Thread by @BoringSleuth

🧵Proof: The Criminal Complaint filed on behalf of the US Government vs ex-FBI Corrupt Agent Bridges, who extorted Silk Road's Ross Ulbricht, contained several inaccuracies, including failing to identify and label Bitcoin address' that would go on to fund the Ethereum ICO and several more ICO's from 2014 thru Today.

1/

Before we begin, we would like to state that we are Proud Americans, that believe all Governments are at risk of corruption from within. These individuals, or corrupt agencies do not define a nation. What does define a nation is how these moments are addressed and how it is used to become a better Nation for the People they Serve.

2/

This specific Thread address' specific innacuracies provided in Exhibit E of the criminal complaint filled on March 25th, 2015. The Criminal complaint was filed by the USA vs Carl Mark Force IV, which was based on ex-Special Agent Tigran Gambaryan.

For reference, this exhibit can be found here:

3/antilop.cc/sr/files/2015_…

While there are SEVERAL innacuracies in this Filing, we are going to focus on just a Couple, to prove to you that what we say, and have shared previously, is to be taken seriously, and to shut down those from paid to slander the real Truth.

Below we have highlighted with Red Boxes, 2 specific transactions mentioned in Exhibit E of the Criminal Complaint against ex-FBI Agent, Carl Force.

Transaction 1: You can see that Exhibit E states that Bitcoin wallet 17p1DgXbvbDm5DQ3zu9vc2q9TzJe9vn5ct sends 154 Bitcoin to wallet 1HDvYvhcFJJV3HxnRYZNmh5ZNHZwik13qL on September 29th, 2013, 10 months prior to the Ethereum ICO.

Transaction 2: You can see that it states that Bitcoin wallet 17p1DgXbvbDm5DQ3zu9vc2q9TzJe9vn5ct sends 154 Bitcoin to wallet 1HEuVmWKybo1ZXAVTTBYFiXSvQNEat46BQ on that same Date.

4/

To verify what the Exhibits showed, we used 2 Tools, @AppBreadcrumbs and @ArkhamIntel.

The first tool used to show the Bitcoin both received and sent from wallet 17p1DgXbvbDm5DQ3zu9vc2q9TzJe9vn5ct is Breadcrumbs. This is shown below. You can see below that while Wallet 1791Dg did indeed send 189 Bitcoin to wallet 1HDvYv (Transaction 1), the Transaction outlined in Exhibit E where they allege that wallet 17p1D send 154 to corrupt Agent Force's Camp BX account 1HEuVm, never happened.

Below shows every wallet that ever interacted with wallet 17p1Dg.

5/

In the below screenshot, we verify what we've already established: Transaction 1 did occur, but Exhibit E in the filing was inaccurate, because wallet 17p1D never sent 154 Bitcoin to wallet 1HEuVm. To verify we used @ArkhamIntel which shows every transaction ever by wallet 17p1D.

6/

Below is Exhibit E, which declared both of these Transactions having occurred. The once before sealed filing can be found here:

7/ antilop.cc/sr/files/2015_…

We provide this evidence calling out innacuracies in this filing because when the Bitcoin is followed, both prior to this transaction, and post this date, an entire new understanding of History is provided. The failure to identify correctly the wallets that did send money into corrupt Agent Force's wallets, ommitted wallets that's Bitcoin would go on to fund the @ethereum ICO, and in turn, several ICO's on Ethereum between 2016 thru Today.

Who controls the non-traced Bitcoin, and was was it ommitted from the Filings by ex-Agent Tigran Gambaryan, who left to work for Binance in 2021, the exchange where the FTX Drainer off-ramped Houndreds of Millions of Dollars?

The inaccuracies in this filing, and our past Revelations, call for an immediate investigation into the inaccuracies of these filings, the investigation into Mt. Gox and @RealRossU, along with Ethereum, and the entire Digital Asset Committees that worked on this Investigation, and tools used like @chainalysis.

This is just a peak into the revelations behind what came from this laundered, untraced Bitcoin, covered up by faulty Exhibits in once-sealed Criminal Complaints.

Stay curious my friends, and always choose to be on the side of Truth.

🫡🇺🇸