Thread by @ImactuallyBrad

The Michael Jackson Allegations: He Was Innocent. Here’s the receipts to prove every anti argument as weak or completely wrong.

A Thread🧵

“Why sleep in the same bed as unrelated children?”

It’s understandable why this raises eyebrows, this wasn’t the wisest decision Jackson allowed. However he DID NOT ask to sleep in bed with children. Here’s what he actually said. Parents have said they were allowed in his room

The 1993 Arguments:

“But why settle?” Due to California’s law at the time where a civil suit could go ahead criminal trial. MJ’s team tried 6 times, got denied. Settlement was made so Jackson could have a fair trial. Further explained here (READ PIC DESCRIPTION TOO):👇🏾

From Ray Chandler's book, which attempts to portray MJ as guilty but does the opposite.

If he were guilty, why wouldn’t he pay before the allegations surfaced?

Argument 2: “But the drawing of his genitals matched!”

False. If it did, MJ’s mother wouldn’t need to be asked if she possibly knew anything about her son altering his genitals.

The Chandler’s plan to explain a no match.

The 2005 Trial Arguments.

“Not guilty≠innocent, the courts are rigged anyways so who cares about the verdict!”

It’s true the American courts are very flawed, but it does work sometimes. Jackson’s verdict was correct. And I advised anyone wanting details to follow @RuckerJael

But to sum it up, there was way to many credibility issues. The family had a history of commit frauds before and with other celebrities. To much evidence that gave the jury every reason to doubt the claims.

“Okay what about the books with NAMBLA authors? You can’t explain that!”

Oh but I can!

“Okay, but what about the Leaving Neverland documentary? The graphic details seem too vivid to be lies!”

However, their stories are influenced by anti-Jackson sites.

Let’s debunk Leaving Neverland, starting with Wade Robson.

Wade Robson, when asked in 2016 about an anti MJ site, claimed he didn't remember it, but it's evident that he does. I’ll create a second thread about these sites and their operations

Robson also claimed Jackson’s hair felt like a brillo pad.

That description is problematic as it perpetuates racial stereotypes and doesnt accurately depict the jheri curl hairstyle from the 1980s. The comparison made to a "brillo pad" is more associated with an Afro hairstyle.

Notably, there’s no mention of Jackson’s skin or genitals in Leaving Neverland. This is because neither accuser could access Jackson’s 1993 strip search photos, despite attempts in multiple times.

Look at the date 2017-2018 that was also went Leaving Neverland was being filmed.

Robson claims his first lawsuit was dismissed as it was too late. But doesn’t state how he alleged he only learned about the Jackson estate in 2012, but emails reveal he was aware of its existence earlier. (Look at the date of email)

And this Robson’s reason for suing the estate….. no seriously. He trying to blame Jackson for him not having a successful career.

Also for emails discover him linking old tabloid stories to his mother, who said it wasn’t true, but used it in his story anyways. His mother is also caught giving “versions” of her memories to her son that “better suits” his story.

Up next James Safechuck:

Most of his story is just copying Robson’s. However there 2 key points I want to point out.

The Train Station Lie

One of the places Safechuck claimed abuse occurred in. However this building DID NOT exist during the time frame of his alleged abuse (1988-1992). The building was made in 1993, and finished in 1994.

Aerial shot of Neverland in August 1993.
Construction of the Train Station in December 1993 (in newsprint and color)