Thread by @ncdave4life

@jhgates1 @Veritatem2021 @benmooreau @ammocrypta @agentsinaction @markinkorea @S_D_Mannix @B_Bolshevik100 @Willard1951 @TheDisproof @Climatehope2 @JustThi30117912 @aznatv2 @lheal @2xBeepBoopVodka @Trikkynikky1 @WillWat6 @Ceist8 @TWTThisIsNow @Mark_A_Lunn @wille99 @Data79504085 @0Sundance @ShroedingerBird @AristotleMrs @glinch72 @Jaisans @atherton_chris @ItsTheAtmospher @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @EthonRaptor @Anvndarnamn5 @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @PaulDFarrar @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 James Gates wrote, "…all for a 1.5 degree temperature change over the next 30 years."

Worse! They CALL it "1.5°C of warming," but that's NOT what they mean. They mean 0.3°C of warming.

Really!

1.5°C warmer than the Little Ice Age, which they estimate was 1.2° cooler than now.

@jhgates1 @Veritatem2021 @benmooreau @ammocrypta @agentsinaction @markinkorea @S_D_Mannix @B_Bolshevik100 @Willard1951 @TheDisproof @Climatehope2 @JustThi30117912 @aznatv2 @lheal @2xBeepBoopVodka @Trikkynikky1 @WillWat6 @Ceist8 @TWTThisIsNow @Mark_A_Lunn @wille99 @Data79504085 @0Sundance @ShroedingerBird @AristotleMrs @glinch72 @Jaisans @atherton_chris @ItsTheAtmospher @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @EthonRaptor @Anvndarnamn5 @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @PaulDFarrar @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 They reference prospective temperature increases (which they preposterously claim would be disastrous) to a poorly constrained "pre-industrial" (Little Ice Age) estimated average temperature, so they can use a bigger number, to reduce the sniggering at its ridiculousness.

@jhgates1 @Veritatem2021 @benmooreau @ammocrypta @agentsinaction @markinkorea @S_D_Mannix @B_Bolshevik100 @Willard1951 @TheDisproof @Climatehope2 @JustThi30117912 @aznatv2 @lheal @2xBeepBoopVodka @Trikkynikky1 @WillWat6 @Ceist8 @TWTThisIsNow @Mark_A_Lunn @wille99 @Data79504085 @0Sundance @ShroedingerBird @AristotleMrs @glinch72 @Jaisans @atherton_chris @ItsTheAtmospher @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @EthonRaptor @Anvndarnamn5 @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @PaulDFarrar @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 If we accept their estimate that the LIA was 1.2°C cooler than now, then what that inconveniently means is that, not only have we already realized about 80% of the warming which they claim would be catastrophic, that 80% has been objectively BENEFICIAL.

@jhgates1 @Veritatem2021 @benmooreau @ammocrypta @agentsinaction @markinkorea @S_D_Mannix @B_Bolshevik100 @Willard1951 @TheDisproof @Climatehope2 @JustThi30117912 @aznatv2 @lheal @2xBeepBoopVodka @Trikkynikky1 @WillWat6 @Ceist8 @TWTThisIsNow @Mark_A_Lunn @wille99 @Data79504085 @0Sundance @ShroedingerBird @AristotleMrs @glinch72 @Jaisans @atherton_chris @ItsTheAtmospher @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @EthonRaptor @Anvndarnamn5 @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @PaulDFarrar @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 If you posit that the remaining 20% (0.3°C) might be inconsequential, or that it might even be beneficial, you're lampooned as a "climate denier."

The simple fact is that "climate science" has little to do with science. It's mostly about feeding Piggy.
sealevel.info/1.5_Trillion_D…

@jhgates1 @Veritatem2021 @benmooreau @ammocrypta @agentsinaction @markinkorea @S_D_Mannix @B_Bolshevik100 @Willard1951 @TheDisproof @Climatehope2 @JustThi30117912 @aznatv2 @lheal @2xBeepBoopVodka @Trikkynikky1 @WillWat6 @Ceist8 @TWTThisIsNow @Mark_A_Lunn @wille99 @Data79504085 @0Sundance @ShroedingerBird @AristotleMrs @glinch72 @Jaisans @atherton_chris @ItsTheAtmospher @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @EthonRaptor @Anvndarnamn5 @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @PaulDFarrar @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 To learn about the SCIENCE of climate change see:
tinyurl.com/learnmore4

It has:
● accurate intro climatology info
● in-depth science from BOTH skeptics & alarmists
● balanced debates between experts on BOTH sides
● info about climate impacts
● the best blogs on BOTH sides