Thread by @Anshulspiritual

Debunking this Thread! You don't even know how to give proper reference. For eg:- you have ment Manadal number in Mahabharat. Rig Ved is having Mandala number not Mahabharat (Its reference should be Parva name, then chapter number and then shloka number). Anyways lets start.

You mentioned Van Parva 168.6-7 as Apsaras.

Answer:- Nowhere in the Sholka mentions about Apsara (Check the SS

Mahabharat 13.79.27 i.e Anushasan Parva

Answer:- Again no mention of Apsaras here (Check Gita Press SS)

You mentioned Atharva Ved 4.34.2 mentions Intercourse with Women

Answer:- Check the SS Mentioned in Atharva Ved 4.34.2

Parashar Smriti 3.31 does not mentions any Women neither Apsara.

You mentioned about Mahabharat Shanti Parva (12).98.46-48. Here Apsara is mentioned but it says that Beautiful woman is waiting for his Husband in Swarga lok, And nothing wrong in having intimacy with husband. You translated as per your convenience.

Again you gave reference from Rig Ved 10.103.3
Answer:- No where mentioned about Apsara neither Women.

In Atharva Ved 2.2.5 (You gave this reference)

Check the SS:- Its mentioned Apsaras as Gandharva's wife and Worshiping them.

Rethinking what you have mentioned 😄

Mahabharat does not have mentioned Mandal concept. Its in Rig Ved

Enough of evidence now, If you really want to know more about Apsaras in our scriptures then do your Ghar wapsi.

Apsara is a celestial term in Sanatan and Worship them,you can't compare them to hoors, Are Hoors worshipped in heaven? No right?, Its a completely different concept.

In नाट्यशास्त्र its mentioned that they were Originated for Abhinay. If you find any verse in Scriptures to have pleasure of Apsaras means you need to watching their Natya (Not for Sex). Its up to you with what intensions you are seeing that Natya of that girl.

I have covered almost all the misconceptions related to Sanatan Dharma, Check the whole thread and bookmark it. You can use it for the reference to counter Vidharmis

Debunking Shoaib Jamai part 2