Thread by @t42592

@0hour1 The answer has been in play since end of Revolutionary War.

After the October 19, 1781: Cornwallis surrendered his entire army to George Washington and French allies.

That's the extent of what is in history books.

What if I told you the British and US have been at war since?

@0hour1 1958 was a year when British influence over Iran was already declining, and the main Britain–Iran cooperation framework from that era was the Baghdad Pact (later CENTO), which had been formed in 1955.

@0hour1 Britain had previously helped overthrow Iran’s democratic government in 1953 (along with the CIA) in Operation Ajax, reinstalling the Shah.

SAVAK (the Shah’s secret police) was created with CIA and MI6 help and maintained close intelligence cooperation with British services.

@0hour1 Britain Overthrows the Shah and Installs a Controllable Islamic Regime

In reality, Britain covertly orchestrates the fall of the Shah and the rise of a regime.

• Appears anti-American and Islamist on the surface

• Remains covertly aligned with British strategic interests.

@0hour1 This would give Britain:

• A puppet state in a critical oil region.

• A platform to reshape the Middle East under the guise of Islamic revolution.

• By incubating and sustaining jihad across neighboring states (Iraq, Afghanistan, Gulf states)

@0hour1 Keep oil exporters dependent on Western security guarantees.

• Prevent any single anti-Western power from dominating the Gulf.

• Maritime Insurance as a Hidden Tool of Control

• Britain already historically dominated global maritime insurance through Lloyd's of London.

@0hour1 Effectively dictate which oil flows are "insurable"—thereby controlling global oil exports.

• Weaponize maritime security narratives (piracy, terrorism, war zones) to manipulate premiums and routing.

@0hour1 You didn't think this administration was unaware .@England was pulling there strings all these years?!?

Jihad -- Instead of eliminating terrorism, Britain sustains a calibrated level of:

• Jihadist movements
Regional conflicts
Anti-American and anti-Soviet resistance

@0hour1 @England This serves multiple purposes:

• Justifies Western military presence in the Gulf.

• Creates permanent demand for arms sales.

• Keeps oil-exporting states compromised and dependent.

• Prevents regional unification against Western interests.

@0hour1 @England Global Terrorism as a Byproduct (and Feature)

In reality, the far-reaching global terrorism that emerged post-1979 is not an accident but a byproduct of this managed insurgency system:

• Blowback from covertly supported militant networks.

• Instruments of coercive diplomacy.

@0hour1 @England This creates a system where Britain doesn't need to occupy oil fields—it operates the switchboard that determines:

1. Which oil flows

2. At what price

3. Under what security conditions

4. And through which insurance/risk frameworks

@0hour1 @England You think we're bombing Iran ?!?

Nope.

We're dismantling. @England CASH COW.

End of story.

cc:
.@PrometheanActn

@0hour1 @England @PrometheanActn .@threadreaderapp unroll