Profile picture
Sam Vinograd @sam_vinograd
, 15 tweets, 20 min read Read on Twitter
@KenDilanianNBC Some thoughts on the @ODNIgov @POTUS relationship: 1) @ODNIgov appearance at @AspenSecurity was likely cleared by @WhiteHouse as were his TPs. So no one should have been surprised
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 2) Typically you would want to ask the DNI for analysis on how Putin would assess an invite based on his leader profile + based on collection and intel analysis to date.
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 3) Plus, before making the policy decision to invite Putin, would have thought @POTUS would want @ODNIgov analysis of how Putin viewed the #helsinkisummit
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 4) Many are shocked by Coats' statements that he wasn’t consulted about the 1:1 and hasn’t been debriefed. It’s another example of the President failing to ask his team for advice in the first instance, and to listen to it in the second. But
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 5) there are real reasons why a President has historically worked with his intelligence community both before and after a high stakes meeting to maximize the chances for success going in and then to leverage the actual meeting content to shape our next moves.
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 5) Let’s start with the pre-meeting role that the IC can play -- the DNI can provide feedback on what kinds of situations the foreign leader typically seeks out, feels comfortable in, and what settings make him / her feel like he has the advantage and is in control.
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 6) in this case you could have imagine Coats flagging that Putin would consider a 1:1 a win because he thinks he has more experience that the President, can catch him off guard, and Putin knows he could play up the narrative that a dirty deal was done behind closed doors
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 7) once the meeting ended i.e. Putin would view a 1:1 as another opportunity to sow divisions and conspiracy theories in the US.
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 8) DNI wouldn’t have offered a policy judgment on what kind of meeting to schedule, but they could have shared analysis on how Putin would view a 1:1 set up.
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 8) Moving to the lack of a post-op (and i use the word operation here purposefully because we have to view the 1:1 between Putin and Trump as part of Putin’s ongoing operation against the United States), the failure to debrief the DNI
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse 9) Coats told @mitchellreports yesterday that he hadn’t been debriefed - is a big counterintelligence risk and also knowingly disadvantages our national security team (and our national security)
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse @mitchellreports 10) On the CI risk: A foreign hostile power - Russia - now has information on the President and what he discussed with Putin that the US government does. This is unto itself a CI risk - the Russians can manipulate this information and, if anything was discussed that @POTUS
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse @mitchellreports 11) doesn’t want coming out, the Russians can use this as a manipulation or bribery point. That’s why part of basic security clearance investigations is to ask about foreign meetings/ contacts - you never want a foreign government to know more about you than your own.
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse @mitchellreports 12) Typically after such a sensitive meeting, the President would share a readout with a very small group of people but the DNI would definitely be included because he would want to look out for any intel on how the Russians viewed the meeting/ but in this case he doesn't know
@KenDilanianNBC @ODNIgov @POTUS @AspenSecurity @WhiteHouse @mitchellreports 13) what actually happened. So he may be hearing pieces of intel on the meeting without having a baseline to assess whether it's accurate or not
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Sam Vinograd
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!