 @Huroner2 @Willard1951 @Devonian1342 @Mark_A_Lunn @AristotleMrs @Michael_D_Crow @sandcastle1975 @Jaisans @Hji45519156 @Data79504085 @S_D_Mannix @JusticeTrudeau @JimBlack48 @glinch72 @DenisDaly @stitchnstab @CarrudoDon @Veritatem2021 @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @priscian @Ceist8 @Joeyd87745119 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @JustThi30117912 @SniemN @BointonGiles @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @CDMarshall7 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @MaggieL 4/4⟫
The box at the lower-right also disputes (with 15 exclamation points) the Earth's commonly claimed approximate average surface emissivity ε of 0.95.

𝙒𝙃𝙔? What do you think the correct figure is?

Here's a reference supporting that approximation:
jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia1883…