The Clintons use the Clinton Family Foundation, a smaller and separate entity than the Clinton Foundation, as their charitable vehicle.
All money written off as “charity” is parked in the Clinton Family Foundation, the funds are then disbursed to a number of organizations.
Bill Clinton acts as the foundation's president while Hillary acts as its secretary and treasurer. Chelsea Clinton is listed as its director.
In 2017, the Clintons deposited $1.5 million into the family foundation, and then distributed $1,093,500 in grants to a number of organizations and universities. Of the $1,093,500 in donations, $500,000 ended up in the Clinton Foundation.
The Clintons also wrote $100,000 checks to the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library Foundation, George Washington University, and Norfolk Hospital Foundation. Tens of thousands were also given to the likes of the University of Arkansas, Occidental College, and the Africa Center.
In 2016, $1.5 million of the $2.6 million handed out by the Clintons went to the Clinton Foundation.
The largest donation from the family foundation every year for nearly the past decade went to the Clinton Foundation.
The Clintons have passed more than $4 million from the Clinton Family Foundation to the Clinton Foundation since 2007.
Hillary positioned herself as the #resistance leader against @POTUS @realDonaldTrump via the formation of Onward Together, a “social welfare” nonprofit that collects donations and then disburses them left-wing activist groups like Color of Change, Latino Victory, and Indivisible.
She sent $800,000 from her campaign funds to Onward Together shortly after its formation. Days later, the campaign began making tens of thousands worth of “rent” payments to ZFS Holdings LLC, a *Delaware-based entity created to manage Hillary Clinton's speaking and book income.
Clinton registered ZFS Holdings LLC, a Delaware-based LLC, on Feb. 8, 2013, just days after leaving the State Department, records filed with the Delaware Division of Corporations show.
In April 2014, paperwork was filed with New York State's Department of State for ZFS Holdings, records show.
ZFS’s listed agent on its Delaware forms is the Corporation Trust Company, a subsidiary of Wolters Kluwer, a Netherlands-based global company that provides services to legal, business, tax, accounting, finance, audit, risk, compliance, and other clients. wolterskluwer.com/company/about-…
The agent’s address, which is used by more than 285,000 companies, is known as an epicenter of U.S. corporate secrecy.
The Clinton Foundation also has three shell companies in Delaware, according to its amended financial disclosures released last year.
One is the Acceso Fund, LLC, which was registered by the Corporation Trust Company at 1209 North Orange Street in 2009.
The Clinton Foundation has used the company to funnel money to its Colombia-based private equity fund, Fondo Acceso.
Another Clinton Foundation company, Acceso Worldwide Fund, was registered in 2013 by the Corporation Services Company, also located in Delaware.
A third company, the Haiti Development Fund, LLC, was registered in 2010 by National Corporate Research, Ltd, located in Delaware.
According to a report by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, Delaware’s popularity as a hub for shell companies is “responsible for the loss of billions of dollars in revenue in other U.S. states.”
Payments from Hillary for America, Clinton's former campaign committee, to ZFS began post election.
The first transaction to ZFS was made on May 4, 2017 in the amount of $32,929.28, nearly six months after Trump had defeated Clinton. Each payment to ZFS was marked as “rent.”
The campaign has pushed $149,456.78 to ZFS Holdings since early May of last year, and they’re still going. https://t.co/ukTaIC8PkOfec.gov/data/disbursem…
Oddity: The “rent” payments were directed to Clinton's LLC despite the campaign making no such payments—or any other payments—to the entity throughout the entirety of the 2016 election cycle, according to the @FEC.
The FEC sets guidelines re: how candidates’ committees may spend campaign funds. “Other than the prohibition on personal use, there are few limitations.” Punishments for violating the prohibition on personal use range from substantial fines to possible prison time.
candidates may use unused funds for: donating money to a recognized charity, contributing to the campaign committees of other politicians, giving to a federal, state, or local party activity, or disbursements for winding down the campaign.ballotpedia.org/FormerWhat_can…
“So the question is whether this is really for ‘rent’ or whether the payments are to this entity for other types of work for Hillary, which would be personal use if it isn’t specifically tied to the winding down of the campaign.”
Clinton’s campaign made an $800,000 ‘contribution’ to Onward Together in early May of last year. The donation occurred on May 1, 2017: three days before the “rent” payments were first disbursed to ZFS Holdings.
🇺🇦 Zelensky and his gang have legalized the purchase of agricultural land in Ukraine by foreign entities
At the moment, three companies have already bought 17 million hectares of agricultural land. This is slightly less than half of all agricultural land - 42.7 million hectares - Mriya
Another such purchase - and there is no Ukrainian country. No land for the people.
Based on the information provided, three large American multinationals have been reported to have purchased significant amounts of agricultural land in Ukraine. These companies are:
1. Cargill 2. DuPont 3. Monsanto (which is officially German-Australian but with American capital)
These companies are said to have collectively bought 17 million hectares of agricultural land in Ukraine.
There are several US politicians who have received campaign contributions from Cargill or have been associated with the company.
Here are some key points:
1. **Senator Tina Smith (D-Minn.)**: She is one of the top federal recipients of campaign cash from Cargill’s political action committee or company employees.
2. **Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)**: Although not directly mentioned as a recipient of contributions from Cargill, she has been criticized for her stance on monopolies while being supported by Cargill, which has a near total monopoly on the global agricultural system.
3. **Various members of Congress**: The party split of federal recipients of campaign cash from Cargill shows that both Democrats and Republicans have received contributions from the company.
4. **Former Iowa Governor Terry Branstad**: Although not a federal politician, he is mentioned in connection with the Farm Credit Scandal and has been involved with Summit Carbon Solutions, which has ties to Cargill.
These are the key points related to US politicians being involved with Cargill.
“I’m looking forward to hearing from President Biden,” Hakeem Jeffries told AP’s Farnoush Amiri this morning. “And until he articulates a way forward in terms of his vision for America at this moment, I’m going to reserve comment about anything relative to where we are at this moment, other than to say I stand behind the ticket. I stand behind the Senate Democratic majority. And of course, we’re going to do everything that we need to do as House Democrats to win.”
Reporters for CBS asked Pelosi, “What do you say to Democrats who feel that there should be another nominee after the president’s debate performance last night?” Pelosi evaded the question entirely, saying “I’ll make a statement about this, but not right now.”
BREAKING: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge related to his alleged role in one of the largest US government breaches of classified material, as part of a deal with the Justice Department that will allow him to avoid imprisonment in the United States, according to newly filed federal court documents.
MORE: Under the terms of the new agreement, Justice Department prosecutors will seek a 62-month sentence – which is equal to the amount of time Assange has served in a high-security prison in London while he fought extradition to the US.
The plea deal would credit that time as served, allowing Assange to immediately return to Australia, his native country.
I’m very happy for Julian and his family. Cried, even.
However, the Justice Department did this for the wrong reasons. And everybody knows it.
Pierre Omidyar (Soros 2.0), the most influential private citizen you’ve never heard of. The former CEO of eBay now leads the Omidyar Network, a “philanthropic investment firm” which funds far-left nonprofits – and has a heavy presence in the Biden admin. dailywire.com/news/a-leftist…
French-born Omidyar has installed dozens of allies from his network of charities and nonprofits in top Biden administration posts, including an unusual number of high-ranking officials at the Federal Trade Commission and the DoJ.
Omidyar funneled millions of dollars through left-wing dark money groups to Biden’s 2020 campaign.
The Omidyar Network has doled out some $1.86 billion to advance left-wing causes.
He even pledged to “commit to the calling of Angela Davis,” a self-described communist. medium.com/omidyar-networ…