Why did the Federal Judicial Center put out a publication that, essentially, says fossil-fuel manufacturers should lose climate cases? Why did Elena Kagan write a forward to it? Did they tell Congress this was coming? The impropriety and irresponsibility are staggering. 1/4
As Congress considers the FSGG appropriations, Republicans should ask the FJC why they quietly published a new edition of their "reference manual" for scientific evidence that is so biased it would make Al Gore blush. 2/4
An organizer of the project--David Tatel--said at the outset that the goal is to convince "climate skeptic" judges to take a different view. Why did the FJC think this was its job? 3/4
Congressional Republicans should demand that that the FJC rescind this absurd publication before it does real damage to the judiciary's credibility in Congress. Article below. 4/4
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.