@DineshDSouza Seriously? You're going to try this again, after what @KevinMKruse did to you?

OK then. Let's take a look at the history of the Republican Party, shall we?
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse The Republican Party formed in 1854, after rich slaveowners got Congress to pass the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which let them spread slavery across the nation. Northerners recognized that free workers-- the little guy-- would be shut out of the West + rich slaveowners would take over.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse "We were thunderstruck and stunned," Lincoln recalled. But opponents of this power grab splintered into different factions, at first. "We rose each fighting, grasping whatever he could first reach- a scythe- a pitchfork- a chopping axe, or a butcher's cleaver."
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse And then, in 1858, South Carolina Senator James Henry Hammond, famous for raping his nieces as well as his slaves, explained his view of the world. Known as the "Cotton is King" speech, his explanation was really a vision of society.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse Hammond explained that every society needed "a class to do the menial duties," the "mudsill" that was strong, dumb, and unable to rise. On it rested "that other class which leads progress, civilization and refinement. Most folks were mudsills; slaveowners were "that other class."
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse That the slaveowners were so rich proved that their system was the best, and any attempt to alter this plutocracy was simply to fly in the face of God's will.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse Let's pause here for a minute to remember what Alexander Stephens, vice-president of the Confederacy said about his new nation:
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse But back to Hammond: he also said that people should have no say in the policies of their government; they could only vote for leaders, who would do what was best for them because they understood the world better than regular folks.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse And, even if everyone wanted something (like roads) the government could do nothing unless it was enumerated in the Constitution, which only protected property (including slaves, of course). This would move money to the very top, but that was clearly the best system for everyone.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse Ah, but Lincoln. Hammond's speech gave Lincoln the chance to articulate what Republicans stood for. In 1859, in Milwaukee, at an agricultural fair, he laid out the worldview of the Republican Party:
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse A former day laborer himself, Lincoln attacked Hammond's mudsill theory, denying that workingmen were dumb drudges who could never rise. Instead, he outlined the "free labor" theory that declared the men at the bottom, not those at the top, to be the nation's important class.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse The idea was that poor folks created wealth for all while rich folks lived off others. Republicans rallied to the idea that the government should not work for rich slaveholders, but rather should make it easier for hardworking folks at the bottom to prosper.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse Just for fun, let's look at this plank in the Republicans' 1860 party platform. See? They really did believe that helping poor people-- including immigrants-- was good for everyone.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse So what did they do when they got control of the government in 1861? Well, they turned the government over to regular folks. They began by taking control of the finances of the nation away from rich bankers, by inventing the American income tax. Yep.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse In 1861, the GOP invented the income tax. They graduated it, and raised it in 1862 and 1864. The government had a right to "demand" a man's income, they said. When necessary, "the property of the people... belongs to the government." [Justin Smith Morrill, 1862]
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse They also created a tariff wall around the country to raise money and to develop industries. But that put a squeeze on regular folks, so to make it easier for poor people to prosper, they gave them land, money, education... and eventually, freedom.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse In 1862, the Homestead Act gave every settler (or immigrant) 160 acres of land (most of which belonged to Cheyenne and Lakota). "Every smoke rising from a new opening in the wilderness marks the foundation of a new feeder to Commerce and the Revenue"-- GOP editor Horace Greeley.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse When bankers tried to threaten the government, Congress created new money, backed by the people. These were the greenbacks- printed on the back with green ink. GOP also issued bonds that regular people snapped up, financing the war themselves, rather than through banks.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse GOP Congress also created the Land-Grant Colleges, aka our state universities, so that kids from poor families had access to education, and so could rise more easily. Previously, only rich kids got college degrees.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse They also established the Department of Agriculture to help farmers get accurate information and good seeds. This "seed money" was worth it, they said, for the country would be "richly paid over and over again in absolute increase of wealth. There is no doubt of that."
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse Ah, but wait. So far this is all about white men. What about enslaved men? What did the GOP do for them? Make no mistake, most Republicans were racists, and wanted the West (and America) for themselves. In 1861, they didn't want slaves... or free blacks, either. That changed.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse By 1862, it was clear that black workers were key to southern victories, and northerners began to see them as good workers. Then, black soldiers fought brilliantly and died in disproportionate numbers for the US government. They started to look way better than Rebels.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse To weaken the southern war effort, Lincoln emancipated southern slaves under the War Powers, and justified it by pointing to the loyalty of black soldiers at Olustee, where they covered the retreat of white comrades and got clubbed to death for their pains, and at Fort Wagner.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse So concerned was he that his wartime proclamation might not stick that Lincoln made a constitutional amendment the key to his 1864 election, even though he thought he might well lose that election. He didn't, and we got the Thirteenth Amendment, abolishing slavery.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse Lincoln and the GOP had given the nation "a new birth of freedom," rededicating it "to the proposition that all men are created equal" and that "government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse He recognized that once we start deciding that some folks are better than others, we are all at risk, according to which of us can be useful to the people in charge of the government.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse "When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy [sic]," Lincoln wrote to his friend Joshua Speed in 1855.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse From 1854-1865, Lincoln and the GOP took a stand against rich oligarchs who had taken over the country. The GOP pioneered an active government that helped regular Americans, believing that a democratic government should give equal access to resources so everyone could rise.
@DineshDSouza @KevinMKruse No extraordinary stretch of any fevered mind can see those as the principles of today's GOP. //END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heather Cox Richardson (TDPR)

Heather Cox Richardson (TDPR) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HC_Richardson

Oct 24, 2020
Writer's Block.

A thread for @alixabeth and others. This is not about writing problems in general: procrastination, frustration, stress eating, pain, and so on. It's for when you cannot remember how to write- like there is a gap in your brain- and the whole world goes gray. 1/
You might well be a prolific writer, but it starts to dry up. It's honestly like you can't remember how to do it. Upset, you tell friends, who joke about it, because OF COURSE you can write. But you can't, and you can't convince anyone you have a big problem. So you wither. /2
The harder you try to meet that deadline, or outline that book, the more elusive it gets. It is like you have lost a piece of yourself, and you are terrified you will never get it back. But no one understands. So you try harder to write, and it gets worse. /3
Read 13 tweets
Oct 25, 2019
Re: Barr's now apparently criminal inquiry into the origins of the Russia investigation. FWIW, Trump's GOP has made disinformation surrounding investigations a key part of their political strategy. /1
There was Clinton's emails, of course, which last week's report showed was completely fabricated. There was not a crime. The investigation was, itself, the story that would change votes. It seems that Giuliani was vital to the strategy of keeping investigation leaks coming. /2
Giuliani and Trump turned to pressure Ukraine's leaders for dirt on Biden after the 2018 midterms showed they were in trouble, but William Taylor's statement and texts made it clear they didn't care about the dirt so much as for Zelensky to say he was opening an investigation. /3
Read 5 tweets
Oct 1, 2019
Although it has been a lifetime since this morning when Trump threatened civil war, he was onto something. Not a war now- which Russian trolls have been pushing and right wingers have echoed for over a year- but how the present looks like the years before the real Civil War. /1
In the 1830s, wealthy slaveowners began to defend slavery as good for white men. But when Indian Removal in 1830s pushed native people off rich cotton lands, land prices skyrocketed and forced many whites into poverty (see @rothmanistan's Flush Times and Fever Dreams). /2
As poor folks started to turn against the rich slaveowners who made up less than 1% of the population, elites undercut their opponents by increasingly denigrating enslaved black people and urging racial solidarity. Opponents, they said, wanted to make slaves equal to whites. /3
Read 15 tweets
Jul 22, 2019
But majority of US- a "liberal consensus"- liked active gov't. The GI Bill gave educations to 7.8 million soldiers, letting them climb to middle class, and from 1945-1960, GNP jumped 250%, from $200 bn to $500 bn, baby boom meant families and consumers. Why go back? /40
In 1951, young Taft believer William F. Buckley Jr. wrote God and Man at Yale, saying that Enlightenment idea of making fact-based arguments must be wrong because voters kept choosing active gov't, which was bad by definition. /41
Stop trying to convince people with facts: "free enterprise" and God are not optional! In 1954, Buckley and BIL write a book saying McCarthy is right, and US is under siege by "Liberals," meaning everyone, D and GOP, who likes active government. "Conservatives" must prevail! /42
Read 6 tweets
Jul 19, 2019
Cherry-picked versions of GOP history argue that the party has been unchanging in its support for black rights and ordinary Americans, but that's just not right. The long history of the GOP has been both glorious- as they argue- and sordid.

Let's have a look, shall we? /1
The GOP organized in the 1850s. White northern man had long worried that rich southern slaveholders were taking over the government. In 1854, Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act opening the West, which had been free under the Missouri Compromise, to slavery. /2
They would create new slave states, overpowering free states. Soon rich men would own Congress. Poor white men would become serfs. The day after the K-N Act passed, N Reps from all parties joined to stand against the Slave Power, and ordinary men protested the new law. /3
Read 40 tweets
Jul 5, 2019
@Cernovich @MaraGay Douglass was indeed a Republican, a member of the party that organized to stand against a cabal of wealthy men who controlled the US government and used it to establish an oligarchy. Their wealth came from enslaved labor, so Republicans sought to stop the spread of slavery. /1
@Cernovich @MaraGay It was a proud party, one that believed the economy grew from the bottom up, and so the government should protect equality of opportunity for all individuals (men, but that was expected in that era). /2
@Cernovich @MaraGay So it established public college, and gave away land to farmers, and invested in railroads, and taxed all American incomes to pay for national development. The early GOP gave us our first activist state... and the economy boomed. /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(