1) somebody leaks parts of a classified intelligence report to Ignatius about Flynn calling Kislyak several times in December 2016.
2) that leaker VERY CAREFULLY AVOIDS mentioning transcripts of the actual conversations exist
How does Flynn know this?
But I'm not most people & don't forget so here it is: look at the date.
"The FBI in late December *reviewed intercepts* of communications between the Russian ambassador to the United States and retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn..."
Wait, what's that? Intercepts, you say? 🤔
First, the presiding Judge. Ruldoph Contreras, is suddenly removed from the case. The media insists on reporting that he recused HIMSELF, which is not the case.
Somebody YANKED him.
Brady violations = prosecutors HIDE exculpatory evidence.
Both Strzok & Pientka would've filed a FD-302 following the interview with Flynn.
And then SOMEBODY higher up decided make use of this interview to nail Flynn for a bogus crime.
It could also be Strzok has been flipped by Horowitz/Huber & states his 302 form says Flynn didn't lie, or he ALTERED IT LATER.
Recall who it was going all around D.C. in December/January 2017 telling anybody who would listen that Flynn was violating the Logan Act?
And the media is full of morons.
The TRANSCRIPTS of the phone calls.
Yes, they exist. And they are EVIDENCE.
And the bloodhound is closing in.
You've figured it all out, bro! 🙄
Contreras wasn't yanked off the case & replaced by Sullivan, I fantasized it.