1/n: To continue with my previous post: I posited that the skyrocketing perceptions of discrimination among (primarily Liberal) Whites is at least partly a function of the digital/social media boom of the past decade. So what evidence is there in support of this hypothesis?
2/n: Before I directly answer this question, let's first survey the changing media landscape (forgot to source the graphs below, but they're derived from either Pew, ANES or Cooperative Congressional Election Studies data)
3/n As you can see, digital/social media consumption has exploded since the beginning of the decade--with liberals generally leading the pack
4/n: One of the results of this boom has been a rise in 'digital activism', which many White Americans (Liberals, again, most markedly) are increasingly exposed to
5/n: So how does this transformation affect perceptions of discrimination? Across multiple datasets, I found that consuming online liberal newspapers and using social media results in greater perceptions of discrimination.
6/n: In general, those who exclusively consume PRINTED news perceive less discrimination against blacks
7/ Moreover, using data from the Pew Racial Attitudes 2016 survey, I found that greater exposure to race-related social media discourse results in perceiving MORE country-level discrimination against blacks
8/n If you've been following some of my previous tweets, you'll recall me showing that racial sympathy (reverse-coded 'racial resentment' scale) reached record levels among Liberals/Democratic Presidential Candidate voters in 2016.
9/n Interestingly, the trends discussed here appear to explain at least some of these record-increases.
10/n To be clear: the effects of social media/digital news consumption were also apparent in the ANES 2012. The difference now is that such consumption was limited to a minority of liberals back then, whereas it spread considerably in 2016.
11/n In other words: social media use/digital news consumption---> greater perceived discrimination. Thus: more liberals using social media/consuming digital news = greater perceived discrimination.
12/n I should also note that the effects of the media on public estimates of the prevalence of crime is a fairly researched topic in the communications/media psychology literature.
13/n It's just that the same theoretical principles (cultivation theory, availability bias etc.) have NEVER been applied to estimates of discrimination. I wonder why 🤔
14/ Anyways, have to hit the road soon so sorry if this seems kind of rushed. I'm in the middle of writing a paper that better elaborates/analyses what I've shared with you here. Hope to have a draft for you all to read soon! (End of thread)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zach Goldberg

Zach Goldberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZachG932

Dec 30, 2021
1/n After trailing them somewhat in 2016, white Dems (51.8%) are now significantly more likely (p=0.001) than non-white Dems (43.6%) to prioritize the use of 'inclusive'/PC language over speaking frankly about issues and problems facing the country. Little change among white Reps
2/n Disaggregating the Dem racial/ethnic groups, whites are sig. more likely to give this response than blacks and hispanics, but are virtually tied with their Asian counterparts (who, as some contend, do their best to ape woke white elite sensibilities )
3/n Checking in on white liberals, the figures overall (56%) are very similar as those among Dems. Somewhat surprisingly, though, sex differences in this response are fairly modest
Read 7 tweets
Dec 17, 2021
1/n 53% of white liberals (48% of white Dems) think that white people should feel guilty about racial inequality
2/n Needless to say, this is more or less the purpose of equity-oriented K-12 curriculums--i.e., cultivate white support for race-conscious/anti-white policies via the inculcation of collective guilt and shame.
3/n Alas, and as my dissertation research suggests, it may actually be an effective strategy. And I suspect proponents of such curricula *know* this (I mean, the relevant literature explicitly discusses shame and guilt in terms of its utility for effecting social change).
Read 4 tweets
Dec 8, 2021
1/n Very briefly (I'm vacationing in India atm), the 2016 CCES Team Module of American University shows that 30% of white liberals (19% white cons) don't think there ANY IQ diffs between wealthy and poor people. Among those that believe there *are* diffs..
2/n 32.6% of white liberals (vs. ~18% of cons) indicated that genes were 'not important at all' in these differences, which was their modal response choice
3/n Generally speaking, the Left is more likely to deny genetic attributions for outcome differences between economic classes and advantaged vs. disadvantaged social groups. They may accept their relevance to differences between individuals--but economic classes and..
Read 4 tweets
Nov 26, 2021
1/n Ah, forgot to give an update: I successfully defended my dissertation (in fact, fwiw, my committee members thought so much of it that they are nominating me for a best doctoral dissertation award), so I guess I’m now a ‘doctor’ 🤷‍♂️
2/n The years of research/work I put into this dissertation will now serve as the basis for many of the articles (and ultimately the book) I’ll be writing in the months and years ahead. Tl;dr of dissertation: White guilt and shame are central to..
3/n …to white racial liberalism (aka ‘wokeness’). In their absence, white racial attitudes would be far more conservative (note: my dissertation is completely agnostic on whether these emotions are ‘good’ or should be ‘encouraged’. I have my own normative position, but you..)
Read 7 tweets
Nov 20, 2021
1/n Someone asked me to compile these data, but I'll share them here as well: top 10 unarmed (i.e., no lethal weapon found) white vs. black deaths at the hands of police in terms of ProQuest news article search results Image
2/n Had to create separate graphs because a single graph would have obscured the bars for white victims (as below) Image
3/n I have the data for ALL unarmed black and white victims, so I'll probably write up an analysis via substack in the coming weeks
Read 5 tweets
Nov 10, 2021
1/2 The Mapping Police Violence database counts many cases in which off-duty police officers (for instance) murder their families or lovers (and each family member is counted as a separate victim). I mean..I get that these acts were committed by police officers. But are they.. ImageImage
2/2 ...but can they *really* be reasonably construed* as cases of lethal police force? I call bullshit.
3/2 Hell, even *accidental* off-duty shootings are counted: "Miller's husband accidentally shot her in the head when he was cleaning his gun. She was 22 weeks pregnant, and the child died after an emergency c-section. The killing was ruled accidental."
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(