Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️ Profile picture
Civil - Human Rights / Whistleblower Lawyer ✝️🐭conservative- constitutional- Director-Australian Medical Network - journalism #Holdtheline (TM) COVID cases

Jun 24, 8 tweets

The 221 Base Pair That Could Change Everything!

Time to get real folks - Watch this!!

1/7
What if I told you just 221 base pairs of synthetic DNA could link a jab to death?
--Not theory.
Not a hunch.
But forensic evidence—pulled from the tissues of real people - now deceased.

This is what we found in the @MRobertsQLD @WarwickStaceyp @NIHDirector_Jay @RobertKennedyJr @RWMaloneMD

2/7
SP1 - bp synthetic sequence

A 221bp synthetic sequence used to express spike protein.

It matched plasmid DNA—used in biotech, never meant to persist in human tissue.

We found it in multiple organs. It shouldn't be there.
Yet here it is. Documented. Preliminarily Verified. But Suppressed.
@Jikkyleaks @SabinehazanMD @KLVeritas

3/7
Australian & Global institutions failed to investigate.

They gaslit victims. Ridiculed families.
And buried the evidence—literally and politically.

We took it to Court, to Senate, to media, in letters.

Now, to you - are you ready?
@P_McCulloughMD @NicHulscher @dragonfishy

4/7
The presence of SP1 could be a silver bullet in coronial investigations.

This isn’t about conspiracy—
It’s about accountability.

Because truth leaves a trace.
And like hound dogs - we just found it.

@wideawake_media @FredPawle @zeee_media @AugustoZimmerm5 @rowandean @RitaPanahi @joshg99

These are just some of the organs where we found it and we have photos of the slides!

5/7
This confirms:

The SP1 221 bp synthetic sequence was successfully extracted and amplified from post-mortem samples in the Cook investigation.

It was not random background contamination—the same sequence matched synthetic plasmid DNA, typically used in mRNA vaccine vector systems.

Presence in multiple samples implies systemic distribution - something we have said all along.@DrJulieSladden @TheRustler83 @RetsefL

6/7
Legally, this changes the landscape.
The presence of persistent synthetic DNA—without full public disclosure—undermines informed consent, safety assurances, and regulatory compliance. It brings into question the classification of these products as vaccines, rather than gene therapies - first raised in Kassam v Hazzard and then in later cases. @MaryanneDemasi @JasonStrecker @WhenMumsGetMad

7/7
This is significant because it provides forensic molecular evidence of synthetic DNA in human tissue post-injection—a central claim in your visual script. It reinforces your position that synthetic constructs persisted in vivo and supports potential coronial or legal scrutiny. @VirusFighterVi1 @IamBrookJackson @dockaurG @MartinKulldorff

No nucleocapsid present ---

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling