Thread by @KevinMoncla

🚨Lake's Appeal & Petition to AZ Supreme Court 🚨
🇺🇸 Thank you @KariLake

scribd.com/document/65910…

2/
This Appeal includes the basis for the Maricopa Malfeasance video that has been viewed over 25M times. The same one @maricopacounty has said were "lies" and would debunk. There's been ZERO debunking:
https://t.co/cbfb2r8tfn

3/
The "Print to Fit" issue- produced over 8,000 unreadable ballots. Scott Jarret knowingly lied and said only three vote centers that produced less than 1,300 unreadable ballots. The P2F ballots required duplication to be read/counted. What happened to the rest?

4/
There's more. The tabulator system logs showed that the database was not of the same domain as the election program and warned of this condition. All 446 tabulators issued the same warnings:

5/
One of the most grave and critical issues found was that the tabulator also warned that the Machine Behavioral Settings (MBS) file was not correct. The MBS file contains the counting rules for the tabulator and can be used to control the outcome of an election:

6. What's even more concerning is that the system was expecting a file from the 5.10 platform, and not the 5.5B platform certified for use in AZ. The only place 5.10 is used is in California- and it isn't certified by the EAC.

7/
There is ONLY ONE MBS version certified by the EAC and the SOS for use in Arizona- and it is listed here in the EAC's 5.5B Scope of Conformance (available on the EAC website):

8/
To note: There are no Engineering Change Orders (ECO) approved by Maricopa County, the State of Arizona, or the EAC to permit such a change. The use of versions other than those tested and certified by the EAC voids the certification:

@BrianTerry180 2/
Right before...

@BrianTerry180 3/
And during:

@TimC_266 @PootDibou @AngryFleas @KariLake 2/
In response to Lake's Rule 60 motion (appealed today) @maricopacounty lied (LIED) and said there was no testing (they didn't know we had video) and county attorney @Rachel1Mitchell didn't knowthat M.C. had provided L&A TESTING records for the dates/tabulators in question.

@TimC_266 @PootDibou @AngryFleas @KariLake @maricopacounty @Rachel1Mitchell 2/
testing was performed was on October 11th. The logs must include the test as the law requires that the test be performed using the same election program as is used for the election- and specifically states "Not a Copy". Second, we have the Logic & Accuracy test

@TimC_266 @PootDibou @AngryFleas @KariLake @maricopacounty @Rachel1Mitchell 3/
checklists for all tabulators and the only ones dated for the 11th are for the 5 tabulators @maricopacounty identified as "Spare". Third, we have the L&A test results which are attached to the fraudulent certification which shows that only
scribd.com/document/65243…

@TimC_266 @PootDibou @AngryFleas @KariLake @maricopacounty @Rachel1Mitchell 4/
45 Election Day ballots were counted in the test. M.C. has 4,312 Election Day ballot styles- and therefore did not test the ballot styles or the equipment they were required by law to test.