1. In the past I wrote two other threads about how, apparently, Russia has “betrayed” Syria and/or Iran.
The first charge:
“Russia demanded that Hezbollah/Iran leave Syria"
The first point: notice the words "the political process”. The “experts” for some reason completely overlooked these 3 words. And it is a grave error.
“Russia spoke with Avigdor Lieberman”.
Wow! What a crime! Russia called the Defense Minister of Israel as a part of the process to settle the Syrian war. The war can be settled simply by ignoring the existence of Israel and its interests? I don’t think so.
“America and its proxies failed to overthrow Assad, but Russia saved the day by demanding that Hezbollah and Iran leaves Syria”.
Confused? Well, it’s simple: apparently, Russia is working against Syria too, but Syria still exists...
“Damascus is now in a bad position because Russia betrayed Iran and thus can’t rely on Russia’s long-term help”
Either I am living in a parallel universe, or this charge was picked from the nose.
"Indian media reported earlier that the country’s defense ministry expects an approval from the Governmental Committee on Security to buy five S-400 complexes from Russia for a total of around $5.5 bln”